logo
Big Pharma Has a Trump Problem

Big Pharma Has a Trump Problem

Miami Herald20 hours ago

President Donald Trump's clamp-down on federal science funding has handed Big Pharma an existential headache: the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has terminated more than 2,100 research grants and contracts, according to NIH scientists, totaling around $12 billion in early-stage studies that drugmakers often rely on to seed the next generation of therapies.
In an open letter sent June 9 to NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and key lawmakers, 92 NIH scientists warned the sweeping cuts could shutter campus labs, hollow out the biotech talent pipeline, and push jobs and billions in investment overseas.
White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the administration's approach to federal research, telling the Associated Press that Trump is focused on restoring a "Gold Standard" of science, not "ideological activism."
Newsweek has contacted the White House, NIH, and HHS via email for comment.
University labs across the country supply Big Pharma with a constant stream of breakthrough ideas and a talent pipeline of PhDs who know how to turn them into therapies.
"The industry of biotechnology is built on advances in academic labs," Richard DiMarchi, a professor of chemistry at Indiana University, told Newsweek, adding that there was "no way large companies can sustain this level of creativity and productivity without a vibrant academic research community."
This mutually beneficial relationship can be seen in Eli Lilly's planned $250 million infusion into Purdue, AbbVie's oncology alliance with the University of Chicago, and Harvard-AstraZeneca stem-cell projects—plus dozens of smaller sponsored-research deals.
"Universities also train the next generation of scientists who work in drug companies," Eric G. Campbell, a professor of medicine and director of research at the CU Center for Bioethics and Humanities, at the University of Colorado, told Newsweek.
"Research has shown that financial interactions between academics and industry are ubiquitous in biomedical research, medical education and the practice of medicine in the U.S.," he added.
Cities like Boston and San Francisco have "emerged as major hubs for biotech and pharma because of the quality and concentration of biomedical research conducted at universities such as Harvard, UCSF and Stanford," Ulrich Mueller, a professor of neuroscience and biology and director of developmental neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, told Newsweek.
As a result, Big Pharma companies, such as Novartis and Pfizer, have established major research facilities in Boston "to be in proximity to the hubs of discovery," he said.
Venture funds in those cities have fueled an "astonishing local biotech ecosystem that provides a direct pipeline for pharma," Mueller said, and the major founders of these biotech companies are often professors from academic institutions that "want to translate findings from their research labs funded by the NIH into cures."
"This has been a major driver of the American biomedical enterprise but is on the verge of being destroyed," he said. The ecosystem of science and drug discovery in the U.S. is now "endangered."
"The pharmaceutical industry is not equipped with the brain power or expertise to conduct basic research," Michael A. Santoro, professor of management and entrepreneurship at the Leavey School of Business and the Santa Clara University, told Newsweek.
"Even if it was somehow possible for the pharmaceutical industry to pour more billions of dollars into basic research, the payoff for the investment would be less impactful than university-conducted research," he added.
As a result, Santoro said that he thought Trump's cuts to university research would result in the costs of new drugs rising "astronomically as that will be the only way the pharmaceutical industry can justify replacing university research with private labs."
He added that the U.S. would also experience a "brain drain" as "researchers look for opportunities abroad or perhaps drop out of the economy altogether."
"The U.S. is on the verge to lose its pre-eminence in biomedical research and drug development," Mueller said.
The "cracks are already appearing" Mueller warned. Pfizer has recently made a deal with 3SBio in China to develop cancer medicine, with an upfront payment of $1.25 billion with milestones potentially increasing the deal to $4.8 billion.
"The loss is devastating because it has wide ranging impacts also for local economies and the job market," Mueller said. "Intellectual property and the benefits to the U.S. will move to other shores together with major investment of pharma and venture firms in companies abroad."
An Eli Lilly spokesperson told Newsweek: "We understand cuts will likely impact the research these labs conduct, which is not positive for the biopharmaceutical research ecosystem. However, these cuts should not impact Lilly's ability to keep our own discovery engine going which is a key priority for our company."
Newsweek has contacted Merck & Co., AbbVie, AstraZeneca, as well as Novartis and Pfizer, via email for comment.
Santoro said that the Trump administration's actions towards medical research will also "affect the quality of health care generally."
"Physicians have an ethical duty to practice science-based medicine. Without scientific research at the university level, the quality of medical care will decline," he said.
More widely, the cuts could also have "societal consequences to the nation's health and economic prosperity," DiMarchi said.
"It's a delicate network that links translation of breakthrough university discoveries to drug development and registration at global pharmaceutical companies, and as such should be approached with a 'first do no harm mentality'," he added.
Related Articles
Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill Backing RFK Jr., Elon Musk PriorityPharma PAC That Donated to Trump Breaks With Him Over Executive OrderWhat Trump's Executive Order Means for Medicare, MedicaidBernie Sanders Issues Warning About Trump's Drug Pricing Executive Order
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil climbs after Trump's Tehran warning, Sasol now up 80% since April
Oil climbs after Trump's Tehran warning, Sasol now up 80% since April

