Toothpaste widely contaminated with lead and other metals, US research finds
Toothpaste can be widely contaminated with lead and other dangerous heavy metals, new research shows.
Most of 51 brands of toothpaste tested for lead contained the dangerous heavy metal, including those for children, or marketed as green. The testing, conducted by the Lead Safe Mama non-profit, also found concerning levels of highly toxic arsenic, mercury and cadmium in many brands.
About 90% of toothpastes contained lead, 65% contained arsenic, just under half contained mercury, and one-third had cadmium. Many brands contain a number of the toxins.
The highest levels detected violate some federal and state limits in the US, though the thresholds have been roundly criticized by public health advocates for not being protective – no level of exposure to lead is safe, the federal government has found.
'It's unconscionable – especially in 2025,' said Tamara Rubin, Lead Safe Mama's founder. 'What's really interesting to me is that no one thought this was a concern.'
Lead can cause cognitive damage to children, harm the kidneys and cause heart disease, among other issues. Lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic are all carcinogens.
Rubin first learned that lead was added to toothpaste about 12 years ago while working with families that had children with high levels of the metal in their blood. The common denominator among them was a brand of toothpaste, Earthpaste, that contained lead.
Last year she detected high levels in some toothpaste using an XRF lead detection tool. The levels were high enough to raise concern, and she crowdfunded with readers to send popular brands to an independent laboratory for testing.
Among those found to contain the toxins were Crest, Sensodyne, Tom's of Maine, Dr Bronner's, Davids, Dr Jen and others.
So far, none of the companies Lead Safe Mama checked have said they will work to get lead out of their product, Rubin said. Several sent her cease-and-desist letters, which she said she ignored, but also posted on her blog.
Some companies have defended themselves, often claiming that lead is found in trace levels throughout the environment and is impossible to avoid. Others have said the levels Rubin found are not concerning.
The federal Baby Food Safety Act of 2024, which is stalled in Congress, called for lead limits in kids' food or personal care products like toothpaste of five parts per billion (ppb). California's limit on lead in baby food is two ppb, but it does not include toothpaste.
Most toothpastes exceeded those thresholds.
The FDA's current lead limit for children is 10,000 ppb, and 20,000 ppb for adults. None exceeded the FDA limits.
The state of Washington recently enacted a law with 1,000 ppb limits – several exceeded that and have been reported, Rubin said, but companies have time to get in compliance with the new rules.
The FDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did Crest's parent company, Procter & Gamble.
Rubin said the contamination seems to lie in some ingredients added to toothpaste, including hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonate and bentonite clay. Hydroxyapatite is extracted from cow bone and added because it allegedly helps teeth absorb calcium, though Rubin said she doubts it does. Calcium carbonate is added to help remove stains from teeth. Bentonite clay is a cleaning agent.
Those with the highest levels all had bentonite clay. Meanwhile, Rubin's testing of hydroxyapatite and calcium carbonate as individual ingredients showed concerning levels of lead and other metals, suggesting those are the source.
