Appellate court grants stay, halting start of Tarrant County death penalty trial
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has in effect stopped the beginning of evidence presentation to a jury in the capital murder trial of a man whom authorities accuse of beating a woman to death. Police found the victim's body in the dirt of a crawl space underneath the defendant's house in west Fort Worth.
The appellate court in Austin last week granted an emergency stay of trial court proceedings in the Valerian O'Steen case in Tarrant County. A jury was set on Tuesday morning to begin to consider prosecutors' case in chief in the 371st District Court.
The Tarrant County District Attorney's Office is seeking the death penalty.
The stay is in effect until the Court of Criminal Appeals rules on O'Steen's petition for a directive known as a writ of mandamus. It is not clear when a ruling, in which the court could order the state to perform DNA testing on six pieces of physical evidence or order that the testing is not required, will come. The ruling may be issued on Wednesday.
Defense attorneys Bob Gill, Miles Brissette and Colin McLaughlin were appointed to represent O'Steen. The attorneys filed an emergency motion for a stay connected to their argument for DNA analysis of items that were found at O'Steen's house. Prosecutors noted that the items tested presumptively negative for blood.
O'Steen is accused of killing Marissa Grimes, who was 26 and the mother of two young children. Her body was found wrapped in blankets and a gray tarp underneath the single-story house.
Grimes' relatives had reported her missing. Police found her U-Haul abandoned on Lake Como Drive, about a mile from O'Steen's house on Locke Avenue, according to the account of a homicide detective that is included in an affidavit supporting O'Steen's arrest warrant.
On Feb. 22, 2022, police executed a search warrant at O'Steen's house and found a crawl space entry in a bedroom closet. A SWAT officer looked down into the space and saw a mound of dirt and smelled an odor of decomposition. The next day, police found Grimes' body in the crawl space.
A Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office pathologist determined that her death was a homicide caused by blunt force trauma to the head.
Judge Ryan Hill on May 19 denied a defense motion that sought an order directing the state to complete DNA testing that Gill, Brissette and McLaughlin argued is compulsory under the Texas criminal procedure code.
'After closely reviewing the evidence, applicable crime scene reports and ... laboratory reports, the defense realized that six items of biological evidence that were agreed to be tested were not subjected to DNA testing,' Gill wrote in petition for a writ of mandamus.
The items to be tested from among all of the collected physical evidence were agreed upon by the state and defense and tested by the state, Deputy Criminal Division Chief Allenna Bangs wrote in response to the defense motion that was denied in the district court.
'The defense was aware of what was tested, what was pushed forward for further testing, and what requests were made of each item tested,' Bangs wrote.
The items on the defense list were tested for blood evidence to be processed for DNA and did not yield any positive results, Bangs wrote.
In urging the Court of Criminal Appeals to deny O'Steen's petition for an order directing the DNA testing, the state questioned the timing of the defense motion.
O'Steen's attorneys 'waited until the jury was nearly selected to request additional DNA testing. Recognizing the possible dilatory tactics in not requesting testing earlier the trial court properly denied [O'Steen's] request for additional testing on the eve of trial,' Assistant Criminal District Attorney Victoria Ford Oblon, who handles appellate matters, wrote in the state's response to the defense petition.
Jury selection is, in cases in which the state is seeking the death penalty, conducted with one prospective juror at a time. It began in the O'Steen case on March 27.
Prosecutors allege that O'Steen was in the course of committing or attempting to commit obstruction or retaliation when he beat Grimes to death.
O'Steen, who is 27, is the second capital murder defendant for whom the state is seeking the death penalty to go to trial in Tarrant County this year.
A jury in May found Lamont Cousins guilty of capital murder in the December 2020 killings of three people and assessed his punishment as life in prison without eligibility for parole. Juries in Tarrant County last year sent three defendants to death row.
Six days before Grimes' body was found, O'Steen pointed a gun at another woman and threatened to harm her if she left his house, according to the arrest warrant affidavit.