News24

time30 minutes ago

  • News24

Oil climbs after Trump's Tehran warning, Sasol now up 80% since April

• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page. Oil prices jumped on Tuesday after US president Donald Trump call for Tehran residents to evacuate. Brent crude rose more than 1% to $74.15 a barrel. A month ago, it was trading close to $60. The synthetic fuels group Sasol's share price continued its surge from Friday. By late morning on Tuesday, it was trading at R99.43. It was trading at R87 on Thursday, before Israel's attacks on its regional foes. Its shares have now gained 80% since it reached its lowest level since the pandemic in April. Sasol has been grappling with the fallout of a disastrous US chemicals project, which resulted in a huge debt burden. After Friday's surge sparked by the attacks, crude ticked more than one percent lower Monday as traders bet that the conflict would not spread throughout the Middle East and key oil sites were mostly left untouched. Prices bounced back Tuesday after Trump called for the evacuation of the Iranian capital, which is home to nearly 10 million people. "Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign," he said on social media, referring to nuclear talks that were taking place. "What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Trump later poured cold water on remarks from French President Emmanuel Macron that he was leaving the G7 summit in Canada to discuss a possible ceasefire. Gains were tempered after the International Energy Agency said in its 2025 report that global demand would fall slightly in 2030 for the first time since the start of the Covid pandemic in 2020. It cited "below-trend economic growth, weighed down by global trade tensions and fiscal imbalances, and the accelerating substitution away from oil in the transport and power generation sectors". Traders are keeping a wary eye on developments in the Iran crisis, with the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz leaving Southeast Asia on Monday after cancelling a Vietnam visit as the Pentagon announced it was sending "additional capabilities" to the Middle East. Trump has maintained that Washington has "nothing to do" with Israel's campaign, but Iran's foreign minister said Monday the US leader could halt the attacks with "one phone call". Tehran has said it would hit US sites if Washington got involved. Meanwhile, Britain, France and Germany called on Iran to quickly return to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme, a French diplomatic source said. The US president had earlier said Iran wanted to make a deal, adding "as soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something". He later left the gathering in the Rockies, telling reporters: "I have to be back as soon as I can. I wish I could stay for tomorrow, but they understand, this is big stuff." Tehran had signalled a desire to de-escalate and resume nuclear talks with Washington as long as the United States did not join the conflict, according to the Wall Street Journal. Rand recovers After briefly breaking through R18/$ on Friday, the rand strengthened to R17.8177 by mid-morning on Tuesday. The rand has lost half a percent of its value against the dollar over the past week. Equities were mixed in Asian trade, with Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul, Manila, Bangkok, Jakarta and Taipei all advancing, while Hong Kong, Sydney, Wellington and Mumbai struggled along with London, Paris and Frankfurt. The JSE's All-Share index was 0.3% lower, with Harmony (-3.9%), AngloGold (-3.4%) and Gold Fields (-3%) among the biggest losers. Dealers also kept tabs on the G7 summit, where world leaders pushed back against Trump's trade war, arguing it posed a risk to global economic stability. Britain, Canada, Italy, Japan, Germany and France called on the president to reverse course on his plans to impose even steeper tariffs on countries across the globe next month.

The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts
The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts

USA Today

time38 minutes ago

  • USA Today

The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts

The trickle-down effect of President Trump's massive NIH budget cuts U.S. medical research is at a precipice as President Trump proposes cutting $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health. Show Caption Hide Caption Cuts to health research could impact clinical studies and trials at the NIH The Trump administration wants to cut health spending in the coming year, and plans to cut the budget at the National Institutes of Health by $18 billion. Trump administration officials say they are restoring trust in public health and cutting waste. Universities said the Trump administration is marking important studies as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs and mistakenly cutting their funding. Fyodor Urnov left the Soviet Union for the United States more than 35 years ago with a dream: To become a scientist and cure rare diseases in the country that was a beacon for biomedical research. Umrov recently was a key member of a team that used gene editing technology to treat a 'stinking cute' New Jersey baby born with a severe disability. That breakthrough, like decades of other medical research he's done, was funded by the National Institutes of Health. But millions of dollars in NIH research has now ground to a halt at universities across the country after the Trump administration cut studies it says are driven by diversity initiatives or a fixation on COVID-19. And the remaining research stands at a precipice as President Donald Trump's budget proposes cutting $18 billion from the NIH next year – the largest cut to any single government agency. NIH grant money doesn't sit in Washington – it gets funneled down to research universities across the country, where professors, graduate students, and doctors do their life's work. The schools include prestigious Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard University, and dozens of lesser-known private and public colleges. 'I really hope that we're going through a focused, phased of review of how funding is distributed,' Urnov said. 'I just cannot imagine a future where American biomedical research is not the shining light that leads the world.' On Jan. 16, a federal judge in Boston said NIH's cancellation of more than $1 billion in research grants on the basis of DEI was illegal and reinstated them. He signaled he could issue a more sweeping decision in the case as it moves forward. But Trump officials say they are restoring trust in public health and cutting waste. 'In recent years, Americans have lost confidence in our increasingly politicized healthcare and research apparatus that has been obsessed with DEI and COVID, which the majority of Americans moved on from years ago,' Kush Desai, a spokesman for the White House, said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is focused on restoring the Gold Standard of Science – not ideological activism … to finally address our chronic disease epidemic.' Texas university loses virus catalog funding The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, which receives about $150 million in NIH grants annually, has already lost $19.3 million, according to Scott Weave, the scientific director for Galveston National Laboratory. Weaver said he's most concerned about the World Reference Center, a collection of thousands of viruses that has been preserved since the 1950s to help scientists conduct emergency research into new viral threats, such as Zika or West Nile virus. In recent years, the research focused on COVID-19. NIH terminated the center's grant funding in full on March 24. In a letter obtained by USA TODAY, the agency wrote: 'These grant funds were issued for a limited purpose: to ameliorate the effects of the pandemic. Now that the pandemic is over, the grant funds are no longer necessary.' Weaver said that framing is incorrect. The project on viruses isn't just focused on COVID-19. Historically, the center worked on mosquito-borne viruses, not respiratory ones. The group only pivoted briefly to help with the pandemic health emergency. He believes the grant was eliminated in error. 'I think it would've been clear if anyone with an understanding of science had read the information about of our grant that we were not a COVID grant,' Weaver said. Research programs mistaken for DEI Andy Johns, who administers research grants at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, described a similar situation. The school lost $7.7 million in NIH contract terminations, which he said began in February but picked up pace in March and April. The cuts include a study on how to improve tobacco regulatory science to reduce health disparities, a study to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural communities, a study on neurobiological susceptibility to peer pressure and drug use among teenagers, and a study on malaria in Africa. 'The ones that might sting the most are ones that get caught up because they're perceived as being involving a particular issue that they don't actually involve – where a project may have been deemed as DEI, but there's actually not a DEI focus in any way shape or form,' Johns said. Sometimes, only a small portion of a research project involves analyzing how research affects a specific demographic, experts said, but this has been enough for the Trump administration to flag the grant as DEI. Johns said professors involved in the defunded studies asked NIH to let them continue the underlying scientific research and simply omit the demographic analysis. But the university hasn't haven't seen much success with this approach, he said. Weaver, the Texas researcher, mentioned a grant that helped students who graduated from small colleges that lack research opportunities get research experience before applying to PhD programs. He said NIH cut that on the grounds it was a DEI initiative. Weaver said that while the grant may have technically fit into that category, it was 'more opportunity-based.' He lamented what stripping the campus of the program means: 'I've really taken a lot of pleasure in seeing them succeed and go on and thrive as scientists.' Layoffs in Maryland and California Daniel Mullins, a health outcomes professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, said he laid off off five people and reduced the workload of a sixth worker after NIH told them to stop work on a five-year, $9.4 million grant for a health care study. The grant helped Mullins study how to make patients more likely to participate in clinical trials − a vital step in the approval of new medicines. He describes the program as a 'health equity hub,' but says there's no one disease or demographic of people it is specifically designed to help. Mullins' biggest challenge has been walking into work every day and seeing people who are about to lose their jobs. 'I asked the department chair and the dean if we could just fund these people a little bit so they could at least find a job,' he said. Kim Elaine Barrett, the vice dean of research at the University of California Davis School of Medicine, said her school lost grants aimed at building a biomedical workforce that is more representative of the population. Other terminated grants provided stipends and salaries for graduate students and junior faculty. Barrett said the school historically received just over $200 million a year from the National Institutes of Health. She said the funding loss affects about 100 people. "If the situation continues for much longer, and/or gets worse, then we will have to start looking at layoffs, and not just for trainees, but for lab personnel in general," Barrett said. "A lot of faculty derive some or all of their salaries from research grants." 'I wish we had better medications' At Northwestern University, just outside of Chicago, Dr. Benjamin Singer, the vice chair for research in the Department of Medicine, said the university has been 'very gracious' in helping his research group fill in the funding gaps to keep his research group's work going. Singer treats patients in the intensive care unit, and some of his research focuses on how a specific cell can help rebuild a damaged lung – research that can benefit people suffering from pneumonia. His group also identifies targets for potential future prescription drugs. 'I take care of critically ill patients at a high risk of dying,' Singer said. 'When they're really up against a tough spot, I think, 'I wish we had better medications. I wish we had better therapies to help your mom, your son, your daughter.'' The University of Minnesota, which reported losing 24 NIH grants as of early May, created a program to help researchers continue their work if their funding was terminated or they received a stop-work order from the federal government. 'I just can't be clear enough, however," said Rebecca Cunningham, the university's president. "There is no mitigation for the loss of federal funding.' Contributing: Reuters

