DEA's Internal Marijuana Resistance: MMJ BioPharma Delays Reflect a Wider Cannabis Rescheduling Crisis
As Former White House Drug Czar Rahul Gupta revealed DEA intentional sabotage, will DEA Administrator Nominee Terrance Cole Address the Marijuana Crisis? Bureaucratic Inaction and Medical Delays Demand Accountability.
WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESS Newswire / May 25, 2025 / When former White House Drug Czar Rahul Gupta revealed that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) had intentionally delayed marijuana rescheduling from within its own ranks, it sent shockwaves through the cannabis policy world. For MMJ BioPharma Cultivation, the federally compliant pharmaceutical company developing cannabinoid-based treatments for Huntington's disease and Multiple Sclerosis, this revelation merely confirms what they have endured for years: bureaucratic sabotage from inside the DEA.
The similarities between MMJ's stalled license application and the national rescheduling impasse are too glaring to ignore. Both involve DEA officials subverting legal processes, ignoring scientific consensus, and acting contrary to Department of Justice (DOJ) directives. And in both cases, the ultimate cost is borne by suffering patients and U.S. scientific progress.
MMJ's Seven-Year Delay: Compliance Met with Contempt
MMJ BioPharma Cultivation has followed every federal rule:
Yet the DEA has refused to issue a Schedule I Bulk Manufacturing License necessary to grow cannabis for clinical trials. The agency's inaction has persisted for over seven years, despite multiple inspections and full compliance.
The delay isn't based on science. It isn't based on law. It's based on unaccountable bureaucrats like DEA Deputy Assistant Administrator Thomas Prevoznik and marijuana policy administrator Matthew Strait, who wield unchecked power behind closed doors.
Echoes of the Rescheduling Crisis
Gupta's recent statement to The New York Times revealed that the DEA's internal resistance to rescheduling cannabis had torpedoed the Biden administration's efforts. Despite HHS and FDA recommendations, and Attorney General Merrick Garland's approval, DEA leadership stalled the process and raised suspect questions about the medical value of cannabis-a move critics call 'rigged.'
Sound familiar?
That's precisely what MMJ BioPharma Cultivation has alleged in court: that DEA officials have subverted the Controlled Substances Act and DOJ policies, intentionally obstructing the lawful drug development process.
Constitutional Violations, Ignored Directives
The Supreme Court's Axon ruling declared the DEA's Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) system unconstitutional. In line with this, DOJ formally informed courts it would no longer defend those ALJ tribunals. Yet MMJ's case was just sent back into that exact invalid hearing structure, scheduled for June 11, 2025.
This isn't mere delay. It's institutional defiance of the rule of law.
The Real Victims: Patients and Science
While DEA officials delay and deflect, patients with progressive neurological disorders continue to suffer. MMJ's therapies could offer relief, but the agency that should be enabling scientific advancement has instead become its greatest obstacle.
Meanwhile, as DEA devotes resources to sabotaging federally compliant companies, it admits in its own 2025 National Drug Threat Assessment that cartel-backed operations are thriving in legalized states, exploiting weak oversight.
'The irony is glaring,' said MMJ CEO Duane Boise. 'The DEA blocks lawful drug development while cartels profit. The agency is both gatekeeper and roadblock-and now, a constitutional liability.'
Time for Accountability
MMJ BioPharma is calling on:
'This is no longer about science or safety,' Boise concluded. 'This is about entrenched power, defiance of the law, and a complete abandonment of the public interest. Congress must act now.'
MMJ is represented by attorney Megan Sheehan.
CONTACT:
Madison Hisey
[email protected]
203-231-85832
SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
As Fed Enters Blackout Period, June Meeting Expected To Hold Rates Steady
FILE - Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference following the Federal ... More Open Market Committee meeting, Wednesday, May 7, 2025, at the Federal Reserve in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File) Ahead of its next interest rate decision on June 11, Federal Open Market Committee members are now in a blackout period. This limits public comments on monetary policy. Recent speeches suggest that June's meeting will result in holding rates at their current 4.25% to 4.5% level. The CME FedWatch Tool, which gauges the implied forecast of fixed income markets implies it is almost a certainty that rates are held steady in June. However, the FOMC is watching the impact of tariffs closely and incoming data this month, and next, could help inform the path for interest rates later in 2025. The summary of a meeting between Jerome Powell and President Trump on May 29, also suggests the President is still looking for lower interest rates, but Powell has no interest in accommodating that if the economic outlook does not support it. For now, policymakers generally believe the U.S. economy is performing well, limited the need to cut interest rates. Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr summarized the economy in the following way in a speech on May 15. 'In my view, the economy is on solid footing, with solid growth, low and stable unemployment, and inflation continuing to come down towards our 2 percent target. But the outlook has been clouded by trade policies that have led to an increase in uncertainty, contributing to declines in measures of consumer and business sentiment.' Some of these themes were echoed in a more recent speech on June 1 in Korea by Fed Governor Christopher Waller, in exploring the impact of tariffs, he said. 'I do expect tariffs will result in an increase in the unemployment rate that will, all else equal, probably linger. Higher tariffs will reduce spending, and businesses will respond, in part, by reducing production and payrolls.' Then continuing onto inflation Waller said the following, 'I expect the largest factor driving inflation will be tariffs. As I said earlier, whatever the size of the tariffs, I expect the effects on inflation to be temporary, and most apparent in the second half of 2025.' President Trump and Fed Chair Jerome Powell met at the White House on May 29. Powell mentioned in response to a question at the press conference after FOMC's May meeting that he never requests meetings with the President, so presumably the meeting was at the President's request. President Trump has said in several public comments that he believes Powell should cut interest rates immediately. It appears Trump may have made that same point in the meeting with Powell. However, Powell noted that, 'path of policy will depend entirely on incoming economic information and what that means for the outlook.' As such, the President and Fed Chair may have had, in private, a similar debate to their public statements, with Trump calling for lower rates, and Powell stating that interest rates will be set based on economic data. So far, Trumps criticism of Powell doesn't appear to have had any bearing on monetary policy, despite temporarily shaking the markets in late April when it was believed Trump might try to fire Powell. On reported data, the economy continues to show robust job growth and somewhat cooling inflation. However, inflation remains above the FOMC's 2% goal, limiting the prospect for interest rate cuts currently. That's likely why rates won't be cut in June. The big question is tariffs. FOMC policymakers have signaled that they will wait and see what the impact of tariffs are based on the economic data. For now, the impact from tariffs on economic reports is muted, in part because of reporting lags and also because firms are evaluating their response. Once the data of tariff's economic impact becomes more evident, it's likely the FOMC's response will too. However, since that data likely won't come before the June meeting, rates are expected to be held steady.
