Air India flight to London cancelled because of ‘precautionary checks'
An Air India flight on the same route as a plane that crashed last week has been cancelled because of 'precautionary checks', the airline said.
Flight AI159 was planned to depart Ahmedabad, India, at 1.10pm local time on Tuesday, and arrive at Gatwick airport at 6.25pm BST.
Air India's website shows the flight was initially delayed by one hour and 50 minutes but was later cancelled.
A flight from Gatwick to Amritsar, India, set to depart at 8pm BST was also axed.
The cancelled flights were scheduled to be operated by a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which is the same type of aircraft that crashed shortly after take-off at Ahmedabad on June 12.
An Air India spokesperson said: 'Flight AI 159 from Ahmedabad to Gatwick has been cancelled today due to the unavailability of the aircraft, resulting from airspace restrictions and additional precautionary checks, leading to longer than usual turnaround of aircraft, and not due to any technical snag as claimed.
'We regret the inconvenience caused to our passengers and have made alternative arrangements to fly them to their destination.'
The airline said affected passengers are being offered hotel accommodation and full refunds or rescheduling.
Last week's crash was one of the deadliest plane accidents in terms of the number of British nationals killed.
The Air India aircraft struck a medical college hostel in a residential part of Ahmedabad, killing 241 of the 242 people on board, 52 of whom were British.
The sole surviving passenger was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh.
Investigators are yet to determine the cause of the crash.
Indian authority's ordered Air India to carry out additional maintenance checks on its Boeing 787-8/9 aircraft equipped with GE Aerospace GEnx engines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘I have no idea how or when I can go home': The Brits desperate to escape Israel
It had all the makings of a perfect Tel Aviv evening: dappled sunshine, lights strung between lofty palm trees, music spilling out onto the lawns of the family home and a jubilant wedding attended by guests from around the world. Among them was Deborah Clayden, a 51-year-old teacher from London, who had travelled to Israel with her elderly aunt and mother for what she hoped would be a joyful few days away to celebrate her cousin's nuptials. For most of Thursday night, that is exactly what it was. But just after 3am, barely an hour after she climbed into her hotel bed, mother-of-three Clayden was jolted awake by the sound of a siren going off on her phone. An app, which everyone in Israel is told to download when they arrive, told her to find shelter within 90 seconds. While such alerts have become commonplace in the country amid its war with Hamas in Gaza, this alarm was different. Instead of a warning about an incoming attack, it gave notice about Israel launching an assault on its regional nemesis, Iran. The pair have repeatedly exchanged strikes in the days since – resulting in 24 people being killed in Israel, and more than 220 killed in Iran – as tensions continue to escalate. 'I went from euphoria to intense fear,' says Clayden, who is now among thousands of Brits trapped in Israel. 'I fell asleep with a smile on my face thinking about how wonderful the wedding was and was woken with this massive shock. Mum and I grabbed our passports and ran to the shelter in the basement and were so relieved to see my aunt Valerie there already.' Surrounded by fellow tourists, they tried to make sense of what had happened. 'I felt very jittery, although at that point, we didn't know quite how bad things would get,' she says. Foreign Office accused of abandoning stranded citizens Clayden is far from alone. Israel's airspace has been closed until further notice as part of nationwide state of emergency measures, leaving the country effectively cut off and those marooned there mired in panic. While other countries including Poland and Lithuania have announced plans to repatriate their citizens, evacuating them by land to neighbouring countries such as Jordan and Egypt with airports that remain open and from there, onwards to home, the British government has yet to make any such move. The inaction has led some Brits stuck in Israel to accuse the Foreign Office, which has advised against all travel to the country, of abandoning them as the fighting worsens. Many, such as Hannah Lyons-Singer, say the only contact they have had with British authorities so far has been to register their names on a list of people trying to get home. The mother of three has been stranded in Israel since last week, when she travelled to the country to attend to her 80-year-old father, who had been on holiday with his wife before he was hospitalised with a medical emergency. 'I feel like the British Government should be coming to some kind of arrangement whereby they could ferry a few people [out] by air,' she says. 'I registered with the embassy as an emergency case, as I felt like my dad was an emergency, but I haven't heard anything.' 'When you register they don't ask for any circumstances, it's literally just to find out how many Brits are here [in Israel],' Lyons-Singer adds. The three main routes out of the country Shelley Irow, 46, a lawyer from Finchley, is stuck at her parents' house in a suburb of Tel Aviv. She flew out from London last Thursday to visit her elderly mother and father – who retired from the UK to Israel in early 2023. She explains that at the exact moment we speak on the phone, she should have been taking off from Ben Gurion airport. ' The airspace being closed is the hardest thing about this,' she says. 'I have been here before in similar situations and it's frightening, but we coped. But having no idea of how or when I can go home is disorientating and distressing.' Like most Brits stuck in Israel, Irow has joined various WhatsApp and Facebook groups where members post about alternative routes out of the country. She explains that there are three main options being discussed. The first is chartering a boat to Cyprus – a 230 mile trip that takes up to 10 hours at sea, often on the sort of small rubber dinghies we now associate with the migrant crisis in the UK; and in some cases on larger luxury yachts. The second is travelling by taxi or bus to Jordan. The journey itself is relatively simple in principle – it is fewer than four hours by car from Tel Aviv to Amman if you don't count time at the border. But this option has been made more complicated by the fact that Jordan has closed its own airspace twice in the last five days. The third is undertaking a nearly seven hour journey by car to the Egyptian beach resort of Sharm-El-Sheik, on the southern tip of the Sinai Peninsula. But while the region's airport remains open with regular flights to the UK, the area near the Israeli border has become increasingly volatile. On Monday, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said his department was sending support teams to Jordan and Egypt to help people crossing from Israel by land. 