At Boston Marathon, authorities will be watching 'broad set' of potential targets
At this year's Boston Marathon, 12 years after the deadly marathon bombing, law enforcement will be watching "a broad set of potential soft targets for an attack," according to a bulletin obtained by ABC News.
About 30,000 runners are participating in the April 21 race and another half-million spectators are expected along the route.
According to the bulletin, congested areas where the largest amount of people gather -- particularly designated viewing areas -- are likely the most vulnerable spots for a mass casualty attack, along with nearby publicly accessible areas, tunnels, pre-event gatherings and post-event celebrations.
MORE: 'Horrific scene' as police take down man allegedly attacking 4 young girls in NYC
A policy change may provide a motivation for an attack, the bulletin said, pointing to marathon organizers allowing runners to select "non-binary" regarding gender.
"Following this announcement, individuals posting content consistent with racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism posted online calling for an attack on the 2023 Boston Marathon, according to an organization that tracks violent extremist activity online," the bulletin said. "Some of these individuals called for an attack similar to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings."
Three people were killed and hundreds were injured by the powerful explosives detonated near the finish line during the 2013 marathon.
MORE: Lori Daybell trial: Opening statements set to begin in latest murder case of 'doomsday mom'
There are also symbolic anniversaries that coincide with the timing of the Boston Marathon, including the holidays of Easter, Ramadan and Passover, as well as anniversaries of prior attacks that occurred in the third week of April: the Columbine High School shooting massacre on April 20, 1999; the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995; the Branch Davidians' compound fire in Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993; and Adolf Hitler's birthday on April 20.
"The significance of these holidays and key dates may be viewed as an opportune time for acts of violence for many threat actors," the bulletin said, "and it may serve as motivation to disrupt or attack the Boston Marathon or the surrounding areas along the route."
The bulletin said law enforcement officials are unaware of any specific or credible threats to high-profile attendees of the Boston Marathon but are highlighting the threat environment for these officials' awareness.
"Absent a specific, actionable threat to the 129th Boston Marathon, the FBI and [the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis] are providing indicators to aid law enforcement and first responders in identifying and mitigating threats," the bulletin said.
At Boston Marathon, authorities will be watching 'broad set' of potential targets originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Luigi Mangione celebrates 27th birthday with ‘27 Things I'm Grateful For'
Accused CEO killer Luigi Mangione celebrated his 27th birthday at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center by drafting a list of the '27 Things I'm Grateful For' as he awaits trial in his federal death penalty case. The list was later sent out via electronic communication and obtained by TMZ this week. It begins with an expression of gratitude for his family and friends 'for being there when I needed it most.' Mangione goes on to thank his admirers, who send him as many as 115 letters per day, according to ABC News. He says he also appreciates the prison workers who have dealt with the thousands of letters he's received from more than 40 countries since his arrest in December. He subsequent cites his 'world-class' legal team, his cellmate 'J' (who tolerates his clutter), his appreciation for Chicken Thursdays and Sweet Baby Ray's BBQ Sauce, and everyone who has contributed to his commissary account and defense fund — the latter of which has raised more than $1,000,000. Mangione celebrated his birthday on May 6 while awaiting trial for the execution of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, who was gunned down by a masked man in Midtown Manhattan on the morning of Dec. 4. Mangione is accused of shooting Thompson in the back of his head while the Minnesota executive was walking to a conference at the Residences Hilton Club. The Maryland native has pleaded not guilty. Since his arrest five days later, Mangione has attracted a cult following that sees him as a Robin Hood-type character who struck a blow against an industry he heavily criticized in a manifesto seized by investigators. But prosecutors call his alleged actions 'a grossly misguided attempt to broadcast [his] views across the country.' In his list of 27 Things, Mangione mentions his 'current predicament' without speaking of his alleged crime. He thanks both liberals and conservatives for America's greatness and expresses thankfulness for having been born in the U.S. In early April, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed prosecutors to seek the death penalty for Mangione. 'Luigi Mangione's murder of Brian Thompson — an innocent man and father of two young children — was a premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America,' she wrote in a statement. Mangione is due in court June 26.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say
In April, fresh off a presidential pardon that sprung him from prison, convicted fraudster Jason Galanis embarked on a new and audacious legal fight: an attempt to recover money that he had already paid back his victims. As part of his 2017 sentence, a federal judge ordered Galanis to pay more than $80 million in restitution for his various fraudulent schemes. But when President Donald Trump commuted Galanis' 189-month prison sentence in March as part of a flurry of pardons, Galanis' pardon warrant stipulated that "no further fines [and] restitution" should be collected. Days later, Galanis asked a federal judge to order the government to return some $2 million he had already paid, arguing that because the government had not yet released those funds to his victims, Galanis was entitled to them. MORE: Trump grants clemency to 2 of Hunter Biden's ex-associates "Put very simply, the funds were taken for a particular purpose," attorneys for Galanis wrote last month in a letter to the judge. "It is indisputable that that purpose no longer exists and thus ... the funds must be returned." U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, the