Dem support likely to push Trump's pro-union labor pick past key vote
President Donald Trump's nominee for labor secretary is expected to pass a key vote before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) on Thursday after picking up Democrat support from Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H.
Lori Chavez-DeRemer's past support for the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act jeopardized her confirmation last week, when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he would not vote for her if she continued to support the PRO Act. Paul's reluctance meant Chavez-DeRemer would likely need a Democrat's vote to pass a key confirmation hurdle.
Hassan's support, as a Democrat on the HELP Committee, all but confirms Chavez-DeRemer will pass through her committee vote.
"The Department of Labor plays an integral role in supporting workers and small businesses alike, and after hearing significant support from constituents, including members of labor unions in New Hampshire, I will support Representative Chavez-DeRemer's nomination as Secretary of Labor," Hassan shared in a statement to Fox News Digital.
Trump's Nominee For Labor Secretary Walks Back Support For Pro Act, Embraces Republican Right-to-work Laws
Hassan admitted that she "may not agree on everything" with Chavez-DeRemer, but she is "qualified" to serve and earned "significant support" from New Hampshire voters.
Read On The Fox News App
Senate Confirms Trump Nominee Jamieson Greer As Us Trade Representative
"Though we may not agree on everything, after meeting with Representative Chavez-DeRemer and listening to her testimony during her confirmation hearing, I believe that she is qualified to serve as the next secretary of labor, and I look forward to working with her to support New Hampshire's workers and small businesses," Hassan added.
Chavez-DeRemer supported the PRO Act as a representative for Oregon's 5th Congressional District but told senators during her confirmation hearing that she no longer supports overturning Republican-supported right-to-work laws under the PRO Act.
The PRO Act would effectively kill state-level laws that prevent employers and unions from requiring workers to pay union dues as a condition of their employment. Republicans oppose the PRO Act for overturning right-to-work laws.
Chavez-DeRemer could still earn back Paul's vote after she distanced herself from the PRO Act during her Senate hearing. With Hassan's support, Chavez-DeRemer is no longer reliant on Paul for confirmation.
"If she wanted to make a public statement saying that her support for the PRO Act was incorrect and she no longer does, then I'd think about her nomination," Paul told Fox News Digital in a statement ahead of Chavez-DeRemer's hearing.
"So you no longer support the aspect of the PRO Act that would have overturned state right-to-work laws?" Paul asked during the hearing.
"Yes, sir," she replied.
Paul's office did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on how he will vote in committee today.
Chavez-DeRemer testified before the HELP Committee on Feb. 19. If the committee votes to send Chavez-DeRemer's nomination before the full Senate, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., can file a motion to end Senate floor debate on the nominee, triggering a cloture vote to halt deliberations. Once debate closes, senators cast their final confirmation vote.
During her hearing, Chavez-DeRemer advocated for trade school investments to expand "educational pathways beyond the traditional four-year degree" to strengthen the American workforce. She said she is committed to leveling the playing field for American businesses, workers and unions.
Chavez-DeRemer also thanked Trump and credited him with the "single greatest political achievement of our time" in building a "new coalition of working-class Americans."
"President Trump has united a new coalition of working-class Americans like never before. With 59.6% of Teamsters backing him, historic support from African-American and Latino voters, and record-breaking turnout in once-solid blue cities and states, Americans are speaking loud and clear. They are calling for action, progress and leadership that puts the American worker first," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Trump nominated Chavez-DeRemer for secretary of labor less than three weeks after he was elected president.
"Lori has worked tirelessly with both Business and Labor to build America's workforce, and support the hardworking men and women of America," Trump wrote.