The woman later described to detectives seeing blood in the hall near the kitchen entryway. O'Steen told her it belonged to a man whom he assaulted, according to the arrest warrant affidavit. The detectives believe that Grimes was already dead, and the blood belonged to her.
🚨 More top stories from our newsroom:
→ Widow of Arlington firefighter who died in Cancun seeks $35M at trial
→ Christmas-themed restaurant Campo Verde reopens
→ Teen arrested in stabbing death of his father
[Get our breaking news alerts.]
If the jury finds O'Steen guilty of capital murder, it will hear evidence in a second trial phase and consider two options: life in prison without eligibility for parole or the death penalty.
In the punishment phase, jurors would weigh whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it is probable that O'Steen would commit future criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society. The panel also would weigh whether there was mitigating evidence that a juror might regard as reducing O'Steen's moral blameworthiness that would warrant a sentence of life in prison without parole.
Judge Hill presided at a brief hearing on Monday morning at which he noted the stay and asked the state and defense about resulting scheduling matters.
Prosecutor Bangs suggested during the hearing that the disputed six items had recently been submitted to the Fort Worth Police Department Crime Laboratory, which expects to have DNA test results within 30 days. A bottle of bleach and stained wash cloth are among the items.
Bangs represents the state in the case with Assistant Criminal District Attorney Peter Gieseking.
Gill appeared to expect to argue unresolved defense motions at the Monday hearing.
'Can't have any pre-trial hearings on a stay, Bob,' Judge Hill said.
When Gill continued, appearing to argue that the stay did not preclude discussion of other defense motions, the judge said the court would communicate updated scheduling information that night.
'That'll be all,' Hill said. The judge rose from his chair and walked away from the bench and out of the courtroom.
Gill, a former state district judge, stood at the defense table and watched Hill exit.
'We'd ask the court to ...' Gill said before abandoning his sentence.
The defense attorney was facing the bench and an empty judge's swivel chair.
The month before Grimes died, O'Steen refused for several days to allow her to leave his house, repeatedly pointed a gun at her and threatened to kill her, according to law enforcement authorities.
At some point, Grimes sent a text message to her father asking for help, and police located her.
O'Steen was arrested at that time on domestic violence crimes. He was released from a Tarrant County jail within a few days after he posted a $5,000 bond.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Texas Deploys 5,000 National Guard Soldiers Ahead of Protests
Texas Governor Greg Abbott is deploying 5,000 National Guard soldiers and 2,000 state troopers to assist local law enforcement during planned protests this weekend. Any demonstrators engaging in violence or damaging property will be arrested, Abbott warned in a statement Thursday.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Diddy allegedly wanted one last drug-fueled night after rehab push: testimony
Sean "Diddy" Combs' ex-girlfriend, testifying under the pseudonym Jane, told jurors Wednesday that the rapper wanted one more "sobriety party" before he pursued rehab. Jane claimed there were three entertainers at the party, and she allegedly did not take any drugs. She testified that while she agreed to the party, she also resented Diddy "for knowing how much I loved him and knowing how I couldn't say no to him." Under direct examination last week, the government asked Jane if she and Diddy experienced "hotel nights" without drugs. Jane explained that the former couple attempted the nights a handful of times, and it was at Diddy's request in October 2023 that they tried a "sobriety party." "Around this time I just really wanted my partner to get sober," Jane testified. "I just really cared so much about Sean's health, and I could see that he just, like, was excessively partying on top of just so many pills that he takes daily for I don't know what. And I just really wanted him to get clean and just get better." She continued, "And he said, okay, I'm going to do like 30 days without anything, and I'll be sober. But let's just have, like, one more, one more sobriety party. Just one, like, sobriety party." When asked what drugs Diddy used during the "sobriety party," Jane replied, "I believe ecstasy. And cocaine. I don't know." She also alleged the party lasted "too long," claiming it was "close to 12 to 18 hours." Diddy's ex testified Tuesday that