Albert Lea district sees slight decrease in graduation rates
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
May 7—Albert Lea Area Schools saw a small decline in its graduation rates in 2024, though Albert Lea High School remains above the state average, according to data released Wednesday from the Minnesota Department of Education.
The data showed that 171 students, or 86.4%, of students graduated from Albert Lea High School, and 13 students, or 27.1%, graduated from the Area Learning Center. Districtwide, the graduation rate was 74.2%, with a combined 184 students graduating.
That is down from 181 students, or 88.3%, in 2023, for Albert Lea High School and 16 students, or 28.6%, for the Area Learning Center. The districtwide graduation rate that year was 75.6%, with a total of 201 students graduating.
"In looking at trend data, we celebrate Albert Lea High School's ability to remain above the state average. However, the graduation rate data does prompt a call to action for proactive analysis and strategic planning," the school district said in a press release. "While this decline poses a challenge, it also underscores the importance of asking probing questions and disaggregating data to identify underlying factors and opportunities for growth."
The release stated the district acknowledges the challenges posed by attendance, engagement and meeting the needs of students with various ability levels.
"As a district, we are prioritizing multi-tiered systems of support for our student body as it is imperative that students have access to rigorous Tier 1 instruction; however, we must also address any academic, social, emotional and behavioral differences that may exist. We remain committed to addressing these challenges head-on through targeted interventions, enhanced support structures and collaboration with stakeholders to ensure every student receives the necessary resources for academic success. Our ongoing commitment to student achievement and equity drives our resolve to overcome these obstacles and improve outcomes for all learners.
Statewide, 59,720 students — or 84.2% of the 2024 class — graduated, which is the highest the state has ever recorded. According to the Minnesota Department of Education, the statewide data showed increases for students in the American Indian, Asian, Black, Hispanic or Latino and white student groups. Graduation rates also increased for English learners, students from low-income families and students receiving special education services.
"The students of the class of 2024 worked hard and overcame challenges to achieve this milestone," said Commissioner Willie Jett. "I am thrilled to see the success of many of our student groups — especially those most at risk — and a closing of the achievement gap as we work to make sure every student, of every background, zip code and ability has access to a world-class education. I am also grateful for the educators, families and communities who stood behind these graduates and supported their needs and encouraged their successes. Their achievement is evidence that investing in kids pays off."
The statewide graduation rate in 2023 was 83.3%.
Graduation rates
Albert Lea Area Schools
2024: 184 students, 74.2%
2023: 201 students, 75.6%
2022: 228 students, 78.1%
2021: 186 students, 71.8%
2020: 220 students, 80.9%
Albert Lea High School
2024: 171 students, 86.4%
2023: 181 students, 88.3%
2022: 188 students, 88.6%
2021: 166 students, 85.6%
2020: 181 students, 85.8%
Albert Lea Area Learning Center
2024: 13 students, 27.1%
2023: 16 students, 28.6%
2022: 25 students, 41.7%
2021: 20 students, 30.8%
2020: 39 students, 63.9%
Alden-Conger Public Schools
2024: 30 students, 96.8%
2023: 34 students, 100%
2022: 24 students, 92.3%
2021: 46 students, 88.5%
2020: 35 students, 94.6%
Glenville-Emmons Schools
2024: 10 students, 100%
2023: 15 students, 88.2%
2022: 14 students, 82.4%
2021: 20 students, 87%
2020: 10 students, 100%
NRHEG School District
2024: 57 students, 95%
2023: 68 students, 88.3%
2022: 56 students, 84.8%
2021: 65 students, 84.4%
2020: 52 students, 89.7%
United South Central School District
2024: 44 students, 91.7%
2023: 32 students, 74.4%
2022: 45 students, 84.9%
2021: 48 students, 88.9%
2020: 42 students, 85.7%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Howard Levitt: Working for a foreign-owned company in Canada can be risky business
In this uncertain and rapidly evolving global economic climate, Canadians are turning inward more than ever and reevaluating their position within the new world order. We are buying Canadian, travelling Canadian, celebrating Canadian virtues and values; but amidst all of this rediscovered 'Canadiana,' millions of us continue to work for companies based in the U.S. or elsewhere. Working for a foreign-owned company in Canada can feel like being in a cross-cultural relationship — full of opportunity but rife with the potential for miscommunication, mismatched expectations, and even exploitation. From the aggressive pace of U.S. capitalism to the top-down rigidity of some Asian firms, foreign parent companies often bring unspoken assumptions about loyalty, etiquette, work ethic, and what's 'normal' at work — assumptions that may clash with Canadian values and laws. As the job market globalizes, especially in sectors like tech, finance, and energy, Canadian