logo
Tesla has a plan to launch a next-gen taxi service — and it's nothing like what you're used to

Tesla has a plan to launch a next-gen taxi service — and it's nothing like what you're used to

Yahoo23-03-2025

Aside from a well-functioning vehicle, the most important part of a good taxi ride is a safe driver with excellent navigation skills. While that may be true of your average yellow cab experience, Tesla wants to redefine traditional taxis with its newly proposed rideshare service.
The first major change? Kicking out the driver.
According to the Washington Post, Tesla plans to launch a taxi service in California using autonomous self-driving electric vehicles.
Late last year, Tesla reportedly submitted a charter permit application to the California Public Utilities Commission seeking approval to transport passengers in its vehicles. In November, a CPUC official emailed Tesla to propose discussing the next steps of the company's robotaxi proposal, per an email obtained by the Post.
A spokesperson for the CPUC told the outlet that Tesla's permit is currently under consideration.
The Post reported that Tesla already has approval to test its driverless vehicles in California — if a human is behind the wheel. This new permit, however, would allow Tesla to accept self-driven ride requests from users.
Tesla, which is trying to turn around slumping sales and stock performance, is already in the process of rolling out a self-driving rideshare service in Austin, Texas.
While electric yellow cabs already exist in metropolitan areas like New York City, they are still rare across the United States. Even in New York, 19% of rides were from an EV or wheelchair-accessible vehicle, with the city combining the stats, though the Big Apple plans to make that 100% by 2030.
Tesla's entire vehicle fleet is electric, making the promise of an all-EV taxi service exciting to environmental advocates.
Would you ride in a self-driving Tesla Robotaxi?
Heck yes
Probably
Not anytime soon
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Unlike gas-powered vehicles, which run on dirty fuel, EVs produce no planet-warming air pollution when driven — there is still pollution from manufacturing and charging the vehicles, of course, but there are two key ways EVs end up polluting much less.
First, the percentage of renewable, zero-fuel energy in the country is always ticking up, whereas fully gas-powered cars are fully reliant on burning fuel, which releases pollution into the air.
Second, gas cars lose around 80% of their energy to factors such as heat loss. Meanwhile, EVs' efficiency rate is about 89%, as they lose far less to heat waste and recapture a lot of other lost energy through regenerative braking fed back into the battery.
For these reasons, the Environmental Protection Agency reported that wider adoption of EVs could improve public health by curbing respiratory irritation, illnesses, and cancers linked to air pollution.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has repeatedly expressed plans to deploy self-driving vehicles nationwide. In late 2024, Musk said he expects existing Tesla models to start offering "fully autonomous" driving in California and Texas this year. The company also announced plans for the upcoming Tesla Cybercab, also referred to as Robotaxi, a fully autonomous passenger vehicle without a steering wheel or gas pedals.
As the Post pointed out in its report, however, Tesla's autonomous technology has a questionable safety record marred by investigations and recalls.
Musk has recently made headlines for his work with the Trump administration and his position in the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. As the Post reported, safety advocates are concerned the Tesla CEO's government role could create a worrisome conflict of interest that could compromise essential safety standards and federal guidelines related to self-driving vehicles.
Before his DOGE appointment, Musk said he would use his influence with the Trump administration to "create a federal framework for autonomous vehicles." There is a need for that, too, with Tesla not being the only business pursuing this — for example, Waymo has already been operating self-driving cabs in San Francisco since June.
Those safety advocates say that regardless of intent, a conflict of interest would remain if the oversight is not fully independent and supplied with sufficient resources to investigate risks.
The Post reported that a small government team regulating autonomous cars was recently "cut nearly in half" by DOGE cuts. The outlet added that the "reduction in workforce" cuts impacted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the same government body responsible for investigating and reviewing Tesla's safety standards.
If it can be done safely or without requiring the driverless part of the plan until the tech is perfected, the electrification of taxis could make a major difference in air pollution.
Transportation — from passenger cars to rideshares to long-haul trucks — is the largest combined source of planet-warming pollution in the U.S. There are more than 600,000 ride-hail vehicles in California, where rideshare services like Uber and Lyft are more popular than yellow cab services. These largely gas-powered cars release about 50% more planet-warming pollution than the average passenger car due to driving frequency, making them particularly good candidates for upgrading to electric.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Expat reveals astounding detail on street of city with '30 million people'
Expat reveals astounding detail on street of city with '30 million people'

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Expat reveals astounding detail on street of city with '30 million people'

