
Trump's Latest EO Promoting ‘Stircter School Discipline' Discourages Schools From Considering Racial Disparities
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE Source: SAUL LOEB / Getty
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed executive orders purported to promote stricter school discipline — whatever that means.
No, seriously, there's nothing in these orders that unambiguously states what constitutes stricter school discipline. The only thing clear about the agenda behind the orders is also the most predictable thing:
It's more of Trump's anti-DEI propganda.
From CHALKBEAT:
The executive orders target civil rights guidance from the Obama administration that Trump revoked during his first administration and Biden never formally restored. Some school leaders, teachers, and conservative education advocates blamed the Obama-era guidance for deteriorating safety conditions in schools, alleging that administrators let bad behavior slide rather than risk additional scrutiny.
The most recent federal data, from the 2021-22 school year, shows students report fewer assaults and less harassment and bullying than they did a decade ago. Still, a rise in school shootings along with viral videos of vicious assaults have fueled fears about school safety. Two-thirds of schools reported at least one violent incident on campus in the 2021-22 school year.
Under former President Barack Obama, the Education Department warned schools that policies that led to students of certain racial groups being suspended or expelled at much higher rates could be discriminatory. In particular, Black students tend to be suspended at higher rates than other students.
This approach to civil rights enforcement is an example of disparate impact analysis, which considers whether ostensibly race-neutral policies affect certain racial or ethnic groups differently.
The executive orders ban the use of disparate impact analysis in civil rights enforcement and threaten schools with consequences if they use 'racial discrimination and preferencing' in school discipline.
'Under the Biden-Harris Administration, schools were forced to consider equity and inclusion when imposing discipline,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. 'Their policies placed racial equity quotas over student safety, encouraging schools to turn a blind eye to poor or violent behavior in the name of inclusion.'
So, just to recap: There is no evidence whatsoever that studying racially disproportionate disciplinary actions made schools less safe, and the data indicates that, at best, the opposite is true. But the Trump administration will do what it always does, which is repeat lies without presenting evidence and then using those lies to justify policy. In this case, Trump's orders not only make DEI unlawful, but they also make it unlawful to observe and study any data that might indicate the need for DEI.
Look, the MAGA world will always call it 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' whenever we suggest that the president is dabbling in fascism, but a government leader using government authority to forcibly stifle ideas said government leader opposes is very much a cornerstone of Hitler's guide to beating society into Nazi-esque submission .
Also, because white conservatives have generally turned diversity, equity and inclusion into a catch-all umbrella term — just as they did critical race theory and the ubiquoutous thing they call 'woke' — the administration has blindly tossed the 'DEI' label behind disparate impact analysis by requiring that federal officials to author a report analyzing 'DEI-based school discipline and its consequences' to ensure the federal government doesn't fund 'racially preferential policies' such as model school discipline policies. The report should include information about the status of 'discriminatory-equity-ideology-based school discipline and behavior modification techniques in American public education.' (The use of the term 'discriminatory equity' alone tells us that this administration is just throwing words together with no regard to what they actually mean.)
And then there's the underlying message:
Black kids are bad and studying racial disparities means they won't be punished for it.
This goes back to McMahon's baseless assertion that 'racial equity quotas' were prioritized over 'student safety' — an idea that, like all Trump-era ideas, must be backed by a secret database labeled 'Trust Me, Bro' — but it's a narrative that can be traced back to Trump's first administration.
More from CHALKBEAT:
Trump's first education secretary, Betsy DeVos, rescinded the Obama-era guidance after much public debate and attempts to link less harsh school discipline to school shootings.
That guidance led students to be 'disciplined differently depending on their race, and some students who should have been suspended or expelled for dangerous behavior remained in the classroom,' the Trump administration said in a fact sheet.
President Joe Biden promised to reinstate the Obama-era school discipline guidance on the campaign trail, but that never came to fruition. In 2022, his education secretary, Miguel Cardona, did call for reduced suspensions and expulsions for students with disabilities — and there is some overlap as Black children with disabilities are more likely to face harsher discipline at school — but his focus was less on race.
Still, the Trump administration said the Biden administration used Title VI, a civil rights law that prohibits racial discrimination in schools and other federally funded activities, 'to promote a DEI approach to school discipline, which makes schools less safe.'
Again, a Trump 'fact sheet' is not a thing that requires actual facts. During his first term, there was no reason for one to hole their breath waiting for DeVos to cite evidence that, under Obama, dangerous Black students were being kept in the classroom because school officials were afraid of being called racist, and there's no reason to expect McMahon to substantiate the same inherently racist claim now.
At the end of the day, these people just don't want racial disparities to be studied at all, because, if they are, it might expose Trump's entire anti-DEI agenda as exactly what it is.
A reinforcement of white supremacy.