professionals must evaluate not just the job, who's really running the show — and from where. Is it Houston or Calgary? Toronto or Tokyo? The answer to this question is more important than you think, especially when evaluating whether you will be a fit with the organization. Ultimately, however, this boils down to your personality. How you communicate, set boundaries and deal with conflict can make or break your success in these cross-border environments. Some foreign firms reward traits that others might suppress. If you are conscientious and respect hierarchy, you might thrive at a Japanese or Korean-owned company — but expect little tolerance for dissent or work-life balance (though younger generations continue to make progress on these fronts). If you are assertive and goal-driven, an American-owned firm may fit — though loyalty may be one-sided. Those who value consensus and equity may find a better match in Canadian or European firms, where protected leaves and diversity policies are ingrained. Upbringing matters, too. If you grew up equating hard work with moral virtue, you may overlook red flags. If you were raised to value rights and boundaries, you might resist being overrun — but also face friction with hierarchical employers. Canada has one of the world's most employee-friendly legal systems, with strong human rights laws, generous severance standards under common law, and courts that award damages for bad-faith conduct. But if your real boss sits in Houston, Seoul, or Beijing, things get complicated. For example: In many U.S. states, firms often rely on 'at-will' employment terms, whereby companies may terminate your employment without notice or severance pay. This makes for easy terminations, but less reward for employee loyalty and service. While 'at-will' terminations do not exist in Canada, an executive or manager based in the U.S. may resist an employee's proper severance entitlements, even with sound legal advice. Japanese and Korean companies may nominally guarantee long-term employment, but workplace hierarchy often overrides individual rights, and legal recourse is rare due to social stigma in those countries. Canadian employees should be alive to such cultural dynamics, ideally prior to signing an employment agreement. In China, while labour laws exist, they are limited, pro-business and highly ineffective in addressing or resolving employee complaints. The blurry division of power between the government and the courts, coupled with an emphasis on social stability over individual rights, means many Chinese employers remain largely unchallenged by employee grievances and complaints. Recent cases show how these clashes play out in court: China Southern Airlines (2023): The company was chastised by a Canadian court for 'abusive, unfair (and) cruel' treatment of an employee in its effort to manufacture just cause for dismissal or force a resignation. The court sided with the Canadian airline employee, awarding significant damages and reinforcing the principles of Canadian law. Tesla Canada (2023): Workers were allegedly penalized for taking protected sick leave. U.S.–style expectations led to complaints and eventual Ministry of Labour intervention, which forced Tesla to revisit their internal policies. Samsung C&T: The company reportedly retaliated against whistleblowers following its breach of U.S. federal trade laws. Settlements followed, but only after regulatory investigation and prosecution. Some traits increase your risk when working for foreign-controlled firms: High trust in employers by Canadians may lead to under-documenting important conversations, failure to seek appropriate legal or HR advice and be caught offguard in a workplace dispute. Avoiding conflict may cause you to stay silent about questionable business practices. Extreme loyalty, or a predisposition to conformity or deference, can put an employee at risk of being taken advantage of. In contrast, employees who document, ask questions and seek employment law advice early are better protected, or at least better informed when it comes to dealing with these employers. Before accepting an offer from a foreign-owned company in Canada, ask: Who really makes the decisions — your local manager or someone overseas? Does the company follow Canadian legal standards around severance, leaves and discrimination? Is your employment contract governed by Canadian law? Does the local HR/legal team have real authority, or are they just enforcing foreign policies? Always review the contract with an employment lawyer. If it limits you to the minimum protections under the Employment Standards Act, that's a red flag. Your values should align with your employer's culture and legal commitments. The law can protect you — but it will not and cannot buffer every cultural mismatch. Choose employers whose expectations respect both your rights and your personality. Because in the end, who you work for speaks volumes about who you are. Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt LLP, employment and labour lawyers with offices in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. He practices employment law in eight provinces and is the author of six books, including the Law of Dismissal in Canada. Jarret M. Janis is head of the Alberta office of Levitt LLP. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trading Day: Markets rise above the fray
ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist For all that the uncertainty around Washington's global tariff war and worrisome U.S. fiscal outlook continue to unnerve investors, not to mention the Trump-Musk public mud-slinging circus, world markets just closed out a quietly impressive week. Broad U.S., Asian, European and emerging market equity benchmarks all rose, pushing the MSCI World index to a fresh record high, while the dollar, Treasury yields and gold generally held steady over the week. Of course, these broad sweeps mask some notable price moves in certain assets, such as Tesla's 14% share price crash on Thursday, Treasury yields spiking up to 15 basis points on Friday after the latest nonfarm payrolls data, or the dollar sliding to within touching distance of a new three-year low on Thursday. Investors appear to be in a forgiving mood, willing to trust that policymakers will dial down global trade tensions, slow the U.S. fiscal train as it approaches the cliff edge, and steer the world economy through these choppy waters with minimum damage. Investors faced several key monetary policy crosswinds this week. The Bank of Canada stood pat and the European Central Bank cut rates by a quarter of a percentage point, but their guidance was seen as relatively hawkish. The Canadian dollar and euro both strengthened. On the other hand, Switzerland's slide into deflation ups the ante on the Swiss National Bank and traders are betting on a return to negative interest rates by the end of the year. Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of India on Friday cut rates by more than expected. Fed officials mostly continue to hold the line that uncertainty around tariffs and their impact on growth and inflation is so high that the central bank is firmly in the 'wait and see' camp. If the Fed is to resume its easing cycle, it won't be until October, according to rates futures market pricing. With global central banks perhaps entering a summer pause, focus will intensify on the Trump administration's trade deal negotiations with major trading partners like China and Europe ahead of July 9, when Washington's pause on reciprocal tariffs expires. U.S. President Donald Trump indicated that his 90-minute telephone call with China's Xi Jinping on Thursday was friendly, and there were lots of smiles in his meeting later that day in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. But ultimately, the call with Xi yielded nothing concrete, although U.S.-China talks will take place in London next week. And it is through the 27-nation European Union that any deal with Germany will be reached, not bilaterally. There are so many moving parts on Washington's tariff board, including but not restricted to: sector tariffs, reciprocal tariffs, bilateral negotiations with dozens of countries, and court rulings and counter rulings. It's a little surprising, perhaps, that investors' glass is half full. I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at . You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @ This Week's Key Market Moves * The Tesla rollercoaster. Shares in Elon Musk's EVcompany fell 15%, wiping $155 billion off its market cap. Sharesare down 27% this year, the most of the world's top 20companies, wiping $330 billion off its value. * The S&P 500 closes above 6000 points for the first timesince February, and the Nasdaq rises more than 2% for a secondweek despite Tesla's tumble, indicating an otherwise solidrevival in U.S. AI/tech. Global stocks hit a record high withthe MSCI World index up 1.5% on the week. * Precious metals shine. Silver rises nearly 10%, its bestweek since September, climbing to a 13-year high of $36/ also up 10%, for a second week in three. * U.S. crude oil futures rise 6% to trade above $64/bbl,the biggest weekly rise since September, on supply concerns andhopes of a thaw in U.S.-Sino trade tensions. * U.S. bond yield curves flatten, led by selloff at theshort end, retracing some of the recent steepening. 2s/10s curveflattens 11 bps this week, the most since February. Chart of the Week Again, two charts for you this week, both on tariffs. The first shows how much tariff-related turmoil the S&P 500 has navigated since Trump was sworn in. In many ways, it's remarkable that the index is up on the year. The second is based on a New York Fed survey published this week showing how U.S. firms are passing on price increases to customers. Most strikingly, almost half of services companies are passing on 100% of the tariffs. Here are some of the best things I read this week: 1. U.S. Outlook: Unsure - Mark Zandi 2. King Trump vs. the Bond Market - Kenneth Rogoff 3. America's Retreat Is Europe's Big Opportunity - PinelopiKoujianou Goldberg 4. US tariffs and global inflation - Robin Brooks 5. How Should Europe Respond to King Donald? - Brad Setser What could move markets on Monday? * Japan GDP (Q1, final) * Japan trade, current account (April) * China PPI and CPI inflation (May) * China trade (May) * Taiwan trade (May) Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here. (Writing by Jamie McGeever; Editing by Marguerita Choy)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Utah pursuing AI data centers is pure stupidity
