Xiaomi's YU7 car buyers face year-long wait for delivery, sparking complaints
SHANGHAI, July 1 (Reuters) - China's Xiaomi (1810.HK), opens new tab is telling customers of its new YU7 electric sports utility vehicle they will have to wait more than a year to receive their cars, sparking a fresh wave of complaints against the company.
The smartphone turned EV maker said it received roughly 240,000 orders for the YU7 in the first 18 hours after the car went on sale on Thursday night, but only a small number of vehicles were available for immediate delivery.
By Tuesday, the Xiaomi app showed purchasers were facing a wait of between 38 and 60 weeks, according to Reuters checks.
Since Friday, more than 400 buyers have lodged complaints on Sina's Black Cat consumer complaint platform saying they were not made aware of the long wait and demanding a refund, according to a Reuters review of the records on the platform.
Buyers had to make a non-refundable deposit of 5,000 yuan ($697.97) to place their order.
They said the official app only showed the estimated waiting time for the car after the order had been confirmed. They also raised concerns about whether the longer wait would mean they would have to pay more because a tax exemption for EVs is set to expire at the end of this year.
Xiaomi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Its charismatic CEO Lei Jun said on his Weibo account, where he has 26.8 million followers, that he would answer some questions raised after the YU7 launch in a livestreaming event on Wednesday.
Xiaomi made a huge splash in China's EV market with the launch of its first vehicle, the SU7 sedan, in March last year. While early buyers of the SU7 initially faced waits of up to 7 months it has outsold Tesla's Model 3 in China on a monthly basis since December.
The company has been grappling with a consumer backlash since a fatal crash involving an SU7 in March. It has also faced complaints over the confusion surrounding vehicle delivery times, as well as optional features.
The YU7 is Xiaomi's second model and priced from 253,500 yuan ($35,360), nearly 4% less than Tesla's Model Y, currently China's best-selling SUV. Lei has been open about how Xiaomi wants to challenge Tesla's Model Y for the top spot.
Xiaomi has been ramping up output at its Beijing plant and plans new factories on two plots of land nearby. Monthly output has increased to 28,000 units in May from 4,000 units last March.
($1 = 7.1636 Chinese yuan renminbi)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Standard Chartered faces $2.7bn lawsuit over 1MDB scandal
Standard Chartered is facing a $2.7billion law suit over allegations of fraud related to the 1MDB Malaysian fund scandal. Claimants for the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad have accused the Asia-focused banking giant of failing to conduct the necessary anti-money laundering checks. They accuse StanChart of allowing 100 intrabank transfers between 2009 and 2013 that helped obscure the flow of stolen funds despite several red flags indicating the money might be connected to illegal activity. Liquidators from financial services group Kroll filed the lawsuit in the High Court of Singapore on Monday. Kroll says it has identified over $2.7billion of illicit money that flowed through StanChart, including transfers to a bank account belonging to former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak. It also stated that transfers involved business payments and Razak's wife and stepson receiving jewellery and luxury goods. Accusation: Standard Chartered is facing a $2.7billion legal case over allegations of fraud related to the 1MDB financial scandal. It has strenuously denied the claims Razak is currently serving a six-year prison term after being found guilty in 2020 of money laundering, criminal breach of trust, and abuse of power. 'According to this lawsuit, the transfers demonstrate serious breaches and control failings which ultimately enabled the theft of public funds by people operating at the highest levels of the Malaysian government during that period,' said the liquidators. StanChart has strenuously denied the claims, telling Reuters they are 'without merit' and that they will 'vigorously defend any lawsuit commenced by the liquidators'. The 1MDB scandal is often regarded as Malaysia's biggest ever political scandal and one of the worst global cases of financial kleptocracy. US authorities estimate that $4.5billion was looted from 1MDB, which was ostensibly set up to promote the development of