she broached the subject of rehab for the "I Need A Girl" rapper after allegedly witnessing him "overdoing the partying." She claimed he would offer her ecstasy before engaging in role play and that Diddy liked to use the words "voyeurism" and "escapism" to describe his fantasies of watching her participate in sexual encounters with male escorts. WATCH: DIDDY'S EX-GIRLFRIEND PREPS FOR CROSS EXAMINATION AFTER 'GRAPHIC, DAYS-LONG' TESTIMONY Jane also claimed the rapper made her delete social media posts showing him while allegedly forcing her to participate in "hotel nights." The jury was shown a photo of Diddy at the popular sushi spot, Nobu, before a "hotel night." Jane confirmed she and the "Gotta Move On" rapper went to dinner before with two male escorts, Paul and Don. Jane testified during cross-examination that Combs made her delete a social media post from the dinner. The jury was then shown text messages between Jane and Diddy dated March 2, 2022. Jane was coordinating coming to Miami before the Nobu dinner. Diddy's text read, "Everyone can post…" Jane responded, telling Diddy to have another woman delete a post. According to Jane, this was a fight that occurred after a "hotel night" because Jane saw the rapper's other girlfriend, Gina, post a picture wearing a "love necklace." Jane claimed she had a matching "love bracelet." Jane explained that those nights were so "emotionally excruciating, so to see these things was really hurtful." Jane testified she was upset that Gina could post on social media, but she could not. Jane's cross-examination began Tuesday by Diddy's criminal defense lawyer, Teny Geragos. She questioned Jane about her relationship with the rapper and her participation in the allegedly forced "hotel nights." Jane testified Diddy was upfront with her about dating multiple women at the start of their relationship in 2021. She explained the rapper was "polyamorous" and she was okay with that at the time. She testified at first she didn't mind because she was just getting to know Diddy. Diddy paid Jane's rent through their "love contract," according to her testimony. The ex-girlfriend told the prosecution that she felt obligated to perform at "hotel nights" for the rapper because he had threatened to stop paying for her home. For "hotel nights," Jane claimed she was expected to dress in lingerie and have sex with other men in front of the rapper. The cross-examination became heated when Geragos began questioning Jane about the money he spent on her and gifts she received from the rapper. Texts to Diddy from Jane about the "Last Night" rapper buying purses for another woman were brought up in court. Geragos commented that Jane also received a bag of her own. "No, I only got trauma … after three-and-a-half years, I really don't think I garnered anything," Jane told the court. Geragos pressed, "How much do Bottega bags cost?" to which Jane replied, "How much does my body cost?" before asking the court for a break from testimony. When court resumed, Jane apologized to Geragos. Geragos also brought up Diddy's alleged drug use. Jane testified that when she first met the raper, she knew he consumed drugs. However, she claimed she didn't know how much. During a trip early on in their relationship, Jane claimed it became apparent the rapper wasn't taking care of himself after she noticed his eyes and teeth. The music mogul allegedly appeared jaundiced, his gums were gray, and his hands were shaky from over-consuming alcohol. Jane said she spoke to him about rehab and suggested a trip to Thailand. "What the h---, you think I need rehab?" Jane claimed Diddy said at the time. Before cross-examination began Tuesday, Judge Arun Subramanian denied Diddy's second request for a mistrial. Diddy's legal team had argued that the prosecution knowingly presented false testimony to the court in a letter filed June 7 and obtained by Fox News Digital. WATCH: WITNESS DETAILS HOW DIDDY 'DANGLED' HER OVER A BALCONY IN EXPLOSIVE NEW TESTIMONY The defense pointed to testimony from Bryana "Bana" Bongolan, who claimed Diddy dangled her off a 17th floor balcony in September 2016. Portions of her testimony were questioned after she couldn't remember details of the alleged incident, including what drugs she was on at the time. However, the federal judge ruled there was no interference. Judge Subramanian noted the defense was able to, and did, attack Bongolan's testimony to undermine her credibility. According to the judge, there was no prejudice to an exhibit that had helped the defense's case.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Diddy calls his ex a ‘crack pipe' in audio released in rapper's sex trafficking trial