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Pants ‘singed off her body': Eyewitness describes injuries in Boulder attack
Brian H., who did not want to give his last name due to safety concerns, described to CNN the scene at the Boulder attack. He and his family were having lunch nearby when he heard that somebody was throwing fire at people. Brian then ran towards the scene.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed's Waller Outlines Path to Rate Cuts Later This Year
(Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he continues to see a path to interest-rate cuts later this year amid his expectations that tariffs will boost unemployment and temporarily increase inflation. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Waller said tariffs will raise inflation in the 'coming months,' but he supports looking through any near-term rise in price growth when setting policy as long as inflation expectations remain anchored. 'Assuming that the effective tariff rate settles close to my lower tariff scenario, that underlying inflation continues to make progress to our 2% goal, and that the labor market remains solid, I would be supporting 'good news' rate cuts later this year,' Waller said in remarks prepared for a Bank of Korea conference in Seoul on Monday. Waller referenced a speech he gave in mid-April, in which he outlined two scenarios for how trade policy may unfold. His 'large-tariff' scenario assumed an average trade-weighted tariff on goods of 25% that remained in place for 'some time.' The 'smaller-tariff' scenario assumed a 10% average tariff, and that higher country and sector-specific duties would be negotiated lower over time. In both scenarios, Waller expects the impact of tariffs on inflation would be temporary. He also anticipates the levies will cause an increase in the unemployment rate that will 'probably linger.' That said, job cuts would likely be 'modest,' he said, under the smaller-tariff option. 'Reported progress on trade negotiations since that speech leaves my base case somewhere in between these two scenarios,' Waller said. He now estimates a 15% trade-weighted tariff on goods imports. During Waller's dialogue with Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong, he attributed recent increases in long-term treasury yields to rising concerns over the US fiscal deficit. He said markets had expected some progress toward fiscal consolidation, but estimates now suggest the federal deficit will remain near $2 trillion — about 6% of gross domestic product — for the foreseeable future. 'If there's going to be a lot more debt issuance than the markets thought, they'll buy it — but at a much lower price, unfortunately,' he told Rhee. 'It's not a question of whether it will sell, but the price they're willing to pay.' He added that recent trade and geopolitical developments, including tariff announcements and signals from the White House, have fueled risk aversion among foreign investors. Some institutional buyers are reassessing their exposure to US assets, which could weigh on demand and push yields higher. Inflation Expectations Waller largely dismissed a 2025 surge in the University of Michigan's gauge of consumers' inflation expectations over the next five to 10 years. He said he prefers to look at market-based measures of inflation compensation and professional forecasters' expectations, which have not seen a similar increase. Waller said the 'strong' labor market and recent progress toward the Fed's 2% inflation goal offer policymakers time to see how trade negotiations unfold, echoing many of his colleagues. Fed officials have largely indicated rates are in a good place while they await further clarity on President Donald Trump's policies — particularly tariffs — and their impact on the economy before adjusting borrowing costs. Waller underscored that considerable uncertainty remains around the ultimate level of duties imposed on other countries and sectors. Trump announced Friday that he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%, from 25%. 'As of today, I see downside risks to economic activity and employment and upside risks to inflation in the second half of 2025, but how these risks evolve is strongly tied to how trade policy evolves,' Waller said. Stablecoin Implications Waller also weighed in on stablecoins, describing them as a potential tool to introduce competition into payments system. While noting he couldn't speak for the US government's stance on legislation, Waller said he views stablecoins as 'just a payment instrument,' one that could be issued by non-bank entities in the same way deposits are used for transactions. 'If stablecoins can help drive down costs, especially for small and medium-sized firms doing cross-border transfers, I'm all for allowing competition rather than having regulators set prices,' Waller said. (Updates with Waller's comments after speech.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
