Bill to mandate AM radio installations in vehicles moving through U.S. Senate
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) is co-sponsoring a bill that would require auto manufacturers to keep installing AM radios. It's called the AM Radio For Every Vehicle Act. Some say there are better ways to get emergency alerts. But advocates argue it saves lives.
The static of an AM radio is a sound some have forgotten, but not all.
'Out in those rural communities, radio stations are still carrying high school football and basketball and baseball,' said Sharon Tinsley, president of the Alabama Broadcasters Association. 'They're still reporting what's going to be served at school for lunch today.'
She said people still count on AM radio. 'They're still gonna cover the local city council. They're still gonna tell you what's going on with the fire department. And road closures,' she said. 'And any kind of crime reports. That sort of stuff still comes across AM and FM radio across the state.'
Proposed bill would make getting controversial medication easier
But not all agree. Several auto-groups wrote a letter to Congress against an AM radio mandate.
They said it's 'an unnecessary action in the modern communication era and has no bearing on the ability of drivers to receive emergency alerts…'
Autauga County Emergency Management Agency director David Bagley said AM radios interfere with new technology. This is why manufacturers want to do away with them. 'And that's understandable,' said Bagley. 'There's dollars associated there. And we understand that. But, for emergency management, and me as an emergency management director, I need to be able to communicate with people.'
And that means using all forms of communication.
'Hurricane Helene, Hurricane Katrina- if we had some type of national event- military event, where we wipe out communications. We know AM radio is an efficient and effective medium that we can use.'
The bill passed out of the Senate Commerce Committee and now heads to the Senate floor for a vote. Sen. Katie Britt said Alabama communities rely on AM radio for life-saving information.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alabama food banks bracing for impact as Congress moves on ‘big, beautiful bill'
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — One Alabama food bank said $300 million are at stake in President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that is moving through Congress. Those are federal dollars that the state would have to pick up for SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, if the bill passes. Some said that change will harm Alabama, while others said the state is ready to respond. 'I hate that the program will suffer because of this lack of funding, and I don't know where the state would come up with $300 million,' said Nicole Williams, CEO of the Community Food Bank of Central Alabama. That money has worried food banks in Alabama. Williams said over 700,000 Alabamians rely on SNAP benefits. She said families and grocery stores could feel the impact if those cuts are signed into law. 'We're also concerned about grocery stores in rural areas and them not being able to stay afloat or grocery stores closing and causing more food deserts,' Williams said. National Peanut Festival dates, parade route announced for 2025 season But the 2025 Alabama general budget chairman, state Rep. Rex Reynolds, R-Huntsville, said he's talked about those concerns with the department of finance and others. He said the state will have a better idea of what those funding changes mean closer to next year's session. 'We've got to prioritize going forward,' Reynolds said. 'So we'll understand the cuts before we go back into the session in January of '26, and we'll understand what we can and what we can't do.' Reynolds said they may be able to offset the loss of dollars next year for Medicaid and SNAP. 'That may be something that the House considers going into that '26 session and getting out ahead of any potential,' Reynolds said. Carol Gundlach with Alabama Arise said the federal government should do its part when funding SNAP and Medicaid. 'So rather than do what they need to do to adequately fund these programs, they're passing the buck onto the states,' Reynolds said. Those cuts have been passed by the U.S. House and are now making their way through the Senate. Williams said the Community Food Bank of Central Alabama gave 21 million meals to families just last year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
House Speaker Mike Johnson backs efforts to sanction Russia ‘as strongly as we can'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) threw his support behind renewed congressional efforts to sanction the Kremlin over Russian President Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine. 'There's many members of Congress that want us to sanction Russia as strongly as we can,' Johnson told reporters on Monday. 'And I'm an advocate of that.' The House speaker's support for legislation punishing the Russian regime comes amid a bipartisan push in the Senate to impose 'bone-breaking sanctions' on Russia. 3 Johnson expressed support for passing sanctions legislation against Russia on Monday. AP Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) have co-sponsored a measure in the upper chamber that would slap a 500% tariff on any country purchasing Russian energy products. Graham expects the Senate to 'start moving' the bill forward this week. 'You will see congressional action,' the South Carolina Republican said during a press conference in Ukraine last week. Like Johnson, Graham noted that 'there are House members that are ready' to pass the sanctions bill and get it to President Trump's desk for his signature. It's unclear if Trump would support severe sanctions on Moscow amid Russia-Ukraine peace talks that have seemingly failed to gain any traction. 3 Graham met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv over the weekend. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images 'We are in conversations with the White House, obviously, about that subject and that issue,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters on Monday. 'There's a high level of interest here in the Senate, on both sides of the aisle and moving on it, and it very well could be something that we would take up in this work period,' Thune added. 