Americans Are Ditching Fitness Influencers and Trusting Themselves (Report)
New study from Mythology and Vytal World reveals nearly half of Americans now trust their bodies over "experts."
NEW YORK, June 03, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As Americans grow increasingly skeptical of the $100 billion fitness industry, a new study reveals 47% of active adults now trust their own body's signals over experts, influencers, and tracking technology when making fitness decisions. The findings are from "The End of Expert Rule," a comprehensive study conducted by creative agency Mythology and insights partner Vytal World that uncovers a profound cultural shift in how people relate to exercise and wellness.
"People are questioning the assumption that someone else knows their body better than they do," says L Parker Barnum, Managing Director at Mythology. "But this isn't about rejecting science or expertise entirely—it's about pushing back against the commodification of health and the obsessive culture that we've seen over the years."
The end of performative suffering
The survey of 1,000 U.S. adults active in fitness highlights a striking rejection of what the report's authors call "performative suffering," with nearly 30% identifying the "no pain, no gain" mindset as the most outdated fitness status symbol. Just seven percent of adults place primary trust in AI systems or tracking technology, challenging the notion that we need constant digital monitoring to achieve wellness.
The report identifies four key aspects driving this cultural shift:
The rise of self-trust: Nearly half (47%) of respondents prioritize their own physical signals over external authority.
Community experimentation: Friend groups have become innovation hubs, with 49% creating personalized approaches rather than following prescribed programs. Millennials and Gen Z differ significantly in how they apply this approach; Gen Z values authenticity and education, while Millennials prioritize efficiency and time optimization.
Try-before-you-buy mentality: Personal experimentation drives 45% of purchasing decisions, far outweighing scientific validation (26%) or cultural credibility (8.4%).
Rejection of extreme fitness: A third of respondents expect future fitness to focus on "longevity and health, not looks," with 24% viewing expensive branded fitness apparel as a declining status symbol.
"Our findings suggest we're witnessing a maturation of fitness culture," adds Natalie Mbogo, Co-Founder and Chief Strategist of Vytal World. "Rather than the 'hustle culture' fitness of the 2010s with its celebration of exhaustion, people are now prioritizing long-term health, injury prevention, and mental well-being."
Sobering implications for brands
These findings present a significant challenge for brands as successful companies will need to evolve from authorities to partners, acknowledging customers' own expertise, creating spaces for knowledge sharing, and focusing on how products "feel" rather than just how they look.
"Influencer fatigue is real," the study notes, suggesting that brands must recalibrate their marketing efforts to account for this shift in influence, or risk losing relevance as consumers increasingly forge their own paths.
To view the full report, visit https://www.vytal.world/newsletter.
About Mythology
Mythology is an independent creative company based in NYC, founded and led by Anthony Sperduti—with partners Audrey Attal, Ted Galperin, Kim Haxton, and Sophie Mascatello. Our multidisciplinary team is dedicated to creating impactful work across branding, advertising, and retail design. Visit https://www.mythology.com and follow us on IG @mythology for more.
About Vytal World
Vytal World is an innovative research company that revolutionizes how brands understand and connect with their audiences. Through collaborative, community-driven methodologies, we transform traditional consumer insights by making people active participants in the research process, creating deeper understanding that leads to more authentic and effective brand strategies. Learn more at www.vytal.world.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250603997398/en/
Contacts
Media contact: Flight PRAlysha Lightalysha@flightpr.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it. This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions. Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago. So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley. The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction. The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.'' Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5. Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion. 'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5. Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health. Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means. About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us. To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees. Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow. People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest. Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty. To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account. While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Business Wire
29 minutes ago
- Business Wire
FTRE INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Fortrea Holdings Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Fortrea class action lawsuit. Captioned Deslande v. Fortrea Holdings Inc., No. 25-cv-04630 (S.D.N.Y.), the Fortrea class action lawsuit charges Fortrea and certain of Fortrea's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Fortrea class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: Fortrea is a global clinical research organization ('CRO') that provides biopharmaceutical product and medical device development solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device customers. According to the complaint, in June 2023, Labcorp Holdings Inc. spun off Fortrea as a standalone, publicly traded company (the 'Spin-Off'). At the time of the Spin-Off, certain of the long-term projects in Fortrea's portfolio remained ongoing (the 'Pre-Spin Projects'). In connection with the Spin-Off, Labcorp and Fortrea entered into several transition services agreements (the 'TSAs'), pursuant to which Fortrea pays Labcorp to provide certain transitional services for a set period. The Fortrea class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Fortrea overestimated the amount of revenue the Pre-Spin Projects were likely to contribute to Fortrea's 2025 earnings; (ii) Fortrea overstated the cost savings it would likely achieve by exiting the TSAs; (iii) as a result, Fortrea's previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 were inflated; and (iv) accordingly, the viability of Fortrea's post-Spin-Off business model, as well as its business and/or financial prospects, were overstated. The Fortrea class action lawsuit further alleges that on September 25, 2024, Jefferies published a report downgrading Fortrea from buy to hold, citing perceived weaknesses in Fortrea's business model as a CRO amid pressure on biotechnology funding and suggested that the cost savings Fortrea expects to achieve by exiting the TSAs are '[n]ot as [m]aterial as [o]ne [m]ight [t]hink,' stating that 'IT infrastructure costs to exit the TSAs are already non-GAAPed out of adjusted EBITDA. Thus, once TSAs are exited, [Fortrea] will just be replacing TSA costs with internal operating costs.' On this news, the price of Fortrea stock fell more than 12%, according to the complaint. Then, on December 6, 2024, market analyst Baird Equity Research downgraded Fortrea to neutral from outperform after Fortrea abruptly cancelled two scheduled conferences, stating that '[g]iven our ongoing concerns around the sector, [Fortrea's] choppy history post spin, and lack of clarity on the abrupt communications course change, we cannot recommend an actionable investment (buy or sell),' according to the complaint. The Fortrea class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Fortrea stock fell more than 8%. Finally, on March 3, 2025, the Fortrea class action lawsuit further alleges that Fortrea announced its fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results, disclosing that its 'targeted revenue and adjusted EBITDA trajectories for 2025 [were] not in line with [its] prior expectations.' According to the complaint, specifically, in an earnings call held that same day, Fortrea revealed that Fortrea's Pre-Spin projects are 'late in their life cycle [and] have less revenue and less profitability than expected for 2025,' that 'post-spin work is not coming on fast enough to offset the pre-spin contract economics,' and that 'older versus newer mix issue will continue to negatively impact [Fortrea's] financial performance during 2025.' On this news, the price of Fortrea stock fell more than 25%, according to the Fortrea class action lawsuit. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Fortrea securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Fortrea class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Fortrea class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Fortrea class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Fortrea class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China
Palantir (PLTR, Financials) CEO Alex Karp said Thursday that artificial intelligence poses serious risks and that the ongoing AI arms race will ultimately be won by either the United States or China. There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win, Karp told CNBC's Squawk on the Street. He emphasized that the U.S. currently holds an advantage due to corporate willingness to embrace new technologies, but said Western allies, particularly in Europe, are lagging behind and must learn from the U.S. approach. In the interview, Karp also addressed a recent New York Times report suggesting Palantir is assisting the Trump administration in gathering data on American citizens. He denied the claim, stating, We are not surveilling Americans. The Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm has gained 74% year to date as investors bet on the company's growing role in U.S. government contracts and defense applications. While the stock continues to outperform broader tech peers, Karp acknowledged investor concerns around its valuation. You don't like the price, exit, he said. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
