logo
Google faces setback on EU fine as court adviser sides with regulators

Google faces setback on EU fine as court adviser sides with regulators

Global News5 hours ago

Google faced a big setback Thursday in its attempt to overturn a multibillion-dollar European Union antitrust penalty involving Android after a top court's legal adviser sided with regulators.
The European Court of Justice's advocate general, Juliane Kokott, recommended in a non-binding opinion that Google's appeal against the fine worth more than four billion euros (US$4.7 billion) should be dismissed.
The case dates back to 2018, when the EU's executive Commission slapped Google with a 4.134 billion euro fine after finding that the U.S. tech company used the dominance of its mobile Android operating system to throttle competition and reduce consumer choice.
After Google filed an initial appeal, a lower court trimmed the penalty to 4.125 billion euros in 2022, which the company also appealed to the Court of Justice.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Kokott advised that the Court of Justice confirm the fine and uphold the lower court's judgment, according to a press release summarizing her opinion.
Story continues below advertisement
1:25
Google could face Justice Department antitrust probe
Google said it was disappointed with the opinion, adding that if the court follows it, it 'would discourage investment in open platforms and harm Android users, partners and app developers.'
″Android has created more choice for everyone and supports thousands of successful businesses in Europe and around the world,' the company said in a statement.
Opinions from the advocate general aren't legally binding but are often followed by judges.
The judges 'are now beginning their deliberations in this case. Judgment will be given at a later date,' the court said.
The fine was one of three antitrust penalties totaling more than 8 billion euros that the European Commission slapped on Google in the last decade, as the 27-nation bloc launched its crackdown on Big Tech companies.
Story continues below advertisement
Google still faces a decision from Brussels in an antitrust case targeting its digital ad business.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok gets another U.S. reprieve as Trump extends sale deadline
TikTok gets another U.S. reprieve as Trump extends sale deadline

Global News

time36 minutes ago

  • Global News

TikTok gets another U.S. reprieve as Trump extends sale deadline

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for another 90 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark. This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Tuesday. Trump disclosed the executive order on the Truth Social platform Thursday morning. It is the third time Trump has extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court — took effect. The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership that fell apart after China backed out following Trump's tariff announcement. Story continues below advertisement It is not clear how many times Trump can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok.' 0:29 TikTok restores service in U.S. after Trump grants 90-day reprieve amid shutdown threat As the extensions continue, it appears less and less likely that TikTok will be banned in the U.S. any time soon. The decision to keep TikTok alive through an executive order has received some scrutiny, but it has not faced a legal challenge in court — unlike many of Trump's other executive orders. Story continues below advertisement Jeremy Goldman, analyst at Emarketer, called TikTok's U.S situation a 'deadline purgatory.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The whole thing 'is starting to feel less like a ticking clock and more like a looped ringtone. This political Groundhog Day is starting to resemble the debt ceiling drama: a recurring threat with no real resolution.' For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S., and tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50 per cent in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren't sure. Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the Trump administration is once again 'flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks' posed by a China-controlled TikTok. Story continues below advertisement 'An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that's exactly what the president is trying to do,' Warner added.

More than half of Canadian renters plan to buy. So what's stopping them?
More than half of Canadian renters plan to buy. So what's stopping them?

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

More than half of Canadian renters plan to buy. So what's stopping them?