'Obviously, we're working with the White House to try and ensure that what we do and when we do it works well with the negotiations that they've got underway.' 3 The Senate bill would impose 500% tariffs on countries that purchase energy from Russia. via REUTERS The Graham-Blumenthal bill – 'Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025' – has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate. 'The bill would put Russia on a trade island,' Graham wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last week. 'The consequences of its barbaric invasion must be made real to those that prop it up. If China or India stopped buying cheap oil, Mr. Putin's war machine would grind to a halt.' 'I'm hoping for the best, but when it comes to the thug in Moscow, we should all prepare for more of the same.' The bill is currently under consideration by the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Trump has expressed mounting frustrations with Putin's refusal to curtail strikes against Ukraine, but has stopped short of announcing tougher sanctions on the regime despite having threatened them earlier this month.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rank-and-file reject Minnesota legislative leaders' ‘skinny' tax bill
Dark clouds loom over the Minnesota Capitol on May 15, 2025. Photo by Michele Jokinen/House Public Information Services. Senate Taxes Chair Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope, didn't need much time to shoot down the 'skinny,' 12-page tax bill proposed by Minnesota legislative leaders as they rush to button-up a two-year budget deal, without which the state shuts down at the end of the month. 'I rejected it right off the bat,' Rest said in an interview Monday. 'As soon as I saw it, I told them I couldn't vote for that and neither could half a dozen other Senate Democrats.' The text of the bill was posted on Sunday, but Rest said it's been obsolete since Friday morning when she expressed her opposition and asked that they continue working toward a deal. Rest's rejection raises the prospect of a two-year budget agreement without a tax bill, which isn't necessary for ongoing government operations but would leave a bevy of lawmakers and interest groups fuming, their hopes for special tax treatments foiled. The 12-page document largely maintains the status quo with a couple notable exceptions agreed to weeks ago: increasing the sales tax on cannabis 50% and repealing the electricity tax exemption for power-hungry data centers. Those will still be in any final package, Rest said, but the 'skinny' bill leaves out noncontroversial but nevertheless important policies. For instance, more than a dozen cities are awaiting approval for local tax increment financing districts aimed at spurring development. The skinny bill also leaves out continuing tax credits for sustainable aviation fuel, which has bipartisan support but was was absent from the leadership agreement signed off by Gov. Tim Walz, Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park, and Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul. Republican co-chair of the House Taxes Committee Greg Davids of Preston also unequivocally rejected the proposal in an interview with MPR News. 'We put five months of thought into something they put five minutes of thought into, and I know which one's going to be better,' Davids said. 'I'm just not sure why any Republican would even consider voting for this. I don't think it would pass (the) House or the Senate.' While the taxes working group was meeting in public, negotiations have moved behind closed doors and will likely remain so until a deal is reached, Rest said. Building trade unions and business groups are banking on lawmakers extending sales tax exemptions for data centers on equipment purchases even as they sunset exemptions on electricity. They hope by extending the equipment sales tax exemption into the next century, the state will entice Meta, Amazon and other tech giants to build data centers in Minnesota. The tax incentives are particularly important to the construction unions after lawmakers failed to reach an agreement on a public infrastructure package for the second year in a row. Building one large data center can cost upwards of $1 billion — more than an entire public infrastructure package — and create upwards of 1,800 construction jobs, according to a study of Wisconsin. Opponents argue that tech giants will build data centers in Minnesota regardless of the tax incentives leaving regular taxpayers to subsidize some of the richest companies in the world at the expense of investing in schools, nursing homes and infrastructure. The state expects to bring in an additional $56 million in tax revenue over the next two years by repealing the electricity exemption. The state will still exempt data centers from sales tax on equipment and software through 2042, which is expected to cost more than $200 million in forgone sales tax revenue over the next two years. Amazon recently announced that it's suspending plans for a large data center in Becker 'due to uncertainty' — one week after lawmakers announced they were eliminating the sales tax exemption on electricity. Lawmakers have also agreed to raise the tax on retail cannabis sales from 10% to 15%, pushing the total sales tax above 20% across the state when local and state sales taxes are added. The tax hike would land before the state has even issued any cannabis sales licenses, although it has been collecting taxes on THC beverages and low dose edibles. Just one dispensary would be subject to the tax increase: The White Earth Nation opened its first off-reservation store in Moorhead last month after negotiating a compact with state leaders through a process exclusive to tribes. State lawmakers voted to legalize cannabis in 2023 with a relatively low sales tax compared to other states, arguing that a higher tax would allow the black market to survive, and that cannabis sales should not generate funding for unrelated budget items. The 15% rate would push Minnesota toward the higher end of taxes compared to the 23 states with legal cannabis sales, according to the Tax Foundation. The bill would also repeal a law that sends a fifth of cannabis tax revenue to cities and counties to fund local enforcement costs.