When visiting any city with a large population, most travellers would expect to jump off public transport and instantly be hit with a barrage of sights and sounds. However, one US expat living in China has revealed the incredible – and quite different – reality emerging in the county while on a recent visit to a neighbouring city. US citizen Garrett took a trip to the city of Suzhou, about an hour from his home in Shanghai. Arriving there, he was left astounded while standing beside the road because, despite cars and motorbikes zooming past, there was virtually no traffic noise. "Quite a busy intersection but super quiet," he told Yahoo News of the surprising moment, which highlights just how successful the uptake of electric vehicles has been in the Asian economic powerhouse. "The silence on the streets is fantastic; even in a city of 30 million people, the streets are incredibly calm," he said. For Garrett, he's seen firsthand that it's hard for Westerners to understand why this has happened. "As I have seen in China, sustainability isn't political at all; it's a widely acknowledged necessity for the planet and for economics," he said, explaining that EV-driving "isn't cool, it's just normal". In 2024, China sold nearly 13 million fully electric and hybrid vehicles, meaning EVs accounted for 40 per cent of total sales in the Chinese market. The number of sales is four times as many as the United States. In Australia, that figure was just 114,000 in the same time frame, according to the Electric Vehicle Council. Australians are continuing to buy more electric vehicles than ever before, according to recent sales records. But traditional brands like Toyota and Ford still dominate new car sales, with Toyota topping the charts for an incredible 23 years. 🚙 Drivers 'completely unaware' of little-known road rule attracting $6,000 fines 🔌 Hundreds of Teslas in Aussie car park exposes grim truth for Elon Musk 🔋 Solution to hazardous electric vehicle 'problem' in major Aussie city Garrett said his Chinese colleagues are more surprised to hear that someone doesn't drive an EV. "Many of my colleagues have EVs, and when I pointed that out, they responded with 'oh, yeah, don't you drive one?'," he said. "In my view, I think it's because people don't seem to politicise sustainability." This was laid bare as US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk exchanged in a very public back-and-forth earlier this week, signalling their relationship may well be over. The Tesla boss criticised the president's 'Big Beautiful Bill' aimed to fast-track policy around spending, revenue and the debt ceiling, which would see electric vehicle subsidies scrapped in the US. "I don't believe America will get to the level China is at ever without significant political change," Garrett said. "And as America is a very individualistic culture, it will be very hard to sell the public on the benefit to the greater society. Most people I know in China just say 'Well, driving EVs is better for everyone and the government supports that'." China is leading the way with EV uptake largely due to government support through subsidies and tax breaks. Licence plates for regular cars with internal combustion engines face long waits and high costs to get the plates, but for EVs it's free. Homegrown support has helped Chinese automakers expand across the world, with countless new models hitting the market in Australia and worldwide seemingly every month. BYD took the world by storm when photos of its fleet of car carriers recently emerged. The brand, commonly seen on Aussie roads, is moving with "unprecedented speed" to overtake US rival Tesla as the global leader in electric vehicles. Car expert Paul Maric recently returned from the Shanghai International Automobile Industry Exhibition, where Chinese car brands displayed their latest innovations. "China is on another level entirely," he told Yahoo News recently. "Anyone in Australia who thinks they're just going to go away sometime soon is in for a shock. "I think eventually it will just lead to cars becoming more affordable," he said of the growing expansion of the Chinese industry. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Donald Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk
Donald Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk

Donald Trump on Monday addressed a question that's been on many people's minds ever since the president's spectacular blow-out with former so-called 'First Buddy' Elon Musk last week. Namely, what will happen to the red Tesla model S that Trump bought during a White House event in March to promote Musk's electric vehicle brand amid backlash to the billionaire's now-ended role leading the public spending-slashing, unofficial Department of Government Efficiency. 'Are you going to get rid of the Tesla and the Starlink system that you have here at the White House?' Trump was asked by a reporter. 'No, I haven't heard that,' the president replied. 'I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink, it's a good service,' he added, the latter being Musk's satellite internet service. The journalist pressed Trump on the Tesla: 'Where are you going to move it to? Move it around? What do you mean?' Trump replied: 'I have a lot of locations. I've got so many locations I don't know what to do with them all.' Watch the exchange here: Earlier this month, a White House official had claimed that Trump would sell or give away the car. Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme Mike Johnson Offers Bizarre Justification For ICE Masks. Backlash Follows. George Clooney Reveals The 1 Line He Used To Silence Protesters During Broadway Play