'The situation remains fast-moving,' he said. 'We expect more strikes in the days to come. This is a moment of grave danger for the region.' 'When you're watching the news it looks uniformly terrifying' Irow, for her part, says she is too scared to try and flee for the moment. She is hoping the British Government will step up and bring her home from Israel instead if the country's airspace doesn't reopen promptly. 'I am not thinking about Jordan or Egypt as it just doesn't feel safe,' she says. 'I was considering taking a boat to Cyprus but I have now seen videos and they look like the sort of small boats you'd take out on a short day trip. I feel very anxious at the idea of being on one of those for hours on end. I think I am going to wait and hope that repatriation takes place or the airspace opens.' Irow's firm has offered her indefinite absence from her job but – despite having left her work laptop at home – she is keen to find a way to log-on. With the very real possibility that she might be in Israel for weeks or even months, she is aware that she can't just abandon her responsibilities in the UK indefinitely. 'My husband is at home with my dog and I miss them both,' she says. 'I am usually the one in London worried about my parents, whereas now it is him watching the news thinking about me. 'I've realised it feels different when you're on the ground: one minute we are frightened in a shelter and the next we're walking in the sunshine to go and get a coffee, whereas when you're watching on the news from another country it just looks uniformly terrifying.' 'My children are watching every bullet' Much like Irow, Ivor and Sue Levene flew to Israel in order to spend time with family. Three weeks ago, they arrived from London in order to help their son Ilan and his wife with childcare for their six-year-old grandson and three-year-old granddaughter. When missiles were fired from Israel on Thursday night, the couple – who are both in their 70s – were preparing to fly home the next day. Now, the whole family is living in Ivor and Sue's apartment in Netanya, a Mediterranean resort city in central Israel, as his son's house does not have a shelter. To try and keep disruption to a minimum, the children are put to bed every evening in the safe room; when the alarms go off, the adults tiptoe in. 'It means, fortunately, that the kids have slept through [the missiles] most of the time,' says Ivor. Keen to return to life in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, as soon as possible, he has written to his local MP Oliver Dowden to 'put pressure' on the Government to push evacuation plans forward. Ivor briefly considered using one of the private firms that are already taking advantage of the panic by offering to take tourists out of the country by sea, before deciding against such a move. 'Motor yachts are offering services but they are not even proper ships,' he says. 'We only very briefly thought about doing that – but we didn't consider it for long. There's a risk element as much as anything: we are both in our 70s.' Like the Levenes, Maureen Fisher is hoping the Government will put on repatriation flights. She flew out to Israel last week in her capacity as CEO of Wizo UK, a charity that supports women, and is staying in the Carlton in Tel Aviv. Aside from her colleagues, the London-based mother and grandmother knows very few people in Israel. 'There is, at least, a sense of camaraderie,' she says. 'I met one couple in the hotel lobby who have now crossed to Jordan and flown on to Abu Dhabi, and an American man who needed to be in Paris this week, and so went on a small boat – which takes five or six people – to Cyprus. I am here on my own and I feel more vulnerable, so my inclination is to stay put.' Until then, she is trying to reassure her children and grandchildren back in London that she is safe. 'My children are watching every bullet, I get advanced notice from my kids saying, 'Are you in the shelter? The missiles are coming'. My daughter phones asking about provisions and whether I am eating enough and even my grandson told me he was freaking out. It's nice to know how much people care, I suppose.' An overwhelming sense of powerlessness For Brits watching on from home as their loved ones remain trapped in Israel, there is an overwhelming sense of powerlessness. Clayden's family is deeply worried and frightened about the days ahead. With her children at home in London – including one about to do her A-Level preparation exams – and a teaching job at a secondary school that can't be done remotely, she has now decided to attempt a border crossing in order to fly home from a different country. For safety reasons, she doesn't want to divulge any details until she is safely back on British soil. 'I feel sick with anxiety,' she says. 'I have been in denial about what I am doing and am trying to put on a brave face, although my mum is not very happy. I am a positive person though, and I have a vision of myself landing in the UK by Wednesday. But it will be a long journey and not without risk, and lots of people here have told me I shouldn't do it, or have said that I am very brave. Both reactions are scary and I feel trepidatious.' Clayden will be leaving behind her mother Ruth, 81, and her aunt Valerie, neither of whom feel ready to attempt an exit. 'We are staying put for the moment,' says Valerie, 76. 'We don't have the immediate concerns that Deborah does, although we are very upset to be unable to travel. We were supposed to be in New York for our grandson's graduation this weekend but with no flights out for the foreseeable, we can't see it happening. I'm trying to be circumspect: if that's the worst thing that comes out of this war, we will cope.'