Malaysia, but ended up funding the purchase of luxury houses, artwork, a private jet and even the film 'The Wolf of Wall Street'. They suspect businessman Low Taek Jho, also known as Jho Low, masterminded the massive embezzlement through several schemes. Low, who has been on the run since 2016, has denied all allegations. StanChart said on Tuesday that liquidators had previously claimed the firms implicated in the fraud were shell companies with no legitimate business. Another prominent figure in the 1MDB affair, ex-Goldman Sachs banker Tim Leissner, was sentenced to two years behind bars in late May after pleading guilty to federal bribery charges. A 1MDB board spokesperson said: 'The Malaysian people were the true victims of this global fraud, and all parties are determined to hold every facilitator to account - including financial institutions that failed in their most basic duties of vigilance and responsibility.' In 2016, StanChart was fined S$5.2million (US$4million) by Singapore's central bank - The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) - for breaking anti-money laundering rules. MAS said the company's breaches were 'serious,' but did not uncover 'pervasive control weaknesses or wilful misconduct'. Standard Chartered shares were 2.9 per cent lower at 1,172.5p on Tuesday morning, making them one of the FTSE 100's biggest fallers.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starbucks under fresh pressure as China's biggest coffee chain opens first US locations with $2 drinks
A Starbucks competitor has opened its first location in the US. Luckin Coffee, known for its no-frills menu and ultra-low prices, has already given Starbucks a run for its money in its home country of China. It has now opened its first two American shops this week — both near the campus of New York University. The Big Apple's newest coffee shop opened on Monday. The chain celebrated Monday's opening with free tote bags with for the first 100 guests and $.99 drinks for early customers. In China, the no-frills coffee chain has consistently pulled in young shoppers, with aggressive TikTok campaigns and low prices. Luckin's strategy is clear: keep it simple and cheap. Lattes, matchas, and cold brews go for as little as $2 to $3 — significantly less than Starbucks. It also has a small assortment of pastries. Diners can order some fruit-forward refresher drinks, too. In China, the brand has leaned into aggressive TikTok marketing and a grab-and-go model that caters to students and professionals on the run. The chain has a history of undercutting Starbuck's value. A standard cup of Starbucks coffee will typically cost New Yorkers around $6 to $7. In China, Starbucks drinks are typically 30 percent more expensive than Luckin's. Luckin has used its simple, easily-scaled restaurants with bargain basement prices to become one of China's biggest restaurant chains. By 2019, the brand had overtaken Starbucks as the largest coffee chain in China. It currently operates 22,000 stores in the country, triple the size of the Seattle-based brewer's Chinese locations. Meanwhile, Starbucks' forray into the Chinese market is appearing to lose steam. The company is fighting off rumors that it was exploring a sale of all its Chinese store locations. The New York openings also come as Starbucks attempts to mount a sales ressurgence back in the US. Last year, Starbucks posted declining growth, prompting a wave of changes in the company's restaurants and in the C-suite. The coffee chain slashed products from its menus, changed its perks programs, and pilfered Chipotle's CEO to become the coffee chain's top boss. The chain has reintroduced ceramic mugs, slashed some of its complicated menu items, and changed its rewards program to become more competitive 'People love Starbucks, but I've heard from some customers that we've drifted from our core,' Brian Niccol, the new CEO, said during a 2024 earnings call. 'As a result, some are visiting less often, and I think today's results tell that same story.' In April, the company reported a two percent increase in net sales. But Niccol said the company is still facing headwinds from higher costs and decreasing consumer strength. Meanwhile, Starbucks might not be the only coffee chain in the Chinese coffee-makers sights. Luckin's new stores could also lure coffee drinkers away from Dunkin ($2.15 to $3.50 average coffee price) and Tim Hortons ($3 average price). If it expands westward, the Chinese coffee chain could set its sights on Dutch Bros ($5.25 average price).
