Meta Oversight Board calls on company to investigate how content moderation changes could impact human rights
Meta's Oversight Board is calling on the company to evaluate how recent changes to its content moderation policies could impact the human rights of some users, including those in the LGBTQ community.
The Oversight Board published 11 case decisions overnight Wednesday, marking the first cases to take into account the policy and enforcement changes announced by the Facebook and Instagram parent company at the start of the year.
'Our decisions note concerns that Meta's January 7, 2025, policy and enforcement changes were announced hastily, in a departure from regular procedure, with no public information shared as to what, if any, prior human rights due diligence the company performed,' the board wrote in a release.
The board points specifically to Meta's decision to drop some LGBTQ protections from its hate speech rules amid a wider overhaul of content moderation practices. Under the changes, Meta now allows users to accuse LGBTQ individuals of being mentally ill despite otherwise prohibiting such content.
'We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality,' Meta's policy now states.
'As the changes are being rolled out globally, the Board emphasizes it is now essential that Meta identifies and addresses adverse impacts on human rights that may result from them,' the board wrote.
This includes investigating the potential negative effects on Global Majority nations, LGBTQ users, minors and immigrants, according to the release. The board recommended Meta update it on its progress every six months and report its findings publicly 'very soon.'
The 11 cases reviewed by the board related to freedom of expression issues and the board noted it has a 'high threshold' for restricting speech under an international human rights framework.
In two cases related to gender identity debate videos, for example, the board upheld Meta's decision to allow two posts about transgender peoples' access to bathrooms and participation in athletic events in the U.S.
'Despite the intentionally provocative nature of the posts, which misgender identifiable trans people in ways many would find offensive, a majority of the Board found they related to matters of public concern and would not incite likely and imminent violence or discrimination,' the board wrote.
The board also recommended Meta improve its enforcement against bullying and harassment policies, including the rules requiring users to self-report content.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described the changes in January as an effort to 'get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression.'
In doing so, he also announced Meta's elimination of its fact-checking program. The system was replaced with a community-based process called Community Notes that relies on users to submit notes or corrections to posts that are potentially misleading or lack context.
The fact-checking program officially ended in the U.S. earlier in this month and Meta began testing the Community Notes feature last month. It used X's open-source algorithm for the rating system that determines whether notes get published.
The board recommended Meta 'continually assess the effectiveness of Community Notes compared to third-party fact-checking, particularly in situations where the rapid spread of false information creates risks to public safety.'
For years, Meta has also used artificial intelligence technology to proactively detect and remove violating content before it is reported. The board said Meta should also assess whether reducing a reliance on automatic technology may have impacts across the globe, especially in countries faced with crisis.
The board is run independently from Meta and funded by a grant provided by the company. It can offer non-binding policy recommendations, which if adopted, can have far-reaching impacts for the company's social media platforms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta Sues Hong Kong Firm in Crackdown on Deepfake Nude Apps
(Bloomberg) -- Meta Platforms Inc. is suing a Hong Kong-based business for allegedly promoting so-called nudify apps, as the Facebook owner attempts to combat a surge in naked and sexual images created by artificial intelligence. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? The tech giant said it filed a lawsuit in Hong Kong to stop Joy Timeline HK Ltd. allegedly advertising CrushAI apps on Meta platforms. The apps allow people to create AI-generated nude or sexually explicit images of individuals without their consent, Meta said in a post on its website Thursday. The legal action is part of broader crackdown on online non-consensual sexual images, which can be used for sextortion, blackmail and abuse. Meta, which also owns Instagram, said it will now share with other technology companies information about ads, accounts and content that have been removed for promoting nudify apps. In its post, Meta said it had noticed 'concerning growth' in this area. 