Avocados, auto parts and ambushes: Inside Mexico's cargo theft crisis
Cargo theft remains a critical threat to logistics networks across Mexico, with the first quarter of 2025 revealing both troubling trends and tactical shifts in criminal behavior. According to Overhaul's Q1 2025 Cargo Theft Report, an overwhelming 81% of all cargo theft incidents reported nationwide involved violence, highlighting the persistent danger facing drivers and supply chain operators.
Geographically, theft was highly concentrated. Nearly 78% of cargo thefts occurred in Mexico's central and Southeast regions, with the central region alone accounting for 61% of all incidents. Two states, Mexico and Puebla, each reported 19% of the national total, maintaining their status as the most dangerous regions for cargo transport. Additionally, theft in Guanajuato and San Luis Potosí surged, each rising by 3 percentage points compared to Q1 2024.
A deeper look into temporal patterns shows that 82% of all thefts occurred from Monday through Friday, with peak activity from Tuesday through Friday (69%). The most dangerous time windows were 6 p.m. to midnight (31% of incidents) and 6 a.m. to noon (28%), aligning with common cargo movement schedules and suggesting targeted strikes during transit shifts.
Food and beverage shipments were the top target, representing 34% of thefts. This category saw a 5-percentage-point increase over Q1 2024, with avocados identified as a specific high-value item. Other rising categories included auto parts (up 4 points), particularly tires and electrical components, and chemicals such as detergents and plastics (up 1 point). Home and garden products, especially appliances, also saw a modest increase in theft.In terms of tactics, criminals primarily intercepted trucks in motion, accounting for 62.6% of cases. The theft of parked vehicles accounted for 36.8%, often occurring in zones associated with fuel theft and organized crime.
Overhaul also shared a notable success story in Queretaro, where its Mission Security Operations Center tracked a compromised food shipment in real time. After the truck's engine was remotely disabled and then forcibly reactivated by criminals, the MSOC coordinated with the National Guard to intercept the perpetrators, rescue the driver and recover the stolen cargo.
To mitigate ongoing threats, Overhaul recommends transiting during daylight hours and implementing a multilayered security approach combining physical and electronic safeguards. Its platform, for example, provides real-time tracking, behavioral alerts and predictive analytics powered by GPS, weather and historical crime data.
Freight fraud has gone digital and more dangerous. According to Descartes, fraud in today's transportation landscape extends well beyond stolen cargo. Tactics like spoofed GPS signals, fake identities and double-brokering are costing brokers and shippers millions, while leaving behind complex digital fingerprints. Fortunately, visibility platforms are becoming a powerful line of defense.By layering real-time location tracking with AI-powered behavioral analysis, carriers can now detect red flags such as ping gaps, out-of-route movements, suspicious VoIP contacts and high-risk delivery stops. Fraud prevention doesn't stop on the road. Tools that verify VIN geolocation, insurance status and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration authority during onboarding help keep bad actors out from the start.
Want to learn expert ways to leverage your visibility technology to fight fraud?Check out the Descartes and FreightWaves white paper here.
In this episode of Check Call with Mary O'Connell, we get into some freight fraud trends that are more commonplace than double brokering. Her guest, Michael Grace, VP of customer risk management at Highway, breaks down how carrier sales reps and shippers can be a first line of defense against fraud.
Cargo theft. Identity spoofing. Double-brokering.If it sounds like a heist movie, it's because it practically is.
Join Elizabeth Moscoso, president of Moscoso Express, and FreightWaves' own Grace Sharkey as they expose the tricks of the trade — and the tech, trust and tactics needed to stay one step ahead.
Expect:
Real stories from the front lines of freight fraud.
Smart compliance strategies that actually work.
How Moscoso Express builds a fraud-proof foundation.
You don't need a badge to bust bad actors — just this chat.Register for FreightWaves' virtual summit on May 21 here.
From the Fraud DeskCheck Call: TIA's annual fraud report spotlights surge in incidents
Insurance costs, fraud and cargo theft hit Landstar's Q1
Cyberthreats surge against US logistics infrastructure
2025 FreightWaves Fraud Fighters Awards recognize FreightTech innovators
Articles by Grace Sharkey
The post Avocados, auto parts and ambushes: Inside Mexico's cargo theft crisis appeared first on FreightWaves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
NWSL and WNBA unions release joint statement in response to immigration raids across the U.S.
