Bayer renews bid for US Supreme Court to curb glyphosate cases
April 4 (Reuters) - Bayer (BAYGn.DE), opens new tab said on Friday it was again petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to sharply limit legal claims that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer, seeking to avoid potentially billions of dollars in damages.
Bayer said in its petition, opens new tab that consumers should not be able to sue it under state law for failing to warn that Roundup increases cancer risk because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has found no such risk and requires no such warning. In fact, it argued, federal law does not allow it to add any warning to the product beyond the EPA-approved label.
here.
The company tried to make that case to the Supreme Court and was rebuffed in 2022, but a federal appeals court has since agreed with the company in a split from other appeals courts. The Supreme Court is generally more likely to take cases where federal appeals courts are divided.
A Supreme Court victory for Bayer would likely make it much more difficult for the lawsuits to continue, though it is not clear whether it would eliminate them entirely.
Friday's petition came in the case of John Durnell, who in 2023 won a $1.25-million verdict in a St. Louis, Missouri state court. Bayer has been hit with much larger verdicts over Roundup, most recently a $2.1-billion award last month to a plaintiff in Georgia.
The company has paid about $10 billion to settle claims that Roundup, based on the herbicide glyphosate, causes cancer. About 67,000 further cases are pending, for which the group has set aside $5.9 billion in legal provisions.
CEO Bill Anderson has struggled to revive a share price that has plunged by more than 70% since Bayer's $63-billion acquisition of Monsanto in 2018 that saddled it with costly litigation and debt.
The company's problems include the glyphosate litigation, a 2023 development setback for its most promising experimental medicine, weak agriculture markets and pressure from some investors to separate or sell businesses. Bayer plans to seek shareholder approval to raise equity capital worth close to 35% of its outstanding shares over the next three years to cover possible costs of U.S. litigation.
The company has warned U.S. lawmakers it could stop selling Roundup, which is widely used by U.S. farmers, unless they can strengthen legal protection against the litigation. It has already replaced glyphosate with other ingredients in the home consumer version of Roundup.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
UK's Metro Bank receives takeover approach, Sky News reports
June 14 (Reuters) - UK's Metro Bank (MTRO.L), opens new tab has been approached about a takeover bid backed by a private equity firm Pollen Street Capital, Sky News reported on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report.
Reuters
20 hours ago
- Reuters
Live Nation case at US Supreme Court tests reach of arbitration law
June 13 (Reuters) - A firm that developed rules for large scale arbitrations has asked the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving entertainment giant Live Nation (LYV.N), opens new tab to reject a ruling that criticized the procedures as unfair to consumers. In a friend-of-the-court brief filed, opens new tab on Thursday, dispute resolution firm New Era ADR said the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had last year misinterpreted its rules in a decision rejecting Live Nation's efforts to require consumers to agree to arbitrate any disputes when they purchased tickets. Live Nation was accused of charging artificially high ticket prices in a lawsuit that the event company tried unsuccessfully to move them into arbitration. The 9th Circuit had last year rejected New Era's arbitration rules and said the consumer plaintiffs could sue Live Nation in a proposed class action in federal court. New Era is not a party in the lawsuit. It submitted a filing to the justices as a friend of the court, defending its practices. Live Nation has denied any wrongdoing. The case, which the Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear, could give the justices a fresh chance to weigh the contours of the Federal Arbitration Act and whether so-called mass arbitration fits into the decades-old law. Live Nation in its petition, opens new tab to the high court said plaintiffs' lawyers were increasingly pursuing mass arbitration as a pressure tactic to force companies to settle what it called meritless claims. Live Nation did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A lead attorney for the plaintiffs declined to comment. New Era chief executive Rich Lee in a statement said the company was "focused on removing gamesmanship and impediments to ensure that all parties have their cases heard and efficiently resolved on their merits." Companies often promote arbitration as a more efficient way for individual consumers to air their disputes outside of court. As more companies have employed arbitration agreements to steer consumer claims away from the federal courts, plaintiffs' lawyers have increasingly turned to mass arbitrations, filing thousands of individual arbitration demands that are nearly identical. Live Nation in 2021 had turned to New Era, a new dispute resolution company, to use its mass arbitration platform. A federal judge in 2023 had ruled that Live Nation could not enforce its arbitration provisions, and the 9th Circuit had last year upheld the decision. The 9th Circuit had determined that New Era's mass arbitration rules were 'so dense, convoluted and internally contradictory to be borderline unintelligible.' New Era's Supreme Court filing said its rules 'have remained centered on keeping mass arbitration workable, accessible, fast, and merits-based for all parties involved.' In a separate filing, opens new tab on Thursday, lawyers for the consumers urged the justices to leave the 9th Circuit's order in place. The case is Live Nation Entertainment et al v. Skot Heckman et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. For plaintiffs: Warren Postman of Keller Postman, and Kevin Teruya of Quinn Emanuel For Live Nation: Roman Martinez and Tim O'Mara of Latham & Watkins For New Era: Sandra Musumeci of Kelley Drye & Warren Read more: Class action administrators, banks accused of kickback scheme in new lawsuits Lawsuit accuses American Arbitration Association of monopolizing consumer market Samsung defeats consumers' mass arbitration demand in US appeals court
Reuters
21 hours ago
- Reuters
Inter Milan set to early repay bond as plans new debt deal
MILAN, June 13 (Reuters) - Champions League finalist Inter Milan is set to repay early a 415 million euro ($479.57 million) high-yield bond this month as the Italian soccer club prepares to secure funds from a new debt deal, it said in a statement on Friday. Inter Milan paid a 6.75% coupon to place a five-year bond in 2022 to refinance Italy's top-flight soccer club's debt. The debt facility was issued by the Serie A club's media company, which manages the broadcast and sponsorship business of Inter Milan. The company plans to redeem the bond on June 26, subject to securing funds from a debt financing transaction by the business day before the redemption date, it said in a statement. Companies typically repay debt early to secure better financial conditions. Controlled by U.S. investment fund Oaktree (OAK_pa.N), opens new tab, Inter Milan was reportedly tapping private debt investors to refinance the debt facility. Oaktree took over the club last year after a missed 395 million euro payment from the then majority shareholder, Chinese conglomerate Suning ( opens new tab. ($1 = 0.8654 euros) (This story has been refiled to fix typos in paragraphs 1 and 5)
