
Lynch: Rory McIlroy had three goals in 2025. He's achieved the first, now on to the second
Lynch: Rory McIlroy had three goals in 2025. He's achieved the first, now on to the second
OAKMONT, Pa. — Twenty-odd years ago, I sat with Ian Woosnam on a golf cart at Kiawah Island, South Carolina. Woosie is the practically-minded son of a Welsh farmer and not given to deep reflection, but on one question he was. He told me he could pinpoint exactly — to the day — when his career decline began.
It was April 14, 1991, the day he won the Masters.
Woosnam had two goals in his golfing life, other than making a living (his autobiography, Woosie, ends every chapter with a summary of his earnings per season). One dream was to win a major championship. The other was to be the best in the world. On April 8, six days before winning at Augusta National, he reached No. 1 in the official world golf ranking. Two dreams checked off in one week.
'Other people go looking for another mountain to climb,' he told me that day at Kiawah Island. 'I just slid down the other side.'
There were 11 more wins on the European Tour, but only one real shot at another major, a decade later in the Open at Royal Lytham, when two drivers in the bag doomed him to a penalty and a tie for 3rd. But the fire that took a diminutive blue-collar guy from hitting balls during winter in his dad's barn to the pinnacle of a white collar sport was extinguished.
I thought back to that conversation these past two weeks, listening to Rory McIlroy. Thirty-four years after Woosnam, McIlroy achieved his lifetime dream and completed the career grand slam. The emotion that drained from him on the 18th green and on the walk to the clubhouse — so poignant as to keep the CBS announce team respectfully silent — spoke volumes about what it meant.
Shortly afterward, an elated McIlroy opened his press conference with a question that poked fun at the previous decade of inquiries about whether he would win a green jacket: 'What are we all going to talk about next year?'
The answer, it turns out, was this: What else ya got? And when ya got it?
McIlroy never took time to fully process that seismic accomplishment. Ten days later, he was at the Zurich Classic playing with Shane Lowry, having made a trip to London and Northern Ireland in between. Then it was on to the Truist Championship and straight into another major at the PGA Championship. By comparison, when Tiger Woods won the Masters in '97, and also in '19, he did not make a competitive appearance for five weeks.
McIlroy has been asked what comes next several times since the Masters,. Even earlier this week at Oakmont, he was asked what his plan is for the coming years. 'I don't have one. I have no idea,' he said. 'I'm sort of just taking it tournament by tournament at this point. Yeah, I have no idea.'
It was disarmingly honest, but alarming for those who fetishize the mentality epitomized by Tiger Woods, a single-mindedness that moves shark-like between feasts without enjoyment or even digestion. It's a sentiment that celebrates racking up accomplishments, but not of taking actual pleasure in those victories. Earlier this year, McIlroy said one of his goals for '25 was to have more fun. It's why he went to a soccer game in Bilbao with friends, why he wants to play in India and Australia later this year. Yet somewhere along the way, he denied himself the time to have fun celebrating the greatest achievement of his career.
Now, a minor hangover of sorts has kicked in. "You dream about the final putt going in at the Masters, but you don't think about what comes next,' he said a few days ago. 'I think I've always been a player that struggles to play after a big event, after I win whatever tournament. I always struggle to show up with motivation the next week because you've just accomplished something and you want to enjoy it and you want to sort of relish the fact that you've achieved a goal. Chasing a certain goal for the better part of a decade and a half, I think I'm allowed a little bit of time to relax a little bit.'
The schedule doesn't allow much time for relaxation or reflection, even if he had been minded to pursue it. Two majors have passed with not much of an impact, a tie for 47th at Quail Hollow and lingering around the top 25 at Oakmont as the final round wound down.
In a casual conversation a few months back, he summarized his objectives for the year: win the Masters, win the Open at Royal Portrush, win an away Ryder Cup at Bethpage Black. As he prepared to leave Pittsburgh, McIlroy acknowledged fresh motivation is on the horizon for the second item on that list.
'If I can't get motivated to get up for an Open Championship at home, then I don't know what can motivate me,' he said. 'I just need to get myself in the right frame of mind. I probably haven't been there the last few weeks. But as I said, getting home and having a couple weeks off before that, hopefully feeling refreshed and rejuvenated, will get me in the right place again.'
Just 63 days have passed since that victorious evening at Augusta National. Only 32 remain until balls are in the air at the 153rd Open. Maybe that hasn't been enough time to celebrate realizing a dream 30 years in the making, but it's probably enough to narrow the focus to knocking off the second item on his target list for '25.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
This was not Adam Scott's U.S. Open. Will the wait for his second major ever end?