Dems scream that democracy is in peril while proving that it's absolutely fine
Dems scream that democracy is in peril while proving that it's absolutely fine

USA Today

time39 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Dems scream that democracy is in peril while proving that it's absolutely fine

Dems scream that democracy is in peril while proving that it's absolutely fine | Opinion Despite the fact they were able to protest freely – something that isn't allowed in Cuba or Russia – progressives still act as if President Donald Trump is destroying democracy. Show Caption Hide Caption Army 250th anniversary parade marches on despite weather worries President Donald Trump's controversial military parade kicked off 30 minutes early to avoid inclement weather. I would like to thank the 'No Kings' protesters. The estimated 5 million people who attended more than 2,000 protests nationwide June 14 made an excellent point: Our democracy is alive and well. Now, that is not what protest organizers intended. They chose the name for their day of action in response to President Donald Trump's decision to hold a military parade to honor the 250th anniversary of the Army (June 14 also happened to be Trump's 79th birthday). Liberals have painted the president as a tyrant and authoritarian, resembling the dictators in Russia and North Korea – thus the plea for 'no kings.' Yet, the protesters disproved their own point. Opinion: Hey, Democrats, LA riots make Americans like me glad Trump is president The demonstrations mostly went off without hitches, and the federal government did nothing to stop them. Protesters carried signs and shouted things extremely critical of Trump and his administration. No one was arrested for participating in peaceful rallies. That is exactly what democracy and our constitutional rights look like in practice. Liberals are confused about the freedoms they have Despite the fact they had every right to protest freely – something that is not allowed in countries like Russia and North Korea – progressives still acted as if Trump is destroying the principles of our country. 'On this day, where we celebrate the flag, where we celebrate America, we are fighting for democracy,' Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said at an event in Philadelphia. 'The throughline in America is that the people are governed not by a king, not a tyrant, not nobility, but the people.' Perhaps Weingarten, whose Democratic-loving teachers union helped organize the No Kings protests, has forgotten that the American people decisively elected Trump just seven months ago. She's not the only one. Opinion: Trump hosts patriotic parade as Democrats plan silly protests against 'kings.' Another protestor, Margo Ross of California, told NPR, 'I am completely terrified of what's going on in our country' and that 'from the beginning it's been a coup and a fascist overthrow.' Again, the very ability to hold the protests disproves those 'fears.' Democrats, media show they were not really worried about Trump's parade The reaction to the weekend's festivities also highlighted how Democrats and journalists were never that concerned about Trump's Army parade, despite all their handwringing ahead of time. After raising fears about the parade and what it says about Trump's authoritarian instincts, progressives roundly mocked the military display as 'underwhelming,' a 'disappointing, sad affair' and 'pathetic.' Opinion: Can you be legally punished for misgendering someone? Colorado says yes. This belies that they ever really thought the parade would be a threat to democracy. 'Overall this was a pretty listless and low-energy parade and crowd," The New York Times' John Ismay observed from the event. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. The Independent's Richard Hall acknowledged the parade was less North Korea-lite and 'something closer to a medium-sized town's July 4th celebration.' Following the June 14 parade and protests, here's my takeaway: Trump is nowhere close to a dictator – and Democrats proved U.S. democracy is just fine. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store