Disturbing new bodycam reveals Kentucky sheriff's outburst moments after he shot judge best friend dead in his chambers
A sheriff who shot the local judge dead in his chambers was paranoid he was going to be murdered on the way to jail minutes later.
Letcher County Sheriff Shawn 'Mickey' Stines gunned down Judge Kevin Mullins inside the county courthouse on September 19.
Exactly why Stines killed his close friend soon after they had lunch together is a mystery, with only vague explanations from his lawyers so far.
The shooting and the moments leading up to it, before Stines drew his gun and Mullins tried to hide behind his desk, were caught on film.
Kentucky State Police arrested Stines minutes later and their attempts to interview him in the courthouse hallway were filmed on bodycam.
But the troopers didn't have any success as they spent the whole time trying to reassure a paranoid Stines that they weren't going to kill him.
'I leave this building, I won't draw another breath,' he told them while handcuffed, his leg nervously shaking.
Stines was terrified of being transported to the Leslie County Jail, an hour's drive away, and begged to be locked up in the one next door instead.
The troopers spent the whole time trying to reassure a paranoid Stines that they weren't going to kill him
KSP Investigator Clayton Stamper reminded him that wasn't possible, as he had to be taken out of the county due to his position as sheriff.
'I'll never make it to the Leslie County Jail. Put me in the Leslie County Jail, I'll get killed there. I'll get killed in any jail,' Stines pleaded.
Stamper, confused about why Stines was in fear of his life, asked why he thought the troopers planned to kill him.
'Mickey, why do you think we're going to do something to you? Why would we wanna hurt you?' he said.
'Look, I know that this is obviously a very crappy situation, but I assure you we have no intentions of harming you whatsoever.'
Stines said he was worried the transport would stop along the way, and someone else would get in the car and kill him.
'Come on, be fair to me now. I seen the look… Y'all come on now, don't kill me. Don't punish me, you know. Let's be fair. Don't shoot me, nothing like that, he said.
Stines eventually settled down, but became more paranoid when the troopers tried to question him about the shooting.
'Y'all are gonna kill me, I know you are. Let's just get it over with. Let's just go,' he said.
Stamper eventually convinced Stines to go to the Leslie County Jail by agreeing to let Trooper Jason Bates, a former Letcher County deputy Stines knew well, be the one to drive him there.
Stines still appeared fearful and jumpy as he was led to the police car, peering around corners and scanning for potential threats everywhere.
Troopers tried to question Stines during the drive, but he stayed quiet.
Stines' lawyers plan to present an insanity defense if the case goes to trial, claiming two weeks of intense stress drove him to murder.
Footage from just before the shooting showed Stines express concern about his family, and call his daughter from the judge's phone.
He also told officers seconds after the shooting: 'They're trying to kidnap my wife and kid.'
Defense attorney Jeremy Bartley issued a legal filing saying his client's state of mind at the time of the shooting would be key to his upcoming trial.
He said the case will hinge on testimony that Stines gave at a deposition for a lawsuit by Sabrina Adkins days before the September 2024 shooting.
Stines in that interview answered questions about one of his deputies allegedly sexually assaulting jail inmates.
An accuser in that case claimed that she was forced by a deputy sheriff to have sex in Mullins' chambers for six months in exchange for staying out of jail.
Bartley claimed Stines was concerned about backlash from his deposition testimony, which caused him to fear that his or his family's lives were in danger.
The attorney claimed Stines' 'mental health' was affected by the perceived threat.
'Ultimately, he was in fear for the safety of his wife and his daughter, and I think what you see there is the result of that,' he wrote.
Adkins accused Judge Mullins of inappropriate behavior, claiming she had witnessed him engaging in sexual acts with women in exchange for special treatment.
This lawsuit, filed in January 2022, claimed Mullins was involved in a sex-for-favors scheme within his chambers.
Adkins also alleged former deputy Ben Fields was involved, having filmed illicit encounters, some of which reportedly involved Mullins.
Stines, a close friend of Mullins for about 30 years, was mentioned in the legal proceedings just three days before the shooting.