New data shows that although more than half of Canadian renters say they spend more than a third of their net income on rent, many are seriously considering purchasing a home sooner rather than later. However, there are factors holding them back. 'Affordability has improved and we wanted to understand if that had impacted the attitude of renters towards making a move from being a tenant to an owner,' says CEO of Royal LePage Phil Soper. 'We did find that 54 per cent of those polled did want to move into owned housing.' According to the 2025 Canadian Renters Report, 54 per cent of those currently renting their homes this year plan to purchase a property in five years or less, with one-third of those respondents saying they plan to do so within the next two years. Story continues below advertisement At the same time, many of those who plan to buy say they're still waiting to jump into the market. This may raise the question — what are they waiting for, exactly? Of those renters who said they were considering purchasing a home within the next few years, 40 per cent said they were waiting for property prices to decline, while 29 per cent said they were waiting on further interest rate cuts by the Bank of Canada. The central bank's overnight, or benchmark, interest rate remains at 2.75 per cent, as it has since April with the economy overall taking a cautious approach amid the trade war brought on by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies. 1:28 Ground broken on new development to bring 230 affordable homes to Calgary 'Waiting rarely, rarely works out well…it's very rare to see home prices decline,' says Soper. Story continues below advertisement 'Home prices don't come down. Just like overall cost of living rises over time, so does the cost of housing, and you shouldn't try to time house prices like you're getting into timing a stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy For other Canadians surveyed, it may be less about timing the market and more about being priced out of it altogether. Of those surveyed who currently rent but are looking to purchase within the next five years, more than 25 per cent said the reason they haven't made a purchase yet was that they couldn't qualify for financing or a mortgage. There are multiple reasons why a bank or other lender may deny a loan, like a mortgage, to someone, including a poor credit score, but if that isn't the case, often it comes down to an insufficient down payment or a household income that is too low to support the monthly payments. The government of Canada recommends saving personal funds for a down payment on a home between five and 20 per cent of the purchase price, but that varies depending on the price of that home and other factors. 2:01 Canada to accelerate affordable housing with $25 billion investment, Carney says Many renters may not be able to save enough every month to reach their goals in addition to monthly rent costs. Story continues below advertisement The survey results showed that of all renters nationally, 30 per cent said they had to reduce their contributions to savings, retirement or both in order to afford their rent payments. 'It takes sacrifices to live in cities and pay rents or pay mortgages, and I think therein lies one of the challenges with living in a country like Canada where we have a structural housing shortage, we don't have enough homes for our growing population,' says Soper. 'Rent and mortgage payments are high if you want to live in the most vibrant cities with the most employment opportunities.' Prime Minister Mark Carney campaigned on several affordability measures, including lowering some income taxes and providing GST relief for first-time buyers. Sales in Canada have already started to rise, as the Canadian Real Estate Association reports that in May, there was a 3.6 per cent increase in the number of units sold, signalling that many buyers who had been waiting took the plunge into the real estate market last month. The Leger survey, commissioned by Royal LePage, polled more than 1,800 Canadian renters over the age of 18 between June 2 and 9, and included those in major cities such as Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Winnipeg, Toronto, Ottawa-Gatineau, Sherbrooke, Que., Quebec City and Montreal.

Want to fix Canada's air industry? More foreign owners needed: watchdog
Want to fix Canada's air industry? More foreign owners needed: watchdog

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

Want to fix Canada's air industry? More foreign owners needed: watchdog

Canada's Competition Bureau is urging the federal government to allow for up to 100 per cent foreign ownership of domestic-only airlines as a way to spur more competition in the industry. The recommendation is one of several made by the Competition Bureau in a new study looking at Canada's aviation industry, with the watchdog suggesting changes to the 'highly concentrated' market. 'With the right policy changes, governments can create the conditions for new airlines to grow and compete – and give Canadians access to more affordable, reliable options for flights,' Matthew Boswell, commissioner of competition, said in a statement. Among the suggestions is to create a new class of airline that operates only in Canada but allows for owners to be from outside the country, with up to 100 per cent ownership, which it says would allow domestic aviation to benefit from 'greater global expertise and capital.' Story continues below advertisement The watchdog also recommends changing Canada's current single-investor foreign ownership limit, currently set at 25 per cent, up to 49 per cent. 'Allowing more foreign investment in Canadian airlines improves access to capital, drives growth, and promotes competition,' the report reads. 1:49 Manitobans travelling domestically this summer That capital could be important for new airlines hoping to gain a foothold in Canada, as the study found that those who recently entered the market say foreign investment is 'critical' for them to launch and stay in the air. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy According to the bureau, adding just one extra competitor to a route can reduce airfares by about nine per cent. The study outlined various challenges faced by both airlines and travellers, noting that airlines are struggling to enter the market, stay in business and grow, while passengers face higher costs and complex flight bookings. Story continues below advertisement The Competition Bureau says robust competition would result in better service and lower prices. The study says while airlines like Flair and Porter have succeeded and are expanding their services, others, like Lynx Air, have exited, with market concentration remaining 'extremely high' and competition from new entrants 'fragile.' At major airports, Air Canada and WestJet account for roughly 56 to 78 per cent of all domestic passenger traffic. 'A concentrated market has few, large airlines,' the report says. 'They face less pressure to offer passengers a good deal because travellers have few choices.' The report also says the federal government should remove barriers that prevent smaller airports from competing with major hubs for international flights. Currently, international flight exclusivity clauses prevent more than one airport in a local area from hosting international flights, often restricting them to a major hub airport. 'Removing these restrictions would enable secondary airports to respond to market opportunities,' the study found. 'Passengers, workers, and airlines would then have more options.' The watchdog also says a national working group should be established to focus on higher-quality and more accessible services to remote regions. The report also says the minister of transport should no longer be able to override the federal review process and allow deals to move forward that have been deemed anti-competitive. Story continues below advertisement Over the past 20 months, four low-cost carriers have disappeared from the skies, as Lynx Air and Canada Jetlines shut down and WestJet folded subsidiary Swoop and the recently acquired Sunwing Airlines into its mainline service. — with files from The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store