SEE ALSO:
Fighting Back: 12 State Attorneys General File Lawsuit Against Trump Administration Over Its Tariff Agenda
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Wants To Take On Trump In An IQ Test
SEE ALSO
Trump's Latest EO Promoting 'Stircter School Discipline' Discourages Schools From Considering Racial Disparities was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
National Guard Troops Line up in Front of LA Protestors
National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday under orders from President Donald Trump, escalating a showdown with California leaders who say the federal deployment is politically driven and unnecessary. (Source: Bloomberg)


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles it promised to Ukraine and sent them to US troops, Zelensky says
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. Zelensky revealed Sunday that he had secured a deal for the missiles under the Biden administration to counterattack Moscow's deadly, Iranian-designed Shahed drones, which have been at the center of Russia's mass bombardment campaign. 'We have big problems with Shaheds,' Zelensky told ABC News' 'This Week.' 'We counted on this project — 20,000 missiles. Anti-Shahed missiles. It was not expensive, but it's a special technology.' Advertisement 5 Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Trump administration diverted anti-drone missiles originally meant for Kyiv to American forces in the Middle East. ABC News 5 A firefighter extinguishes a fire at a civilian plant following powerful attacks to Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. AFP via Getty Images The diversion of the weapons was first reported by the Wall Street Journal last week, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly issuing an 'urgent' call to redirect the weapons on June 4 away from Ukraine. The missiles were instead sent off to American forces in the Middle East as the US braces for possible conflict with Iran over the stalled nuclear deal, as well as the Houthi rebel group in Yemen, according to the WSJ. Advertisement The order also coincided with Hegseth's absence from the most recent Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting, which was the first time a DOD chief missed the conference since Russia began its invasion in 2022. Under Hegseth and Trump, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine, with the administration previously putting a temporary halt on weapons shipments earlier this year. With Moscow ramping up its drone and missile strikes against Ukraine, Zelensky has called on the US to reaffirm its support for Kyiv and for President Trump to not give up on America's role mediating the strained cease-fire efforts. Advertisement 5 Under President Trump and Pete Hegseth, the US has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine. via REUTERS 5 Smoke billows after drone strikes in Kharkiv, northeastern Ukraine, amid the Russian invasion. SERGEY KOZLOV/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'I am convinced that the president of the United States has all the powers and enough leverage to step up,' Zelensky said, adding that Ukraine already backs the 30-day cease-fire deal proposed by the US. He also rejected Trump's latest characterization of the war as 'two young children fighting like crazy' in a playground. Advertisement 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' he said. 5 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park. This is why I am saying he is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids,' Zelensky said. AFP via Getty Images Along with renewed military aid, Ukraine is pushing the US to join the rest of the world in imposing new economic sanctions against Moscow. Zelensky maintains that sanctions from the US will hurt Moscow the hardest as he backed a proposal from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to slap 500% tariffs on any nation that buys Russian energy products.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump economic adviser ‘very comfortable' with a trade deal closing with China on Monday
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday that he is 'very comfortable' with a trade deal closing between the United States and China after the two sides meet Monday in London. Hassett's comments on CBS' 'Face the Nation' come after President Donald Trump said last week that he had a 'very good' conversation with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and that talks with China are 'very far advanced.' Hassett said the United States is looking to restore the flow of 'crucial' rare earth minerals, which are used in the manufacturing of electronics, to the same levels before early April, when the US-China trade war escalated. 'Those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva,' Hassett said. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will lead the negotiations in London, along with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who in May led a weekend of the trade talks in Geneva. But tensions between the nations escalated weeks later after Trump posted on Truth Social that China 'totally violated' its 90-day trade agreement, which had dialed back the tit-for-tat trade war. Under the agreement, the US temporarily lowered its overall tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China cut its levies on American imports from 125% to 10%. Under the agreement, China said it would suspend or cancel its non-tariff countermeasures imposed on the United States since April 2. Part of Beijing's retaliatory measures included export restrictions on some rare earth minerals, which are essential parts used in products such as iPhones, electric vehicles and fighter jets. The Trump administration on April 2 imposed sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of trading partners before pausing them for 90 days and lowering them to a 10% baseline. Hassett on Sunday declined to say what baseline tariffs could be in place moving forward as the Trump administration continues negotiations with trading partners ahead of the July 9 deadline. 'You could be certain that there's going to be some tariffs,' Hassett said. Lutnick told CNN's 'State of the Union' in May that 'we will not go below 10%' and to expect that baseline rate for the foreseeable future. The Trump administration has so far announced only one trade deal, with the United Kingdom. The Trump administration has touted that other countries, particularly China, will bear the burden of tariffs. Businesses and economists have warned otherwise, spurring uncertainty about consumer spending and fears of a potential recession. Amid those concerns, US inflation slowed to its lowest rate in more than four years in April. The annual inflation rate fell from a 2.4% increase in March to 2.3% as consumer prices rose 0.2%, according to Consumer Price Index data. 'All of our policies together are reducing inflation and helping reduce the deficit by getting revenue from other countries,' Hassett said. The Treasury Department reported that a record $16.3 billion was collected in gross customs duties in April, a sharp jump from the $8.75 billion that was collected in March. Since the start of the 2025 fiscal year, which began in October 2024, the United States has collected about $63.3 billion in gross customs duties — a more than $15 billion increase from the same period during the last fiscal year. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that increased tariff revenue, without accounting for effects on the US economy, could reduce total deficits by $3 trillion over the next decade. The US government deficit stood at about $2 trillion in 2024, or roughly 7% of gross domestic product, according to a June 2024 report by the CBO. Meanwhile, House Republicans' sweeping bill to enact Trump's policy agenda would pile another $3.8 trillion to the government's $36 trillion debt pile, according to recent CBO estimates. CNN's Matt Egan and Alicia Wallace contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data