Insiders say Mark Carney could compromise on emissions cap
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government might weaken or cancel the incoming oil and gas emissions cap if a group of fossil fuel companies builds a planned $16.5 billion carbon capture megaproject for Alberta's oilsands, three federal government sources told the Star.
Hailed under former prime minister Justin Trudeau's leadership as a marquee plank of the Liberal government's climate action plan, the proposed emissions cap is also politically contentious, with staunch opposition from federal Conservatives, the Alberta government, and oil and gas businesses.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Kelly McParland: Poilievre needs to earn an extension as leader
Canada's federal Conservatives are stuck with a dilemma as they consider whether to do anything different in the next two years than they did in the last two. Article content At the centre of the dilemma are a host of riddles. As in, did they actually lose the last election? Sure, they didn't win, but did they lose lose? Like, did Canadians actually reject them, or did something else happen that got in the way of the victory they anticipated? Article content Article content Article content If they did lose, what do they do about it? And if they didn't lose lose, what do they do about that? Article content Article content Depending on the answers to those questions is another of equal weight: do they head into the future with the same team of decision-makers who didn't quite win if they maybe didn't lose? And how do you answer that question when you don't know what the future holds, given that one complaint against the current leader is that he didn't respond effectively enough when the playing field changed? Article content As far as Pierre Poilievre is concerned, there's nothing to decide. 'We had the biggest vote count in our party's history, the biggest increase in our party's history, the biggest vote share since 1988 and we're going to continue to work to get over the finish line,' he replied when asked. That same argument is on offer from other Conservatives keen on moving past the vote that left them once again in second place. Article content The 'nothing to see here' case goes like this: In any previous election dating back 40 years the Tory results would have put them in power, likely with a majority. The fact this one didn't was the result of unprecedented exterior factors, specifically, the timing of Justin Trudeau's departure and the coinciding emergence of a U.S. president even his most fervent detractors didn't foresee as being quite this nuts. Alarmed and unnerved, voters opted for continuity and incumbency over the very real practical policies they'd been firmly embracing until then. Article content It's not a bad argument, but also not entirely convincing. In the Liberal bastion of greater Toronto, it sounds a lot like the local NHL team's annual excuses for once again failing to deliver the goods. 'Hey, at least we did better than our last collapse,' doesn't quite cut it. Article content Article content To its credit, the conservative universe isn't ready to simply roll over and accept the excuses. In this the party shows itself once again to be more independent-minded than the rival Liberals, who — after refusing to give themselves the power to oust Justin Trudeau, and living to regret the fact — made the same decision over his replacement. A majority of the caucus voted not to accept the rules of the Reform Act, meaning Prime Minister Mark Carney knows he can rule as he sees fit, safe in the knowledge the minions can't get rid of him. Would any other party in the democratic world vote to remain minions? Article content Conservatives not only adopted the Reform rules, but are discussing whether Poilievre should face a leadership review. A decision could be made as early as this month, with a review to take place next spring. It's possible they'll reject the option, but it would be a mistake. The world a year from now may look a lot different than it does today. Given the level of international uncertainty and the daily madhouse in Washington, it would be a shock if it didn't. Locking themselves into a recently-defeated leader when circumstances could easily demand an entirely different set of calculations would not be a show of confidence but an act of denial.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Carson Jerema: Carney ignores his own constitutional power to approve pipelines
Mark Carney isn't interested in being prime minister of Canada. Sure, he may like the title, the presumed prestige that comes with it, as well as meetings with Donald Trump, but when it comes down to the authority the federal government possesses, he'd rather defer to the provinces. He doesn't want to be the leader of the sovereign nation of Canada, he wants to be a project manager for B.C., Quebec and Ontario. Article content Article content At a news conference Friday to discuss his One Canadian Economy legislation, Carney claimed it would streamline the approval of projects deemed in the 'national interest,' and said it was a 'bill that meets this hinge moment' with 'urgency' and 'determination.' The prime minister spoke of how 'it's become much too difficult to build in this country' and that the 'federal government' will 'identify and expedite nation building projects.' Article content Article content Except by 'urgency' and 'determination' Carney means not a streamlined process, but another regulatory regime on top of all the others. And, crucially, when Carney talks about 'nation building' and the 'national interest,' he doesn't mean anything that would be in Canada's interests but would, instead, cede power to the provinces, giving them a veto over infrastructure projects. Article content When asked by a reporter about whether pipelines would be approved over objections from B.C. or Quebec, Carney responded as if Ottawa didn't have the clear authority to do so. 