logo
Proposition 414's blowout loss sends Tucson officials 'back to the drawing board'

Proposition 414's blowout loss sends Tucson officials 'back to the drawing board'

Yahoo20-03-2025

Tucson leaders are figuring out how to move forward after final election results show city voters overwhelmingly rejected a ballot measure to raise the city's sales tax to pay for public safety and community investment.
At the polls on March 11, Tucson voters voted 2-to-1 against Proposition 414, which would have raised the city's sales tax from 2.6% to 3.1% to give a financial boost to police, firefighters and housing programs, among many others.
Of the total 87,081 ballots cast, about 70%, or 60,758 people, voted against the measure.
As the deadline to present a balanced budget to the Tucson City Council approaches, city officials are looking at alternatives.
'As a city manager, I developed a plan B and I worked with the mayor a bit on what that could look like,' said City Manager Tim Thomure, who added officials "went into the election feeling confident that we would get a positive result."
Thomure is working on next year's budget proposal, which he will present on April 22, and gave the Tucson City Council updates to the budget process at a meeting on Tuesday.
Part of the budget process will mean figuring out how to pay for expanding services that would have seen a boost if the proposition had been successful.
Expanding services in growing areas will mean adding $15 million to an already-expected deficit of $13 million in the budget. Local officials say the deficit is largely caused by a loss of state-shared revenue.
Thomure said he will have to find ways to balance the budget and ring that deficit down to zero. That might include budget cuts and slowing down projects, he said in an interview with The Arizona Republic.
He added Tucson will also look for grants to help reduce the deficit. But the city already does, and Thomure noted the options for grants are not 'very robust."
Although Thomure did not speculate on a reason for the ballot measure's failure, he said city officials must reflect on what happened. Historically, he said, the city and voters have had a 'strong alignment.'
Previous ballot measures that have had a clear benefit for voters passed at the polls, he said, alluding to Proposition 409 in 2012, Proposition 407 in 2018, Proposition 101 in 2017, and Proposition 411 in 2022.
'Did we mishear the citizens about what they wanted? That's possible,' Thomure said. 'Did we reach the point where they're not willing to invest further in the form of a sales tax than what they've been asked? Also, possible. Did we make it too complicated? That's very possible.'
While some opposition was critical of any increases in taxes, others opposed the high allocation of funds to public safety. Two-thirds of the funds that would have been raised by Proposition 414 would have gone to police and fire departments.
One of the most vocal critics of the measure was the No Prop 414 Coalition.
April Putney, a spokesperson for the coalition, faulted the ballot measure for not reflecting the public feedback Tucsonans said they want to be prioritized during public engagement efforts.
'Again and again Tucson has outlined that housing affordability is our top priority, followed by quality city services and programs like education, public transit, mental health care, and park amenities like restrooms,' Putney wrote in an email.
She reiterated that 'funding punishment and criminalization' will not solve Tucson's problems, and that citizens want to invest in data-proven solutions, like quality housing and services.
City Councilmember Kevin Dahl, a Democrat who supported the measure, said he was surprised it lost by such a large margin.
With so many elements in the ballot, he said it's challenging to know if any one issue caused the proposition to fail. Dahl noted a general distrust of government could be a potential cause.
'Tucson is bearing the brunt of concern about government,' Dahl said, noting the mass layoffs, implementation of tariffs, and the shuttering of agencies at the federal level.
Dahl said Proposition 414 was a good measure and highlighted the undefined that wants more public safety and supports the fire department and the city's 311 and 911 systems.
He also said the measure would have continued using community service officers for police-related calls that don't require a sworn officer with a gun.
'I'm very disappointed, but where we go from here, we go back to the drawing board and sharpen our pencils and work it out so that we live within the budget that will be available to us,' he said.
Reach the reporter at sarah.lapidus@gannett.com. The Republic's coverage of southern Arizona is funded, in part, with a grant from Report for America. Support Arizona news coverage with a tax-deductible donation at supportjournalism.azcentral.com.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Prop. 414's loss sends Tucson officials 'back to the drawing board'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'll never forget what Walter Cronkite told me
I'll never forget what Walter Cronkite told me

