Judge overthrows conviction of owners of New Zealand island volcano where 22 died in an eruption
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — The owners of an island volcano in New Zealand where 22 tourists and local guides died in an eruption had their criminal conviction for failing to keep visitors safe thrown out by a judge on Friday.
The ruling absolves the company from paying millions of dollars in restitutions to the families of those bereaved in the 2019 explosion on Whakaari, also known as White Island, and two dozen seriously injured survivors. Most of the 47 people on the island were U.S. and Australian cruise ship passengers on a walking tour, along with their local guides.
The company, Whakaari Management — run by three brothers who own the active volcano on New Zealand's North Island — appealed their convictions for breaching New Zealand's workplace health and safety law in a three-day hearing last October at the High Court in Auckland. They were found guilty in a 2023 trial.
Responsibility for tourist safety probed
The case hinged on whether the company — which granted access to the volcano to tourism operators and scientific groups, for a fee — should have been in charge of safety practices on the island under New Zealand's workplace health and safety laws. Anyone in charge of a workplace must ensure management of hazards and the safety of all there, including at entry and exit points.
Survivors told the trial in emotional testimony during the company's 2023 trial that they had not been told the active volcano was dangerous when they paid to visit it. They were not supplied with protective equipment, and many were wearing clothing that made their horrific burns more damaging.
In Friday's written ruling, Justice Simon Moore ruled the company did not have a duty under the relevant law to ensure that the walking tour workplace was without risks to health and safety. He agreed with the company's lawyers that the firm only granted access to the bare land through permits — and should not have been legally considered an entity that managed or controlled the workplace.
The judge ruled it wasn't unreasonable for the company to rely on tourism operators — who were licensed under New Zealand law — and emergency management and scientific agencies to assess the risks of activities on the island and manage safety precautions.
A significant case for the tourism sector
The case had far-reaching implications and changed the laws governing New Zealand's adventure tourism industry, which is often based around outdoor thrills on or around the country's many natural hazards. Operators must now take all reasonable steps to inform customers of any serious risks.
The lawyers for the company said during last October's hearing that if the conviction was allowed to stand, it would make other landowners reluctant to allow such activities to take place on their property for fear of being held responsible for the day-to-day decisions of tourism businesses operating on it — a suggestion rejected by the New Zealand's workplace safety regulator, which brought the charges.
Justice Moore said in Friday's ruling that a too narrow or broad interpretation of the law governing who controls a workplace could have 'profound' consequences.
Others faced charges
White Island, the tip of an undersea volcano also known by its Māori name Whakaari, was a popular tourist destination before the eruption and was reached by boat or helicopter from the North Island's Bay of Plenty. When the superheated steam blew in December 2019, it killed some instantly and left others with agonizing burns.
The workplace safety regulator brought charges against a number of parties — including the company run by Andrew, Peter and James Buttle.
Six entities pleaded guilty in 2022 and 2023 to the charges they faced, including five tour companies and New Zealand's geoscience research institute, which monitors active volcanoes.
Charges were dismissed against the Buttle brothers individually, along with two tourism logistics firms and the government emergency management agency.
In March, those convicted were ordered to pay a combined total of just over 10 million New Zealand dollars ($5.6 million) in restitutions to the bereaved families and survivors. Almost half of that was due to be paid by Whakaari Management Limited.
The company filed its appeal the same month.
In his ruling, Justice Moore said he had not overlooked or minimized the 'unquantifiable tragedy' of the episode.
