India March services growth moderated, inflation eased sharply, PMI shows
BENGALURU, April 4 (Reuters) - The rapid expansion in India's dominant services sector cooled slightly in March amid softer demand, despite firms raising prices at the lowest rate in three-and-a-half-years, according to a survey that also showed a deceleration in job creation.
The HSBC final India Services Purchasing Managers' Index (INPMIS=ECI), opens new tab, compiled by S&P Global, fell to 58.5 last month from 59.0 in February, but was higher than a preliminary estimate that showed a fall to 57.7.
However, it remained comfortably ahead of the 50-mark separating contraction from growth.
"Domestic and international demand remained fairly buoyant, despite being sequentially a tick lower than the month before," noted Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC.
Domestic demand remained a key driver, with new business showing solid growth, albeit at a less intense pace compared to February.
Foreign demand softened and international orders rose at the slowest pace in 15 months, signaling potential vulnerabilities to global economic shifts including from U.S. President Donald Trump's recently announced tariff measures.
Inflationary pressures subsided with input cost inflation rising at its slowest pace in five months. That, along with intense competition, led to the weakest increase in output prices since September 2021.
The competitive landscape weighed on business sentiment for the coming year and the future activity index cooled to a seven-month low, affecting employment growth. The pace of hiring additional staff slowed to the lowest in just under a year.
"Looking ahead, business sentiment remains generally positive, but intensifying competition presents a significant challenge to many survey participants," added Bhandari.
The HSBC India Composite PMI, which included robust manufacturing growth, rose to a seven-month high of 59.5 in March from February's 58.8, reflecting stronger overall private sector growth.
Manufacturing growth outpaced services, but both sectors saw moderating employment growth and business confidence.
Weaker inflation and poor business confidence could compel the Reserve Bank of India to cut interest rates again, by 25 basis points on April 9, to support an economy which likely grew at its slowest rate in four years last fiscal year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Newsom is warned of ‘criminal tax evasion' if he withholds federal taxes
The US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, has warned California governor Gavin Newsom that he would be guilty of 'criminal tax evasion' if he withholds his state's tax payments to the federal government amid threats of a funding cut by Donald Trump. Newsom had threatened to cut tax payments to the federal government two days ago after reports that Trump was preparing huge federal funding cuts targeting Democrat-dominated California, including its state university system. 'Gavin Newsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion,' Bessent said in a post on X. 'His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes.' Bessent continued: 'I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path Governor Gavin Newsom is threatening.' He described Newsom's comments as 'extremely reckless' and advised the governor to come up with a tax-cutting plan for California that mirrored Trump's federal tax cutting plan, 'instead of committing criminal tax evasion'. The treasury secretary's comments came after Newsom posted on Friday that 'Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off, Donald Trump.' The California governor linked to a CNN report that the Trump administration is preparing to cancel some federal funding for California and federal agencies had been directed to identify grants that could be withheld, including the University of California and California state university systems. In a statement on Friday, the White House spokesperson Kush Desai criticized California's energy, immigration and other positions as 'lunatic anti-energy, soft-on-crime, pro-child mutilation, and pro-sanctuary policies'. 'No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country,' Desai said, but he added that 'No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation.' Newsom and Trump are accustomed to a war of words, including threats to withhold funding. The administration recently cut $126m in flood prevention funding projects, and Trump has threatened 'large-scale fines' on the state after transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed in the long jump, high jump and triple jump events at the California Interscholastic Federation track and field championships. But the reported threat to cut off federal funding to California's university system appears to have pushed California officials into threats of retaliation. Soon before Newsom made his threat, California assembly speaker Robert Rivas described the rumored grant cancellations as 'unconstitutional and vindictive.' 'We're the nation's economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share,' Rivas wrote. 'I'll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA – we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes.'
NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump aims to slash Pell Grants, which may limit low-income students' college access
For many students and their families, federal student aid is key for college access. And yet, the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 calls for significant cuts to higher education funding, including reducing the maximum federal Pell Grant award to $5,710 a year from $7,395, as well as scaling back the federal work-study program. The proposed cuts would help pay for the landmark tax and spending bill Republicans in the U.S. Congress hope to enact. Roughly 40% of undergraduate students rely on Pell Grants, a type of federal aid available to low-income families who demonstrate financial need on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Work study funds, which are earned through part-time jobs, often help cover additional education expenses. President Donald Trump 's 'skinny' budget request said changes to the Pell Grant program were necessary due to a looming shortfall, but top-ranking Democrats and college advocates say cuts could have been made elsewhere and students will pay the price. 'The money we invest in post-high school education isn't charity — it helps Americans get good jobs, start businesses, and contribute to our economy,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told CNBC. 'No kid's education should be defunded to pay for giant tax giveaways for billionaires.' Pell Grants are 'the foundation for financial support' Nearly 75% of all undergraduates receive some type of financial aid, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. 'Historically the Pell Grant was viewed as the foundation for financial support for low-income students,' said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and a research fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research. 'It's the first dollar, regardless of other types of aid you have access to.' Under Trump's proposal, the maximum Pell Grant for the 2026-2027 academic year would be at its lowest level in more than a decade. 'The Pell reduction would impact the lowest-income families,' said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit. More than 92% of Pell Grant recipients in 2019-2020 came from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. How Pell Grant cuts could affect college students If the president's cuts were enacted and then persisted for four years, the average student debt at graduation will be about $6,500 higher among those with a bachelor's degree who received Pell Grants, according to Kantrowitz's own calculations. 'If adopted, [the proposed cuts] would require millions of enrolled students to drop out or take on more debt to complete their degrees — likely denying countless prospective low- and moderate-income students the opportunity to go to college altogether,' Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement. Already, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, the average was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board. The Pell program functions like other entitlement programs, such as Social Security or Medicare, where every eligible student is entitled to receive a Pell award. However, unlike those other programs, the Pell program does not rely solely on mandatory funding that is set in the federal budget. Rather, it is also dependent on some discretionary funding, which is appropriated by Congress. The Congressional Budget Office projected a shortfall this year in part because more students now qualify for a Pell Grant due to changes to the financial aid application, and, as a result, more students are enrolling in college. Cutting the Pell Grant is 'extreme' Although there have been other times when the Pell program operated with a deficit, slashing the award amount is an 'extreme' measure, according to Kantrowitz. 'Every past shortfall has been followed by Congress providing additional funding,' he said. 'Even the current House budget reconciliation bill proposes additional funding to eliminate the shortfall.' However, the bill also reduces eligibility for the grants by raising the number of credits students need to take per semester to qualify for the aid. There's a concern those more stringent requirements will harm students who need to work while they're in school and those who are parents balancing classes and child care. 'These are students that could use it the most,' said the University of Chicago's Turner. 'Single parents, for example, that have to work to cover the bills won't be able to take on additional credits,' Mayotte said. 'If their Pell is also reduced, they may have to withdraw from school rather than complete their degree,' Mayotte said.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Senator Cory Booker says he will not accept any donations from Elon Musk
A leading elected Democrat rejected the idea of taking campaign donations from tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose spectacular fallout with former ally Donald Trump has roiled American politics. Trump on Saturday said Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he moves to support Democratic political candidates in any upcoming elections, following a public rift between the two men over Musk's staunch opposition to the cost of US president's planned piece of landmark domestic legislation. But Cory Booker, a senator for New Jersey, scotched any idea he would take any Musk cash. 'I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign,' Booker told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. But Booker added, referring to the Republicans budget bill that Musk has criticized, 'I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know, sound the alarm, treat this like a Paul Revere moment.' Booker added: 'More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans.' The senator's comments come as Democrats wrestle with the how to turn the dramatic fallout between Musk and Trump into opportunity. Musk turned his back on the party in 2022 and contributed $270m to Trump's re-election campaign in 2024, providing crucial help in the Republican's eventual victory. As the Trump-Musk feud intensified on Thursday, Musk posted on X: 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.,' clearly referring to any politician who supported Trump's budget bill. Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman, reportedly talked with one of Musk's 'senior confidants' on last week about whether Musk might now want to help the Democrats in the midterm elections next year. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna told Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against Maga Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026,' Khanna, who has argued that his party was unwise to alienate Musk, told the outlet. However, leftwing politicians, including Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have publicly pictured Musk as what voters should be against: powerful wealthy billionaires seeking influence through politics. Sanders told CNN's State of the Union Sunday that Musk had 'evolved' into an extremist since he voted for Obama in 2008. 'Over the years he has developed into a rightwing extremist. The issue and drama over what happened last week is that we are living, increasingly, in an oligarchic society. Musk said: 'Hey listen, I spent $270m dollars to get you elected. I bought you the presidency …' 'This is a fight between oligarchs. It's a fight about power among the few, and it's really an embarrassment for those of us who believe in democracy and the rule of law,' Sanders added. Musk said last month that he planned to spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns as he scaled back and ultimately exited his time in government, where Trump had tasked him with massively slashing federal spending and jobs. 'In terms of political spending I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk told a Bloomberg forum in Doha. Asked why, he responded: 'I think I've done enough.' But Musk's opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful' bill budget proposal, calling it an 'disgusting abomination', by definition puts him in relative proximity to Democratic positions on that issue. Booker was asked if agreed with Musk about the planned legislation that Trump has made a centerpiece of his administration. 'I agree that it's going to saddle this country with trillions of dollars of debt, endanger our entire economy … This is a morally wrong bill. And it's definitely, definitely an economically wrong bill as well.' 'This is not about right or left, it's about right or wrong,' he added. 'And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on congresspeople and senators to not do this.'