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
England's most family-friendly seaside spots revealed as heatwave hits country
With the UK set to hit 30 degrees this weekend, the British seaside is calling. But where are the country's best-rated coastal spots? A new study has revealed the UK's most family-friendly beaches by looking at the average sea temperature, water quality, the availability of lifeguards, parking prices and watersport facilities. Sennen Cove, a picturesque beach in Cornwall, tops the list of family-friendly spots. Average sea temperatures can reach as high as 14 degrees and the beach has RNLI lifeguards between April and November, while parking costs just £6 for eight hours. Its water quality is classified as 'excellent' and it's a popular surfing spot in summer. The sandy beach stretches for almost a mile. Next on the list for a family-friendly seaside holiday is Bude in Cornwall. One of the area's best-rated beaches is Summerleaze which is wide and sandy. Summerleaze has RNLI lifeguards between May and September. Exmouth in Devon is the third-best rated seaside spot for families. Known as the gateway to the Jurassic Coast, the area's water quality is classified as 'excellent'. Exmouth Beach stretches for two miles and there are lots of rock pools for children to explore. Broadstairs in Kent lands just outside the top three for a family-friendly beach holiday. The area's water quality is rated as 'excellent' and tourists can head to Botany Bay to admire impressive chalk stacks. Car parking at Broadstairs costs only £6.50 for eight hours. Shanklin Beach in the Isle of Wight takes fifth place on the ranking. The beach offers easy access to restaurants and cafes and it has life guards on duty during the summer season. Bournemouth Beach in Dorset, Cromer in Norfolk, Littlehampton in West Sussex, Brighton Beach in East Sussex and Lyme Regis in Dorset are also named among the 10 most family-friendly beaches in the UK. Millets, who commissioned the study, used data from the ONS to find the UK's most popular beaches. Natalie Wolfenden, author and outdoor enthusiast at Millets, says: 'England is brimming with gorgeous beaches, from the pebbled Brighton Beach to the sandy shore of Sennen Cove. 'While a family beach trip is a great way to get children off screens and keep the whole family entertained, preparation is key. 'Make sure you pack all the essentials tailored to your family's needs. If you have younger children or those less confident in the water, packing some armbands can provide some peace of mind, but always keep a close eye when they are near or on the water. 'Suncream is essential for all the family, while caps and sunglasses offer an extra layer of protection from the sun's rays. 'Consider taking a windbreak of beach shelter as a protective barrier against wind for a more comfortable beach experience.' Looking for a break outside the UK instead? Two exciting cities in Eastern Europe have become easier to visit this summer with new packages on offer from TUI. Europe's biggest tour operator has expanded its city breaks offering to include Riga, in Latvia, and the capital of Poland, Warsaw. The firm said that the new holidays are for 'travellers seeking destinations rich in culinary experiences, scenic beauty, and cultural attractions'.
South Wales Guardian
35 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Air India flight to London cancelled because of ‘precautionary checks'
Flight AI159 was planned to depart Ahmedabad, India, at 1.10pm local time on Tuesday, and arrive at Gatwick airport at 6.25pm BST. Air India's website shows the flight was initially delayed by one hour and 50 minutes but was later cancelled. A flight from Gatwick to Amritsar, India, set to depart at 8pm BST was also axed. The cancelled flights were scheduled to be operated by a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which is the same type of aircraft that crashed shortly after take-off at Ahmedabad on June 12. An Air India spokesperson said: 'Flight AI 159 from Ahmedabad to Gatwick has been cancelled today due to the unavailability of the aircraft, resulting from airspace restrictions and additional precautionary checks, leading to longer than usual turnaround of aircraft, and not due to any technical snag as claimed. 'We regret the inconvenience caused to our passengers and have made alternative arrangements to fly them to their destination.' The airline said affected passengers are being offered hotel accommodation and full refunds or rescheduling. Last week's crash was one of the deadliest plane accidents in terms of the number of British nationals killed. The Air India aircraft struck a medical college hostel in a residential part of Ahmedabad, killing 241 of the 242 people on board, 52 of whom were British. The sole surviving passenger was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. Investigators are yet to determine the cause of the crash. Indian authority's ordered Air India to carry out additional maintenance checks on its Boeing 787-8/9 aircraft equipped with GE Aerospace GEnx engines. The plane that crashed had two GEnx engines.