"I look forward to working with her to create tremendous opportunity for American Workers, to expand training and apprenticeships, to grow wages and improve working conditions, to bring back our manufacturing jobs. Together, we will achieve historic cooperation between Business and Labor that will restore the American Dream for Working Families," he added.Original article source: Dem support likely to push Trump's pro-union labor pick past key vote
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Privatisation shelved as premier fights to stay afloat
A retracted privatisation promise by Jeremy Rockliff has added pressure on the embattled Tasmanian premier to resign. Mr Rockliff has stopped prominent economist Saul Eslake from preparing a report on viable opportunities to sell government-owned businesses to support Tasmania's troubled finances. He promised legislation ensuring that any sales would require a two-thirds majority support in parliament. Today, I can confirm that there will be no privatisation under a Government I will also be changing the law so that a government business can only be sold in future if it receives a two-thirds majority in the Parliament. — Jeremy Rockliff (@jeremyrockliff) June 7, 2025 "There will be no privatisation. Nil," Mr Rockwell said. However, not everyone is convinced by his backtracking. "Frankly, Jeremy Rockliff saying that he won't be proceeding with privatisation cannot be believed and, even if it could, it doesn't go far enough," Unions Tasmania secretary Jessica Munday said. "The community ... will be rightly cynical about the timing of this announcement and the commitment underpinning it, given it comes as the premier is fighting for his political life." Mr Rockliff's backflip comes as the Greens ramp up pressure on him to resign, saying they are ready to offer "confidence and supply" to Labor leader Dean Winter as premier. "Just because we don't see eye to eye on everything doesn't mean we can't work constructively for our state," Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said on Saturday. "Jeremy Rockliff could make sure there is no election by resigning. "But with the premier refusing to do so, it is incumbent on Dean Winter as opposition leader to engage with the Greens and the wider crossbench to prevent the state heading to the polls." Mr Winter has ruled out forming government in a deal with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers. The ongoing political fractures could send Tasmanians back to the polls for the fourth time in seven years, unless the Liberal party opts to remove Mr Rockliff and negotiate a new deal with crossbenchers. An election could be called on Tuesday. Despite feuding over the state's finances, Tasmania's proposed $715 million stadium looms as the biggest issue. The roofed Macquarie Point proposal is a condition of an AFL licence, with the state government responsible for delivery and cost overruns. Labor and the Liberals support the stadium but recent polls suggest Tasmanians are not sold. Firebrand senator Jacqui Lambie, independent federal MP Andrew Wilkie and acclaimed author Richard Flanagan are among well-known Tasmanians who oppose the project.
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
TikTok influencer slammed for viral video about ‘unchic' fashion
Tara Langdale talked to Fox News Digital about how she received hurtful messages from critics after a not-so-serious fashion post describing what she views as 'unchic' went viral, spawning a cascade of events that made her apolitical post a victim of attacks. The self-described stay-at-home working mom amassed some 250,000 views and found herself on the receiving end of some hate after an April 7 TikTok of her seated, drinking from a wine glass with nicely done hair, gold jewelry and manicured nails as she skimmed through a list of 'unchic' fashion sins. Advertisement Tattoos, Lululemon, baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines were just a few that made part one of Langdale's controversial 'unchic' list, which drew backlash from seething critics who called her out with a political twist. 'Voting for Trump is unchic,' one said. 'To her, privilege = chic. Hope this helps!' said another. A third said, 'just say you're a republican and go lmao,' while a slew of commenters took exception to her tattoo stance and ranted about classism. Advertisement The video even caught The Guardian's attention, prompting an article that coined 'chic' as 'a shorthand for a type of conservative-coded aesthetic' and spoke of the 'rigid and airbrushed' looks of Trump allies, sch as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 4 Tara Langdale received backlash for her 'unchic' fashion TikTok. @tara_langdale / TikTok Though Langdale diddles cribe herself as conservative when speaking to Fox News Digital, she insists not everything is about politics. 'When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that,' Langdale said. Advertisement 'I think conservativism is more of culture, religion – all of those things go into your conservativist mindset. Now, if you're talking about conservative style of dress… that's also going to be more like religion and culture,' she went on. 'Of course, if I'm going to church on Sunday, I'm dressing very conservative. I'm going to keep it classy, but if you see me in the street in my regular day-to-day, I am not at all conservative. I would never consider my style to be conservative. But am I conservative? Absolutely, so I can differentiate the two. I know that the internet has a hard time doing that.' 4 Lululemon made Langdale's controversial 'unchic' list — along with baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines. REUTERS 4 Tattoos were also on Langdale's list. xartproduction – Langdale addressed the politicized dogma, saying she doesn't understand why TikTok users jumped to conclusions about 'conservative' or 'Republican makeup' as they did. Advertisement 'Because I'm blonde, because I have more of a natural look about me, I'm not fully glammed all the time… I'm really not sure how that makes me appear conservative, but, again, I just think when people don't agree with what you say, they have to find a way to discredit you, and that's just an easy tactic,' she continued. At the same time, Langdale pushed back against the idea of her video implying that people too poor to afford expensive items are automatically 'unchic,' and pointed to brand-name items like athletic apparel brand Lululemon, Apple Watches and Golden Goose sneakers – all of which can be pricey – as evidence pointing to the contrary. 'Just keep in mind that money talks and wealth whispers, and I don't know any wealthy people that are wearing Gucci across their chest,' she said in her original post. Langdale explained that the TikTok trend of users showcasing 'things I find incredibly chic' grabbed her attention as they began circulating on the app. She found them 'pretentious and off-putting,' so she felt compelled to take her own stab at the video. 4 'When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that,' Langdale said about the political criticism she received. @tara_langdale / TikTok 'Of course, my video came off as pretentious and off-putting as well, but it felt like a certain level of cringe for me, and I don't like to personally attack anybody on social media, so I wouldn't go after a specific creator. I just kind of wanted to hop on the trend… so that was my initial, 'Why I created the video.'' Advertisement Langdale shared that her direct messages on the platform have been 'insane' with threats and comments about her family since the video went viral. 'It does make you step back and take a pause,' she shared. 'Like, is this really worth it for how crazy people react? And I would never want to put my family in danger, but I think a lot of it is just the keyboard pirates that are just back there behind their computer typing whatever they can to try to get more likes in the comments,' Langdale added.
Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
County pilot program looks to increase rental housing
County of Brant Council received a report in regards to a new Temporary Rental Grant Pilot Program, during their regular council meeting on Tuesday, May 27, 2025. Overall, the program will attempt to get more houses with several bedrooms, available for rent in the short term, by incentivizing developers to turn their unsold inventory into rental units in exchange for a grant. As stated in a report presented to Council, 'the grant would be paid over a period of five years, equal to the amount of the Development Charges [DC] reduction they would have been entitled to if they met the criteria of Rental Housing Development under the Act.' The initiative comes after preliminary findings from the County's Housing Needs Assessment outline that the needs for rental housing in the community is not being met. 'The initial housing needs assessment results came back, which noted a dire need for rentals within the county, specifically multi-bedroom rentals,' said Alysha Dyjach, General Manager of Development Services. 'Some commentary coming back from some of the councillors in this room indicated that it's time to potentially get some innovative solutions. What's before you tonight is not, in any way, a magic bullet. This is a very small, specific response to one, very small issue.' Not only would the program incentivize more rental units, but it would also help the local construction industry. According to the report, developers are saying that with fewer people buying homes, it has left them unwilling to continue with their developments due to the fact that the inventory of vacant constructed units is growing. On top of that, the County's allocation policy only allows developers to move onto the next phase of a subdivision when 75 per cent of the units in the previous phase are occupied. 'While this approach has helped manage infrastructure capacity, it is also contributing to the pause in construction activity as units remain unsold and unoccupied,' said Dyjach. 'The slowdown in construction activity has resulted in a surplus of vacant units for sale, while at the same time creating uncertainty in the local housing construction and job market which could result in job reductions, lower material demand, lower business attraction, and reduce municipal revenue that can be invested in infrastructure and services.' Within the program, staff are proposing a starting budget of $81,500 based on an initial estimate of 40 three-bedroom units. This would provide a per-unit investment of approximately $2037.50 in the first year. Staff did mention that because this is a pilot project, they were anticipating that the uptake could be significantly lower than the maximum amount. 'This is a temporary solution. It's not permanent, and we have no idea on what the uptake might be,' said Dyjach. 'What we're hoping is that this might potentially tip the scales to allow even if it's just a handful of rentals within our community. Those are rentals which families desperately need right now, who can't afford a down payment for home.' Councillor John Peirce congratulated staff for thinking outside of the box, but said it was a bit of a doubled-edged sword. 'There's nothing in here to indicate that we, as the County, would have any sway as far as the cost of rent would go. So sure, you've got a million dollar house there that they can't sell, so they can rent it, but are they gonna rent it for $4,000 or $5,000 a month that people still can't afford?' he said. 'I think it's a great idea, don't get me wrong, but I'm wondering, do we have any skin in the game, so to speak, when it comes to the amount that's going to be charged for rent? Because it doesn't help anybody if there's $3,000 to $5,000/ month houses out there to rent.' Dyjach responded saying that he was correct, the County would not have any control over the price of rent. 'To be clear, these are not affordable [units]. If they were affordable under what the province declares to be affordable, there would be a 100 per cent DC credit,' she said. 'So, these are not affordable, however, they do have to be rented and so if they are so high that there is no market for them, then they would not be eligible for the program.' While several councillors including Steve Howes, Lukas Oakley, Christine Garneau, and John Bell, commended staff for the innovative solution, Bell wondered if an entire family could be displaced if a developer sold their rental unit. 'I would like to be sure that people that do rent these properties, don't find that two months into their rental, the developer comes and says, 'sorry we sold it, so now you're out,'' he said. 'I think there needs to be some reasonable guarantee of tenure for people that use this program, and I think that's a reasonable quid pro quo from the developers.' Dyjach said that because these would be private rentals, the County ultimately wouldn't have any control over the lease agreements, but that staff could make it so that in order to be eligible for the grant, the units have to be rented in 12-month blocks. Later, Mayor David Bailey said he thought it was a great program. 'I think when people get into these units, they'll be able to establish some sort of a rental history with the builder, and perhaps be able to buy it later,' he said. 'If some people don't have any history on rentals, this is a good opportunity to have a break and all buy something you're already living in and familiar with, so I think it's really great.' In the end, Council unanimously voted to receive and support the report, approve funding for the project in the amount of $81,500 and directed staff to draft a Temporary Rental Grant agreement. Kimberly De Jong's reporting is funded by the Canadian government through its Local Journalism Initiative. The funding allows her to report rural and agricultural stories from Blandford-Blenheim and Brant County. Reach her at . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