Several children's toothpastes, like Dr Brown's Baby Toothpaste, did not test positive for any metals and did not contain the ingredients in question.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
As ivermectin goes over the counter, some pharmacists worry about a lack of guidance
Boise, Idaho, pharmacist Matt Murray has no choice but to disappoint the handful of people who call him every day asking for a drug used to treat parasitic worms. He could give them the medication, called ivermectin, but only with a doctor's note. The callers aren't in the throes of an active intestinal worm infestation, Murray said. They simply want access to the pills without having to see a doctor first. 'A lot of people are calling, asking, 'Do you guys have it for sale? Can I buy it? How do I get it?'' said Murray, the director of operations for the independent Customedica Pharmacy. 'Not so much, 'How does it work? What is it for?'' The volume of such calls has increased sharply since mid-April, when Idaho Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, signed a bill into law mandating that ivermectin be available to anyone who wants it over the counter. While the law technically says that pharmacists like Murray can sell the drug over the counter, the Food and Drug Administration hasn't approved it to be used this way. 'I don't feel that we could just sell prescription ivermectin,' Murray said. 'It's not designed or packaged for retail sale.' That hasn't stopped frenzied social media claims about ivermectin's supposed 'miraculous' abilities to cure everything from Covid to cancer. 'Ivermectin eliminated the cancer on the skin of my shoulder and it only took 3 weeks,' one person wrote on X. 'It's also working wonders on my eczema,' another wrote on the platform. Ivermectin has never been formulated or labeled specifically for over-the-counter use, like aspirin or an antacid. Without proper guidance, there is concern that people could overdose on the medication. Interest in using drugs or experimental treatments in unapproved ways has gained steam with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s appointment as head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy recently said on a podcast that people should have access to controversial alternative therapies like stem cells and chelation therapy to remove heavy metals from the body. The FDA has warned that neither should be used without oversight from a doctor. The hype has prompted lawmakers in 16 states, including Idaho, to propose and in some cases pass legislation to make the pills readily available for anyone without a prescription. While health insurance covers many prescription drugs, including ivermectin, it doesn't cover over-the-counter medicines. This year, two other GOP-led states — Arkansas and Tennessee — passed over-the-counter ivermectin laws. NBC News called 15 independent pharmacies in those states, plus Idaho, to ask whether pharmacists could provide ivermectin without a prescription. Not a single one said they'd sell the drug over the counter, despite the new laws. All, however, appeared to be sympathetic to the request. One pharmacist in Arkansas took the time to explain that he needed to wait until the FDA provided guidance on over-the-counter ivermectin. Until then, he and all the others said, over-the-counter access to ivermectin would have to wait. Pharmacists say that just because over-the-counter ivermectin is written into law doesn't mean it should be made available to anyone who asks for it. They still rely on federal health guidance. 'Most over-the-counter drugs, especially ones that were prescriptions at one point, go through some FDA approval process,' Murray said. 'In that process, it gets decided what the labeling is going to say,' including warnings and directions. Republican lawmakers in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and West Virginia have also proposed bills to make ivermectin available over the counter. Nearly all would simply permit health care providers and pharmacists to distribute ivermectin without a prescription. Most, like the one proposed in Alabama, would also protect pharmacists from any possible disciplinary action such as fines or license suspension from pharmacy licensing boards for dispensing it. Maine's proposed legislation specifically permits ivermectin to be sold to people who want to try it for Covid, cancer or the flu. Mississippi's bill would limit over-the-counter ivermectin to anyone 18 and older. The drug likely wouldn't be placed on store shelves, but be kept behind pharmacy counters, much like some cold medicines. Even if states do pass laws protecting pharmacists from disciplinary action, like the proposed legislation in Alabama, Murray said that he and his colleagues remain concerned. 'If you dispense something that doesn't have directions or safety precautions on it, who's ultimately liable if that causes harm?' Murray said. 'I don't know that I would want to assume that risk.' The Food and Drug Administration warns that taking large doses of ivermectin 'can be dangerous' and cause vomiting, diarrhea, low blood pressure, seizures, coma and even death. The drug could also interact with other medications like blood thinners, the FDA says. A spokeswoman for CVS Health said that while its pharmacies are able to dispense ivermectin with a prescription, they are 'not currently selling ivermectin over the counter' in any state. Walgreens declined to comment. What ivermectin is — and isn't Ivermectin was discovered by Japanese biochemist Satoshi Ōmura in the 1970s, first as a veterinary drug and then as a groundbreaking treatment for dangerous and disfiguring tropical diseases such as river blindness, as well as tapeworms, scabies and other worm-related infections. Hundreds of millions of people in mostly underdeveloped countries have used it safely with minimal side effects, such as fatigue or diarrhea, for decades. During the pandemic, the true benefit of the drug got twisted and distorted amid a social media frenzy. When mainstream doctors and scientists insisted that ivermectin didn't treat Covid, mostly conservative groups embraced it in direct opposition to public health officials. Podcaster Joe Rogan told his tens of millions of followers that ivermectin worked to cure him of Covid in 2021, prompting many people to seek out the drug as a way to treat mild or moderate cases of the virus. While there was early hope that ivermectin could ease Covid symptoms, it didn't treat respiratory viruses. It still doesn't. Ivermectin has also been touted as a cancer cure. On the same podcast, actor Mel Gibson claimed ivermectin had wiped out Stage 4 cancer in three of his friends. Gibson offered no proof. Some cancer patients believed the promises, with potentially devastating results. 