'No. Simply no, we must have a consensus of all the provinces and the Indigenous people,' he said. If that wasn't clear, Carney added, 'if a province doesn't want it, it's impossible.' Article content Article content To drive home an apparent ignorance of Canada's constitution, Carney also said, 'It is not the choice of the federal government.' Article content Article content However, this is incorrect. While the Liberals may choose to not exercise their constitutional powers, it is most definitely Ottawa's 'choice.' Section 92 (10) of the Constitution explicitly grants the federal government power over 'Works and Undertakings connecting' a province 'with any other or others of the Provinces, or extending beyond the Limits of the Province.' Ottawa also has authority over any projects 'declared by the Parliament of Canada to be for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the Provinces,' even if such projects exist entirely within a single province. Article content What this means is that if Ottawa wants a pipeline that crosses provincial borders, it is entirely within its rights to approve it, even over the objection of provincial obstructionists, be they in B.C. or Quebec. It is a power that could not be more clear and it is one that has been backed up by the courts. In 2019, for example, the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled against the provincial government, which was seeking a reference on whether it had the power to put conditions on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which exports heavy oil from Alberta, through, B.C. and to the West coast. The ruling stated that this was 'not within the authority of the Legislature.'
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
$33B in construction spending for Labrador megaprojects is welcome news for industry
While shovels aren't yet in the ground and no labour contracts are signed, billions of dollars in planned construction spending for a new megaproject has many optimistic about the positive impact the new Churchill Falls deal will have on Newfoundland and Labrador. A memorandum of understanding for Churchill Falls hydroelectric plant and other projects was announced in December and is set to be finalized in April 2026. It will require approximately $33 billion in construction contracts between Churchill Falls and Gull Island. "Thirty-three billion [dollars'] worth of construction is significant, no question," Trades N.L. executive director Bob Fiander told reporters while attending Energy N.L.'s annual conference in downtown St. John's earlier this week. Stéphane Jean, a senior director with Hydro-Quebec, says construction on Gull Island's temporary infrastructure, like the work camps and roads, will begin next year, while construction at the Churchill Falls extension will begin in 2029. Fiander says his members need this work. "We're about 70 per cent unemployed," he said. "We're looking forward to getting shovels in the ground and that's important for us because, you know, when our members are not working, they're not getting paid. They're looking elsewhere." While there haven't been any signed labour agreements, he says he's looking forward to what lies ahead. Fiander says he also welcomes the news from Prime Minister Mark Carney on fast-tracking projects deemed "nation-building." "Fortunately for Newfoundland and Labrador, we have a number of projects that could be nation-building projects," said Fiander. 'Optimistic about the future' Energy N.L. CEO Charlene Johnson says the investment will mean a lot of work for her members through construction, environmental work and building transmission lines. "That's very exciting for our members because really we're at a little bit of a lull in the industry now and I'm very optimistic about the future," she said. Johnson added Bay du Nord won't have a decision on its future for some time, making the Churchill Falls deal the next big project in the province. She says Energy N.L. members will have to be ready soon for work on the camp, roads and bridges needed in Labrador. "They said they want to move quickly because all of this has to happen in very short order if they're going to have this power in place within 10 years," she said. Brad Forsey, director of business development for the Cahill Group and vice-chair of Energy N.L. board of directors, says there's going to be a lot of long-term construction work ahead of the sector. "It's a great opportunity for us to be involved from the beginning all the way to the end. We've been involved in similar type projects in this industry and adjacent industries. And we look forward to the opportunities that we have here in front of us," he said. Forsey agreed with Johnson that these projects are important. "There is a bit of a lull right now, but we need to make sure that we're ready and we need to communicate and show to them that we're ready."
