US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say
Satellite image over Fordow, before the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025. 2025 Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS/File Photo
US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say
WASHINGTON - A preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment has determined that U.S. strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's program by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.
The initial report was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters.
The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking U.S. officials - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear program.
Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Hegseth on Sunday said that the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been "completely and fully obliterated."
Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. did not know the extent of the damage yet.
Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed.
One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear program may have been set back only a month or two.
The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear program was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists.
"Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons," Hegseth said in a statement provided to Reuters.
"Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target—and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission."
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
But in a statement to CNN, which first reported the intelligence assessment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the conclusion was incorrect.
"This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong," Leavitt said, according to CNN.
"Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."
Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different U.S. intelligence agencies.
Democrats have previously said Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence.
"There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed," House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday.
Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were canceled on Tuesday. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
22 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trump baffles with sudden U-turn on China buying Iranian oil
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Jun 24) appeared to undermine years of US sanctions on Iran, giving its biggest customer, China the green light to carry on buying its oil as he seeks to bolster a ceasefire with Israel. The announcement on social media, which surprised both oil traders and officials in his own government, could undermine the central element of Washington's Iran policy under multiple administrations, which have sought to cut the regime's main source of revenue by making its top export off limits. 'China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran,' the president said on Truth Social, amid a flurry of posts demanding Israel and Iran cease hostilities. The statement landed only hours after Trump declared the Middle East rivals had agreed to a ceasefire, which got off to a shaky start with early breaches by both sides. It follows massive US airstrikes on several of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities on Sunday, an offensive aimed at stopping Tehran from obtaining an atomic weapon. Oil prices extended losses on Tuesday after Trump's comments, with West Texas Intermediate futures sinking 6 per cent to settle near US$64 a barrel. Futures plunged as the threat to crude flows from the Israel-Iran conflict faded. US Treasury and State department officials handling Iranian oil sanctions were surprised by Trump's statement and uncertain how to immediately interpret it, according to sources familiar with the situation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In the meantime, however, Treasury will continue to strictly enforce related sanctions, said one of the sources, who asked not to be identified given the political and market sensitivity of the issue. The Treasury Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment, while the State Department referred questions to the White House. A senior White House official later signalled that sanctions would remain, saying that the president continues to call on China and others to import American oil rather than Iranian, which would be a violation of US sanctions. The official added that Trump's post was only intended to highlight that his actions over the past several days ensured that the Strait of Hormuz was not impacted, which the official said would have been devastating for China. Tammy Bruce, State Department spokeswoman, declined to provide further specifics during a briefing on Tuesday. 'I'm not going to get ahead of the president or try to guess what his strategy will be,' she said when asked about the comment. 'Things happen quickly and I think we will find out sooner rather than later.' The apparent shift also comes as the Trump administration seeks to hammer out a new trade framework with China and climb down from a tariff war that saw duties reach levels high enough to cut all trade between the world's two biggest economies. The comments appeared to be Trump 'throwing a bone' to China and Iran for cooperating in their respective talks with the US, said Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert. 'Most of us are thinking that it's just rhetoric at this point. But it definitely took me by surprise.' Allowing a specific carve out for China may be an effort by Trump to send positive signals to Beijing as he seeks a new tariff deal, said a source familiar with the president's thinking, also asking not to be identified. While the potential shift may ease some legal risks around China's buying of Iranian oil, it's unclear what impact the change would have on actual flows. China, the world's biggest importer, gets about 14 per cent of its crude from Iran. But that figure is likely higher as some imports are masked as shipments from Malaysia, as well as the United Arab Emirates and Oman, in order to circumvent US sanctions, which Beijing does not recognise. While China has not officially purchased Iranian barrels since June 2022, third-party data providers and traders signal flows have been resilient despite broad US sanctions. That's because the Chinese have built a supply chain outside of Western control, which includes dark fleet ships and yuan-denominated payments, supporting imports of more than one million barrels a day. Iran's oil, often purchased at a discount, is vital for China's substantial private refining sector and a crucial source of fuel for its economy, which has struggled under the weight of a slumping property sector. 'The Iranian oil sanctions have been so significant for so long, but also with relatively muted enforcement,' said Daniel Tannebaum, former Treasury official and partner at Oliver Wyman. 