'I tried that last year,' Scott Adams, the creator of the 'Dilbert' comic strip, wrote on X, 'to no effect.' Adams, a vocal Donald Trump supporter, revealed in May that he'd been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. 'There are claims of it working, but I am aware of no patient who benefitted from it.' Adams asked his social media followers to stop inundating him with advice to take ivermectin. Adams wrote that his 'odds of survival have probably jumped from zero to 30%' because he decided on a different treatment and will be 'working with top doctors in the field.' When one person pleaded with him in the comments not to discourage people from trying ivermectin, the cartoonist didn't play around: 'Your advice could kill people if they delay other treatments.' There's simply no evidence that ivermectin treats cancer, said Dr. Harold Burstein, a breast oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. He knows because he's looked for it, without success. Since the Rogan podcast featuring Gibson aired, Burstein has had an uptick in patients asking him about ivermectin. He scoured the medical literature looking for any shred of indication that the drug could be useful to his patients. 'There are exactly zero published clinical trials in a human being on whether ivermectin does or doesn't treat cancer,' Burstein said. 'I can assure you that if any oncologist in America had seen' a benefit to ivermectin, he said, 'they would have been eager to write it up.' Some scientists are indeed trying to figure out whether ivermectin has any impact on cancer outcomes. Researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles have begun a preliminary study combining ivermectin with an immunotherapy drug for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Final results aren't expected anytime soon. Doctors tried to make ivermectin 'work' Ivermectin is manufactured in the U.S. by Merck. The company said in a statement that ivermectin should only be used within the approved FDA framework. 'The use of ivermectin is not supported beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information,' a Merck spokesperson wrote in an email. Despite the growing push for over-the-counter ivermectin, there's no sales data available for how many people are buying the pills. Focusing on making ivermectin available without a doctor's prescription is the latest in a trend of mostly conservative politicians sidestepping expert medical advice. Utah and Florida, for example, recently banned community water fluoridation, despite decades of widespread evidence that it drastically reduces tooth decay. Dr. Hugh Cassiere, director of critical care services for South Shore University Hospital, part of Northwell Health in New York, said, 'This is about constituents who either heard, read or saw something on social media and now have an idea that this is something good. They're going right to their congressman or senator to demand access.' 'That's not how medicine should work,' he said. Scientists did, in fact, study whether ivermectin helped people with Covid. Dr. Adrian Hernandez, a cardiologist with the Duke Clinical Research Institute in Durham, North Carolina, led a large research project that ultimately showed ivermectin had no benefit in treating acute Covid. 'It's always great that legislators care about the health of the state,' Hernandez said. 'But ivermectin didn't help patients get better any faster.' Hernandez's study was posted on a preprint server called medRxiv in 2022. Studies posted on the site are considered preliminary because they haven't been peer-reviewed. A second 2022 paper published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that Covid patients treated with ivermectin weren't any less likely to be hospitalized than people who didn't get the drug. A third study that did suggest a benefit was later retracted because it contained fraudulent data, according to the publisher. None of this stopped many from demanding access to the drug. During the pandemic, hospitals reported a spike in patients who had been poisoned after taking veterinary-grade ivermectin intended for livestock. Two deaths in New Mexico were linked to the drug. Even the FDA warned that high doses of ivermectin can cause seizures, coma and death. 'You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it,' the FDA tweeted on Aug. 21, 2021. The controversial post was later deleted but can still be accessed through web archives. A Merck spokesperson said the drug shouldn't be used for anything other than clearing parasitic infestations. Northwell Health's Cassiere said medications, especially ivermectin, should only be used after talking with a qualified health care provider, no matter how politicians vote. 'If you're not an expert, if you did not go to medical school, nurse practitioner school, physician assistant school, and don't have the proper training, then you should not be recommending therapies outside of that expertise,' he said. 'Are you going to get a bank loan at the deli on the corner? I don't think so.'
