logo
A Ukrainian MiG Hurled A Bomb Thru The Door of a Russian HQ Bunker

A Ukrainian MiG Hurled A Bomb Thru The Door of a Russian HQ Bunker

Forbes31-03-2025

A GBU-62 strikes the Russian HQ.
Ukrainian air force capture
To Russian commanders in Kherson Oblast in southern Ukraine, a defunct air defense command bunker—once associated with a Ukrainian air force S-300 missile battery—may have seemed like a safe location for a field headquarters.
After all, it was mostly underground and likely featured fortified doors.
But for the Ukrainian air force's modified Mikoyan MiG-29s, newly equipped for precision bombing using a boutique American-designed munition, the bunker was just another target. On or just before Monday, one of the supersonic MiGs hurled a GBU-62 glide bomb, seemingly sending the winged munition right through the bunker's door.
The raid 'minuses the high-ranking officer corps along with equipment,' one Ukrainian blogger quipped. 'Such strikes deprive enemy forces of clear control, and also significantly demoralize the military unit.'
The aim of the HQ raid was to render leaderless the Russian regiments and brigades responsible for attacks on islands in the wide Dnipro River. 'No leadership—no landing on our islands,' the blogger explained.
The aerial attack was just the latest in a long series of them as the tiny Ukrainian air force inducts new munitions and aircraft and continues its transformation into a small but potent precision strike arm.
A GBU-62 under the wing of a Ukrainian Sukhoi Su-27.
Ukrainian air force capture
It's likely every one of the roughly 100 combat aircraft in the Ukrainian inventory—an eclectic mix of ex-Soviet MiGs and Sukhois, ex-Danish and ex-Dutch Lockheed Martin F-16s and ex-French Dassault Mirage 2000s—is equipped for precision bombing using a host of satellite- and inertially-guided glide bombs: American GBU-39s and GBU-62s, French Hammers and potentially even a new Ukrainian model.
Of course, the Russians conduct precision bombings, too. And with hundreds more jets than the Ukrainians have, the Russians have the numerical advantage in the air.
But Ukrainian jamming of satellite radios throws off Russian munitions' accuracy more than Russian jamming throws off Ukrainian accuracy, as the Ukrainian bombs have superior backup guidance in the form of inertial systems that calculate a munition's position by way of precise accelerometers.
The GBU-62 that popped the Russian headquarters in Kherson is American-made but uniquely Ukrainian. Shortly after Russia widened its war on Ukraine in February 2022, the administration of ex-President Joe Biden rushed to equip old Ukrainian MiGs and Sukhois with an inexpensive but precise glide bomb combining a standard 500-pound dumb bomb with the wings of the new Small Diameter Bomb and the guidance kit from the U.S. military's non-gliding Joint Direct Attack Munition.
The approximately $50,000 GBU-62 is a killer—and allows Ukraine's MiG-29 brigades to do what the Russians have done with their much more expensive Iskander ballistic missiles, each of which costs upward of $3 million.
When the Kremlin wanted to eliminate a Ukrainian headquarters in a buried bunker in Kharkiv in the early hours of the wider war three years ago, it first located the Soviet-built HQ in long-forgotten archives—and then aimed an Iskander at it.
Ukraine duplicated the feat with a small surveillance drone, a single old fighter and one cobbled-together precision bomb.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO needs to get ready for modern war — and fast, top commander tells BI
NATO needs to get ready for modern war — and fast, top commander tells BI

