
Parents close to deadline for GHIC cards warn experts
If you have an existing EHIC you can continue to use it until the expiry date on the card. Once it expires, you'll need to apply for a UK GHIC to replace it. You can apply for a new card up to 9 months before your current card expires.
Alicia Hempsted, travel insurance expert at MoneySuperMarket, says: 'With schools in the UK breaking up for summer as early as Wednesday June 25, some parents now have just 20 working days left to apply for their Global Health Insurance Cards (GHIC) to ensure they arrive in time.
'Free to apply for and lasting for up to five years, applying for a GHIC card couldn't be simpler. Visit the NHS website, provide the appropriate details and then wait 24 hours for your application to be approved.
All you need to know about the new free Global Health Insurance Card (GHIC) https://t.co/uH9paMtlc2 #MartinLewis — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) January 7, 2021
"It is important to note that each family member requires a GHIC card, so parents will need to complete one for each child. Once approved, your card will be sent to your address and should arrive within 15 working days.'
You can apply for a UK GHIC if you're a resident in the UK. You can also add your family members to your application when you apply.
You'll need to provide your:
full name
address
date of birth
National Insurance number
Health and Care number (if you're from Northern Ireland)
If I have a UK GHIC do I also need travel insurance?
UK GHIC is not a replacement for travel insurance. You also need travel and medical insurance for the duration of your trip.
Alicia says: 'While a GHIC card will cover treatment for emergencies, it is not a direct replacement for travel insurance. Having the appropriate travel insurance before your holiday is vital, as there are several things that GHIC doesn't cover, such as medical repatriation or treatment in a private health facility should you need it.
'Wherever you're planning to travel this summer, it's vital to have the right travel insurance in place for you and your family so you can enjoy your trip worry-free.'
You should also check FCDO travel advice on GOV.UK for the country you're visiting.
Recommended reading:
What is a GHIC card, and which countries are covered?
'In the event of a medical emergency, a GHIC card allows travellers to access state healthcare on the same basis as a resident in the country that you are visiting," says Alicia.
'GHIC covers emergency healthcare in any country within the European Economic Area (EEA), and other countries such as Montenegro, Australia and Jersey.
"A full list of countries is available on the NHS website.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
9 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Patients 'waiting 48 hours in hospital corridors' but Betsi health board says things are getting better
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info NHS chiefs were asked how Ysbyty Glan Clwyd's emergency department could be 'de-escalated' when patients in Conwy are still reportedly waiting up to 48 hours in hospital corridors. The issue was raised at a social care and health scrutiny committee at Conwy council's Coed Pella HQ, where councillors grilled Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board chiefs on the state of the NHS in North Wales. Attending the meeting were Dyfed Edwards, chair of the health board; Gareth Evans, integrated health community director; and Alison Cowell, assistant area director for child and adolescent health. Mr Edwards began by acknowledging the challenges the board has faced since being placed in special measures two years ago. He told councillors there had been 'challenges in every area' but claimed the situation had since stabilised. He also pointed to significant reductions in patient backlogs. He said there had been a 43% reduction in the number of patients waiting two years or more for treatment. Sign up for the North Wales Live newslettersent twice daily to your inbox. Health chiefs added that a number of areas had improved, citing the example of Ysbyty Glan Clwyd's emergency department, which in 2022 been designated as a Service Requiring Significant Improvement (SRSI) due to concerns raised by the Healthcare Inspectorate Wales. It was de-escalated following an unannounced follow-up inspection of the Emergency Department in 2024. But the claims were met with opposition from councillors, including Cllr Cheryl Carlisle, who questioned how the department could have been de-escalated while patient experiences remained 'worse than ever'. She said: "You say that Ysbyty Glan Clwyd (YGC), the emergency department (E.D) there, has been de-escalated by the Health Inspectorate for Wales, but the patient experience for those of us in Conwy is worse than ever. There are waits of 48 hours. I regularly witness my residents for 48 hours in chairs in corridors, and I'm not quite sure how de-escalation has come around, when things are patently so bad in this central area." Responding, Mr Gareth Evans defended the board's progress, insisting some performance measures had improved, although he acknowledged major pressures remained. He said: "I don't think waits have got worse. I think, in some areas, performance data is telling us things have got a bit better. 