'With nudify apps being advertised across the internet — and available in App Stores themselves — removing them from one platform alone isn't enough,' Meta said. Joy Timeline didn't immediately respond to a request for comment sent to its public email address. Meta is under fire around the world for not doing enough to protect teenagers and young people. In Australia, a world-first ban on social media for under-16s will start this year, and other countries are tightening content oversight. But while Meta is fighting back against some fake, auto-generated material, it's pushing deeper into artificial intelligence more broadly. Advertisers promoting nudify apps are changing tactics to avoid being caught, according to Meta. Some use benign images to evade detection, while others swiftly create new domain names to replace blocked websites. In response, Meta said it has developed technology to identify such ads, even when they don't include nudity. In its Hong Kong lawsuit, Meta claims Joy Timeline repeatedly tried to circumvent ad review processes after they were removed for breaking Meta's rules. --With assistance from Kurt Wagner and Newley Purnell. New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trans Texans brace for life under strict sex definition law
It was in a San Antonio courtroom in 2015 that Leo Tyler felt he became who he was always meant to be. The 17-year-old had long known he was trans, but it didn't feel real until a judge agreed to change the name and gender on his government documents. 'It was euphoric,' Tyler, now 27, recalls. 'Walking out of that courtroom, I felt so seen.' Tyler was the youngest in a group of people changing their gender markers that day. On the steps of the courthouse, they all embraced him, crying tears of joy over the idea that he'd get to live his whole adult life on his own terms. ''This is something no one can ever take away from me,'' he remembers thinking. But now, just a decade later, Tyler finds himself in limbo, waiting to see whether the state of Texas will require him and other trans people to live as the sex they were assigned at birth, rather than the gender they identify as. House Bill 229, which the governor is expected to sign into law, enforces a definition of sex based on the reproductive system someone was born with — women produce ova, men fertilize them. This definition could now be applied across state statute, leaving trans people and lawyers rushing to understand what exactly will change as a result of this law. 'The question of the hour is how will [HB] 229 be enforced and applied,' said Sarah Corning, a legal fellow at the ACLU of Texas. 'What we do know is that it's incredibly disrespectful to so many Texans the Legislature represents, and completely disregards their identity.' Compared to past legislative sessions, where battles over bathrooms, drag shows and gender-affirming care sparked dramatic showdowns between lawmakers and community members, the 2025 session was remarkably quiet. But HB 229 and the handful of other bills that passed may end up having even more significant consequences for LGBTQ people than many people realize, Corning said. The ripple effect will likely take years to sort out. Tyler, who works at a shelter for LGBTQ youth and runs support groups for trans people, is struggling to provide his community with answers he himself doesn't have. Carrying a driver's license that says he's a woman would 'be like I'm carrying an ID of some random person,' Tyler said. 'That name, that photo, that doesn't reflect who I am. I could just see it causing a lot of confusion, and for what?' LGBTQ advocates went into this legislative session unsure of what to expect. It had been a bruising few years, with Texas lawmakers pushing more, and more aggressive bills than any other state. In 2023, they banned trans athletes from playing college sports, as they'd done for K-12, prohibited children at drag shows and banned certain gender-affirming medical care for minors. Protesters turned out in full force, leading to arrests in the House chamber. The issue only became more prominent during the 2024 presidential election, where Republicans spent more than $200 million on round-the-clock anti-trans ads hammering Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democratic candidates. Immediately after entering office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order asserting there are only two sexes, male and female. Texas Governor Greg Abbott followed with a similar order for Texas, and the Texas Department of Public Safety began refusing to change gender markers on drivers' licenses, even with court orders. Amid all this upheaval, it wasn't immediately clear what Texas legislators' next priorities would be on this front, Jonathan Gooch, communications director at Equality Texas, said in April. 'Having had such an aggressively anti-trans legislative session in 2023, they accomplished a lot of things they wanted to do, and now the federal government is doing a lot of what they'd hoped,' he said. 'That's left Texas [lawmakers] to dig into some of the finer details, which are less obvious to most people.' The bills that gained traction this session were more nuanced and harder to understand, which Brad Pritchett, CEO of Equality Texas, said was intentional. 'This year, they have tried to hide the discrimination in bills that are more and more complicated,' he said at a rally, adding that legislators were hoping people's 'eyes glaze over' as they chipped away at health insurance and discrimination protections for trans people. One new law will require health insurers that cover gender-affirming care to also cover all costs related to detransitioning or any adverse effects. Or, as bill sponsor Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Allen, summarized it, 'if you take somebody to the dance and they want to go home, then you have to take them home.' Democrats argued that this would disincentivize health insurers from covering gender-affirming care by significantly raising the costs, and filed more than half a dozen amendments to narrow the scope of the bill, to no avail. A related bill that passed will require medical records to list someone's birth sex, even if they've transitioned, which advocates worry will lead to discrimination. 