The players' associations from the National Women's Soccer League (NWSLPA) and the Women's National Basketball Association (WNBPA) shared a joint statement on Thursday acknowledging and standing with the families 'facing fear, hardship, and uncertainty tied to immigration.' 'We're in the midst of a new season and an incredible moment for women's sports, but it's not lost on us that this country and the world are in turmoil right now,' the joint statement reads. Advertisement The unions' announcement comes amid widespread immigration raids ordered by President Donald Trump and his administration. Trump has vowed to reach record-level deportations. The administration has deployed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to cities across the country to detain people off the street and at their workplaces. Los Angeles has been a particular hotbed of activity in the past week, where protests have broken out in some parts of the city. On June 7, Trump signed a presidential memorandum that authorized the deployment of 2,000 members of the National Guard to Los Angeles, stating their presence was needed to 'address the lawlessness' there. Local and state lawmakers and law enforcement have objected to the move, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta suing the Trump administration over an unlawful use of the National Guard. NWSLPA Executive Director Meghann Burke spoke to The Athletic ahead of the statement's release, saying, 'What's happening in LA is clearly an immigration issue, but it goes even beyond that. It's also about this administration's willingness to bring military force in to enforce their policies, and specifically the arrest of a union leader, David Huerta.' The Services Employees International Union (SEIU) California president was arrested on Friday on a charge of conspiring to impede an officer and suffered an apparent head injury. On Monday, he appeared for a bail hearing and was released on a $50,000 bond. A post shared by WNBPA (@thewnbpa) In response to the raids, protests have been organized across the country, including Los Angeles, Seattle, Omaha, and Raleigh, to express anger with the administration's crackdown on immigration. Burke credited the WNBAPA, with whom the NWSLPA has a 'very strong relationship,' with initiating the conversation about releasing a joint statement. Advertisement 'They've been leaders in this space,' she said. 'We shared (the statement) with our board, and it really resonated and spoke to our situation right now.' Burke added that humanity can get lost during fraught moments like this, as 'families are getting ripped apart, workers getting targeted. It's important to stand together as workers' unions.' In the days since, the initial number of National Guard members has doubled, and the president has also deployed 700 active duty Marines to the Southern California city since the raids and demonstrations began last week. Historically, active duty Marines have only been deployed within the country under extraordinarily dire conditions. 'We stand with all people seeking safety, dignity, and opportunity, no matter where they come from or where they hope to go,' The NWSLPA and WNBPA statement reads. 'Every person deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. We know not every situation is simple. But offering compassion should never be up for debate.' Last Friday, when protests against ICE raids in Paramount, Calif. (in Los Angeles County) carried over into Saturday and coincided with Angel City FC's home match against the Chicago Stars, the club released a statement ahead of the game and posted it to its Instagram account: A post shared by Angel City FC (@weareangelcity) The post was accompanied by the names of two organizations, the Coalition of Humane Immigrant Rights and the LA County Office of Immigrant Affairs. Last month, ICE joined forces with the Tennessee Highway Patrol and the Department of Homeland Security to conduct 588 traffic stops and detain 103 people in a week in Nashville, the home of an eponymous Major League Soccer (MLS) club. Nashville SC supporters, many of whom belong to the city's Latino community, held up signs during the team's game on May 10 that read: 'No estamos todos aquí.' 'We are not all here.' Advertisement Last Sunday at BMO Stadium in Los Angeles, where Angel City plays, fans of Los Angeles FC initiated a silent protest during the team's game against Sporting Kansas City, taking up six rows of seats on the supporters' end of the stadium for a sign that read 'Abolish ICE.' Burke said that when it comes to monitoring events across the MLS to prepare for what may happen in the NWSL, 'everything is information.' In addition to other soccer leagues in the U.S., the union has had 'laser-beam focus' on the news surrounding travel bans and is in constant communication with the league. 'When I look across the landscape of what's happening in our country, it's unions leading the way,' she said.
