DC mayor responds to proposed 'Bowser Act,' which aims to repeal Home Rule
The Brief
Two Republican congressmen have introduced a bill that would repeal Home Rule in D.C. if passed
D.C. has operated under Home Rule since 1973, ensuring residents can vote for their elected officials
D.C. mayor said the district is focused on making the district become the 51st state
WASHINGTON - D.C.'s mayor is responding to a proposed bill that aims to repeal Home Rule in the district and could strip the powers of the D.C. government if passed.
The bill was introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tennessee last week. It has been named the "Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident" (BOWSER) Act in the Senate and House, named after District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser.
According to the bill sponsors, the proposal is in response to the mayor and city council's "failure to prevent violent crime, corruption, and voting by non-citizens". It would repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act one year after passage.
Mayor Bowser has addressed calls to repeal Home Rule in recent months and doubled down on her past statements Monday that D.C. has followed the law and is prepared to continue defending itself.
"Home Rule is a limited self-government, but what we should be focused on is our pathway to becoming the 51st state," Mayor Bowser said Monday.
The backstory
Home Rule refers to the law signed in 1973 by President Richard Nixon, which created a local government for Washington, D.C. It granted DC residents the ability to elect a mayor and council, but Congress retained the power to overrule local legislation and D.C. residents remained without a vote in Congress.
Prior to Home Rule being enacted, D.C. representatives were chosen by Congress and the President.
Congress has the authority to manage the nation's capital according to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, the bill sponsors said.
FOX 5 reached out Monday for interviews on the proposed legislation, but neither Sen. Lee's or Rep. Ogles' offices returned our requests for comment.
In a joint statement, Lee said described the 'corruption, crime, and incompetence of the D.C. government' as an 'embarrassment to our nation's capital for decades'.
Rep. Ogles' remarks in the joint statement took direct aim at Mayor Bowser.
"The radically progressive regime of D.C. Mayor Bowser has left our nation's Capital in crime-ridden shambles." said Rep. Ogles. "Washington is now known for its homicides, rapes, drug overdoses, violence, theft, and homelessness.Bowser and her corrupt Washington City Council are incapable of managing the city. As such, it seems appropriate for Congress to reclaim its Constitutional authority and restore the nation's Capital. The epicenter of not only the UnitedStates Federal Government but also the world geopolitics cannot continue to be a cesspool of Democrats' failed policies."
What they're saying
Mayor Bowser did not directly respond to the bill being named after her, nor did she address criticism from the bill sponsors.
When asked about the significance of Home Rule in D.C., Bowser said Monday, the district's focus remains on becoming the 51st state in the country
"I know there's talks about other places being the 51st state, but we're going to be the 51st state. What that means is that we'll be treated just like every other American. Right now, we're not, because we pay taxes. In fact, we pay more taxes than most, because we're larger than two states, but we don't have representation in Congress," she said.
She added, residents are witnessing what that means under a new administration.
"When important things are being debated like cabinet nominees, we neither have a voice or a vote," she said. "In the House, our congresswoman is a delegate, but she doesn't have a vote. So, we are reminded what it means to be full citizens of this nation and we can only get that through statehood."
What's next
Home Rule in D.C. has been challenged in the past, according to Prof. Leah Brooks at George Washington University's Trachtenberg School of Public Policy and Public Administration.
It's possible this legislation could get further than it has in the past given Republican majorities in both the House and Senate, Prof. Brooks noted. However, Brooks pointed out the bill currently less than a page long and does not clearly define what happens if Home Rule is repealed.
"Basically what happens the legislation says is, we get rid of home rule as it was defined in 1973 by Congress. What it doesn't say is, what happens after that? So, what happens after that?" she questioned. "Do we go back to the Home Rule we had as of 1967 that Lyndon Johnson passed? Do we go back to Congress managing every facet of D.C.? It's hard for me to imagine that Congress wants to become the city council of Washington D.C."
It's not immediately clear if other congressmembers have openly supported this bill.
The Source
The information in this story comes from FOX 5 reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ali Velshi: Protests demonstrate why, despite Trump's actions, America is still a democracy
MSNBC's Ali Velshi details how Donald Trump's attempts to squash protest and dissent by deploying the military to Los Angeles – along with things like the handcuffing of a U.S. senator - are mobilizing protests against his agenda. M. Gessen joins to discuss the importance of not normalizing Trump's unlawful actions in order to keep America a democracy.
