logo
Aging LGBTQ+ community finds unique challenges providing care for loved ones

Aging LGBTQ+ community finds unique challenges providing care for loved ones

CBS News7 hours ago

Many older members of LGBTQ+ population dealing with stress of caregiving
Many older members of LGBTQ+ population dealing with stress of caregiving
Many older members of LGBTQ+ population dealing with stress of caregiving
New York City represents the largest LGBTQ+ population in the country, with more than 700,000 residents.
Many encounter unique challenges as they age and provide care for their loved ones.
In this installment of CBS News New York's Cost of Caregiving series, reporter Jennifer Bisram takes a close look at the community-wide issues, resources and how chosen family plays a pivotal role.
Read more: Geriatric care improvements needed immediately in New York, doctors say
Matt Sullivan's story
Matt Sullivan's husband, Ken, who was an artist, died back in 2020 from a 9/11-related cancer.
"The biggest struggle is the loss of a best friend, and my life is still on the walls with his paintings," said Sullivan, a 76-year-old retired professor.
He showed CBS News New York the Manhattan apartment filled with memories that they shared together, and remembered becoming his partner's caregiver.
"It was really challenging. I had no idea what I was up for. Life was about trying to stay up with him while maintaining my own life," Sullivan said.
Sullivan said the loss was even harder without family support. These days, he's aging alone in his New York City home.
"I came out to my family at 18. It was illegal for me to be gay. They could have put me in an institution," Sullivan said. "It's really the loneliness and, especially in my case, I've been abandoned by family and truly alone, and I can speak for those suffering ... love given and not being returned."
Sullivan said his parents and brother passed on and his only living sibling disowned him for being gay.
"My brother considers me an evil person and not aligned with his belief system," Sullivan said.
The mission of SAGE -- Advocacy and Services for LGBTQ+ Elders
According to the Family Caregiver Alliance, older adults in the LGBTQ+ community are twice as likely to be single and live alone and are three times less likely to have children.
As a result, nearly two-thirds of older LGBTQ+ adults consider their friends to be their chosen family.
"I gained strength from my friends, my gay friends," Sullivan said.
SAGE -- Advocacy and Services for LGBTQ+ Elders is one of the oldest and largest organizations dedicated to aging LGBTQ+ elders and caregivers.
"We offer support groups, counseling, care management, help with supplementals like respite and supplies they might need," said Ernesto Finales, SAGE's director of care management.
SAGE has four senior centers across New York City, including one in Midtown.
Recent studies show older LGBTQ+ adults experience social, financial, physical and mental health disparities, including health care and housing discrimination and social isolation. They're also at risk for developing chronic diseases.
"When you prolong care or avoid health care, makes chronic issues more present, more likely to happen," Finales said.
According to a recent Equal Rights Center report, 48% of older same-sex couples applying for elder housing say they were subjected to discrimination.
"Every single step you have to come out and disclose your LGBTQIA status, part of that has a fear of marginalization and discrimination, which is based on genuine lived experience," Finales said.
Another recent study also shows 88% of LGBTQ+ older adults say they'd feel more comfortable with long-term care services if they knew the staff had been trained about the needs of LGBTQ+ patients.
Read more: Help is available for New Yorkers caring for loved ones whose health is declining
"I've never done this, never really faced it"
It's all too familiar for Sullivan, who broke down at one point during his interview with CBS News New York.
"I've never done this, never really faced it," Sullivan said. "We learn to deal with loneliness because of people who judge us."
Later, he said, "Thank you for helping me also deal with what I'm going through cause you brought out a part of me that I don't talk about very much."
Now, as an aging New Yorker, he says he'll rely on his chosen family.
"Loneliness, financial insecurity, which I'm going through, some of that, getting around, I may have to use a walker now because of all the falls I've taken," Sullivan said.
He said he'll continue to advocate for LGBTQ+ rights and encourage the older generation who struggled with social stigmas their entire lives.
"I have a new life in speaking out now as a senior gay man," Sullivan said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is UNH's Dividend at Risk Due to Its Falling Stock Price?
Is UNH's Dividend at Risk Due to Its Falling Stock Price?

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is UNH's Dividend at Risk Due to Its Falling Stock Price?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is one of the . UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is currently facing some challenges in terms of stock price. The stock has fallen sharply, down 39% since the beginning of 2025 and over 37% in the past 12 months. That's a steep drop for such a major company. However, despite the decline, its market value remains strong, keeping it among the world's largest healthcare firms. A senior healthcare professional giving advice to a patient in a clinic. As a result of the lower share price, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH)'s dividend yield has risen to 2.87%. A falling stock price can increase a stock's dividend yield, but that doesn't necessarily mean the dividend is in danger. To judge dividend safety, it's important to look at a company's financials, especially the payout ratio and free cash flow. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH)'s payout ratio stands at a manageable 35%, suggesting it retains enough earnings to reinvest in the business or cushion against downturns. The company also generated $24.9 billion in free cash flow over the past 12 months, while paying just $7.7 billion in dividends. This indicates its dividend remains well-supported as long as business performance stays stable. In addition, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) has raised its payouts consistently every year since 2011. This makes UNH one of the best next generation dividend aristocrat stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None.

Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal'
Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal'

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled on Monday that directives from the Trump administration that led to the cancellations of several research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were "void" and "illegal." U.S. District Judge William Young said the cancellation of the grants -- related to studies involving LGBTQ+ issues, gender identity and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) -- violated federal law, saying it was a case of racial discrimination and discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community, according to the plaintiffs in the case. Two lawsuits had been filed against the administration: One led by the American Public Health Association and the other filed by a group of 16 states. Some estimates have suggested that up to $1.8 billion in research funding had been cut. MORE: NIH terminating active research grants related to LGBTQ+, DEI studies Young, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said he was ordering the NIH to restore the grants that were terminated. In a statement, Andrew Nixon, the director of communications for the Department of Health and Human Services, said the agency stands by its decision to end funding for research "that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people. Under the leadership of Secretary Kennedy and the Trump administration, HHS is committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science – not driven by divisive DEI mandates or gender ideology." Nixon said HHS is "exploring all legal options, including filing an appeal and moving to stay the order." Among the plaintiffs is Dr. Brittany Charlton, an associate professor at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who had all her grants terminated by the NIH. One of the terminated grants focused on documenting obstetrical outcomes for lesbian, gay and bisexual women and another focused on how discriminatory laws impact mental health among LGBTQ+ teens. "As a plaintiff, I felt truly seen -- it was a rare moment when the deep harm caused to researchers and the communities we serve was acknowledged out loud, in front of the world," Charlton told ABC News in a statement. "Sitting there, I felt a wave of relief and hope as the judge condemned the government's actions and ordered the grants to be reinstated," the statement continued. "After so much uncertainty and disruption, it finally felt like justice and the value of our research -- and the communities at its heart -- were being affirmed." The terminations came after President Donald Trump passed a flurry of executive orders including vowing to "defend women from gender ideology extremism" and aiming to dismantle DEI initiatives. MORE: Judge blocks Trump administration's move to cut billions in NIH scientific funding According to termination letters sent to researchers at various universities that were reviewed by ABC News, the administration said the canceled projects do not serve the "priorities" of the current administration. "Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment, and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore, rather than seriously examine, biological realities. It is the policy of NIH not to prioritize these research programs," some of the termination letters read. "The premise…is incompatible with agency priorities, and no modification of the project could align the project with agency priorities," the letters continued. ABC News' Sony Salzman contributed to this report. Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal' originally appeared on

Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal'

timean hour ago

Federal judge rules Tump directives canceling NIH grants are 'void,' 'illegal'

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled on Monday that directives from the Trump administration that led to the cancellations of several research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were "void" and "illegal." U.S. District Judge William Young said the cancellation of the grants -- related to studies involving LGBTQ+ issues, gender identity and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) -- violated federal law, saying it was a case of racial discrimination and discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community, according to the plaintiffs in the case. Two lawsuits had been filed against the administration: One led by the American Public Health Association and the other filed by a group of 16 states. Some estimates have suggested that up to $1.8 billion in research funding had been cut. Young, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said he was ordering the NIH to restore the grants that were terminated. In a statement, Andrew Nixon, the director of communications for the Department of Health and Human Services, said the agency stands by its decision to end funding for research "that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people. Under the leadership of Secretary Kennedy and the Trump administration, HHS is committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science – not driven by divisive DEI mandates or gender ideology." Nixon said HHS is "exploring all legal options, including filing an appeal and moving to stay the order." Among the plaintiffs is Dr. Brittany Charlton, an associate professor at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who had all her grants terminated by the NIH. One of the terminated grants focused on documenting obstetrical outcomes for lesbian, gay and bisexual women and another focused on how discriminatory laws impact mental health among LGBTQ+ teens. "As a plaintiff, I felt truly seen -- it was a rare moment when the deep harm caused to researchers and the communities we serve was acknowledged out loud, in front of the world," Charlton told ABC News in a statement. "Sitting there, I felt a wave of relief and hope as the judge condemned the government's actions and ordered the grants to be reinstated," the statement continued. "After so much uncertainty and disruption, it finally felt like justice and the value of our research -- and the communities at its heart -- were being affirmed." The terminations came after President Donald Trump passed a flurry of executive orders including vowing to " defend women from gender ideology extremism" and aiming to dismantle DEI initiatives. According to termination letters sent to researchers at various universities that were reviewed by ABC News, the administration said the canceled projects do not serve the "priorities" of the current administration. "Research programs based on gender identity are often unscientific, have little identifiable return on investment, and do nothing to enhance the health of many Americans. Many such studies ignore, rather than seriously examine, biological realities. It is the policy of NIH not to prioritize these research programs," some of the termination letters read. "The premise…is incompatible with agency priorities, and no modification of the project could align the project with agency priorities," the letters continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store