Forbes
41 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Takes Credit For LA Protests Dying Down After Clashes With Newsom
President Donald Trump took credit Thursday for calming protests in Los Angeles, alleging his deployment of federal troops there stopped demonstrations from growing, while California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said the military presence actually inflamed protests—as the two long-time political nemeses have contradicting narratives of their roles in managing the demonstrations. National Guard troops and Department of Homeland Security Police officers fire tear gas and ... More non-lethal rounds at demonstrators protesting at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building on June 8, 2025 in downtown Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Jay) Trump said Los Angeles 'was safe and sound for the last two nights' and 'without the Military, Los Angeles would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years,' he wrote on Truth Social, cheering the 'great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines.' No Marines have been deployed to the protests as of Thursday morning—the Defense Department said Wednesday 700 Marines had completed the necessary training to monitor the protests and would be deployed within 48 hours. Attacking Newsom using his preferred nickname of 'NewScum' to refer to the California governor, Trump said he 'had totally lost control of the situation' and 'should be saying THANK YOU' for 'saving his ass, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!' Trump made the comments as protests in the Los Angeles area that cropped up over the weekend in response to Trump's anti-immigration raids had largely subsided after Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass set an overnight curfew that took effect Tuesday. Newsom, however, alleged the presence of National Guard troops Trump sent to Los Angeles earlier this week only attracted more protesters and said the city 'had to use our own law enforcement' to defend the National Guard, he told The New York Times in a podcast interview aired Thursday. Newsom and Trump have also given contradicting accounts of their communication throughout the week. Newsom called Trump a 'stone-cold liar,' alleging Trump never mentioned the possibility of deploying the National Guard in a phone call Saturday, as Trump claimed. Newsom also disputed Trump's claim that he called the governor Monday. A federal court hearing over whether Trump is allowed to deploy troops to the LA protests is set for Thursday. Newsom's administration filed an emergency motion asking the court to block the deployment of about 2,800 service members, including 2,100 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines. Trump and Newsom have clashed throughout the week as Newsom has accused Trump of 'perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions,' by sending in military troops, he said in televised speech Tuesday. Trump's deployment of the National Guard without approval of a state governor is largely unprecedented in modern times. Los Angeles police arrested dozens of people for violating the 8 p.m. PT curfew imposed this week in what Bass said was an effort to deter bad actors, while the National Guard also said it briefly detained some protesters. The protests are widely viewed as a major moment for Newsom's political future as he's a top prospect for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028. Los Angeles Protests Live Updates: National Guard Has Detained Some Protesters (Forbes) Stephen Miller Pushes For Even More Surprise ICE Raids—His Deportation Quotas, Explained (Forbes)
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
L.A. Immigration Crackdown Sparks Concerns About Possible Martial Law
TOPSHOT - Demonstrators holding signs and flags face California National Guard members standing ... More guard outside the Federal Building as they protest in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, on June 9, 2025. US President Donald Trump on June 9 ordered active-duty Marines into Los Angeles, vowing those protesting immigration arrests would be "hit harder" than ever. Protests in Los Angeles, home to a large Latino population, broke out on June 6, triggered by immigration raids that resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. (Photo by Apu GOMES / AFP) (Photo by APU GOMES/AFP via Getty Images) In recent weeks, the Los Angeles immigration crackdown has become the epicentre of a dangerous national experiment—one in which immigration enforcement is serving as the pretext for something far more ominous: a steady descent into possible martial law. The deployment of U.S. military forces into California without the governor's consent, the violent sweep of immigration raids, and the weaponization of emergency powers all signal that the constitutional order is under siege. President Donald Trump's decision to send 4,000 National Guard troops and Marines into California was met with outrage from state leaders and legal experts alike. California Governor Gavin Newsom has called the action 'an illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional act,' and the state has filed suit against the federal government, citing violations of the U.S. Federal Code, which prohibit federalizing state militias except in cases of invasion, rebellion, or when a state cannot enforce its own laws. None of those conditions apply in this case. Yet the justification offered by the administration—that Los Angeles was on the brink