logo
Harvard faculty quietly drop courses as legal battle over academic freedom escalates in the US

Harvard faculty quietly drop courses as legal battle over academic freedom escalates in the US

Time of Indiaa day ago

Harvard faculty cancel courses as US academic freedom dispute intensifies
As tensions escalate between Harvard University and the US federal government, several faculty members are quietly withdrawing or revising their courses, raising alarms about the future of academic freedom in the country.
The developments, first reported by MassLive, coincide with Harvard's ongoing legal battle to defend its educational independence in the face of federal funding threats and ideological pressure.
Harvard University, alongside its faculty chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), has filed motions for summary judgment in federal court. These actions come in response to multi-billion-dollar funding cuts and what the institution describes as targeted political interference by the Trump administration.
The university argues the measures directly undermine academic freedom at one of the country's most prestigious institutions.
Faculty shift course content in response to political pressure
According to documents reviewed by MassLive, a History and Literature lecturer canceled a planned course on global transgender history out of concern for content-based retaliation and student safety. As an openly transgender academic, the lecturer cited increased vulnerability under current federal scrutiny.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Amplie seus horizontes: Estude no exterior (Clique para mais informações)
Study Abroad
Saiba Mais
Undo
Their course materials included subjects such as the Holocaust and World War II, raising fears that teaching on such issues could result in disciplinary or political backlash.
Harvard's International Students Get Trapped In Trump Visa Crossfire; 'The Danger Is…'
Another faculty member, whose identity remains anonymous, withdrew plans to teach a course focusing on the historical roots of the US Civil War. The course would have examined slavery, settler colonialism, Indian removal, and the US-Mexico War.
However, the professor worried that the material could be mischaracterized as part of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programming, and might attract complaints under Title VI, a federal statute prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, or national origin.
Faculty departures reflect growing discomfort
In addition to course changes, MassLive reports that some Harvard professors are opting to work outside the US, citing growing discomfort under the current political climate.
One medical school faculty member with decades of clinical experience has decided to leave the country, following increased pressure related to their pro-Palestine advocacy.
The AAUP has had to expand its support services significantly. According to court filings, the organization is now holding twice as many member meetings and offering additional training on digital surveillance and faculty rights, redirecting vital resources toward defense measures.
Broader implications for academic freedom across the US
The tension arises amid Trump administration efforts, outlined in an April 11, 2025, letter, to reduce the influence of students and non-tenured faculty in shaping curriculum. Many educators fear that such policies could result in loss of control over course content and force compliance with federally approved viewpoints.
As Harvard's lawsuit progresses, the outcome may set a national precedent. The university's actions could shape how other academic institutions defend their independence in an increasingly polarized educational environment.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Bill Ackman, the man who could broker peace between Elon Musk and Donald Trump?
Who is Bill Ackman, the man who could broker peace between Elon Musk and Donald Trump?

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Who is Bill Ackman, the man who could broker peace between Elon Musk and Donald Trump?

Bill Ackman made a public post on X asking Donald Trump and Elon Musk to stop fighting. He said they should 'make peace for the benefit of our great country.' Though Ackman used to support Democrats, he is now backing Donald Trump for 2024. He posted this because the fight between Trump and Musk was getting out of control, especially after comments about cutting funds to Musk's companies. Elon Musk replied directly to Ackman's post on X, saying, 'You're not wrong.' This reply showed Musk agrees with Ackman's opinion. The 'X' fight between Musk and Trump The fight got worse after Trump made a comment about 'one Big Beautiful Bill.' Trump earlier threatened to cancel government contracts for Musk's companies, Tesla and SpaceX. Musk hit back, saying SpaceX would end the Dragon spacecraft and asked for Trump to be removed. Trump also said cutting off funds to Musk would save money, and asked why Biden wasn't doing it already. Trump hit back online, saying cutting Musk's government money would save the country money, and questioned why Biden wasn't doing it already. Musk then took it further by mentioning Trump's name in the Jeffrey Epstein files, suggesting Trump might be hiding something. Live Events Who is Bill Ackman? William Albert Ackman, born May 11, 1966. He's a billionaire hedge fund manager and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management. As of May 2025, his net worth is $9.1 billion, as per Forbes. He's known as an activist investor, he buys company shares to push for changes. Raised in Chappaqua, New York. His dad was chairman of a real estate finance firm. Graduated from Harvard College in 1988, and got an MBA from Harvard Business School in 1992. Started a firm called Gotham Partners in 1992 with David Berkowitz. In 2002, Ackman investigated MBIA, a financial services company, and made a big profit during the 2008 financial crisis by betting against it. In 2014, Pershing Square had $4.5 billion in net gains, putting him among top 20 hedge fund managers. Was a board chairman at Howard Hughes Holdings from 2010 to 2024. He stepped down in 2024. FAQs Q1. Why did Bill Ackman post on X about Elon Musk and Donald Trump? He posted asking them to stop fighting and 'make peace for the benefit of our great country.' Q2. Who is Bill Ackman? He's a billionaire investor who tries to fix companies by buying their shares.