'So things like how long people are waiting in ambulances before they are offloaded has actually got better; however, there are still some areas which probably haven't improved and probably are pretty much the same. So, we still have far too many people that wait more than 12 hours for admission once they need to be admitted. That is a key performance indicator that we are not getting worse on, but we are struggling to make the improvements that we would like to. "And that is because that particular key performance measure is highly dependent on things that go on outside the emergency department - how long people are delayed getting home from hospital, and indeed, how many people are coming to the front door in the first place. "So, I wouldn't want to play down the experience of people who use our services and our E.D at YGC (who say it) still isn't good enough. It isn't. But the concerns that the Healthcare Inspectorate Wales identified when they placed us into special measures have been addressed.' He added: "But it doesn't mean it's perfect by any means. The problems we have at YGC E.D are probably no different than the ones we have at E.D departments anywhere in the UK, I would suggest. "So there is lots, lots more improvement work going on, and we will need to go on so that hopefully, one day, you'll sit here and say things have got better.' Public notices in your area


Wales Online
15 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Lack of GPs in Conwy raised with health chiefs
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Conwy councillors have raised concerns with health chiefs about a lack of GPs in the county. The matter was debated at a social care and health scrutiny committee at Conwy's Coed Pella HQ, where councillors questioned Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board chiefs on the NHS. Councillors complained of a lack of GP surgeries, claiming patients can't get an appointment. Old Colwyn Cllr David Carr grilled Betsi's chiefs on the lack of access locally to doctors, arguing the case for more health care centres. He said: 'Really, the essential thing we need to do is to improve GP services, because that is the first point of contact. The situation at the moment isn't really a very adequate situation. GPs have too many patients, and that is the real problem.' Sign up for the North Wales Live newslettersent twice daily to your inbox. Cllr Carr said the responsibility was on GPs to pay the capital costs if they wanted to move to a suitable building that could accommodate more patients, with the NHS only covering running costs. He added: "We do need to put money into that. We do need health centres with medical staffing. The situation is, at the moment, in my ward… it's not working. The GP surgery in my ward has too many patients. But the situation isn't working for anyone. What we need is some way of being able to accommodate people. "My suggestion is - but this would require funding - is that we put health centres into areas where we have too many patients. Put health centres in and staff them with medical staff. That's what we need to do. Because we are getting more people going to A&E because they can't get a GP appointment. Or some people don't bother at all, and they get really sick. It is more about prevention.' Cllr Carr went on to say that some residents were forced to visit GP surgeries out of their area and could only get emergency appointments. He also raised concerns over the way in which GP surgeries were funded, claiming many didn't want to expand. He added: "The basic things are being missed if you haven't got emergency appointments. How can you deliver at that local level?' Chair of the health board Mr Dyfed Edwards was in attendance and admitted provision was not good enough. 'I live in an area where there used to be four GP practices, and now there is one. And I've gone from one to the other gradually and ended up with the last GP standing, and that's serves an operation of 15,000,' he said. "I agree with your analysis that it's too much. So as a result, there is massive pressure and difficulties getting an appointment. And as you say, people bypass the GP, going straight through to E.D and putting extra pressure there. So, we need to do something.' Mr Edwards then said the NHS had difficulty getting doctors as 'attracting GPs to work as GPs wasn't what it was half a century ago'. GPs are looking for something different now. They are looking for different experiences,' he said. 'Some of them are looking to do general practice but also be involved in research, perhaps. Some are looking to do part-time work. Some are looking to do general practice but also specialise in something.' He then pointed to the success of the health centre in the West End of Colwyn Bay offering a wide range of services, although he admitted it was oversubscribed. He also added his own GP surgery was 'in a terraced house' which 'is not acceptable in 2025'. "But we are improving the estate and looking at health centres,' he said. "Now, I've got to say it is more complicated than you think - that is what I have discovered anyway - because some GP practices are, what you would term, private businesses and don't wish to change because they're happy with their lot. So it is quite difficult to sometimes engage with those GP practices.' He said the good news was that doctors training at Bangor University would come into the system but that would take time. "But we've got to make the offer from the Health Board an attractive one,' he said. 'Not just say, 'Join this practice; you've got 15,000 patients; you've got to work seven days a week,' basically. That's not going to be attractive for young people coming into the profession. So we've got to look at what the offer can be like, and can it be a combination of things and work across boundaries as well. So I think there is a way forward that hopefully will have that impact you highlighted." Public notices in your area


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Does the NHS discriminate against children who attend private school?
