Maradona death trial in peril with judge under microscope
More than two months after it started, the trial of seven Argentine health professionals accused in the death of football legend Diego Maradona hangs in the balance over questions about a judge's impartiality.
The trial was suspended last week after defense lawyers said the judge's involvement in a documentary related to the case constituted a possible breach of her duty, influence peddling and even bribery.
The possible removal of Julieta Makintach, one of three judges presiding over the case, risks nullifying the proceedings.
Maradona died on November 25, 2020, at age 60, while recovering at home from brain surgery for a blood clot after decades battling cocaine and alcohol addictions.
He died of heart failure and acute pulmonary edema two weeks after going under the knife, and was found dead in bed by his day nurse.
Maradona's medical team is on trial in the Buenos Aires suburb of San Isidro over the conditions of his convalescence at a private home.
Prosecutors have described the football icon's care in his last days as grossly negligent.
The trial is set to reconvene Tuesday, where at least one lawyer is expected to ask for Makintach's recusal.
If she is removed from the case, it must be determined whether she can simply be replaced, or whether the trial must start afresh with a new panel of judges.
"This is a scandal of such magnitude that the whole world is talking about Argentine justice as the worst example," Fernando Burlando, a lawyer for Maradona's daughters, told local radio last week.
At issue is the alleged use of cameras in the courtroom in violation of a ban on filming the trial.
Makintach had denied participating in or authorizing any filming, but footage shared in Argentine media over the weekend shows her allegedly being interviewed by a film crew on the eve of the trial starting.
- 'Compromised' -
A producer, in a deposition seen by AFP, said they were filming a documentary about Makintach, as "a judge and a woman," but not the trial itself.
Burlando rejected the explanation and said he would ask for Makintach's recusal on Tuesday.
"She did not act like a judge but like an actress," he charged.
"Everyone now feels that this (trial) is compromised," added Mario Baudry, the lawyer for Maradona's ex-partner Veronica Ojeda.
"It's healthiest to start over from scratch," he added.
The defendants risk prison terms between eight and 25 years if convicted of "homicide with possible intent" -- pursuing a course of action despite knowing it could lead to death.
The case so far has focused on the decision by Maradona's doctors to allow him to recuperate at home with minimal supervision and medical equipment, instead of a medical facility.
In her testimony, Maradona's daughter Gianinna said her father's carers had kept him in "a dark, ugly and lonely" place and claimed they seemed more interested in money than his welfare.
pbl-mry/mlr/st
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
an hour ago
- News24
YOU True Crime: When cop becomes killer - the grim saga of the Rosemary Ndlovu murders
Read this for free Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Laura Coates explains what happened in court when judge admonished Combs
Judge Arun Subramanian warned the defense that Sean 'Diddy' Combs could be excluded from the courtroom if he continues to attempt to interact with the jury. The judge said he saw Combs on two different occasions during Bryana Bongolan's testimony, looking at the jury and 'nodding vigorously." Combs' defense attorney told the judge it wouldn't happen again. CNN's Laura Coates reports.


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Jury deliberations in Harvey Weinstein's retrial in New York begin
Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial has reached its final stage. The jury began deliberations, but not without drama in the courtroom beforehand. is now in the hands of a jury in New York City. One of the jurors who had been listening to the trial for weeks got sick just as deliberations were set to begin. Juror 8 didn't show up Thursday morning, and was replaced by an alternate juror to begin deliberations. CBS News New York's Lisa Rozner reports Juror 8 was somebody Weinstein's defense wanted as part of the trial and therefore the deliberations, so much so that Weinstein's legal team initially threatened to move for a mistrial if the judge didn't give Juror 8 more time to potentially show up. Eventually, the judge dismissed that as a possibility, saying that even though the defense "chose" the juror, "the purpose of an alternate juror is for this very reason." The judge then began instructing the jurors on deliberations just before 11 a.m. Juror 8 was female, as is her replacement, Alternate Juror 1. Weinstein addresses court after jury starts deliberations Deliberations began at 11:30 a.m. After the jury left, Weinstein asked to address the court. "Your honor I'd like to thank your team, court officers, security, all the people who were just and fair with me and with the exception of the captain - I'm kidding," Weinstein said. "Just seriously, I've been treated incredibly fairly. The court officers, the court clerks, everybody I just want to thank from the bottom of my heart. I appreciate you all." The judge then thanked Weinstein for his comments. Closing arguments in Harvey Weinstein retrial The defense requested a mistrial Wednesday morning, claiming the Manhattan District Attorney's office forced some witnesses to testify, but the judge turned down the request. The jury was brought in around 10:30 a.m. to hear the rest of the prosecution's closing arguments. The defense spoke for nearly three hours Tuesday in its closing statements. The prosecution kept it serious, portraying Weinstein as a sexual predator, while the defense was animated, cracking jokes that incited laughter from the jury box and telling them Weinstein was the true victim. The 73-year-old's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, told the jury Tuesday, "I know this is going to sound crazy, but he's the one getting abused." He alleged the accusers used Weinstein for fame and fortune and that everything was consensual. The prosecution called those remarks offensive and said, "He had enormous power and control over the entertainment industry for over 30 years, he decided who was in and who was out," adding Weinstein "was not used to the word 'no.'" What is Weinstein accused of in this case? Two accusers -- former production assistant Miriam Haley and actress Jessica Mann -- testified during the retrial and at Weinstein's first trial in 2020. Haley alleged Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in July 2006, and Mann alleged he raped her at at New York hotel in 2023. Former model Kaja Sokola alleged Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 when she was 19 years old. She was not part of the original trial. Weinstein is charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sex act and one count of third-degree rape. Both carry a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. He has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein's 2020 conviction was overturned last year when the state's highest court ruled the judge should not have allowed testimony from other accusers who were not part of the criminal charges. He was then held at Rikers Island for several months leading up to his retrial. Weinstein was also convicted in 2022 of sexual assault in Los Angeles and was sentenced to 16 years in prison.