Audio released in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial features the rapper calling his ex-girlfriend a "crack pipe." Diddy sent the audio message to his ex-girlfriend, who testified under the pseudonym Jane, after a "hotel night." Jane claimed she was forced to continue having sex with multiple male escorts after becoming sick. "Hey, baby, we had a great time, stay in the light. It's all good, get your rest," Diddy can be heard saying in the audio message. "You are the crack pipe. That's my new name for you, crack pipe, or should I call you CP? But yeah, I want you to stay in the light. You know what I'm saying? We had a very, very good time together. Like so much, so much so much so much f---ing fun, so much f---ing fun." "Now go rest up, get in your bag," he added. "You know what I'm saying, you got your contract, find a nice little spot, put your mind at ease and yeah, I had a great time and I really, really want you to get some rest. I didn't know about you throwing up and all that. That's when I was like, hold up a second. All right, get some rest baby, love." LISTEN: JURY HEARS AUDIO MESSAGE DIDDY SENT TO HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND The jury was also shown photo evidence of damage allegedly done by Diddy to Jane's home. Multiple photos were entered as evidence of the master bedroom door, the master bathroom door and a guest bedroom door of Jane's home. Jane testified that Diddy kicked the doors "literally off the hinges" during an altercation that occurred after she confronted the rapper about another woman. "I just – I was making an assumption that he was with another woman, and it just had really angered me, I think at this point in our relationship," she told the court Monday. "I just was bottling up a lot of resentment and anger towards him." Jane called Diddy a "pedophile" during the confrontation because the age gap between him and this other woman "rubbed [her] the wrong way." Jane felt the fight escalated after she pushed Diddy's head into a marble countertop and threw candles towards the rapper. According to Jane, she did not strike Combs with any glass. The rapper allegedly followed her into the master bedroom, bathroom and closet before she attempted to run for the front door. "Sean kicked me from the back of my thigh, and then I fell down on my butt," Jane testified. "And then he picked me up in a chokehold and choked me." Jane claimed she ran about six blocks away from the home and waited for approximately two hours before returning. Once home, the fight between her and Diddy continued. As the fight turned physical, Jane recalled Diddy punching her twice. She ran into the backyard and laid down in the grass, covering her face, head and body with her hands. Diddy allegedly punched and kicked her "several times" while in this position before he dragged her back into the home. Jane said she "just kept saying, 'Leave me the f--- alone. Leave me the f--- alone. Just leave. Just leave.'" She added: "And I just kept saying that I hated him." Jane recalled getting into the shower to clean off. At this point, Diddy allegedly slapped her until she lost her balance and fell over. Jane told jurors Wednesday that the rapper wanted one more "sobriety party" before he pursued rehab, which she had suggested. Jane claimed there were three entertainers at the party, and she allegedly did not take any drugs. She testified that while she agreed to the party, she also resented Diddy "for knowing how much I loved him and knowing how I couldn't say no to him." When asked what drugs Diddy used during the "sobriety party," Jane replied, "I believe ecstasy. And cocaine. I don't know." She also alleged the party lasted "too long," claiming it was "close to 12 to 18 hours." Diddy's ex testified Tuesday that she broached the subject of rehab for the "I Need A Girl" rapper after allegedly witnessing him "overdoing the partying." Jane's cross-examination began Tuesday by Diddy's criminal defense lawyer, Teny Geragos. She questioned Jane about her relationship with the rapper and her participation in the allegedly forced "hotel nights." The cross-examination became heated when Geragos began questioning Jane about the money he spent on her and gifts she received from the rapper. Texts to Diddy from Jane about the "Last Night" rapper buying purses for another woman were brought up in court. Geragos commented that Jane also received a bag of her own. WATCH: DIDDY'S EX-GIRLFRIEND CROSS-EXAMINED AFTER 'GRAPHIC, DAYS-LONG TESTIMONY' "No, I only got trauma … after three-and-a-half years, I really don't think I garnered anything," Jane told the court. Geragos pressed, "How much do Bottega bags cost?" to which Jane replied, "How much does my body cost?" before asking the court for a break from testimony. When court resumed, Jane apologized to Geragos.