'It would be premature to think that this policy, which would benefit both China and Iran, would go ahead without a longer-term view of ensuring stability in the region, before just literally opening up the spigots to allow legal trade of Iranian oil by China.' Trump as recently as last month, insisted all purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products 'must stop, NOW!' and that buyers would be subject to secondary sanctions and prevented from engaging in any business with the US. That threat built on previous warnings from his administration. In February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington intended to squeeze Iran's oil exports to less than 10 per cent of current levels, as it renewed the 'maximum pressure' campaign deployed during Trump's first term. As part of that effort, the US has sanctioned hundreds of oil tankers for their role in handling Tehran's petroleum and, absent an easing in those measures, some buyers may still take a more cautious approach. The White House has also targeted Chinese entities that bought Iranian oil, something that could make other buyers wary. Likewise, secondary sanctions on Iran's sales remain in place and it's not clear where the president's remarks will leave those. The sanctions were intended to force Iran to voluntarily give up uranium enrichment so that it would never be in a position to obtain a nuclear weapon. It's still unclear if US airstrikes over the weekend seriously damaged the country's nuclear facilities, while the International Atomic Energy Agency still does not know what happened to Tehran's stockpile of 409 kilogrammes of highly-enriched uranium – potentially enough for 10 nuclear warheads. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
China calls CIA videos ‘absurd' attempt to recruit spies
The CIA videos are supposedly aimed at recruiting Chinese officials to help the US. PHOTO: REUTERS BEIJING - Beijing accused the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on June 25 of making an 'absurd' attempt to recruit Chinese citizens via videos posted on social media. China's Ministry of State Security (MSS) said the placement of what amounted to job advertisements on social media platform X was an 'amateurish gambit' to convince people to spy for the Americans. 'These two painstakingly crafted 'job ads ', riddled with clumsy rhetoric and slanderous claims, lay bare the absurd logic and paranoid delusions of American intelligence agencies,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its official WeChat account. 'Once again, the self-proclaimed 'world's top intelligence power' has turned itself into an international laughingstock through its baffling incompetence,' it added. CIA director John Ratcliffe said that the videos, posted in May 2025 and implored the sharing of state secrets – were aimed at 'recruiting Chinese officials to help the US'. Beijing condemned the posts at the time as 'naked political provocation'. The MSS vowed on June 25 to 'resolutely protect the nation's strategic interests and core secrets'. It warned the CIA that 'any attempt to incite betrayal among the Chinese people is doomed to fail, and any plot to infiltrate China for intelligence will prove futile'. The intelligence agency's diatribe was among the top trending items on China's X-like Weibo platform on June 25 , with users mocking the alleged job ads. 'Can we organise a group of scammers to carry out a telecom fraud against the CIA? We can trick the US and make a little money at the same time,' one wrote. The US and China have long traded accusations of espionage. In April , security officials said they had implicated three US 'secret agents' in cyberattacks during the Feb 2025 Asian Winter Games in the north-eastern city of Harbin. The MSS said in March it had sentenced to death a former engineer for leaking state secrets to a foreign power. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
China, Taiwan clash over history, Beijing says can't ‘invade' what is already Chinese territory
Tensions have raised the possibility Beijing may one day make good on threats to take Taiwan by force. PHOTO: REUTERS China, Taiwan clash over history, Beijing says can't 'invade' what is already Chinese territory BEIJING/TAIPEI - China and Taiwan clashed over their competing interpretations of history in an escalating war of words over what Beijing views as provocations from Taiwan's government, and said it is impossible to 'invade' what is already Chinese land. China views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory and has stepped up military and political pressure over the past five years. China has a special dislike of Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te, calling him a 'separatist'. Mr Lai has since June 22 given two speeches in what will be a series of 10 on 'uniting the country', saying that Taiwan is 'of course a country' and China has no legal or historical right to claim it. Speaking on June 25 at a regular news briefing in Beijing, Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said any 'independence provocations' from Mr Lai and his administration will face 'resolute countermeasures'. 'Though the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have not yet been fully reunified, the historical and legal fact that compatriots on both sides belong to one China and that both sides' compatriots are Chinese has never changed,' she said. Tensions between China and Taiwan, including several rounds of Chinese war games, have raised the possibility Beijing may one day make good on threats to take Taiwan by force which could ignite a regional war. China's last war games were in April, and its air force and navy operate around Taiwan on a daily basis, sometimes using dozens of warplanes, according to the island's defence ministry. Asked about US comments on Chinese drills strengthening preparations for an attack, Ms Zhu corrected the reporter. 'Taiwan is a part of China; there is no invasion to speak of,' she said. Mr Lai takes a different view on Taiwan's status and future. In a speech late on June 24, he said Taiwan's future can only be decided by its people, democratically, not by a decision by any party or president, and that 'Taiwan independence' refers to the island not being a part of the People's Republic of China. The defeated Republic of China, founded after the 1911 revolution that brought down the last emperor, fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing a civil war to Mao Zedong's communists, and that remains the island's formal name. 'How old is the Republic of China? It's 113 years old, and will be 114 years old this year. The People's Republic of China? It's only some 70 years old, right? It's simple and clear,' Mr Lai said. This year's 80th anniversary of the end of World War II is another sensitive topic, and China has invited old soldiers who fought for the Republic of China to a military parade in Beijing in early September. Taiwan does not want them to attend, and on June 25, Taiwan's Defence Minister Wellington Koo said Beijing was trying to distort history. 'The war of resistance was led and won by the Republic of China, not the People's Republic of China - this is without a doubt,' he told reporters at Parliament. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