2 hours ago
US Senate seeks to add expanded compensation for nuclear radiation victims to tax bill
WASHINGTON -- A program to compensate people exposed to radiation from past nuclear weapons testing and manufacturing could be restarted and expanded under a provision added by U.S. senators to the major tax and budget policy bill. The language added Thursday to the Senate version of the massive tax bill would overhaul the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, which was originally enacted in 1990 and expired about a year ago. The law compensated people in about a dozen western states who developed serious illnesses from nuclear testing and manufacturing stemming from World War II-era efforts to develop the atomic bomb. The new Senate provision would expand the coverage to states including Missouri and Tennessee, among other places. It would also cover a wider range of illnesses. The program's limited scope in the West has led Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri to push for its expansion to include uranium sites in St. Louis and victims in other states. His advocacy led the Senate to twice pass a major overhaul of the program, but it stalled in the U.S. House amid concerns about its cost. Without an agreement over the program's scope in Congress, the program lapsed. Hawley said the new language compensates many more people, but at a far lower cost than previous legislation. 'These folks deserve to be recognized for the sacrifices they made and compensated when the government has poisoned them without telling them, without helping them, without making it right," Hawley said Friday. 'This is a chance, finally, to make it right.' Still, the new provision's pathway remains uncertain when the House considers the Senate's changes. While there is broad Senate support for the payments, it is unclear how the addition of Hawley's legislation will be received by cost-conscious Republicans as they barrel toward a self-imposed July 4 deadline for the overall tax bill. House leaders are waiting to see what comes out of the Senate before deciding whether they might make further changes or simply try to pass the Senate bill and send it to President Donald Trump's desk. St. Louis played a key role processing uranium as the United States developed a nuclear weapons program that was vital for winning World War II. But that effort exposed workers and nearby residents to radiation, with lingering issues remaining to this day. An elementary school was closed down a few years ago because of radioactive material found on site. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers remains years away from finishing environmental cleanup work. An investigation by The Associated Press, The Missouri Independent and MuckRock found the federal government and companies responsible for nuclear bomb production and atomic waste storage sites in the St. Louis area in the mid-20th century were aware of health risks, spills, improperly stored contaminants and other problems but often ignored them. Nuclear waste contaminated Coldwater Creek, and those who live nearby worry their cancers and other severe illnesses are connected. It's difficult to definitively link specific illnesses with the waste, but advocates for an expanded compensation program said there's evidence it made people sick years later. After the report by the AP and others, Hawley said sick St. Louis residents deserved help, too. He was joined by Dawn Chapman, co-founder of Just Moms STL, which brought attention to local nuclear contamination. She has called St. Louis a 'national sacrifice zone.' 'Many of us have had extreme amounts of devastation in the form of illnesses in our families,' Chapman said Friday. The provision added Thursday would also expand coverage areas in several states for those exposed to radioactive contamination that blew downwind from government sites. In New Mexico, for example, advocates have sought to expand the program for people near the spot where the first Manhattan Project-era bomb was tested. These residents didn't know the blast was why ash had fallen. It poised water, crops and livestock. Attention for these 'downwinders' rose following the release of the film Oppenheimer. 'Our federal government has a moral responsibility to support Americans that helped defend our country — and it has a moral responsibility to include all people who were exposed. That begins with reauthorizing RECA and amending it to include those who have been left out for far too long,' said Sen. Martin Heinrich, Democrat of New Mexico. Prior to the addition of the radiation compensation measure, Hawley had so far withheld support for the overall tax package, questioning cuts to Medicaid programs and the potential effects on rural hospitals and low income residents. He said he still wants to see improvements in the package, but added that help for radiation victims was essential. 'It would be very hard for me to vote for a bill that doesn't include (the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act). This is extremely, extremely important to me," Hawley said. ___
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence
In what's become somewhat customary once an Illinois political titan falls, leaders throughout the state responded with condemnation and called for reforms upon hearing Friday that ex-Speaker Michael Madigan was sentenced to seven and a half years in federal prison and fined $2.5 million on federal corruption charges. House Republican leader Tony McCombie of Savanna and Senate Republican leader John Curran of Downers Grove called for bipartisan ethics reforms in the wake of the sentencing, with Curran specifically requesting committee hearings and votes on potential changes — something that didn't happen this session. Madigan's sentencing was 'a stark and shameful reminder of the corruption that has plagued Illinois government for far too long,' McCombie said in a statement. 'Justice was served — but the damage to public trust runs deep.' But Illinois' last prominent statewide politician who went to federal prison, former Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, held back on the chance to take a swipe at a bitter nemesis when Madigan was sentenced. Though the two were Democrats, they feuded for nearly all six years Blagojevich was in office between 2003 and 2009. 'When that guy, Madigan, was on the top of the mountain, they were all kissing his ass,' Blagojevich said. 'Now they're going to be stomping all over his grave. And it's really, it's really sort of an unappealing side of human nature.' Blagojevich said Madigan's conviction underscores the systemic problems in politics and government in the state Capitol. 'Is the system in Springfield corrupt, in many ways, absolutely,' Blagojevich said in an interview with the Tribune while insisting he didn't break the law. 'It's a system, I've been saying this from the beginning, it all too often works for itself on the backs of the people.' Blagojevich — whose 14-year federal prison sentence for corruption was commuted by President Donald Trump, who ultimately also pardoned Blagojevich — didn't want to celebrate Madigan's prison sentence despite the two's often-tense relationship. 'I just don't think it's right for me to kick a man when he's down,' Blagojevich said. 'What's happening now to him, I know what it's like. And it's really easy for these politicians to get on their high horses and start kicking someone, stomping on someone.' Senate President Don Harmon, a Democrat from Oak Park who is facing a potential fine of nearly $10 million from the Illinois State Board of Elections for improper political fundraising, said Friday's sentence represented 'a solemn reminder' that the duty of public office holders is to serve 'and that there is accountability for those who do not.'