Elon Musk's trans daughter Vivian reacts to his feud with Trump: ‘I love…'
Elon Musk's trans daughter Vivian reacts to his feud with Trump: ‘I love…'

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Elon Musk's trans daughter Vivian reacts to his feud with Trump: ‘I love…'

Elon Musk's estranged daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson has shared her thoughts on his recent fallout with Donald Trump. The 21-year-old took to social media Thursday to react to the billionaire's claim that the president was mentioned in the FBI's Jeffrey Epstein files. 'I do not want to comment,' Wilson said before bursting into laughter in a video shared on her Instagram Stories. She captioned the clip, 'I love being proven right.' In a separate Threads post set to the song Job Application by Chase Icon, Musk's daughter wrote, 'Such beauty in life.' Wilson's cryptic remarks came just minutes after Musk said in an X post, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The Tesla CEO further wrote in the comments, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The explosive fallout between Musk and the president began shortly after the former formally departed from the Trump administration as a Special Government Employee late last month. Prior to his bombshell claim about Trump appearing in Epstein files, Musk publicly criticised the president's 'big, beautiful' spending bill. The pair has since been exchanging barbs on social media. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' the SpaceX founder wrote on X earlier this week. Meanwhile, Trump fired back with, 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' In another Truth Social post, the commander-in-chief said, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!'

India's global engagement needs rethink, says Congress
India's global engagement needs rethink, says Congress

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

India's global engagement needs rethink, says Congress

New Delhi: Congress leader Supriya Shrinate, in a press briefing on Friday, expressed concern over what she described as a decline in India's diplomatic engagement and visibility on the global stage. She specifically referred to India's absence from major forums like the G7, despite being among the world's largest economies. Shrinate cited then-US President Barack Obama's 2010 remarks in praise of then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and questioned why countries like Canada now appear hesitant to extend invitations to India for the G7. She interpreted this as a sign of waning diplomatic influence. She also referred to public statements made by US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly claimed to have brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The Congress spokesperson further said that similar assertions are now being echoed by Russia. She urged the Indian government to respond clearly to these claims, either by refuting them or explaining the context if they are accurate. "The nation deserves clarity," she said, stressing the importance of transparency in foreign affairs. Shrinate also voiced apprehensions over what she viewed as a preference for image-building over substantive diplomacy. She warned against focusing too heavily on symbolic gestures or visual narratives. She, in this context, suggested that a more strategic and consistent foreign policy is needed to safeguard national interests. She expressed concern over "the evolving global perception" of Pakistan. Institutions like the IMF, the ADB, and the World Bank, she noted, have extended significant financial support to Pakistan, while the country has also assumed roles in global bodies such as the UN's Counter-Terrorism Committee. In her view, this is at odds with India's long-standing position on terrorism and reflects a missed opportunity for stronger international advocacy. Commenting on recent international outreach by Indian parliamentary delegations, Shrinate questioned the effectiveness of such efforts. She pointed out that many of these visits resulted in meetings with lower-level officials or Indian diaspora groups, rather than influential foreign leaders or decision-makers. "We need to assess what tangible outcomes these visits have achieved," she remarked. Turning to domestic matters with international implications, Shrinate referred to the tragic terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, which claimed the lives of 26 individuals. She questioned the timing of the Prime Minister's visit to Jammu and Kashmir, suggesting that it came more as part of a ceremonial event than a response to the tragedy. She expressed disappointment that "national security concerns in sensitive regions are not always met with prompt or visible engagement". Shrinate also commented on alleged shifts in India's traditional alliances, pointing to what she called Russia's recent cooperation with Pakistan. She warned that regional dynamics are changing, with China and Pakistan strengthening ties—a development, she said, that has long been cautioned against by opposition leaders. When asked about Congress MPs, including Shashi Tharoor, who participated in foreign delegations and later described the visits as positive, Shrinate acknowledged the complexities of international diplomacy. She explained that while representatives may exercise restraint abroad, there remains a responsibility to ask hard questions back home. She cited Kuwait's recent decision to lift a 19-year visa ban on Pakistan shortly after an Indian delegation's visit, suggesting this raised legitimate questions about diplomatic impact. A key concern she highlighted was the apparent reluctance to hold comprehensive discussions in Parliament on foreign policy matters, while simultaneously prioritising engagement with Indian communities abroad. "There seems to be a disconnect between domestic accountability and international outreach," she said. The Congress spokesperson stressed the need for a more grounded and outcome-driven foreign policy approach. In her view, the current trajectory risks sidelining India's voice in global conversations, despite its growing economic stature.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store