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse
Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Dartmouth, Mass.: Being the richest man in the world does not appear sufficiently ego-gratifying for Elon Musk. Observing his recent involvement with the Trump administration, with his destructive actions leading the DOGE crusade to disrupt or destroy American governance, one wonders what his motivation is. Is it financial gain, media attention or a quest for power? Or is it a grand plan conceived by a man with a deep psychological disorder? Musk's recent severe criticism of President Trump's legislative agenda is perhaps the first salvo in his plan to save America from the conflagration he ignited and helped enlarge. Is the grand scheme to now be the white knight who comes to the rescue and douses the flames, thereby becoming the hero who saved America? The legislative and judicial branches of government have either enabled, been enriched by or ignored the destruction occurring to American democracy. Musk can now assume the role of hero by utilizing his enormous resources to defeat Trump's agenda by threatening to 'out-primary' any Republican legislators who continue to support the president. Trump has certainly provided a roadmap by imposing or threatening tariffs, or defunding and then dowsing the flames with a change of course, thus appearing as though he's coming to the rescue of America. Musk has far more personal resources and grasp of political strategy than Trump, and may have greater aspirations as he interjects himself into the politics of Brazil, Germany and the United States. Betty Ussach Glendale: From the ancient text 'The Art of War' by Sun Tzu, it is said, 'All war is based on deception.' The same applies to the accusations of division now viewed as front-page news regarding Trump versus Musk. Such antics create a storyline that hurts people. Also stated in the book: 'There's no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.' Our country is experiencing a period of adjustment whereby deception has been made to separate us. The lesson from the book stipulates, 'There are times when you have to forgive your enemies and love them as your own.' Hatred never ends if people embrace only what makes them comfortable. Jonathan Kiddrane Brooklyn: Let me get this straight. TACO man sits on his hands when his criminal cultists storm the Capitol, but he unleashes the National Guard on peaceful protesters? When is this madness going to end? Don't tell me America is not in the midst of a constitutional crisis. June Lowe Staatsburg, N.Y.: Trump deploys the National Guard for individuals who are protesting in Los Angeles. Rioters attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 and the National Guard was not deployed, then the rioters were pardoned. What's wrong with this picture? I really hope no one tries to explain this to me, because it's obvious that this so-called president has no idea how to run this joke of a country that the United States has become. Glenn Marowitz Manhattan: Joe Biden thought he needed woke approval to be reelected. Woke devotees created sanctuary cities and no immigrants could be deported. That and no bail for repeat criminals was the end for Biden and the Dems. They would not allow the bad apples to be vetted and deported. Trump had a royal straight flush in this game of hold 'em. An inexperienced Vice President Kamala Harris only added to the pot. Trump got elected and decided to deport everyone. All those righteous people are now thrown in with the criminals. These uprisings in California are just the beginning. We will soon see violent terrorist operations carried out secretly. People like AOC and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams are responsible. Fascist Trump is smiling and licking his lips as if he just had a jelly donut. There are no strong Dems to counteract him. We are in big trouble. Michael Malewich Avon-by-the-Sea, N.J.: There were a few letters in yesterday's edition questioning why ICE agents cover their faces. Simple answer: Same reason the protesters do — to avoid discovery. Protesters want to evade arrest and prosecution. ICE agents want to protect their families and selves from retaliation. The liberal justice system would most likely free the criminals while ICE agents face physical retaliation. Robert Stiloski Bronx: Where is the outcry from the left demanding that protesters remove their masks? More importantly, where is their condemnation of the violence and destruction taking place? Those who take part in destructive mobs should be held accountable and required to pay for any damages caused. Even a simple act of assault or resistance against a federal officer can carry up to a year in jail. Enforcing the law consistently is essential to stopping this wave of violence. Al D'Angelo Smithtown, L.I.: Voicer Katherine Raymond agrees with democratic-socialist ideas such as taxing the rich but, like almost all liberals, 'the rich' are anyone making more than her. She shows her hand by questioning how anyone can think a household income of $1 million qualifies as rich. Is she kidding or is this a misprint? Andrew Ross Bronx: As a 48-year Belmont/Little Italy resident, community advocate and 37-year NYC Board of Education/Department of Education educator and parent, it has become abundantly clear that neither Rafael Moure-Punnett, the rest of Bronx Community Board 6, The Belmont BID or, as of yet, any of our local politicians have shown a genuine or active interest in the safety and wellbeing of the children, teenagers or families in our neighborhood in regard to the completely unchecked speeding that has been going on for more than a decade one block from our local elementary, middle and high schools. Despite the Department of Transportation claiming to have done a study in this area, one of their representatives would not provide the time or date they did so, yet insisted that their conclusion had been there was no need for a traffic light on the corner of this highly dangerous intersection. Jeff Vargon Peekskill, N.Y.: To Voicer John Weiss: Wrong you are! On page 24 in Friday's Daily News, there was an article on the 81st anniversary of that momentous day ('WWII vets are still toast of Normandy even 81 years later,' June 6)! I guess it appeared in my paper and no one else's. Steven Bevacqua Pleasantville, N.Y.: To Voicer Nick Smith: My letter wasn't saying that criticism of Israel is always antisemitic, it was more about why Israel is the only country heavily criticized for fighting terrorism. Every year, when Yom Haatzmaut, which is known as Israeli Independence Day, and the Salute to Israel Parade come up, I always hear a bunch of anti-Israel fanatics calling it Nakba Day as an insult. Had the Arabs just accepted the UN Partition Plan back in 1947 rather than attack the Jews that day, there wouldn't be such issues now. As for me living where I do, it was because my father had a major job transfer when I was an infant that brought my family here. If you really believe in giving land back to indigenous groups, then give your property to the Native American tribe that originally lived there. Tal Barzilai Staten Island: So far, everything I have read or seen about Sean 'Diddy' Combs shows that he is rich, controlling and a bully. No matter what, people's lives have been ruined. I hope he can't buy his way out of this. Thomas Bell Bronx: To Voicer Stephanie Revander: You do not disagree with what I said, but how I said it. I could have made my point and saved four words by leaving out 'run-of-the-mill.' In retrospect, I should have stated that while some rapists can be reformed, that does not include those who brutally beat and/or choke their victims unconscious. They should serve life. Richard Warren

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store