'The 47 people who were on Whakaari at the time it erupted should never have been there,' he wrote. The fact that they were revealed 'multiple systemic failures.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Inside the battle to control the world's supply of rare earths
Back in 2009, Jim Kennedy, a consultant and entrepreneur of rare earths — a group of 17 metallic elements, including 15 lanthanides, crucial for modern technology — met with a top official at the Pentagon to discuss the future of these precious minerals. 'He was almost indifferent to the issue,' Kennedy tells The Post. 'His dispassion was staggering. It was one of the most disappointing meetings in my life.' Sixteen years later, that indifference has widely disappeared. Rare earths — used for everything from smartphones, electric cars and airplane engines to medical equipment, wind turbines and military applications like missiles and fighter jets — have become one of the most in-demand and politically contested industries in the world. 10 A miner carrying a heavy bag of rare earth-filled mud in China, which controls many of the most crucial rare earth elements now required for the sophisticated technology that powers everything from cellphones to fighter jets. REUTERS Rare earths 'enjoy an unusual level of bipartisan political support because they are vital both to economic development and national security,' says Melissa Sanderson, a former president and current board director at American Rare Earths, an Australian company focused on developing rare earth projects, including one in Wyoming. Rare earths aren't just a big part of modern technology; they're in many ways the most critical components. They're used as heat-absorbing agents in wind turbine motors, as strengthening and anti-glare agents in iPhones and fighter jets and as clarifying agents in MRIs. They're also almost completely controlled by China. Between 2020 and 2023, 70% of our rare earth imports came from China, according to Statista. That number jumped to 80% last year. And the US is 100% reliant on China imports of Yttrium, a rare earth metal used in everything from cellphones to TVs to radiation therapy used to treat liver cancer. 10 Rare earths 'enjoy an unusual level of bipartisan political support because they are vital both to economic development and national security,' says Melissa Sanderson, a former president and current board director at American Rare Earths. China has been fickle about granting export licenses for rare earths, although their grip has shown recent signs of weakening. President Trump had a lengthy (and rare) phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 5 and in a social media post after the call, Trump wrote 'there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.' The next day, China granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers. The irony is that for much of the mid-20th century, the US was a global leader of rare earth elements. But 'demand was exponentially lower at the time,' says Sanderson. 'Therefore, the output from our sole producer — Mountain Pass Materials, known as MP Materials now — was sufficient to satisfy a large percentage of then-existing demand.' The Las Vegas-Nevada-based company still operates the only rare earth mine and processing facility in the United States. 10 President Trump and President Zelensky meet in the Oval Office in February. Soon after this meeting a deal was made for Ukraine to supply vital rare earths to the United States. AFP via Getty Images America's rare earths lead came to an end in 1980, brought on by changes to US regulations. Because processing rare earth minerals involves the separation and removal of uranium and thorium, it can lead to radioactive waste and other contaminants. 'The US was concerned about the environmental impact, since particularly with the technology of the time, there were significant impacts to air, water and even ground quality that would not have met US standards,' says Sanderson. It wasn't the same story in China, who were more willing to accept the dangerous pollutants 'as a price for achieving its market dominance,' she says. China's monopoly of rare earths doesn't just give them an economic advantage. 'China has been 'weaponizing' its market hegemony for many years, in increasingly sophisticated and legal ways,' says Sanderson. 10 Pres. Trump with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Having conceded its lead on rare earth mining, the US is playing a serious game of catch-up with the Chinese. REUTERS The country first flexed their power in 2010, blocking rare earth exports to Japan, a major producer of permanent metal magnets. 'That decision was overturned by the World Trade Organization, so China does not exert its control as overtly now,' says Sanderson. But in the current trade tussle with the US, 'China has identified seven crucial elements under its export control regime which it will not sell to the US,' says Sanderson. 'Due to concerns that while suitable for civilian economic use, they could also be used for military purposes.' While President Trump's tariffs are often blamed for exacerbating the tensions, Kennedy, who serves as president of ThREE Consulting, a rare earths consultancy, says the tariffs are actually 'forcing China to reveal the magnitude of this threat. Absent Trump's tariffs, China would never have shown its hand until it was too late.' 10 The US is 100% reliant on China imports of Yttrium, a rare earth metal used in everything from cellphones to TVs to radiation therapy used to treat liver cancer. REUTERS Just how bad could it get? Kennedy believes that if left unchecked, and China was allowed to continue their embargo without consequences, 'the non-Chinese world would need to shut down and re-engineer most everything that comes off an assembly line,' says Kennedy. 