Reuters
16 hours ago
- Reuters
Otsuka's kidney disease therapy trial results heat up battle with rival Vera
June 6 (Reuters) - Otsuka's (4578.T), opens new tab experimental therapy for a potentially life-threatening kidney disease more than halved severe levels of protein in the urine of patients, intensifying the battle for an effective new treatment with rival Vera Therapeutics (VERA.O), opens new tab. The Japan-based company said on Friday its therapy, sibeprenlimab, cut proteinuria levels by 51.2% in patients with Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, also known as Berger's disease, at nine months in a late-stage trial. The data comes just days after Vera said its drug, atacicept, reduced protein levels in patients' urine by 46%, compared with a 7% reduction with a placebo, meeting the main goal of a 428-patient late-stage study. Shares of the U.S.-based drug developer slid 31% to $20.89. Analysts, however, said that though data from Otsuka's sibeprenlimab might look superior, it was unlikely that doctors would interpret it that way. The difference between the two datasets is not too clinically diverse to affect demand for Vera's drug, said Jefferies analyst Farzin Haque. Berger's disease causes abnormal protein buildup in the kidneys and could eventually lead to the organ's failure. Analysts have estimated the U.S. market for its treatments could be worth as much as $10 billion. Otsuka has already applied for the FDA's accelerated approval for its therapy to treat the disease. However, its sales would largely depend on whether the treatment can improve kidney function, analysts said. Even if the drug gains accelerated approval, Otsuka said it plans to study whether it can preserve the organ's ability to filter toxins from blood, measured as the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). "The magnitude of the protein reduction should translate into eGFR preservation down the line, because ultimately that's what patients are going to be asking for," Dana Rizk, the trial's investigator and a professor of medicine at the University of Alabama in Birmingham, told Reuters. The study is expected to be completed in early 2026.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
10 foods you didn't realize contained disease-causing food additives
The so-called 'Skittles ban,' signed by Gavin Newsom in 2023 banned four food additives that have been linked to kidney, thyroid and gastrointestinal cancer and mood disorders. California's law is a big step forward in protecting Americans from dangerous chemicals in foods and health officials and experts are calling on other states, and the federal government, to follow its lead. The four banned additives in the Golden State are: brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben and red dye No.3. Diet and citrus sodas: Brominated vegetable oil. When you reach for a refreshing bubbly drink beware you also could be reaching for brominated vegetable (BVO), one of the additives banned in California. The ingredient often shows up in diet and citrus sodas to stop ingredients in fruit-flavored soft drinks from separating. BVO hasn't been declared a carcinogen and it is still allowed to be used in foods, though the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said the ingredient should be consumed only on an interim basis. Exposure to BVO can irritate the nose, throat, lungs and the mucous membranes inside the mouth, throat, stomach and lungs. Repeated and long term exposure to the chemical can also cause neurological issues like memory loss, impaired balance and coordination and headaches and in rodent studies, the animals had high tissue levels of bromine, which posed a danger to thyroid health. Chocolate candies and flavored chips: Artificial colors. Some popular brands of bite-sized chocolate candies and sweetly flavored chips get their signature hues and flavor from artificial coloring, including Red 3, included in California's new bill, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5, Yellow 6 and Red 40. While the additives may make these foods eye-catching and tasty, they can also make them harmful to your health. Some research has shown these dyes are associated with allergies and asthma and a recent study in mice linked Red 40 to inflammatory bowel disease. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has reported that Red 3 causes cancer in animals and there is evidence several other dyes are carcinogenic. Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 have been found to be contaminated with benzidine and other carcinogens. Additionally, at least four dyes - Blue 1, Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 - cause hypersensitivity reactions, with studies showing consumption of artificial food coloring produces statistically significant increases in ADHD symptoms in children. Red 3 specifically has been found to cause cancer and thyroid tumors in lab animals and has been linked to hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral effects in children. But the ingredient, which has been banned in the European Union, China and India because of its dangerous impact on health, has been shown to cause nose, throat and lung irritation. It has also been shown in lab tests to cause renal and thyroid tumors to form in rats. Cheeses, pickles, syrups, jams and wines: Propylparaben. The fourth and last additive included in California's new ban is propylparaben. That charcuterie board at your next housewarming party may look appetizing and be jam packed with the classics, but a wine and cheese night should be enjoyed with caution. Propylparaben occurs as a natural substance in plants and some insects. It is typically used in a variety of water-based cosmetics and personal-care products, as well as a food additive. The substance, however, has been shown to cause endocrine disruption and reproductive issues. However, the FDA has said the substance is generally regarded as safe. Lunch and processed meats: Heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Classified as carcinogens, lunch meats and processed meats like hot dogs, sausage and bacon contain two ingredients called heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Heterocyclic amines are mutagenic chemicals that form when cooking muscle meats, such as beef, pork, chicken and fish. They are some of the most potent mutagens and have shown to induce tumors in animal models. PAHs are chemicals that occur naturally in coal, crude oil and gasoline. They come from burning coal, oil, gas, wood, garbage and tobacco and the high heat needed to cook meat will form PAHs. PAHs, however, may cause cancer and harm the eyes, kidneys and liver. Potato chips and French fries: Acrylamide. While your guilty pleasure may be diving into a bag of potato chips on the couch or you find yourself hitting the drive-thru to satisfy a craving for french fries, these two foods should be eaten with caution because they contain acrylamide. Acrylamide is a substance that can form through a natural chemical reaction in some foods during high-temperature cooking, such as frying, roasting and baking. However, in the body, acrylamide is converted into a compound called glycidamide, which causes mutations in and damage to the DNA. Additionally, studies in rodent models have found exposure to the substance increases the risk for several types of cancer. Gummy and sour candies: Titanium dioxide. With Halloween right around the corner, store shelves are stocked with candy favorites. And while trick-or-treaters may want to fill their bags with classic sour and gummy treats, they should heed caution before unwrapping their night's reapings. These popular candies contain titanium dioxide, a substance that has been shown to cause irritation of the eyes, nose and throat. Exposure to it in animal studies also showed it to cause lung cancer. This compound is banned in Europe over concerns its particles have genotoxic effects — or the ability to directly damage a person's DNA. However, the FDA still allows it in Americans' foods. Ice cream and cream cheese: rBGH and rBST. If you prefer cream cheese over butter on your bagel or indulge in a scoop or two of ice cream after dinner, you could unknowingly be consuming potentially harmful hormones. Recombinate bovine growth hormone (rBGH) or recombinate bovine somatotropin (rBST) is a synthetic version of a hormone cows produce to regulate certain metabolic processes. It has been marketed to dairy farmers to increase milk production in cows and has been approved by the FDA since 1993, but is banned in Europe and Canada. Research into the hormone's link to breast cancer has produced mixed results but the use of rBST has been shown to increase levels of insulin-like growth factor, a protein found naturally in milk. Some studies have shown insulin-like growth factor to be linked to prostate, breast and colorectal cancers. Bread and flour: Azodicarbonamide. Not only do bagels, bread, pastries and tortillas contain the harmful potassium bromate, these products, along with hamburger and hot dog buns, also have azodicarbonamide, or ADA, in them. This ingredient is a chemical compound approved by the FDA to use as a whitening agent and is used to strengthen and enhance the elasticity of dough in cereal flour and bread dough. It is sometimes called the 'yoga mat' chemical because it is widely used in foamed plastics. The additive is banned in Europe and Australia. While not classified as a carcinogen, some case reports and epidemiological studies in humans have produced evidence the compound can induce asthma and respiratory symptoms, as well as skin irritation. Sugary cereals: BHA and BHT. Sugary cereals may be appealing to kids - and kids at heart - but they contain the ingredients butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). BHA is a synthetic petrochemical used widely as a preservative in cereals and other dry goods. BHT is used in similar products and helps fats in foods stay fresher longer. BHA is considered a carcinogen and has been shown to promote tumor growth and impair blood clotting. It also acts as an endocrine disruptor and is associated with the underdevelopment of the reproductive system. BHA and BHT both pose a threat to the circulatory system and BHT can impact testosterone levels.
