
The double council tax loophole that will cost councils £334million - as locals in second home hotspots 'pay the price'
Second home owners dodging the double council tax bill is set to cost local authorities £334million.
Since April 1, local authorities have been able to charge a 100 per cent premium on second homes under new powers introduced in the 2023 Levelling Up and Regeneration Act. In Wales, they can charge premiums of up to 300 per cent.
However, crafty property barons found a loophole which allows them to dodge paying their taxes by classifying their second homes as holiday lets and renting them out for 70 nights of the year.
The tax dodging move means the properties qualify for business rates relief and also makes owners exempt from paying any council tax at all.
In the past year, the sum of lost council tax revenue has doubled from £170m, according to research by property firm Colliers.
Now, politicians and experts say the soaring figures prove the 100 per cent premium tax raid is doing more harm than good.
Shadow housing minister Kevin Hollinrake critiscied the Government for their backfiring tax raid.
'Labour couldn't even be bothered to carry out any impact assessment, nor have they asked councils to restrict the policy to where there are localised problems in the housing market,' he said.
John Webber, of Colliers, said it's 'making the situation even worse' and pointed out that 'less money will be collected locally' which will result in less spending on things locals actually need, such as public services or affordable housing.
He added: 'The problem is not second home owners; it is politicians failing to understand the issues and having the courage to do something about it.'
A whopping 230 out of 296 councils in England, and 20 out of 22 in Wales took the Government up on their offer and imposed the inflated levy.
To be considered a holiday let, owners must make their property available for at least 140 nights and actually let it out to visitors for 70 nights in one year.
In order to work out the business rates bill an owner pays, the council uses the property's rateable value which is based on its type, size, location and how much money they would make renting it out to holidaymakers.
If they only let one property then they may qualify for small business rates relief which could see them offered up to 100 per cent relief.
Properties with a rateable value of £12,001 to £15,000, will see the rate of relief go down gradually from 100 per cent to 0 per cent.
For example, if the rateable value is £13,500, the owner will get 50 per cent off their bill.
There are an estimated 73,838 holiday let properties that qualify for business rates relief in England and Wales.
This is down from 80,000 last year thanks to tougher restrictions but Colliers expects numbers to shoot up again due to the double tax raid.
Before 2023, property owners just had to declare an intention to use their home as a holiday let to meet the business rates relief qualifications.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
What in the World Why some athletes and musicians are using OnlyFans as a side hustle
OnlyFans is an online platform where people create content (photos, videos and live streams), which can be monetised. Although it hosts a variety of content across topics like fitness and cooking, OnlyFans is known widely for hosting adult content, much of it explicit. As its popularity has soared, so too has the controversy and stigma surrounding the platform. Last week, Kurts Adams Rozentals, a world-class British canoeist, revealed that he had been banned from competing by Paddle UK — the sport's governing body — after they learned he was an OnlyFans content creator. He told the BBC he started posting content because Paddle UK's annual grant of £16,000 was insufficient to cover rent, travel, food and other expenses associated with full-time training in London. BBC Business Reporter Charlotte Edwards explains exactly how the platform works and who owns it. She also gives us the latest on the embattled British canoer. Plus: Chimgozirim Nwokoma, a senior reporter for Tech Point Africa, tells us about All Access Fans — an African start-up that have taken inspiration from OnlyFans' subscription-based business model — and the reaction to it. Instagram: @bbcwhatintheworld Email: whatintheworld@ WhatsApp: +44 0330 12 33 22 6 Presenter: Hannah Gelbart Producers: William Lee Adams and Benita Barden Editor: Verity Wilde


BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK threatens to sue Abramovich over Chelsea sale
The UK government has threatened to sue former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich to make sure the money from the club's sale goes to £2.5bn in proceeds have been frozen in a UK bank account since the sale, with Mr Abramovich sanctioned after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February UK government wants the money to be for Ukrainian humanitarian aid, but Mr Abramovich has said he wants it to go to "all victims of the war in Ukraine".In a joint statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required." They said they wanted "to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible".They added: "The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. "We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far".The delay in releasing the funds centres on a disagreement between the UK government and his Abramovich - a Russian billionaire who made his fortune in oil and gas - was granted a special licence to sell Chelsea following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, providing he could prove he would not benefit from the is alleged to have strong ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, something he has cannot access the £2.5bn sale proceeds under UK sanctions but the money still legally belongs to he announced his decision to sell the club, he said proceeds from the sale would be donated via a foundation "for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine", which would include those in Russia. The UK government has pushed back and argued that the funds should only be spent on humanitarian efforts inside Ukraine.A House of Lords committee said last year said it was "incomprehensible" that Mr Abramovich's promise to use the funds to support Ukraine remained unfulfilled, and that the assets remained frozen."This impasse reflects badly on both Mr Abramovich and the government, which ought to have pushed for a more binding commitment," the report said.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UFC's Tom Aspinall moving on from 'retired' Jon Jones
June 3 - Interim UFC heavyweight champion Tom Aspinall considers Jon Jones to be retired and wants to move on. Aspinall has not stepped into the Octagon since July 27, 2024, when he successfully defended the interim title with a first round knockout of Curtis Blades. That victory avenged the lone UFC defeat for Aspinall (8-1, 15-3 overall). Aspinall's July victory and Jones' win over Stipe Miocic in November 2024 would appear to warrant a unification bout, but there has been no news in the last seven months and some are calling for Jones to be stripped of his title. Jones hasn't competed in that span. "Jon Jones is retired," Aspinall said on ESPN's "Good Guy/Bad Guy" podcast on Monday. "I want to say God bless him moving forward in what he does with his life and career. We move on. I'm the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. I'm ready to take on all comers and get this division moving again. Jones (28-1), a two-time light heavyweight champion, who won the vacant heavyweight belt in March 2023, views the situation differently than Aspinall. "The UFC, I and Tom, we all got a lot of stuff happening behind the scenes," Jones said at a seminar in Thailand while filming a reality show, according to The Independent. "They're one of the biggest organizations in sports and right now, Tom and I have agreed to wait for the UFC to make their announcements. So I legally can't really talk about it." UFC CEO Dana White has expressed optimism that the bout would take place. In November, he referred to the potential matchup "the biggest fight in heavyweight history," but, until Jones' statements in Thailand, Jones had not shown interest in fighting the Englishman. The hold-up has delayed most of the bouts between any of the top-ranked heavyweights. "The other guys don't want to fight anybody because they might be next themselves," Aspinall said. "Everybody else is scared to fight. Nobody wants to make the next move. The division is completely stuck. I am sick of the division being stuck. I'm there. I'm active. I'm getting better all the time. Just stick me in. I'm ready to fight all of them." --Field Level Media