'This is not an overstatement.' The stand-off with China may be at the forefront, but it's not the only way Trump is maneuvering to protect the nation from rare earth depletion. Greenland contains (by some estimates) about a quarter of the world's rare earth minerals, and Trump has suggested that the US could annex the autonomous territory in Denmark. 10 A chunk of Ytrium, once of the most important rare earth elements. Phil Degginger/imageBROKER/Shutterstock The US also recently inked a landmark deal with Ukraine, which has approximately 5% of the total global mineral reserves. Although Trump declared in February that Ukraine would be providing 'the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earth [minerals],' the exact amount wasn't specified in the deal, other than that the US and Ukraine would be splitting profits 50/50. There have also been efforts to mine rare earths from an entirely new source — the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. 10 Consultant Jim Kennedy was one of the first industry insiders to raise the alarm around the rarity — and potential global conflict — surrounding rare earths. It's called the 'Clarion Clipperton Zone,' a remote area of the Pacific between Hawaii and Mexico, roughly half the size of the contiguous US. This seabed region is rich in polymetallic nodules, the rock-like formations that contain some of the most sought-after rare earths in the world. It's a veritable goldmine waiting to be unearthed. In fact, the US Geological Survey recently estimated that the Clarion Clipperton Zone contains more nickel, cobalt and manganese than all terrestrial reserves combined. The Metals Company, a Canadian firm with US investment ties, is already making strides to become the first to mine commercially in the region. They conducted a field test back in 2022, and the company is currently applying for 'exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits' from the US. There are legal hurdles that could slow down their ambitions. Despite a 1980 law passed by Congress to regulate seabed mining, the Clarion Clipperton Zone technically falls under the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority, which operates under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Whether the ISA has exclusive authority over the region remains open to debate. 10 Gerard Barron, CEO of The Metals Company, has dismissed some of the concerns about potential environmental damage surrounding rare earth mining efforts. AFP via Getty Images There are also environmental concerns. Arlo Hemphill, a Senior Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace, warns that any move to mine the Pacific 'would be an ecological disaster. Scientists have not even had a chance to fully explore and understand the wonders of the deep, but a greedy corporation wants to tear up this ecosystem and cause immense ecological damage.' Gerard Barron, CEO of The Metals Company, dismisses these concerns, pointing out during a recent interview that Indonesia regularly mines in biodiverse rainforest regions. 'For some reason,' he said during the interview, 'people think it's okay to go digging up rainforests to get the metals underneath them, yet we're debating whether we should be going to pick up these rocks that sit on the abyssal plain?' (Barron did not respond to the Post's request for comment.) There are other options, but many are just as controversial. Sanderson believes the key will come down to strengthening our relationship with allies like Canada and Australia. 'They have significant natural resources and experienced and large mining companies,' she says. 'Cooperation with these countries is vital for filling the knowledge gap. The US doesn't have nearly enough experienced chemical and process engineers, as just one example.' 10 Rare earths are also crucial components of military fighter jets. Soonthorn – It took half a century for China to achieve its market position, she says, and the US needs an integrated supply chain from mine to magnet, but we're essentially starting from scratch. The US also needs to reform its mining regulatory system, which has a dysfunctional permitting process and some of the longest lead times for new mine production in the world. 'On average, companies wait anywhere from eight to fifteen years from when a deposit is initially determined to be economically interesting to when production can start,' says Sanderson, 'and some have waited significantly longer than that.' New mining projects are also frequently litigated, 'multiple times from multiple angles,' says Sanderson, which can add even more years to the wait time. With the return on investment horizon so long and the prospects so uncertain, many companies 'have difficulty attracting the investment necessary to support the high costs of building a mine,' she says. 10 Miners of rare earths such as these in China are increasingly at the forefront of the global race to control many of the elements that will determine our technological future. REUTERS Kennedy, however, is hopeful for the future. His company, Caldera Holding LLC, is collaborating with federal labs to refashion a former iron ore mine in Missouri to focus on rare earth minerals. He believes his mine is the only one that can provide 'geopolitically significant quantities' of rare earths.' But the ball, says Kennedy, is very much in Trump's court. His trade war has caused uncertainty, but the president's actions 'strongly suggest that delinking from China is real. This can be helpful, but follow-through is critical.' It's now up to the Trump administration to provide low-cost loans, grants and production tax credits to US-based mining companies that have (at least until now) faced almost insurmountable obstacles. 'Failure to support integrated projects,' says Kennedy, 'will result in many slow-motion train wrecks.'
