
Does Palestine Action's cash trail lead all the way to Iran? Probe launched into group in the wake of clash between police and protesters on the streets of London
The Home Office has claimed Iran could be funding Palestine Action as the government moves to designate it a terrorist organisation.
Officials are understood to be investigating the group's source of donations amid concerns its status as a charity means it is not bound by financial transparency rules.
There are fears Iran could be providing money, via proxies, given their objectives of 'dismantling the apartheid regime in Israel ' are aligned.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is due to update MPs next week on the proposals to make it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action.
The move comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.
One person was recorded riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine.
Yesterday, protesters crashed with police in London in response to the Government's plans.
Ms Cooper's secondary legislation to add Palestine Action to the list of proscribed groups will be published next Monday.
MPs will then vote on the motion the following Wednesday; if passed, the House of would have the final say the next day, with the proscription order coming into effect on July 4.
Palestine Action invites donations directly through its website but does not publish financial information.
The Home Office has voiced concerns around where the group is raising the significant sums it requires for its legal costs as it has instructed lawyers to pursue 'all avenues for legal challenge'.
Palestine Action states on its website it is a grassroots movement and accepts funding is 'sometimes inconsistent'. Donations are said to go towards supporting members who are arrested and imprisoned.
NGO Monitor a research institute that aims to promote transparency, has said the group's lack of public financial information 'reflects a lack of transparency and accountability'.
But one of its known public donors is James 'Fergie' Chambers - an American communist and philanthropist who is heir to a multi-billion conflomerate.
Mr Chambers stated in 2023 he had paid the legal fees of Palestine Action members.
Beyond concerns around transparency, the Home Office is yet to state direct evidence that links Palestine Action with Iran.
Ms Cooper has attempted to justify her move in banning the group by pointing to a series of attacks by Palestine Action since its inception in 2022.
She also claimed its media output promotes its attacks involving 'serious property damage, as well as celebrating the perpetrators'.
Among the groups' staging of demonstrations in recent months are the spraying of London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to the Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising President Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.
Ms Cooper went on to say Palestine Action's activity had increased since last year and claimed its methods had become 'more aggressive'.
She said attacks at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, as well as Instro Precision in Sandwich, Kent, and in Bristol last year, had caused damage costing millions of pounds.
Palestine Action has argued Ms Cooper made 'a series of categorically false claims' and called the reaction 'unhinged'.
A spokesman said: 'This is an unhinged reaction to an action spraying paint in protest at the UK government arming Israel's slaughter of the Palestinian people.
'We are teachers, nurses, students and parents who take part in actions disrupting the private companies who are arming Israel's genocide, by spray-painting or entering their factory premises.
'It is plainly preposterous to rank us with terrorist groups like Isis, National Action and Boko Haram.'
Baroness Chakrabarti, former head of the human rights group Liberty, also said banning the group 'may be an escalation too far'.
But Ms Cooper has said the ban would allow law enforcement to 'effectively disrupt the escalating actions of this serious group'.
She added: 'Proscription represents a legitimate response to the threat posed by Palestine Action.'
Palestine Action's protest on Monday was supported by 35 other protest groups, including Just Stop Oil.
Yesterday, hundreds of protesters waving Palestinian flags and holding placards gathered at Trafalgar Square.
A Met spokesman said: 'While the protest initially began in a peaceful manner, officers faced violence when they went into the crowd to speak to three individuals whose behaviour was arousing suspicion.
'This sequence of events repeated itself on multiple occasions, with officers being surrounded on each occasion they tried to deal with an incident.'
Diana Neslen, 85, who said she was a 'regular' at marches in support of Palestine, attended the protest on crutches.
She added in response to police restrictions: 'Look at this, we should have the right to stand in front of parliament and show our faith until the MPs see why we think what they're doing is wrong.
'Instead we're herded into little tiny spaces so that hardly anyone can see us, and certainly not the politicians.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
15 minutes ago
- Sky News
Neither Israel nor Iran seem committed to Trump's script. Daytime will test the durability of any ceasefire
These days, peace is a post on social media. On Donald Trump's Truth Social site, it came in two parts. Part one read: "CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, IT'S TIME FOR PEACE." The Magna Carta it wasn't, but it was a peace treaty for our times - a US president announcing there would be no retaliation against Iran's missile attack. An anxious world watching for US bombers returning to Iranian skies could cool its jets - and the primetime president could feel vindicated, having enjoyed the sugar rush of strategic success. Trump has tweaked the politics and military landscape around Iran to suit US interests, without a single American life lost. He had framed US intervention in Iran as an effort to prevent a "forever" foreign war, not to provoke it, and he is sitting pretty, following ugly predictions he'd be sucked into conflict. Then, on Truth Social, there was peace "part two". A couple of hours after announcing non-retaliation, Trump wrote the sequel: "Ceasefire." He posted: "CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!" - saying a "complete and total" ceasefire had been fully agreed between Israel and Iran. Quite the day of problem-solving for the self-styled "peacemaker-in-chief". Quite the day of problems unsolved too - time will tell. As deadlines loomed, neither Israel nor Iran appeared fully committed to the Trump script, and fresh missiles were fired overnight. Daytime will test the durability of a ceasefire. There are motivations on both sides to continue a conflict in which both see the other as an existential threat. Can Tehran regard Donald Trump as a trusted broker of peace when he floated the idea of regime change in Iran, as pursued by Israel? Can Israel be convinced to pull back on its military advantage when its instinct will be to reinforce superiority and undermine an Iranian rebuild? Trump's influence will be tested, as ever, when he flies to a NATO summit in The Netherlands today. For him, it can be a difficult crowd and one for whom he remains a mystery. A positive result in the Middle East will help to confound their curiosity, for the better.


Sky News
17 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Three killed as Iranian missiles strike Israel - hours after Trump claims ceasefire deal has been reached
Explosions have been heard in Tel Aviv overnight - plunging the US president's claims of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran into doubt. Iran's foreign minister has thanked "our brave Armed Forces who remain ready to defend our dear country until their last drop of blood".


Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Political correctness is damaging our language
Correcting the self-censoring autocue has become an act of resistance. The formidable BBC newsreader Martine Croxall discovered as much when she amended a gender-neutral teleprompter line about 'pregnant people' to say 'women' during a live broadcast. Her quick-thinking was enthusiastically picked up on social media, praised by no less than JK Rowling, the Harry Potter author, and hailed as a fightback against the creeping encroachment of woke language. For very new readers, it behoves us to point out that only females become pregnant. True, there was once a well-regarded Saatchi & Saatchi advertising campaign featuring men disguised as expectant mothers but this was making a political point about men making decisions about women's bodies. The fundamental biological differences have not been changed either by BBC News style guides or National Health Service gender self-identification rules (which render expectant women as 'birthing persons'). What has changed is that language is becoming increasingly caged, for fear of causing offence. Anne Robinson, former presenter of The Weakest Link quiz show, found that language once seen as funny or edgy ('I never let a thought go unsaid') was later viewed as cruel or bullishly blunt. The hypersensitivity of a few is constraining language and creating a pablum of double-speak. • BBC bosses back Martine Croxall over 'pregnant people' correction The result is that the likes of Ms Croxall must add paralinguistic signals, such as the arching of a brow or the rolling of an eyeball, to distance themselves from the prepared text on the autocue. There is charm in these subversive gestures; few have forgotten the interviewer Jeremy Paxman's curled lip as he struggled to remain courteous. But too much ground has been surrendered in the name of political correctness. The result is damaging our language and clouding our expression.