of collapse due to immigrant protests—is as false and inflammatory as was demonstrated on a recent episode of Jimmy Kimmel, which showed footage of quiet Los Angeles streets. Following a series of ICE raids that detained over 100 people, protests erupted across the city. While the Los Angeles Police Department stated that the demonstrations were largely peaceful, federal officials framed them as acts of rebellion. In televised comments, President Trump, without evidence, declared that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without military intervention. However, some legal scholars point out that such claims are disturbingly reminiscent of how autocrats have historically manufactured crises to seize power. For instance, in comments made recently by Yale historian Timothy Snyder, he warned, 'Be wary of paramilitaries. When the men with guns claim to be against the system, the system is under threat.' These warning signs are increasing. Earlier this year, President Trump re-declared a national emergency at the southern border, significantly intensifying deportation efforts, particularly in sanctuary jurisdictions. His Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, asserts that these efforts are crucial to national security. However, critics contend that the raids are politically motivated, intended to incite chaos and test the boundaries of presidential authority. This is not mere conjecture. There have been calls to arrest Governor Newsom for defying the troop deployment—an idea that would equate to criminalizing political opposition. The implications are chilling. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Republicans are racing to pass what Trump has dubbed his 'big, beautiful bill,' a sprawling legislative package that, among other things, includes over $46 billion for the border wall and ICE funding. The administration is leveraging the unrest in Los Angeles to push hesitant GOP senators to fall in line. The proposed bill also imposes a $1,000 asylum application fee—an unprecedented barrier to legal refuge—and earmarks billions more for new Border Patrol and customs agents. These aren't merely policy choices; they are tools of exclusion and intimidation. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), a leading voice for the legislation, is actively urging his colleagues to use the Los Angeles protests as proof of why ICE and the border crackdown require even more support. Beyond Capitol Hill, the cultural symbolism of this shift is equally revealing. Trump has announced a massive military parade in Washington, D.C., timed to coincide with the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary—and his own birthday. With tanks, howitzers, and cruise missile launchers on display, the spectacle is designed to evoke strength. But it also mirrors the authoritarian aesthetics of regimes like Russia and North Korea. The question is, where is this all heading? During his first term, Trump was dissuaded from invoking the Insurrection Act during the George Floyd protests only after senior military officials objected. This time, with loyalists appointed to key positions, those checks seem to be absent. Historically, there exists a dangerous precedent for all this. In 1933, Adolf Hitler used the Reichstag Fire to suspend civil liberties and consolidate power. Legal analysts are increasingly drawing comparisons between that moment and today's ongoing use of emergency powers in the name of immigration control. 'If you saw all this in any other country — soldiers sent to crush dissent, union leaders arrested, opposition politicians threatened — it would be clear that autocracy had arrived,' said constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe. Even tech magnates are playing a role. Elon Musk, who now owns X (formerly Twitter), has eliminated most content moderation, amplifying polarizing rhetoric and misinformation. His platform has become a megaphone for conspiracy theories that portray immigrants as invaders and critics as traitors. Beneath all these disturbing developments in the crackdown on immigrants lies a core question: Is the United States still a democracy governed by civilian law, or is it becoming a militarized state ruled by executive whim? The courts may still provide a line of defense. California's lawsuit regarding the unauthorized deployment of federal troops will test the judiciary's willingness to uphold the Constitution. However, history teaches us that legal battles alone cannot protect democracy when institutions are co-opted or eroded. What is unfolding is more than a dispute over immigration policy; it is a stress test of America's democratic fabric. The use of immigration raids to justify military actions, the demonization of peaceful protests, and the consolidation of emergency powers—these are not isolated events. They form a pattern. While Americans seem divided on the issue of military use in the Los Angeles immigration crackdown, with half in favour and the other half, particularly Californians, opposed, June 14th, 2025, the 'No Kings National Day of Action,' promises to be a pivotal day for America as immigration protests, which have spread to other cities, will likely reach their peak on that day. While this unfolds, Trump will head to Canada to attend the G-7 meeting while keeping a watchful eye on events back home. Meanwhile, the fate of the Republic may hinge not on whether Trump builds a wall, but on whether Americans permit him to dismantle the walls of constitutional restraint in the name of constructing it.