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Cristiano Ronaldo's £492m Saudi deal: two cynical regimes form a strategic alliance
The winners of next season's AFC Champions League Two, Asia's second-tier club competition, will receive about £1.8m. The winners of the Saudi King's Cup will receive just over £1m. Prize money for the Saudi Pro League is not disclosed, but by the most recent available figures (for 2022-23) is in roughly the same area. Weekly attendances at the King Saud University Stadium, where top-tier ticket prices start at about £12, range between 10,000 and 25,000, although of course you also have to factor in pie and programme sales above that. And so you really have to applaud Al-Nassr's ambition in handing an estimated £492m to Cristiano Ronaldo over the next two years. Even if they sweep the board at domestic level, if they fight their way past Istiklol of Tajikistan's 1xBet Higher League and Al-Wehdat of the Jordanian Pro League, if they extract maximum value from merch and sponsorships, you still struggle to see how they can cover a basic salary that comes to £488,000 a day, even before the bonuses and blandishments that will push the total package well beyond that. According to reports, the deal also involves Ronaldo taking a 15% ownership stake in Al-Nassr, extra incentives for winning the Pro League or the Golden Boot, a private jet allowance, 16 full-time staff including two chefs and three gardeners, and a bonus for every time he successfully presses an opposition player. Last one was a joke, obvs. And amid the stultifying assault of numbers, Ronaldo's new contract – announced to great fanfare last week – marks a significant shift in the evolution of the superstar athlete, a further blurring of the lines between what we used to call 'sport' and what we used to call 'the other stuff'. The first question to put: what exactly is Saudi Arabia getting for its money? Because of course Al-Nassr are a majority fund-owned club, an arm of the Saudi state, which is funnelling untold riches into its domestic league free from the encumbrance of cost controls or financial fair play rules. Ronaldo himself is in effect a Saudi employee, albeit one who has enjoyed much better fortune then most migrant workers who have entered the country in recent years. On the pitch, Ronaldo's influence has been highly visible: 99 goals in 111 games under four coaches. Give him a half-chance in a tight space and even at the age of 40, there are still few players you would back over him. At the same time Al-Nassr have won no major trophies since his arrival and the club's two other big attacking talents, Jhon Durán and Sadio Mané, have found themselves overshadowed to such an extent that both may leave this summer. Let's charitably describe this one as: jury out. In recent months there was talk of Ronaldo getting a short-term deal to play in the Club World Cup, a competition that would seem perfect for him: based entirely around celebrity power, influencer fame and a distinct lack of running. Politically and commercially, there was literally no reason for this not to happen. And so we can conclude that while many clubs were interested in his star wattage, none were prepared to pay the going rate to remould their entire system around a 40-year-old striker who lost his last half-yard of pace in about 2017. But of course these days what Ronaldo can do on a football pitch is but a fraction of his total appeal. In an age when power itself is being reimagined along the lines of social media clout, when the attention economy and the actual economy are rapidly converging into one and the same thing, the fact Ronaldo is the most followed person on Instagram – and the third-most followed on X behind Elon Musk and Barack Obama – matters. In a way Ronaldo's fame renders him a kind of one-man city state, an influencer first and an athlete second, his goals and assists entirely tangential to the eyeballs he can garner in the process. What we have, in essence, is the professional athlete reimagined as a kind of plutocratic demigod, able to construct entire new realities around themselves. One in which the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia will be 'the most beautiful ever', or where the Saudi Pro League is 'one of the top five leagues in the world', as he recently put it. 'It's highly competitive, and those who don't know that simply haven't played here.' Fundamentally, this is not true on any measure: Opta ranks the Saudi Pro League as the world's 29th best. And of course by his own criteria, Ronaldo would have had to play in all the others in order to make a reasoned assessment. But when you have 659 million Instagram followers, perhaps whatever you say becomes true simply by saying it. Which is not to say the football is an irrelevance. Football is clearly still inherent to Ronaldo's self-image, albeit these days more as an adjunct to his power than as the source of it. Ronaldo still plays football in the same way that Donald Trump plays golf: as part of a broader cult of personality, something to get photographed doing, content for the feed. A branding exercise stripped entirely of context or objective judgment, complete with massaged numbers and a coterie of obedient applauding acolytes. As is the continuing fixation on his physique, the positioning of Ronaldo as a kind of Übermensch, a transcendent individual, a higher form of biology, albeit one that still possesses an unerring ability to put free-kicks straight into the wall. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion And so Al-Nassr (and to a lesser extent the Portuguese national team) are no longer paying for Ronaldo the footballer. What they're buying is Ronaldo the spiritual leader, the attention machine, the aura, the abdominals, the soft-power influence. They're buying a place on his grid, the opportunity to allow one of the world's most famous men to do their bidding. Perhaps it helps to think of his new contract as a kind of trade deal, a strategic alliance between two cynical regimes drunk on their own power and with largely congruent social views. 'I belong to Saudi Arabia,' Ronaldo stated proudly on announcing his new contract last week. And of course many star athletes in many sports have succumbed to the lure of the Saudi riyal, and will continue to do so. But there is a tonal difference between taking the money of a rogue state and actively advocating for them on the broadest possible stage. For years we have spoken of Saudi investment as a kind of moral dilemma, a fine balance of pecuniary motives, reputational concerns and human rights. For Ronaldo, it is clear that no such dilemma exists.
