US-backed group cancels food aid distribution in Gaza on Wednesday
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has said it would not distribute food aid to people in the enclave on Wednesday, as attacks by Israeli forces continue there.
The private-sector foundation has provided food since May 27. But local authorities say Israeli troops have been repeatedly opening fire on residents waiting for aid, causing deaths and injuries.
The foundation said on Tuesday that distribution centers would be closed on Wednesday for maintenance work, such as "improving efficiency." It added that operations would resume on Thursday.
The Israeli military said roads leading to the sites would be blocked on Wednesday.
The United Nations and other organizations are criticizing the foundation, which is backed by the US. It says food aid distribution should be carried out in a framework led by the UN.
UN spokesperson, Stephane Dujarric, said on Tuesday: "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking, and in several instances, losing their lives, just trying to get food." He also called for an immediate and independent investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
14 hours ago
- NHK
Arab media: Israeli attacks kill over 30 in Gaza
Arab media are reporting that Israeli attacks have left more than 30 people dead in Gaza. Qatar-based broadcaster Al Jazeera reported that at least 34 people were killed on Friday alone. The attacks came at the start of Eid al-Adha, one of Islam's most important holidays. Palestinians were seen praying at mosques that were destroyed. Also on Friday, the US-led Gaza Humanitarian Foundation announced it will halt distributing food in the enclave, citing overcrowding at distribution sites. The group began the operation on May 27. Gaza authorities announced that eight people were killed by Israeli attacks around food distribution sites on Friday. The Israeli military has explained that its troops fired warning shots to those who had approached them around distribution sites.
Japan Times
15 hours ago
- Japan Times
U.S. mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation
The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80% of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing toward their positions.
Yomiuri Shimbun
16 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Cards in Deck: Trump Keeps Stack of Orders Ready to Play as Needed
Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office on May 23. Months before President Donald Trump issued a travel ban on individuals from more than a dozen countries, his team of lawyers and advisers had already started crafting the ban, a process that was underway before he stepped back into the Oval Office in January. Trump announced the proclamation Wednesday night, three days after an Egyptian man with an expired tourist visa was charged with attacking pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado. Trump said the crime 'underscores the danger posed to our country by foreign nationals not properly vetted.' 'We don't want 'em,' Trump said in a video announcing the ban. But a White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that Wednesday night's proclamation 'was not a direct response to' the Colorado attack. Trump was always going to implement a travel ban, his advisers say. The announcement was the latest example of how the Trump administration has dipped into its large reserve of proclamations and executive orders – many of which have been long in the making – to drive its chosen narrative, push the president's priorities and sometimes change the subject when news coverage focuses on topics that Trump officials prefer to downplay. Throughout Trump's second term, White House staff have maintained a stash of executive orders and proclamations they can deploy depending on the themes of the moment and the narratives they want to shape, a senior White House official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about internal strategies. Some orders are put into the calendar well in advance, the official said. Others are teed up the night before they are signed depending on impulse, political strategy and the overall mood within the White House, the official said. On this occasion, Trump invoked the recent attack in Colorado as an example of why the new measure was needed, even though Egypt is not one of the countries listed in the proclamation. Wednesday evening was the time the president and his team chose to hit the go button on the long-planned travel ban – making the announcement as Trump and his White House team were pushing Congress to embrace his sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill legislation, and as Elon Musk, who until recently was a top Trump ally, was increasing his criticism of Trump's bill. During Trump's first term, he implemented a similar travel ban just a week after taking office. It was later revoked by President Joe Biden. A number of the executive orders Trump has signed this term were written during the presidential transition. Wednesday's travel ban had been in the works since soon after Trump reentered office this January, four White House officials told The Washington Post. Broad plans to implement such a ban were underway even earlier, as Trump's lawyers crafted an executive order he signed on his first day in office, requiring the Cabinet to begin developing a potential travel ban. Some of the president's recent executive actions sat in the pile for much less time: Two other proclamations issued Wednesday night were the result of the White House quickly springing into action to seize on recent events. One restricted international students and scholars from entering the country to attend or teach at Harvard University. The other ordered the White House counsel to open an investigation into whether Biden and his staff covered up his cognitive decline. Those orders were 'new,' a White House official said. The Harvard proclamation came just days after a federal judge blocked an earlier effort by the administration to revoke the university's ability to host foreign students and scholars, a critical source of money for Harvard. The order to investigate Biden and his use of the autopen – a tool presidents have long used to sign certain documents and executive orders – followed a flurry of news coverage in recent weeks alleging Biden's cognitive state was in decline throughout his time in office. Trump has alleged without evidence that Biden's staff used the autopen to sign documents without the president's knowledge. Trump's approach to executive action has differed notably from that of his predecessors, who resorted to it at times but never with the intense frequency of Trump's first months in office. In less than five months, Trump has signed 157 executive orders and 62 proclamations, according to data from the Federal Register, a pace faster than any modern president. Trump surpassed the pace of his first term, when he signed an average of 55 orders a year, according to data compiled by the American Presidency Project. White House staff secretary Will Scharf is responsible for managing the flow of orders onto Trump's desk. When orders and proclamations are signed publicly, Scharf, standing at Trump's side, serves the role not only of a lawyer, but something akin to a game show host sidekick – placing each leather-bound order in front of Trump and announcing what every order accomplishes. Trump, meanwhile, will grab a thick black marker from a small box of them placed by his right hand, positioning himself in the stance to begin signing as Scharf gives his summary. Trump has already signed more orders than President Barack Obama in either term, and at the current clip, is likely to surpass this year Biden's sum of 162 orders over four years. Trump's use of the executive order mirrors Franklin D. Roosevelt, who signed an average of 307 orders a year during his more than 12 years in office. However, FDR also worked with Congress to implement his agenda through legislation. Trump signed just five bills into law in the first 100 days of his presidency.
