Weinstein accuser blasts defence lawyer
A former model reproached one of Harvey Weinstein's lawyers for suggesting that her sexual abuse allegations against the ex-studio boss are lies.
"You should be ashamed of yourself," Kaja Sokola retorted.
In her fifth and final day of testimony at Weinstein's sex crimes retrial, she maintained that she was telling the truth and that Weinstein's alleged conduct in her teens had changed the course of her life.
"It changed the course of your life in that you got $US3.5 million ($A5.4 million) from false accusations?" defence lawyer Mike Cibella pressed, referring to compensation she was awarded through civil proceedings in recent years.
"No. That's very unfair," Sokola said softly. "That's not true."
During her days on the witness stand, she said Weinstein repeatedly offered to foster her acting ambitions but then made unwanted physical advances, beginning when she was 16 in 2002.
Weinstein, 73, faces a sexual assault charge related solely to her allegation that he forced oral sex on her when she was 19. He also faces charges based on two other women's claims. He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges, and his attorneys assert that his accusers had consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer because they wanted movie and TV work.
Weinstein's lawyers grilled Sokola about her requests for career help from him after the alleged assault, her motives for her civil lawsuits and criminal trial testimony, as well as her personal struggles, and even a private journal she kept for an alcohol-abuse program in her native Poland.
After apparently getting the decade-old writings via the witness' sister, the defence was allowed to bring up portions in which Sokola said two other men had sexually assaulted her over the years but didn't say the same about Weinstein. Instead, she wrote that he promised her help but didn't deliver.
Sokola testified Wednesday that she had left out Weinstein's alleged sexual abuse partly because she couldn't come to terms with it at the time. Also, she said, her sponsor was in the film business in Poland and knew who Weinstein was.
Cibella questioned that explanation, noting that the text mentioned only "Harvey W" and nothing about his profession. Sokola said her sponsor nonetheless knew his identity because they talked about it.
Tearing up as she spoke, she said she hadn't seen the black notebook for 10 years, never gave anyone permission to share it and was stunned and appalled to be confronted with it in court.
"I felt very violated," said Sokola, now 39 and a psychotherapist.
She was the second of Weinstein's accusers to testify at the retrial, and the only one who wasn't involved in his first trial in 2020. That proceeding led to a landmark #MeToo-era conviction that was subsequently overturned, setting up the retrial. Prosecutors decided to add Sokola's allegations to it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
11 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial
A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
West Australian
18 hours ago
- West Australian
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial
A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Perth Now
18 hours ago
- Perth Now
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial
A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial has asked to be removed from the case because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an "unfair and unjust" way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later on Friday denied a defence request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. "This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations," Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. "Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict." The second day of deliberations ended on Friday without a verdict. Jurors are expected back in court Monday. Jurors reheard testimony from Weinstein's three accusers. They also reviewed other evidence, including medical records and emails. Twice on Friday, though, a juror requested to address the court without the other jurors present. The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment "unfair and unjust" even as he described the tension as "playground stuff" with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticised the judge's questions to the concerned juror as "anaemic at best". "You didn't ask him one follow-up question," Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. The issue, she noted, does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested a readout of other testimony even after he raised concerns. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned in 2024, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