judge overseeing Galanis' case, ruled Wednesday that he cannot recoup the $2 million. But some legal experts say Galanis' bid to retrieve those restitution funds reflects a broader symptom of what they say is Trump's unprecedented use of executive pardon powers. "Typically, the Department of Justice does not recommend a pardon in cases in which the candidate owes a significant amount of restitution ... so these pardons that wipe out large financial obligations are very unusual in their effect," former U.S. pardon attorney Liz Oyer, who is not involved in the case, told ABC News. By Oyer's count, the recipients of Trump's second-term clemency cumulatively owed more than $1 billion in restitution -- money intended for the victims of fraudulent schemes. Instead, according to Oyer, "victims are just out all of the money that they expected to be repaid as part of restitution, due to the pardons." "The victims are the losers," Oyer said. "Those are people who have a legal entitlement under federal law to be repaid their losses ... and the president is overriding that legal requirement ... to the great detriment of people who, in some cases, have lost their life savings." Those victims include a Native American tribe, an Arizona teachers' pension fund, and even a Republican governor. In Galanis' case, prosecutors wrote that the victims of his scheme include "pension funds held for the benefit of, among others, transit workers, longshoremen, housing authority workers, and city employees." The majority of the victims are shareholders in companies like Nikola, whose disgraced founder and chief executive, Trevor Milton, was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology. Prosecutors had asked a federal judge to order Milton to pay more than $600 million in restitution, which they said was "the approximate amount of damages to investors in this case." Milton was pardoned before a judge had a chance to approve that figure, but experts said judges typically hew closely to prosecutors' calculations. Asked in a local news interview in March whether he would repay the victims of his fraudulent scheme, Milton said he "wouldn't pay them back," but offered an alternative: "I've got a few big ventures I'm working on right now, I'd definitely be open to helping those people in the future." MORE: Trump's flurry of pardons include some to campaign contributors "I'm not heartless," he added. "As a matter of fact, I feel for these people probably more than most." Pardon recipients who owed outstanding restitution at the time they were pardoned include Carlos Watson, the founder and CEO of Ozy Media who pleaded guilty to fraud charges and owed nearly $37 million in restitution, and Ross Ulbricht, the Silk Road founder serving life in prison for an online drug scheme, who was ordered to pay almost $184 million in restitution. Other pardon recipients include Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality television celebrities sentenced to more than seven years in prison for tax evasion and bank fraud, whose attorney suggested to TMZ that they may seek to recoup some of the $17 million in restitution that they'd already begun to pay. Former Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore, who spent some $70,000 in donations to a slain police officer fund on personal expenses, including cosmetic surgery, was also pardoned. Trump issued Fiore's pardon before her sentencing, but experts say restitution generally aligns with the cost of the purported fraud scheme. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a fellow Republican, testified at trial that he had donated to Fiore's fund and was a victim of her fraud. Another victim, Harry Mohney, a strip club owner who donated $2,000 to the fund, said he was "distressed" to learn that Fiore would not have to pay restitution. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons "It certainly pisses me off to a great extent," Mohney told ABC News. "It's unfair that she never has to repay the people she got the money from under false pretenses, but there's nothing I can do about that." In a statement to ABC News, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that Trump is "using his pardon power to offer people second chances at life." "The Founding Fathers gave the President the pardon power to provide mercy where the President alone deems it necessary," Fields said. Legal experts ABC News spoke with said it's unclear to what extent victims could seek to claim the restitution they're still owed following Trump's pardons. One option would be to file a civil lawsuit to reclaim damages, but that can be a lengthy and expensive proposition. "Restitution makes it so easy -- you don't have to pay a lawyer, you don't have to go to court," said Mark Osler, an expert on clemency at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. "You can see why that would be a victim's first choice for how to be made whole." Experts who spoke with ABC News struggled to cite past examples of fraudsters who were granted clemency prior to fulfilling their restitution obligations. Oyer said Trump's commutation of restitution payments is without precedent. MORE: Trump issues sweeping pardons and commutations for Jan. 6 rioters "This is not normal," Oyer said. The Justice Department, on its website, cautions fraud victims seeking restitution that "the chance of full recovery is very low," and that "while defendants may make partial payments toward the full restitution owed, it is rare that defendants are able to fully pay the entire restitution amount owed." Nevertheless, experts say that regardless of whether victims ever completely recoup their lost money, restitution obligations remain an important mechanism in the criminal justice system. "One of the purposes of restitution, even if it's never fully repaid, is to ensure that the perpetrator of the crime cannot enrich themselves first, while they still owe money to victims," Oyer explained. "And that's exactly what [Trump's] pardons facilitate happening." Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say originally appeared on
13 hours ago
Trump's pardons have shortchanged fraud victims of millions of dollars in restitution, lawyers say