Hamilton Spectator
18 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Missouri governor signs stadium aid package intended to keep the Chiefs and Royals in the state
KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a legislative package on Saturday, approved by Missouri lawmakers earlier in the week, that includes hundreds of millions of dollars of financial aid intended to persuade the Chiefs and Royals to remain in the state. Kehoe, a Republican, had called lawmakers into special session and they approved of the package Wednesday. The Chiefs and Royals currently play at the Truman Sports Complex on the east side of Kansas City, where Arrowhead Stadium and Kauffman Stadium share parking facilities. But their leases with Jackson County, Missouri, expire in January 2031, and the two franchises have been trying to decide the best route forward for the past several years. Last year, Jackson County voters defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of Arrowhead Stadium — the home of the Chiefs — and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. The slow movement by those on the Missouri side of the state line in supporting the franchises prompted lawmakers in Kansas to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The offer from Kansas is scheduled to expire June 30, and both teams have indicated they will hope to have a plan formulated by then. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs have floated plans for a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. The Royals have insisted all along that they intend to build a replacement for Kauffman Stadium. The stadium subsidies already were a top concern in Missouri when a deadly tornado struck St. Louis on May 16, causing an estimated $1.6 billion of damage a day after lawmakers had wrapped up work in their annual regular session. Disaster relief tied to stadium funding had widespread support. On Wednesday, Democratic state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins described to lawmakers how she had witnessed the tornado rip the roof off her house and damage her St. Louis neighborhood. 'Homes are crumbled and leveled,' said Collins, adding: 'It hurts me to my core to see the families that have worked so hard, the businesses that have worked so hard, to see them ripped apart.' The Chiefs, in a statement to The Associated Press, described the legislative vote this week as a 'significant step forward' that enables the team to continue exploring options to remain in Missouri. The Royals described the legislation as 'a very important piece of our decision-making process' but made no site-specific commitment. 'Our focus remains the same: to prioritize the best interests of our team, fans, partners and regional community as we pursue the next generational home for the Kansas City Royals,' the team said in a statement to the AP. Though they have no specific plans in the works, the St. Louis Cardinals also would be eligible for stadium aid if they undertake a project of at least $500 million. They built their existing Busch Stadium nearly 20 years ago. 'We have the chance to maybe save what is the symbol of this state,' said state Rep. Jim Murphy, a Republican from St. Louis County. The legislation did face some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy franchise owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely. 'This bill is unconstitutional, it's fiscally reckless, it's morally wrong,' Republican state Rep. Bryant Wolfin said. ___ Associated Press writer David Lieb contributed to this report. ___ AP sports: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
San Francisco Chronicle
18 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Missouri governor signs stadium aid package intended to keep the Chiefs and Royals in the state
KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a legislative package on Saturday, approved by Missouri lawmakers earlier in the week, that includes hundreds of millions of dollars of financial aid intended to persuade the Chiefs and Royals to remain in the state. Kehoe, a Republican, had called lawmakers into special session and they approved of the package Wednesday. The Chiefs and Royals currently play at the Truman Sports Complex on the east side of Kansas City, where Arrowhead Stadium and Kauffman Stadium share parking facilities. But their leases with Jackson County, Missouri, expire in January 2031, and the two franchises have been trying to decide the best route forward for the past several years. Last year, Jackson County voters defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of Arrowhead Stadium — the home of the Chiefs — and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. The slow movement by those on the Missouri side of the state line in supporting the franchises prompted lawmakers in Kansas to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The offer from Kansas is scheduled to expire June 30, and both teams have indicated they will hope to have a plan formulated by then. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs have floated plans for a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. The Royals have insisted all along that they intend to build a replacement for Kauffman Stadium. The stadium subsidies already were a top concern in Missouri when a deadly tornado struck St. Louis on May 16, causing an estimated $1.6 billion of damage a day after lawmakers had wrapped up work in their annual regular session. Disaster relief tied to stadium funding had widespread support. On Wednesday, Democratic state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins described to lawmakers how she had witnessed the tornado rip the roof off her house and damage her St. Louis neighborhood. 'Homes are crumbled and leveled,' said Collins, adding: 'It hurts me to my core to see the families that have worked so hard, the businesses that have worked so hard, to see them ripped apart.' The Chiefs, in a statement to The Associated Press, described the legislative vote this week as a 'significant step forward' that enables the team to continue exploring options to remain in Missouri. The Royals described the legislation as 'a very important piece of our decision-making process' but made no site-specific commitment. 'Our focus remains the same: to prioritize the best interests of our team, fans, partners and regional community as we pursue the next generational home for the Kansas City Royals,' the team said in a statement to the AP. Though they have no specific plans in the works, the St. Louis Cardinals also would be eligible for stadium aid if they undertake a project of at least $500 million. They built their existing Busch Stadium nearly 20 years ago. 'We have the chance to maybe save what is the symbol of this state,' said state Rep. Jim Murphy, a Republican from St. Louis County. The legislation did face some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy franchise owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely. ___