Construction proceeds at a data center in Eagle Mountain, Utah, in 2021. Across the country, some state lawmakers are concerned that the growing data center industry is creating a surge in demand for new electricity and grid infrastructure. () Since the legislature established the Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA) in 2018, UIPA has demonstrated an ability to spend millions of tax payer money on one bad idea after another. The latest is to bring artificial intelligence (AI) data centers to their Wasatch Front project areas. UIPA is being caught up in a 21st century gold rush, but like the one in 1848, it will turn out to be mostly fool's gold. Nationwide, state and local officials are fast tracking data center permits in their communities, foolishly giving them enormous tax breaks. Most of the biggest data centers are being built by the mega-billionaire tech bros like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg, the very same people who are already hoarding unprecedented wealth and power. Much of the impetus for these data centers has degenerated into a race between these mega-billionaires to see who ultimately dominates the holy grail of computing — 'artificial general intelligence' (AGI), essentially human brain level sophisticated computation. Data center construction has doubled just since 2022, and the only result is further concentration of wealth and power at the top of big tech. The tech bros race to rule AGI is the crown jewel in their pathologic ethos of 'move fast and break things.' Numerous experts are warning about the existential danger of AGI. It will render many jobs obsolete, it represents a grave national security threat, and it blurs the lines between truth and fiction. This next level AI creates new content by analyzing and mimicking patterns from vast amounts of existing data. Its uses are far beyond helping students to cheat on writing papers. It's being used to spread climate misinformation, exacerbate housing discrimination of Black communities, create increasingly sophisticated phishing scams, and assisting state and corporate surveillance, monitoring workers' every move. AI is stymieing worker critical thinking and not delivering productivity gains. A State Department report concluded AI could pose an 'extinction-level' threat, comparing it to the threat of nuclear weapons if not regulated. AI workers are concerned about the irresponsibility, and perverse motives of these tech companies' executives. Our environment is another one of the things they are 'breaking.' Data centers already rank in the top 10 water-consuming industries. Data centers can consume up to 5 million gallons of potable water a day, 25 times the 200,000 gallon commercial limit set by Salt Lake City. Good luck saving Great Salt Lake if we surround it with UIPA-subsidized data centers. Cryptocurrency serves no useful purpose and requires massive AI computations. Each Bitcoin transaction generates the equivalent carbon footprint of one million VISA transactions. Bitcoin is already one of the leading global industrial polluters. The quality of the algorithms is dependent on the size of the computing systems, and AGI can require 10 to 100 times more computing power than say GPT-4, with an exponential increase in energy demand. One complex can require 100 MW of electricity, the entire output of a small coal-fired power plant. Energy demand from AI data centers is forecasted to more than quadruple by 2030, strain on local electrical grids will be substantial. 'Hyperscale' data centers can require dozens of highly polluting diesel generators for back-up power. AGI electricity demand is undermining decarbonization strategies worldwide, driving an increase in carbon emissions at the worst possible time for climate mitigation. Gov. Spencer Cox cited electricity demands of AI as contributing to Utah's 'energy crisis' justifying his 'Operation Gigawatt,' a promotion of his 'all of the above' strategy, including more polluting, climate killing fossil fuels and risky nuclear power. Data centers are noise pollution centers. They emit constant humming and buzzing that can exceed 85 decibels, which is bothersome and harmful to neighbors. Noise pollution is the second most hazardous environmental pollutant after air pollution, causing many of the same adverse health outcomes. Musk's xAI is being used primarily for his chatbot, Grok, which allows creation of unfiltered deepfake images, like Mickey Mouse wearing a Nazi uniform, and ever more pornography. Musk calls it 'the most fun AI in the world.' The environmental price tag of all that 'fun' is enormous. For example, Musk's AI supercomputer center in Memphis, Tennessee, uses 35 methane driven gas turbines, none have pollution controls required by EPA. It is already one of the largest emitters of toxic nitrogen oxides in a highly polluted county, far more than an oil refinery. Imagine if Utah allowed UIPA to bring several of these to Salt Lake, Tooele, and Weber Counties, each emitting far more pollution than another oil refinery. In many ways the explosion of artificial intelligence is already harming society and threatening our future. We should rename it 'artificial stupidity.' Utah should be smarter than to allow UIPA to drag us into competing for tax payer subsidized big tech data centers, leaving the rest of us as collateral damage.