On the face of it, the idea that the NHS would withhold treatment to a child with special needs because they attended private school is a clear outrage. I say this as someone who went to a state school, whose children are schooled in the state sector, and who supports VAT on school fees. The NHS has, however, flatly denied the Mail on Sunday 's exclusive about it happening, a story about yet another 'two-tier' system operating in Britain – see also justice and policing – which has predictably grown legs, with other such incidents now being reported. 'The story is not true,' the Department of Health & Social Care said in a statement, 'NHS services are free at the point of use to all.' Well, yes, that's the theory – but we'll get to that. 'NHS occupational therapy services are provided for all children with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). For those without an EHCP, some schools provide on-site NHS occupational therapy,' it continued. So what's going on here? Let's run through the story first. I'm going on what has been reported, because the mother wished to remain anonymous – understandably, at a time of polarisation, when nasty social media pile-ons for perceived wrong-think are all too common. We are told that her eight-year-old son was referred to a paediatrician at Kingston Hospital in south-west London after she noticed he was 'struggling to hold the pen well enough to write properly', along with other mobility issues. It was at the hospital that the problems arose. She was asked to fill in a form which included the question: 'Where does your child go to school?' The mother hoped for an appointment at the children's occupational therapy service in Richmond for a crucial part of his assessment. However, days later, she received a text message saying the child had been declined. She claimed the specialist unit wrote a letter to her GP saying that it was 'only commissioned to provide a service' to children in mainstream schools. Point of order: Many children with disabilities don't attend mainstream schools, and some of those who go private do so with funding from local councils because of the gaps in state provision. But let's move on. The website of the Kingston & Richmond NHS Foundation Trust states: 'Children and young people of school age can be referred via their School SENCo [Special Educational Needs Coordinator] for assessment if they attend a state-funded Richmond school and have a Richmond or Kingston address.' A spokesman declined to address claims by the Mail on Sunday that pupils from private schools had been discriminated against, but 'apologised if the wording in our correspondence caused upset": 'We are in the process of revising it to ensure greater clarity.' Which is about as clear as mud. Nevertheless, he added: 'Occupational therapy services are available to all school-age children who have an Education, Health and Care Plan either through the NHS or the local authority. For children without an EHCP, advice may be available through existing NHS services provided in state school.' Here's where it gets kafkaesque: EHCPs are extraordinarily hard to get, even if you do have mobility issues and struggle to hold a pen. It took us years of exhausting battles to secure one for our eldest, who has autism. You need a battery of assessments to get past first base, often including occupational therapists. It is obviously problematic if you can't get occupational therapy without an EHCP in the first place. By now, you've probably guessed that this appears to be a case of 'heads we win, tails you lose'. Your name's not on the list, you're not getting in for this, that, or any other service you might need. My reading of this story is that it is less about discrimination against private schools than it is yet another case of the NHS using any excuse to say no – and of the horrible bureaucratic hellscape that parents with children with special educational needs and disabilities are thrown into. It is a system that crushes those involved with it. It is like being constantly hit on the head with a sledgehammer while being stretched on a medieval rack. As a family, we've been in the same boat with occupational therapy services: denial of service followed by letters followed by the runaround. At one point, in despair, we went to see our local MP Wes Streeting who is now – ding ding ding! – the health secretary. It doesn't much matter if your child is in the private or the state education system. If they have special needs or disabilities, they and their parents will rapidly come to the conclusion that all the agencies supposed to assist them – the NHS, the local authority, sometimes even the school – are actually against them. That, for me, is the takeaway from this story. It is about a scandalous failure to provide assistance to children who need it. Reform has been repeatedly promised, but we all know that money is tight. Worse still is the fact that bad actors – by which I mean some of the worst local authorities – appear to have the government's ear. Perhaps stories like this will make ministers think twice before listening to them? As for the NHS, it was set up to treat people. It shouldn't matter if your children are schooled publicly or privately. Nor should your postcode play a role. Nor whether or not you have a disability. But the battles I have had to fight in order to overcome what feels like institutional ableism could fill a book. We all pay for the service with our taxes, and we should be able to access necessary treatments. Occupational therapy for a child with mobility issues clearly qualifies, regardless of where they go to school. It really shouldn't be this hard.