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

I'll never forget what Walter Cronkite told me

One time, I was interviewing this old guy and he went on and on about how important good journalism is to democracy. You could tell he really believed it. That old guy's name was Walter Cronkite. I interviewed him in his office several years ago, and his words and passion for good journalism have never been more important or rung so true. And The Arizona Republic provides plenty of it. Whether it's local news and sports, expert looks at the dining scene, tough coverage of politics or informed opinions about what's going on in the Valley and the world, The Republic and offer all this in addition to, if I might twist your arm a bit, my media criticism and commentary and movie and TV reviews. And if there is one thing that's true about providing such thorough coverage of the place where we live and beyond, it's this — it ain't free. That's where you come in. A subscription to The Republic helps support our work, which I frequently argue is important. Our coverage of major stories, such as the Gilbert Goons and local favorites like high school sports, is unparalleled. I read it, and you should, too. Not to oversimplify things, but reading our coverage is how I know what's going on in the community I live in. And that's important. For my part, I write about how the media covers (or doesn't) the kind of attacks on democracy Cronkite warned against, alongside reviews of films (horror movies are a particular favorite) and TV shows (I love TV), and the occasional food essay. Recently, I wrote about criticism of the book 'Original Sin,' and how some people think it's something that shouldn't exist. I disagree. You can write about almost anything, and we do. If you don't like one story, move on — you'll likely enjoy the next one. Not only can we cover more than one thing, but we have to. It's what we do. And we do it well. We'd love for you to be a part of it. After all, you don't want to disappoint Walter Cronkite. Special offer: If you like our work, please consider becoming a subscriber. Save on a new subscription today. Reach Goodykoontz at Facebook: Media commentary with a side of snark? Sign up for The Watchlist newsletter with Bill Goodykoontz. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Republic columnist: My mission is to uncover the truth

Arizona Democrats fear infighting will hurt them in midterms
Arizona Democrats fear infighting will hurt them in midterms

