Hegseth in turmoil, Trump's sinking polls
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks at the annual White House Easter Egg Roll in D.C. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)
Senior politics reporter Aaron Blake talks with The Washington Post's chief correspondent covering national politics, Dan Balz, and national security reporter Abigail Hauslohner about new reporting this week about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Hegseth's continued use of Signal, an unclassified messaging app, to share highly sensitive information has roiled the agency he oversees. They also unpack new polling that shows warning signs for Trump: public support for his legally dubious immigration policies have turned negative.
Today's show was produced by Laura Benshoff with help from Rennie Svirnovskiy. It was edited by Lucy Perkins and mixed by Sean Carter.
Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
US Orders Some Embassy Staff to Leave Baghdad on Iran Threat
The US ordered some staff to depart its embassy in Baghdad and authorized families of military service members to leave the region, officials said, after Iran threatened to strike American bases if it's attacked over its nuclear program. The decision to reduce staffing in Iraq was 'based on our latest analysis,' according to the State Department. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth authorized family members of US military stationed across the region to leave, according to a Pentagon statement. Bloomberg's Stuart Livingstone-Wallace reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Lockheed Martin shares sank as much as 7% after a report that the Pentagon is halving F-35 requests for the Air Force
Lockheed Martin shares dropped as much as 7% on Wednesday after news that the Pentagon is asking for half of the F-35s it initially forecast for the Air Force. The defense contractor's shares recovered to $456 at market close, or about 4.2% lower from $476, the price at the end of Tuesday's trading day. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that a procurement document sent to Congress indicated the Defense Department is requesting only 24 F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters for the Air Force, down from 48 that officials projected in the last fiscal year. Per the outlet, the document also proposed 12 F-35s for the Navy and 11 for the Marine Corps, down from 17 and 13 fighters, respectively. Business Insider could not independently verify Bloomberg's report. The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment sent outside regular business hours. The US is by far Lockheed Martin's biggest customer for the F-35, with plans to buy 2,456 of the aircraft over several decades. The Air Force is supposed to eventually receive 1,763 of that total. When asked to comment on a possible reduction of local F-35 purchases this year, a Lockheed Martin spokesperson told BI in a statement that the fighter is "combat proven, offers the most advanced capability and technology, and is the most affordable option to ensure the US and allies remain ahead of emerging threats." "We will continue to work closely with the Administration, Congress, and our customers to deliver this game-changing capability as the budget process continues in the months ahead," the spokesperson added. A reduced ask for F-35s can potentially be changed by Congress, which is still deliberating on official defense funding for the 2025 fiscal year ending on September 30. Lawmakers have shown they're willing to fund the advanced stealth fighter beyond the Pentagon's requests. When the Air Force requested 48 F-35s from Congress last year, it was instead offered money for 51 of the planes. Doubling the requested budget, however, would be a huge jump from that smaller boost. The Pentagon is shifting its budget The reported change could also signify an internal reshaping of the Pentagon's spending priorities under the Trump administration. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asked officials to slash 8% of expenses from existing programs over the next five years so the money could be directed to Trump-favored initiatives. His announcement highlighted 17 categories protected from cuts, and the F-35 was not one of them. All of this comes as those in Trump's circles have publicly criticized the F-35 for its cost and relevance amid the rise of drone warfare. Right-wing commentator Laura Loomer, for example, slammed the F-35 program in April as a "scandal that's been quietly draining our nation's resources." And last month, Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz posted on X that the fighter program was a "$1.7 trillion disaster." While some, like Elon Musk, have suggested that drones make crewed fighters obsolete, the US military says it wants to marry the two concepts instead of abandoning the latter. The Air Force has said combining crewed fighters with drone wingmen is a key priority for the F-47, its next-generation air dominance fighter. Lockheed was in the running to produce that fighter, but lost out to Boeing. However, Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet has said that his firm wants to enhance the F-35 using the tech it created for the failed bid. Taiclet said that plans include automating the sixth-generation fighter and juicing it up to provide most of the capabilities of the F-47 for a fraction of the cost.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth Stumped by Law 101 Question About Marines in L.A.
Pete Hegseth was at a loss when a senator asked him to cite the part of the Constitution that authorized the deployment of 700 active-duty marines against anti-ICE protestors in Los Angeles. 'I'd have to pull up the specific provision,' Donald Trump's defense secretary, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Wednesday, told Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat. 'But our Office of General Counsel, alongside our leadership, has reviewed and ensured, in the order that we set out, that it's completely constitutional for the president to use federal troops to defend federal law enforcement.' Baldwin wasn't appeased. 'Look, I'd like to know the specific constitutional, statutory authority,' she said. The senator observed that Trump had pointed to the law he invoked to send the National Guard into L.A. 'There's plenty of precedent of active-duty troops being used to support law enforcement—historical precedent,' Hegseth fired back. Baldwin said she was not trying to dispute this point and pressed Hegseth once more for a straight answer. 'It's in the order ma'am, but we'll make sure we get it to you as well,' Hegseth said. Trump sent in the marines on Monday, after previously deploying 2,000 national guardsmen over the weekend. While a state's governor typically signs off in the rare instance when troops are used against American citizens, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, did not approve the decision. The governor has accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis' by sending in troops and said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' As Trump again went over his head to deploy marines, Newsom pleaded with a court to intervene. 'They must be stopped immediately,' read a court filing. Trump's deployment of the National Guard, which cited the Title 10 authority, was already a legal gray area. It says the president can only mobilize the guard against his own citizens in times of invasion or rebellion.
