Labour's border bill to 'block migrants from claiming slavery protections'
Labour's new small boats legislation will reportedly retain a number of controversial measures the party previously opposed, including a ban on migrants claiming modern slavery protections and powers to detain children.
The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill – set to be published on Thursday – is expected to include new counterterrorism-style powers to target people smugglers, including the seizure of mobile phones and financial assets.
Sir Keir Starmer has promised to use the legislation to 'smash the gangs' and significantly reduce the number of people illegally arriving in the UK, with more than a thousand people having arrived in the UK via small boat this year so far.
While Labour previously accused the Tories of trashing slavery protections through their 2023 Illegal Migration Act - which the party repeatedly voted against - the new bill will reportedly fail to reverse a number of measures included in the old bill.
According to The Times, the legislation is expected to include a ban on illegal migrants claiming protections under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, as well as powers to detain child refugees for up to 28 days.
Victims of modern slavery who arrived in the UK illegally were prevented from accessing the UK's national referral mechanism (NRM) under the last government's legislation — the system for supporting and identifying victims.
Sir Keir Starmer said the legislation would 'drive a coach and horses' through protections for women who were trafficked to the UK as victims of modern slavery.
Meanwhile, Jess Phillips – who now sits in Sir Keir's government as safeguarding minister – claimed it was as a 'a traffickers' dream, a tool for their control' as it effectively hid modern slavery victims from UK authorities.
But the Conservative government argued that the NRM was being unfairly used by migrants to avoid deportation.
Mr Sunak's illegal migration act also allowed unaccompanied children to be detained for up to eight days, and up to 28 if their age was under dispute by the Home Office. This is also said to be retained in the new bill.
In addition, the government is expected to retain the cap on the number of migrants who can arrive each year on safe and legal routes - a measure which government sources told The Times was imposed to mitigate criticism from the Conservatives and Reform UK.
The legislation is expected to see people-smuggling suspects facing travel bans and social media blackouts as part of an attempt to crack down on organised immigration crime.
Court orders to restrict the activity of those under investigation for such crimes will be strengthened, with suspects facing bans on laptop or mobile phones, accessing social media networks, associating with certain people, or accessing their finances under the measures announced by the Home Office.
Serious Crime Prevention Orders (SCPOs) can already be sought to curb the movement of people involved in organised immigration crime.
But the government said the measures are not being used to their full effect and plans to introduce new 'interim' SCPOs designed to place 'immediate' restrictions on suspects' activity while a full order is considered by the courts.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Dangerous criminal people-smugglers are profiting from undermining our border security and putting lives at risk. They cannot be allowed to get away with it.
'Stronger international collaboration has already led to important arrests and action against dangerous gangs over the last few months.
'We will give law enforcement stronger powers they need to pursue and stop more of these vile gang networks.
'Border security is one of the foundations of this Government's Plan for Change, including making people better off, delivering safer streets and strengthening our NHS, and we will do everything in our power to deliver for working people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faces the most serious revolt of his premiership (Ben Stansall/PA) A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Angela Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers on Wednesday (Andrew Milligan/PA) The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country Labour backbencher One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so, including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut to the benefits bill.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer prepares welfare concessions amid backlash over benefit cuts
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing a climbdown as a major rebellion builds against his planned benefit cuts, Downing Street has suggested. The prime minister will be locked in talks on Thursday with backbench Labour MPs to find concessions to help him stave off an embarrassing defeat. After more than 120 of his own MPs signed an amendment threatening to kill his welfare reform bill, a Downing Street source said ministers are 'talking to colleagues about the bill and the changes it will bring'. But, after days of appearing to rule out changes to the legislation, which aims to cut the welfare bill by £5bn, the source told reporters that 'we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday'. And Douglas Alexander said on Thursday that, having read the rebel amendment, 'the first thing that strikes you is that everyone agrees welfare needs reform and that the system is broken'. The trade minister told Sky News: 'Everyone recognizes you're trying to take people off benefits and into work, because that's better for them and also better for our fiscal position. 'Where there is some disagreement at the moment is on the issue of how you give implementation to those principles.' Mr Alexander said a second reading vote like Tuesday's was usually on the principles of legislation, but the rebellion has forced ministers to consider 'how to give implementation to those principles'. 'So given the high level of agreement on the principles, the discussions over the coming days will really be about the implementation of those principles,' he said. It came after Labour MPs called for 'regime change' in Downing Street, with some elected last summer lashing out at the 'over-excitable boys' in Sir Keir's top team. Many blame the PM's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, for ignoring the concerns of backbenchers 'We are all very happy that we have a leader who's so respected around the world… we just think he needs fewer over-excitable boys in his team,' one MP told The Times. The total number of Labour MPs who have signed the amendment against Sir Keir's welfare cuts hit 126 on Wednesday, despite rebels having been warned with potential de-selections and the government's potential collapse if they support it. Efforts to win over rebels had been led by health secretary Wes Streeting, chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, and work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the government, Angela Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values. "I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight," the deputy prime minister said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. "Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable." She acknowledged that "a lot of people are very scared about these changes" but added: "I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. "What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs." The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. The fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the "reasoned amendment" calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill said: "A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. "It's not very grown up." They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: "I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board." According to the government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty.
Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
No10 hints at benefit cut climbdown as more Labour MPs join rebellion
No10 is locked in crisis talks with angry backbenchers amid speculation a crunch vote on welfare reform might be pulled. An insider told the BBC ministers "want" to hold a vote on Tuesday in a sign of a possible climbdown. Yesterday both Keir Starmer and Deputy PM Angela Rayner insisted they would be pushing ahead with the controversial shake-up. But with 126 Labour MPs signing an amendment that could torpedo the plan, the Government could face an embarrassing defeat if it goes ahead. Last night Ms Rayner said talks were "ongoing". Asked about possible concessions, she told ITV's Peston programme: "I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight. Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable." She acknowledged that "a lot of people are very scared about these changes" but added: "I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. "What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs." In an apparent softening of words, a No10 source told the BBC: "Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the bill and the changes it will bring. "We want to start delivering this together on Tuesday." The source added: "The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this." The latest names to add their names to the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier include Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, and backbenchers Gareth Snell, Sarah Edwards, Irene Campbell and Pam Cox. The Government's plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (PIP) and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. A disgruntled Labour MP said: "I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board." According to the Government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty. Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: "No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity."