The Hill

time3 days ago

  • The Hill

Arizona Democrats fear infighting will hurt them in midterms

Democratic frustrations are growing in Arizona amid a feud within the state party, triggering concerns about the ramifications for 2026 and beyond. Only months into his tenure as Arizona Democratic Party chair, members of the party have voiced exasperation with Robert E. Branscomb II for various actions, including airing grievances with Democratic elected officials publicly; his handling of the party budget and fundraising; and for suspending another party official. While Branscomb has urged Arizona Democrats to have patience and said his job has a steep learning curve, it's done little to quell discontent within the party: Dozens of Arizona Democratic Party state committee members have signed onto a petition calling for a special meeting to consider removing Branscomb. Members are already bracing for a chaotic state committee meeting on Saturday and some are concerned the party's fundraising and coordinated campaign could be impacted ahead of the 2026 elections if the dispute doesn't resolve itself soon. 'We run out of money, then what do we do?' said one state committee member who, like others interviewed in this piece, requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'Who's going to run … the party if there's no money?' Patience is wearing thin among Arizona Democrats since Branscomb was elected chair in January. Months into his term, he roiled the party after accusing the state's two Democratic senators of intimidating him following his selection of a new executive director for the party, prompting both senators in addition to Gov. Katie Hobbs (D), Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) and Secretary of State Adrian Fontes (D) to issue a statement refuting Branscomb's letter to state committee members and saying that Branscomb had lost their trust. More recently, he suspended first vice chair Kim Khoury, with an investigation being launched 'into potential violations of the ADP Code of Conduct and governing procedures,' according to The Arizona Republic, which obtained a copy of the letter. Democrats have also voiced concern over the state party's fundraising after its treasurer recently estimated that, at the current rate, the party would run out of money by the end of the year. One longtime state committee person believed there would be money coming into the state for elections and congressional races, but noted that 'it's not going to be through the state party at this point as long as he's involved.' In an interview with the Arizona Republic last month, the state party chair said that Democrats needed to give him some time to get adjusted to the role and that they needed to have patience. While he's acknowledged there are things he could have done differently as chair, he's suggested the circumstances he entered into when he took over as chair didn't place him in a strong position to lead the party. The Hill contacted Branscomb on Thursday, and he indicated he was not immediately available for an interview. He did not responded to additional requests for comment. While some members of the party are sympathetic to the fact that helming a state party can be challenging, they also say Branscomb did himself no favors publishing his letter invoking the two senators. 'I wouldn't disagree with that,' the longtime state committee member said when asked about Branscomb's comments to the Arizona Republic, 'because I know it's a hard job, and I know there's a learning curve, and I know he's new to the job.' 'The problem is that email basically makes it almost impossible to recover from.' State party feuding is not new, of course. Former Arizona GOP chair Jeff DeWit left his position early last year following a leaked conversation between him and Kari Lake, in which DeWit sought to dissuade the former local news anchor from running for Arizona Senate. In Nevada in 2023, Democrats ousted their chair, Judith Whitmer, whose election prompted a number of officials to exit the state party. And while some members see intraparty conflict as unhelpful and an annoyance, they argue that their candidates, including all three Democratic statewide elected officials, will have the resources needed to be successful and competitive next year. Multiple avenues would be available to them, particularly county parties, to help with fundraising. 'I do think it will be more of a temporary annoyance than something that is actually going to have any sort of electoral impact,' one party insider said, noting that the conflict itself doesn't resolve around an ideological split. But other Arizona Democrats — even those who voted for Branscomb in January — are concerned that the dragged-out rift could negatively impact the party's fundraising and organizational efforts. 'I don't think we'll have an effective coordinated campaign,' said Steven Jackson, the Legislative District 8 chairman who has led circulation of the petition calling for the special meeting to consider removing Branscomb. Jackson supported Branscomb during the January chair election. 'I think it would affect the [Arizona Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee], which will affect legislative races. You know, we've got an attorney general who [won] by 250 votes last time, and a governor's race that's going to be tough,' Jackson added, referring to Mayes's race against Rep. Abe Hamadeh (R-Ariz.) in 2022, which she won by 280 votes. Despite members' frustrations with Branscomb, removing him as chair is still a tall task: Two-thirds of the entire state committee need to vote for his removal in order for it to move forward. Some members question whether there's enough frustrated Democrats to meet that threshold. 'It's hard to gauge because it is a high threshold, right?' the first state committee member said. 'But the more he stays on, the more he loses trust and confidence.'

Why are some shoppers boycotting Walmart this week?
Why are some shoppers boycotting Walmart this week?

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Why are some shoppers boycotting Walmart this week?

Another weeklong Walmart boycott is set to start Tuesday and will continue through Memorial Day. The company has been facing backlash since rolling back DEI programs in the past year but grassroots advocacy group The People's Union USA, which is led by John Schwarz and organized the first Walmart blackout in early April as well as this second one, told The Arizona Republic the actions of The People's Union USA are not directly tied to companies' DEI stances. "The mission of The People's Union USA is to hold corporations and corrupt systems accountable, not with violence or empty promises, but with the one thing that actually affects them, the money we spend," Schwarz said to The Arizona Republic via email. Here's what New York shoppers should know. The weeklong Walmart boycott begins Tuesday, May 20, and runs through Monday, May 26. While specific details haven't been released about this boycott, April's boycott included the chain's stores, online platforms, and Sam's Club, Walmart's membership-only warehouse. There are 82 Walmart Supercenters in the Empire State, according to the chain's website, as well as 16 discount stores and one neighborhood market. 100 Elmridge Center Drive in Greece 3800 Dewey Ave. in Greece 1490 Hudson Ave. in Rochester 2150 Chili Ave. in Gates 1200 Marketplace Drive in Henrietta 441 Commerce Drive in Victor 1990 Brandt Point Drive in Webster There are 12 Sam's Club warehouses across New York, according to Walmart's website. What to know: Why are some shoppers boycotting Walmart this week? The People's Union USA has more consumer boycotts through July. Here's the schedule: Target: June 3-9 McDonald's: June 24-30 Independence Day boycott: July 4 Contributing: The Arizona Republic reporter Reia Li Emily Barnes on consumer-related issues for the USA TODAY Network's New York Connect Team, focusing on scam and recall-related topics. Follow her on X and Instagram @byemilybarnes. Get in touch at ebarnes@ This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Walmart boycott: What shoppers should know

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store