logo
Author Elif Shafak, once put on trial for 'insulting Turkishness', warns of crackdown on free speech

Author Elif Shafak, once put on trial for 'insulting Turkishness', warns of crackdown on free speech

Sky News12-03-2025

"When history takes a darker turn, it always starts with the omission of words."
Award-winning Turkish author Elif Shafak sat down with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on The World podcast to talk about her latest novel There Are Rivers In The Sky, the parallels she sees between Turkey and America, and what it was like being on trial for "insulting Turkishness".
In 2006, Elif Shafak's fictional characters from her bestselling novel The Bastard Of Istanbul were put on trial in a Turkish courtroom.
It was the first time ever a Turkish author had been accused of "insulting Turkishness" under Article 301 of the country's law.
The novel outraged many nationalists for its featuring of the Armenian Genocide, which Shafak says "is still one of the biggest taboos in Turkey" today.
Street mobs burned and spat on pictures of her, torched EU flags in the streets, and called her a traitor.
She was acquitted but relocated to London after the "scary" and "unsettling" episode.
Nineteen years later and Shafak is worried that this crackdown on free speech is being replicated across the West.
Notably, for her, she sees the echoes in America.
"When history takes a darker turn, it always starts with the omission of words," Shafak warns. She points to the book bans across the United States - PEN America has counted more than 10,000 bans in public schools - which "we haven't seen anything like" since the McCarthy era.
Shafak is also worried how the original idealism of the internet has become corrupted.
"Everyone was going to have a voice," she says. "Everybody's voice was going to be heard. What happened is amidst this noise and cacophony, people feel like they're not being heard.
"One of the biggest ironies is, unfortunately, oftentimes populist demagogues are better at connecting with people's emotions than their liberal counterparts."
She believes this has created an ideal breeding ground for populist demagogues like Erdogan in her native Turkey, Viktor Orban in Hungary and now Donald Trump in America.
For Shafak, these populist leaders correctly identify the problems but "what is not true is the solutions they are promising".
"They're promising us simplicity, fake solutions."
The answer to this "age of anxiety" for Shafak lies in confronting these emotions head on and channelling them correctly.
"We have to turn these emotions that we find debilitating into something much more positive and constructive, both for ourselves and for our communities and for humanity. And the only way to do that is by reconnecting."
This is no small task in a world where algorithms create highly personalised echo chambers. Add to that a concerted retreat of a globalist outlook and it could be an uphill battle for the likes of Shafak.
Nevertheless, she is steadfast in her commitment to the arts. For Shafak, the need for literature in this populist age has never been greater.
If history is decided by those who write it, Shafak uses her novels to bring to life those who have been forgotten. Shafak's books have always been entangled in how memory shapes political discourse.
Her new book, There Are Rivers In The Sky is no different. One of the three protagonists in the novel is a young Yazidi girl. The choice is deliberate.
In a community where history is passed down orally, "if you kill the elderly, basically you're killing collective memory", she says - "and when you kill collective memory, you kill collective identity".
To immortalise them in ink is a way for her to record their suffering, and resilience, in permanent form.
In 2014, ISIS carried out a genocide against the Yazidi people, wiping out whole villages and enslaving thousands of young women and girls as sexual slaves to serve ISIS fighters across the region.
5:58
More than 3,000 Yazidi women are still missing. One young Yazidi woman was found in a street near to where Shafak grew up in Ankara while she was writing the book.
"How is it possible that a human being is kept in a house under these circumstances for years, and the entire neighbourhood doesn't know, doesn't see?"
It is her compulsion to make the world see atrocities like this that compels Shafak to keep writing.
And despite the many challenges that the world faces today, she remains, at heart, a firm believer in the human spirit and the transformative power of art and literature for now and future generations.
"In every family there's at least one memory keeper," she says. "And I think writers are the memory keepers of their societies.
"One thing that makes me very happy is that the novel, even in this age of hyper information and instant gratification, the long form of the novel continues to thrive, and we are seeing more and more young men coming to literary events and reading novels.
"So there is, I think, enormous hope in that too."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Daily Mirror

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. ‌ The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. ‌ The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. ‌ Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.

Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports
Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports

In a huge blow to Brits, EU countries have green-lighted controversial plans to lengthen the wait time before delayed passengers can claim compensation for both short and long-haul journeys Customers flying with some big name air operators on short-haul flights have been hit with a brutal four-hour warning over a controversial shakeup. After 12 years of wrangling, EU countries have green-lighted plans to lengthen the wait time before flyers can lodge claims for delayed flights. Currently, passengers have to be delayed by more than three hours before qualifying for compensation. ‌ However, under the new stipulations - which still have to be negotiated with the European Parliament before they become law - short-haul travellers will only be eligible to claim compensation after being delayed by four hours or more, while those on longer journeys will have to sit tight for a six-hour hold-up before they can lodge a compensation claim. ‌ It's not all bad news though, as EU nations have also agreed to increase the amount of compensation for those delayed on short-haul journeys from €250 (approx £210.47) to €300 (£252.56). But, passengers hit with delays on long-haul flights could see their compensation reduce from €600 (£505) to €500 (£420). The trade body Airlines for Europe (A4E), which represents companies such as Ryanair, easyJet and Lufthansa, and The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, both slammed the rules - arguing it would deprive the majority of passengers from being able to claim compensation. This is because most delays are only between two and four hours. "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver," A4E said. "Member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity." According to Yorkshire Live, German members of the European People's Party have also expressed their disapproval, stating that 'decreasing the rights to compensation for air passengers would be a step in the wrong direction'. "Reimbursement after a three-hour delay has been standard for many years and should remain so," they added. ‌ A senior EU diplomat is believed to have said that 'no politician wants to say more than four hours' at risk of dampening Europeans' holiday plans. The news comes amidst accusations by 16 consumer protection associations from 12 Member States against seven budget airlines for imposing unfair charges on passengers' hand luggage. "The European Court of Justice has made it very clear that hand baggage is an integral part of the basic ticket price. Normally, there is no surcharge on the price as long as the hand luggage is of a reasonable size," explained Steven Berger, a solicitor with the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC). "All we're seeing is a proliferation of airlines charging for this baggage... We're calling for very clear rules. Passengers must be able to take one piece of luggage, a small suitcase or a rucksack." He added: "At the moment, there are two different opposing positions among the member states in the Council. On the whole, you have the camp of the member states that are going to defend the three hours to be able to benefit from the right to compensation and others that are going to ask for five hours and nine hours based on distance. So right now this is really the big source of conflict." *Prices based on EUR to GBP conversions at the time of writing.

Opposition calls for ‘vote of conscience' on Israel Bonds
Opposition calls for ‘vote of conscience' on Israel Bonds

BreakingNews.ie

time10 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Opposition calls for ‘vote of conscience' on Israel Bonds

Opposition parties have requested a free 'vote of conscience' on a motion calling on the Government to stop the Central Bank from facilitating the sale of Israel Bonds. The Central Bank of Ireland is the designated authority in relation to the sale of Israel Bonds in the EU. Advertisement Israel Bonds have been advertised as supporting the country's economy, and more recently, websites promoting the securities emphasise their role in supporting Israel's military operations in Gaza. The Central Bank is responsible for assessing whether a prospectus for the offer of securities is in compliance with requirements of the EU Prospectus Regulation, with the authority saying approval should not be viewed as 'an endorsement of the issuer'. Protesters have demonstrated outside the Central Bank and called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. Last month, a Sinn Féin bill which would have imposed restrictions securities on behalf of Israel was defeated after the Government voted against the draft legislation. Advertisement On Wednesday, the Dáil will vote on a motion on the matter brought by a number of opposition parties during the Social Democrats' time. The motion says the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza and argues Ireland has an obligations under the Genocide Convention to use all means likely to have a deterrent effect on those suspected of preparing genocide. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Social Democrats TD Sinead Gibney said: 'We have failed as an international community to prevent a genocide from happening so now we have to do everything in our power to make sure that we stop it.' She added: 'We are urging the Government to allow a free vote, a vote of conscience, because we believe that this is something that many TDs will support if given the opportunity. Advertisement 'And we absolutely urge the government to support this motion.' Sinn Féin TD Sean Crowe said he believes the gap between the vote on the Sinn Féin Bill and this motion will given TDs 'time to reflect'. My statement on the #Madleen . The question we should be asking today is not the merits or otherwise of a flotilla but how the world is shamefully turning a blind eye to children starving in Gaza and to a humanitarian catastrophe — Simon Harris TD (@SimonHarrisTD) June 9, 2025 Meanwhile, Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Harris called on Israel to lift a blockade on aid into Gaza. It comes after Israeli forces stopped a Gaza-bound aid boat and detained activists on board early on Monday, enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory. Advertisement Mr Harris said the vessel was an 'unarmed civilian effort' to get food and medicine to the 'starving people of Gaza' in the midst of 'devastation and catastrophic humanitarian conditions'. Ireland Boylan accuses Government of 'cop out' on Occupied... Read More He added: 'The UN and humanitarian organisations must be allowed to work independently and do their job. 'It is a shame on the world and international community that people are starving in Gaza. 'The question we should be asking today is not a debate about the merits or not of the flotilla but how it has come to this; that the world is turning a blind eye to starving children in Gaza.' Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store