Business Insider

time36 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

NATO needs to get ready for modern war — and fast, top commander tells BI

NATO still has work to do before it becomes the 21st-century fighting force that it needs to be, and allies need to invest heavily in their domestic defense industries, a top commander told Business Insider. "I think it's a struggle," Adm. Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation and the man overseeing alliance modernization efforts, said during an interview this week at his office in Norfolk, Virginia. In recent decades, NATO militaries have been focused predominantly on lower-end counterinsurgency operations in places like Africa or Afghanistan, depending heavily on expeditionary forces enabled by uncontested airpower. In this context, allies thought differently about their own defense, and supporting industries were not sufficiently focused on preparing the alliance for a modern war against a top adversary. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 set off alarm bells throughout NATO, with Western officials warning that Moscow could feel emboldened to push deeper into Europe if it wasn't adequately deterred, presenting the alliance with the possibility of a large-scale conventional war or worse. The past three years have seen many NATO states dramatically boost their defense spending and buy more weaponry. Countries along the eastern and northern edges — the front lines of the alliance, as they share borders with Russia — are hardening their defenses. However, many still argue that there's more work to be done. "I think we forgot all the big principles of a symmetric war, and so it's where we need to reinvest," Vandier said, referring to a conflict in which combatants are more evenly matched. He added that because the defense industrial base shrank so much over the years, ramping it up is "very difficult." Delivering on high-end platforms like warships, fighter jets, and missiles can be a yearslong process. A single F-35 stealth aircraft, for instance, takes around 18 months to build. Vandier warned that if a fight breaks out before NATO has sufficiently bolstered its defenses, the alliance could have a major problem. He acknowledged that NATO still has a long way to go to reach its full potential as a modern fighting force. Member countries are pledging to spend more of their respective GDPs on defense, but the process of going from funding projects to delivery is far from quick. "It's a question of speed," Vandier said. In 2014, when Russia illegally annexed the Crimean peninsula, NATO members agreed to spend 2% of their national GDP on defense. Since then, amid increased Russian aggression, the number of allies that have met or exceeded that goal has steadily risen from three to 22 last year. Earlier this week, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said all allies will reach the 2% target this year, though he is calling for heads of state to agree to a new target — 5%, in line with calls from the Trump administration — at a summit later this month. "The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defense," he said Monday at an event in London. "We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defense plans in full. The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends." Modernizing at speed In its quest to become a modern fighting force, NATO is also focused on integrating asymmetric solutions like drones and other new emerging technologies into its planning. The conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have highlighted the value of uncrewed systems. Vandier and his Allied Command Transformation are at the forefront of these efforts. One initiative they've rolled out is Task Force X, an experiment underway in the Baltic Sea that uses drones, artificial intelligence, and other tech to monitor and deter aggressive Russian activity in the region. Unlike the West's traditional weapons procurement process, which can be slow, Task Force X is NATO's attempt to showcase its speed by quickly deploying cheap and readily available systems to counter Russia. It is simultaneously working to integrate emerging tech with traditional maritime operations. Vandier emphasized the importance of achieving what he described as "digital transformation at speed." He said that another crucial element in NATO's efforts to modernize is leveraging commercial space to improve command, control, communications, and computers, simply known as C4, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. "These are, I think, the two most critical domains for the alliance at war," the commander said. Meanwhile, NATO just shared it has signed a contract with US commercial satellite imaging company Planet Labs PBC in a first-of-its-kind agreement that will give the alliance expanded surveillance capabilities, helping it track potential threats such as new defensive fortifications or large troop build-ups along the eastern edge. Vandier said that, aside from the US, no other country in NATO had this capability and stressed that if America pivots all its surveillance focus to the Pacific, the alliance needs to be self-sufficient and have the resources to keep tabs on Russia, Ukraine, and the rest of Europe, from the Arctic down to the Black Sea. The seven-figure agreement is another example of NATO's efforts to modernize at speed and firm up Europe's defenses. "We've been able to do that in three months, from idea to delivery," Vandier said. "Three months to find the money, make the contract, put that in the field."

Russia launches over 50 strikes on Sumy Oblast, injuring two women
Russia launches over 50 strikes on Sumy Oblast, injuring two women

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russia launches over 50 strikes on Sumy Oblast, injuring two women

Russian forces attacked Sumy Oblast over 50 times on 12 June. Twenty-five settlements have come under attack, two women aged 88 and 57 have been injured and infrastructure facilities and residential buildings have been damaged. Source: Sumy Oblast Military Administration Details: Russian forces struck 25 settlements in 11 hromadas in Sumy Oblast from the morning of 12 June to the morning of 13 June. The most intense attacks were recorded in the Sumy and Shostka districts. [A hromada is an administrative unit designating a village, several villages, or a town, and their adjacent territories – ed.] The Russians fired over 50 munitions and drones: 35 strikes were conducted with multiple-launch rocket systems, over 10 with guided aerial bombs and 20 VOG high-explosive fragmentation grenade drops from UAVs. The Russians also used FPV drones. Two women aged 88 and 57 have been injured in a drone attack on civilian infrastructure in the Mykolaivka hromada. Both suffered shrapnel wounds. A house was completely destroyed in the Seredyna-Buda hromada. An outbuilding was damaged in the Putyvl hromada. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Russia attacks Ukraine with 4 missiles and 55 UAVs: 43 targets downed, 9 strikes occurred
Russia attacks Ukraine with 4 missiles and 55 UAVs: 43 targets downed, 9 strikes occurred

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russia attacks Ukraine with 4 missiles and 55 UAVs: 43 targets downed, 9 strikes occurred

Since the evening of 12 June, Russian forces have attacked Ukraine with four Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles and 55 Shahed-type attack UAVs and various types of decoy drones; 43 targets were destroyed, but there were nine strikes. Source: Ukrainian Air Force on Telegram Quote: "As of 09:00, air defence has downed 43 enemy Shahed-type UAVs and other types of drones in the north, east and south of the country. Twenty-eight were shot down by firepower, and 15 disappeared from radar/were suppressed by electronic warfare." Details: It is reported that the Russians attacked Kharkiv, Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts. Strikes were recorded in nine locations. The air attack was repelled by aircraft, anti-aircraft missile forces, electronic warfare units, unmanned systems units and mobile fire groups from the Ukrainian defence forces. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store