'I think the deposition has several important roles in this case... it's going to be a large portion of the story we tell,' Bartley said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Driver had blood alcohol level twice the legal limit in fatal Yellowstone crash, police say
The driver of a pickup that crashed into a tour van near Yellowstone National Park this month, killing seven people, had a blood alcohol level more than twice the legal limit for driving, police said Friday. The driver, identified previously as Isaih Moreno of Humble, Texas, had a blood alcohol content of 0.20, Idaho State Police said in a statement. The limit is 0.08. 'This tragedy should be a wake-up call,' police Capt. Chris Weadick said. 'No one plans to cause a crash or take a life when they get behind the wheel, but choices have consequences.' Investigators determined that the Dodge Ram driven by Moreno crossed the center line and collided with the Mercedes van, which was carrying 14 people, in the May 1 crash. Both vehicles caught fire. Moreno and six people from China, Italy and California were killed. Survivors were taken to nearby hospitals with injuries. The highway where the crash happened south of West Yellowstone, Montana, is a route between Yellowstone and the Grand Tetons that is open in the spring before a north-south route is plowed and the park fully opens for summer. Yellowstone is one of the country's largest national parks and draws millions of visitors each year.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Has Big Brother arrived? Inside the secretive Trump effort to centralize government data on millions of Americans
The Trump administration is reportedly leaning on an Elon Musk -allied tech company to build wide-ranging data tools pooling government information on millions of Americans and immigrants alike. The campaign has raised alarms from critics that the company could be furthering Musk's DOGE effort to vacuum up and potentially weaponize – or sell – mass amounts of sensitive personal data, particularly against vulnerable groups like immigrants and political dissidents. In March, the president signed an executive order dedicated to 'stopping waste, fraud, and abuse by eliminating information silos,' a euphemism for pooling vast stores of data on Americans under the federal government. To carry out the data effort, the administration has deepened the federal government's longstanding partnership with Palantir, a tech firm specializing in building big data applications, which was co-founded by Silicon Valley investor, GOP donor, and JD Vance mentor Peter Thiel. Since Trump took office, the administration has reportedly spent more than $113 million with Palantir through new and existing contracts, while the company is slated to begin work on a new $795 million deal with the Defense Department. Palantir is reportedly working with the administration in the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Internal Revenue Service, according to The New York Times. Within these agencies, the firm is reportedly building tools to track the movement of migrants in real time and streamline all tax data. The company is also reportedly in talks about deploying its technology at the Social Security Administration and the Department of Education, both of which have been targets of DOGE, and which store sensitive information about Americans' identities and finances. 'We act as a data processor, not a data controller,' the company insisted in response to the Times report. 'Our software and services are used under direction from the organizations that license our products. These organizations define what can and cannot be done with their data; they control the Palantir accounts in which analysis is conducted.' The Trump administration has reportedly pursued a variety of efforts to use big data to support its priorities, including social media surveillance of immigrants to detect alleged pro-terror views, and American activists who disagree wit Donal Trump's views.. Earlier this month, a group of former Palantir employees warned in an open letter that the company was 'normalizing authoritarianism under the guise of a 'revolution' led by oligarchs.' 'By supporting Trump's administration, Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, and dangerous expansions of executive power, they have abandoned their responsibility and are in violation of Palantir's Code of Conduct,' the employees wrote. Previous reporting from CNN and WIRED has described efforts at the Department of Homeland Security to build mass data tools to support tracking and surveilling undocumented immigrants, a key priority for the White House as deportations still aren't reaching levels necessary to meet Trump's promise of rapidly removing millions of people from the country. The effort has involved merging data from outside agencies like Social Security and the IRS, according to WIRED. 'They are trying to amass a huge amount of data,' a senior DHS official told the magazine. 