'However you couch it, [this legislation] is about eliminating the existence of trans individuals in Texas,' Rep. Ann Johnson, a Democrat from Houston, said during the debate. 'Stop pretending that you're for freedom. Stop pretending that this is about the kids." The most high-impact bill, though, was HB 229, the 'sex definition' bill. The preface to the bill said this strict sex definition would be applied across bathrooms, prisons, shelters and sports teams, although legal experts say it is likely contained to anywhere sex is already explicitly mentioned in statute. Supporters call it the 'Women's Bill of Rights,' and said it was necessary to protect women-only spaces from the intrusion of men. 'If we can no longer define what a woman is, we cannot defend what women have won,' Rep. Ellen Troxclair, an Austin Republican, said on the floor. 'We cannot protect what we cannot define.' But for trans people, this strict definition leaves them in purgatory, unsure what exactly will change and where exactly they belong. Ian Pittman, an attorney who has helped dozens of trans people change their gender markers, said it's hard to imagine the state combing back through every individual drivers' license and birth certificate to find ones where the gender marker was changed. He anticipates this might come up when people renew their licenses, but it would depend on each individual case. He's more worried about the 'butterfly effect' of how this definition will come to be used across state and local laws, whether or not HB 229 actually applies to that particular statute. While many trans people celebrated the fact that a 'bathroom bill,' which requires people to use the bathroom that aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth, didn't pass this session, Pittman said the sex definition law could potentially end up having the same impact on the ground. 'There may not be a bathroom ban, but someone might say, since we have 'woman' defined in the government code, this courthouse bathroom is now only for people who are women by the government code definition,' he said. 'It's going to be used as a sword, not a shield.' For trans people like Tyler, who are living fully as the gender they identify with, carrying documents that say they're a different sex would require outing themselves anytime they fly, apply for a job, try to get a loan, are pulled over, or go to a bar, he said. 'I feel like, this is me, and I just want to have a job, and put food on the table, and pay bills, and it's very upsetting that they just threw this bill … down and now it could impact all of that,' he said. 'I've had to take time away just to cry because it gets very depleting.' Ryan McBride has been on testosterone and living as a man for two years. But he hadn't yet changed his gender marker, in part due to fear that he would face discrimination at the doctor's office. Now, he worries that he missed the window. He watched the Legislature closely this session, refreshing its website multiple times a day to see what bills were passing, and what they might mean for him and his community. When lawmakers gaveled out on June 1, he breathed a sigh of relief, taking a moment to celebrate that they didn't go further than they did. 'Weird start to Pride Month,' he said wryly. But even before any bills have gone into effect, living as a trans person in Texas has already become harder, he said. He's faced an uptick in unwanted attention, which he attributes to everyday people who previously had no awareness of, let alone opinion on, trans people suddenly becoming hyper-aware of any gender diversity. 'I've been ma'am-ed a lot more, and I was worried I'm not passing as well anymore, but I've heard this from other trans people that they're getting it too,' he said. 'No one is neutral anymore, it seems like, everyone is either really supportive or really opposed,' This is part of the long-term goal of all the bills that passed this session, Pittman said. Even if they don't change everything overnight, it's part of a campaign to make Texas inhospitable to trans people, to make them move, or live as the sex they were assigned at birth. 'It's more about creating confusion and it's meant to foment a divisive atmosphere and just make people wonder, do I really want to live in Texas as a trans person, where everything is becoming so hostile?' he said. Disclosure: Equality Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meta Sues Hong Kong Firm in Crackdown on Deepfake Nude Apps
Meta Platforms Inc. is suing a Hong Kong-based business for allegedly promoting so-called nudify apps, as the Facebook owner attempts to combat a surge in naked and sexual images created by artificial intelligence. The tech giant said it filed a lawsuit in Hong Kong to stop Joy Timeline HK Ltd. allegedly advertising CrushAI apps on Meta platforms. The apps allow people to create AI-generated nude or sexually explicit images of individuals without their consent, Meta said in a post on its website Thursday.