In April, fresh off a presidential pardon that sprung him from prison, convicted fraudster Jason Galanis embarked on a new and audacious legal fight: an attempt to recover money that he had already paid back his victims. As part of his 2017 sentence, a federal judge ordered Galanis to pay more than $80 million in restitution for his various fraudulent schemes. But when President Donald Trump commuted Galanis' 189-month prison sentence in March as part of a flurry of pardons, Galanis' pardon warrant stipulated that "no further fines [and] restitution" should be collected. Days later, Galanis asked a federal judge to order the government to return some $2 million he had already paid, arguing that because the government had not yet released those funds to his victims, Galanis was entitled to them. "Put very simply, the funds were taken for a particular purpose," attorneys for Galanis wrote last month in a letter to the judge. "It is indisputable that that purpose no longer exists and thus ... the funds must be returned." U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, the judge overseeing Galanis' case, ruled Wednesday that he cannot recoup the $2 million. But some legal experts say Galanis' bid to retrieve those restitution funds reflects a broader symptom of what they say is Trump's unprecedented use of executive pardon powers. "Typically, the Department of Justice does not recommend a pardon in cases in which the candidate owes a significant amount of restitution ... so these pardons that wipe out large financial obligations are very unusual in their effect," former U.S. pardon attorney Liz Oyer, who is not involved in the case, told ABC News. By Oyer's count, the recipients of Trump's second-term clemency cumulatively owed more than $1 billion in restitution -- money intended for the victims of fraudulent schemes. Instead, according to Oyer, "victims are just out all of the money that they expected to be repaid as part of restitution, due to the pardons." "The victims are the losers," Oyer said. "Those are people who have a legal entitlement under federal law to be repaid their losses ... and the president is overriding that legal requirement ... to the great detriment of people who, in some cases, have lost their life savings." Those victims include a Native American tribe, an Arizona teachers' pension fund, and even a Republican governor. In Galanis' case, prosecutors wrote that the victims of his scheme include "pension funds held for the benefit of, among others, transit workers, longshoremen, housing authority workers, and city employees." The majority of the victims are shareholders in companies like Nikola, whose disgraced founder and chief executive, Trevor Milton, was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology. Prosecutors had asked a federal judge to order Milton to pay more than $600 million in restitution, which they said was "the approximate amount of damages to investors in this case." Milton was pardoned before a judge had a chance to approve that figure, but experts said judges typically hew closely to prosecutors' calculations. Asked in a local news interview in March whether he would repay the victims of his fraudulent scheme, Milton said he "wouldn't pay them back," but offered an alternative: "I've got a few big ventures I'm working on right now, I'd definitely be open to helping those people in the future." "I'm not heartless," he added. "As a matter of fact, I feel for these people probably more than most." Pardon recipients who owed outstanding restitution at the time they were pardoned include Carlos Watson, the founder and CEO of Ozy Media who pleaded guilty to fraud charges and owed nearly $37 million in restitution, and Ross Ulbricht, the Silk Road founder serving life in prison for an online drug scheme, who was ordered to pay almost $184 million in restitution. Other pardon recipients include Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality television celebrities sentenced to more than seven years in prison for tax evasion and bank fraud, whose attorney suggested to TMZ that they may seek to recoup some of the $17 million in restitution that they'd already begun to pay. Former Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore, who spent some $70,000 in donations to a slain police officer fund on personal expenses, including cosmetic surgery, was also pardoned. Trump issued Fiore's pardon before her sentencing, but experts say restitution generally aligns with the cost of the purported fraud scheme. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a fellow Republican, testified at trial that he had donated to Fiore's fund and was a victim of her fraud. Another victim, Harry Mohney, a strip club owner who donated $2,000 to the fund, said he was "distressed" to learn that Fiore would not have to pay restitution. "It certainly pisses me off to a great extent," Mohney told ABC News. "It's unfair that she never has to repay the people she got the money from under false pretenses, but there's nothing I can do about that." In a statement to ABC News, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that Trump is "using his pardon power to offer people second chances at life." "The Founding Fathers gave the President the pardon power to provide mercy where the President alone deems it necessary," Fields said. Legal experts ABC News spoke with said it's unclear to what extent victims could seek to claim the restitution they're still owed following Trump's pardons. One option would be to file a civil lawsuit to reclaim damages, but that can be a lengthy and expensive proposition. "Restitution makes it so easy -- you don't have to pay a lawyer, you don't have to go to court," said Mark Osler, an expert on clemency at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. "You can see why that would be a victim's first choice for how to be made whole." Experts who spoke with ABC News struggled to cite past examples of fraudsters who were granted clemency prior to fulfilling their restitution obligations. Oyer said Trump's commutation of restitution payments is without precedent. "This is not normal," Oyer said. The Justice Department, on its website, cautions fraud victims seeking restitution that "the chance of full recovery is very low," and that "while defendants may make partial payments toward the full restitution owed, it is rare that defendants are able to fully pay the entire restitution amount owed." Nevertheless, experts say that regardless of whether victims ever completely recoup their lost money, restitution obligations remain an important mechanism in the criminal justice system. "One of the purposes of restitution, even if it's never fully repaid, is to ensure that the perpetrator of the crime cannot enrich themselves first, while they still owe money to victims," Oyer explained. "And that's exactly what [Trump's] pardons facilitate happening."