'It has nothing to do with finding fraud or wasteful spending … They are already cross-referencing immigration with SSA and IRS, as well as voter data.' Since Trump took office, DOGE operatives, many of whom are unknown to the public nor have been vetted, have rapidly sought access to data at key agencies, including the Departments of Education and the Treasury, as well as the Social Security Administration, often over the objections of senior staff. The efforts have prompted scores of lawsuits against DOGE. At Social Security, the administration also moved thousands of living, mostly Latino undocumented immigrants into the agency's 'Death Master File' in an attempt to pressure them to leave the country. DOGE itself is reportedly under audit for its action by the Government Accountability Office, a federal watchdog. An April letter from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee warned of DOGE's 'extreme negligence and an alarmingly cavalier attitude' toward sensitive data. It claimed a whistleblower had described how 'DOGE engineers have tried to create specialized computers for themselves that simultaneously give full access to networks and databases across different agencies.' The 'whistleblower information obtained by the Committee, combined with public reporting, paints a picture of chaos at SSA [Social Security Administration] as DOGE is rapidly, haphazardly, and unlawfully working to implement changes that could disrupt Social Security payments and expose Americans' sensitive data,' the letter reads.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Wisconsin judge who shielded illegal migrant from ICE shares latest defense: 'I am absolutely immune'
A Wisconsin judge indicted for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant evade ICE is now claiming 'absolute judicial immunity' in a broader legal effort to dismiss all charges. Hannah Dugan, 66, a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge, was arrested by FBI agents on April 25 for allegedly preventing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from detaining a man in her courtroom. The man, 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, was reportedly subject to a federal detainer at the time. Federal prosecutors allege Dugan directed ICE officers to the chief judge's office while allowing Flores-Ruiz and his attorney to exit through a door typically used by jurors. The long-time judge was later indicted on May 13 on charges of obstructing a federal agency and aiding Flores-Ruiz's escape. However, in a 37-page memorandum filed May 14, her attorneys argued the indictment is an 'ugly innovation' that threatens long-standing legal precedent. They claim Dugan is protected by 'absolute judicial immunity' for actions taken as part of her official duties, even if those actions are later contested. 'Judges can be and are charged for actions wholly unrelated to their role, like taking bribes or kidnapping,' the memo notes, adding that Dugan's conduct occurred squarely within her judicial capacity. Her high-powered legal team, including attorney Dean Strang, warned the case could set a 'dangerous precedent,' undermining judicial independence. 'This is an extraordinary prosecution that poses a threat to federalism and judicial independence,' the filing states. 'Dismissal here flows from a straightforward application of long-settled law. The indictment itself is an ugly innovation. Its dismissal will not be.' The filing continues: 'Nothing in the Constitution allows the federal government to superintend the administration and case-by-case, daily functioning of state courts as this indictment proposes.' This latest motion expands on an earlier filing with more detailed arguments about federal overreach and the constitutional role of judges. Dugan's attorneys maintain she acted within her jurisdiction and broke no laws in declining to facilitate the detention. The US Department of Justice, however, characterizes the incident as obstruction of federal law, triggering a contentious legal and political debate. An amicus brief filed on Friday by 138 former state and federal judges supports Dugan, arguing she is entitled to 'absolute immunity for her official acts.' The brief compares this protection to that granted to members of the legislative and executive branches. It calls the prosecution an 'egregious overreach by the executive branch' that 'threatens public trust in the judicial system and the ability of the public to avail themselves of courthouses without fear of reprisal.' But, the Justice Department maintains that no one - including judges - is above the law when it comes to obstructing federal immigration operations. 'Since President Trump was inaugurated, activist judges have tried to obstruct President Trump and the American people's mandate to make America safe and secure our homeland - but this judge's actions to shield an accused violent criminal illegal alien from justice is shocking and shameful,' Assistant Secretary Department of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Dugan, who was released after her arrest, pleaded not guilty earlier this month. Her trial is set to begin the week of July 21. If found guilty of both charges, she could face up to six years in prison and $350,000 in fines. She has served as a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge since 2016, winning election with about 65 percent of the vote and running unopposed for reelection in 2022, according to CBS News. As for Flores-Ruiz, he had appeared in Dugan's court on April 18 for a status conference in a misdemeanor battery case, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He is accused of repeatedly hitting and briefly strangling his roommate, and also striking two women who tried to intervene. Flores-Ruiz has pleaded not guilty to three battery charges and to a separate federal charge of illegally re-entering the US after being deported to Mexico 12 years ago. Six federal agents were present at the courthouse on April 18 to arrest him. He was ultimately taken into custody after a short chase outside the courthouse.