OAKMONT, Pa. — With the day finally over and the week finally done, Adam Scott got to the Oakmont Country Club parking lot and began the process of realization that comes when any long wait is prolonged. These are the moments when the quotation marks fall away, when you hear the hard stuff. Scott stopped walking and started talking. Advertisement 'You know, when I won that Masters,' he said, looking around like a man in an empty room, 'I really thought, 'Here we go, the floodgates are going to open.'' That Masters, played in the spring of 2013, when Scott was 32 and let out a winning roar as photo flashes lit the green and rain fell from above, was 12 years, one month and 20 days ago. At the time, Augusta was going to be the starting point of the story that would determine his place among the greats in golf, and, well, he was sort of right. Except, instead of a career defined by major wins, it's been resembling some cruel Sisyphean endeavor. There's a reason this was everyone's sentimental pick on Sunday at this U.S. Open. What a story it'd be. The old guy. The wise one. The guy who put in his time and traveled the long road and stuck with it. The guy whose résumé has never quite matched a swing so smooth that it somehow overshadows his looks. Adam Scott, in the final pairing of his 24th career U.S. Open, in his 96th consecutive major tournament start, would be a fitting winner for a cathedral like Oakmont. So, what happened? Seventy-nine shots. Seventy-nine wicked, wet, woebegone shots. Each seemingly worse than the last. All over the course of a day seemingly as long as the wait that it took to get here. Scott arrived a little after noon on Sunday. He teed off alongside tournament leader Sam Burns at 2:15. He left the course at 4 amid a pounding rain, then went back to the practice range at 5, then to the eighth hole for a 5:40 restart. Before the delay, Scott liked where he stood. He opened with two bogeys in the opening three holes but got one back on the par-5 fourth before missing a 10-footer for par on No. 6. He was 2 over on the day but felt good about his form and was 1 under for the tournament and one shot out of the lead. He knew Oakmont would take its toll on everyone and believed he'd stay standing. 'I was absolutely feeling great,' he said afterward. 'No doubt.' He did until he didn't. After the stoppage of play, what had been a daring weeklong pas de deux between this U.S. Open's entrants and this wonderful old beast of a course devolved into a sopping-wet street fight of survival. Scott never found his way, pushing drive after drive down the right side. Every second shot he hit seemed to be played out of a bowl of soup. Bad shots combined with some bad breaks, and the Aussie came undone. He played the final 11 holes in 7 over par and finished in a six-way tie for 12th. His tournament essentially ended with back-to-back bogeys on holes 14 and 15, then a coffin-closing double on the 16th. Advertisement Coming up 18, Scott walked through the shockwave of J.J. Spaun's 64-foot winning putt, seeing it all play out a few hundred yards away. In the aftermath, he hit an approach, then set off on a long stroll that he undoubtedly imagined differently only a few hours earlier. A career coronation. A final validation. Instead, he was passed by volunteers running down the side of the hole to get in position for Spaun's trophy presentation. Scott wrapped up a final bogey, tipped his cap, shook hands with his group's standard-bearers and walked off into yet another void. The thoughts that came next are ones he's all too used to. 'I understand that winning another major would, you know, put me in some kind of different category,' he said in the parking lot. 'I've dreamed of winning lots of majors. I'm just trying to get that next one — always. But that's the way it is.' The hardest part about Scott's journey — from Masters winner to world No. 1 to years searching for a next major victory — is that it's never been for a lack of effort. If anything, it's the opposite. The longer he's gone on like this, the harder he's working. Trevor Immelman, CBS's lead analyst, is Scott's closest friend and his extra set of eyes. The two came up together, from junior golf to the PGA Tour to the Presidents Cup to Masters champions. Immelman's career was cut short by injuries; he openly acknowledges living vicariously through his friend. He has seen everything Scott has done and how he has done it. The endless equipment tweaks. All the work on approach shots and iron play. The fitness regimen. Speaking by phone Sunday from his home in Florida, Immelman, 45, pointed out what's missed in all the old-man tropes that line Scott's narrative. The most common perception — that his age and experience are his advantage — is wrong. Advertisement In truth, it's the fact that, even in his 40s, Scott maintains the swing speed and power of a top-20 player in the world because he works endlessly to sustain it. Just like Tiger Woods did. Just like Phil Mickelson did. Just like Ernie Els and Vijay Singh and Davis Love III. And that's the difference. 'An awesome weapon of speed and power — that's how he stays relevant,' Immelman said. 'Because if you don't have that, then you can't use your experience.' Now, still looking for that long-awaited second major, the question is: How much longer can Scott use what he has? There's what he sees on the course. Even with Sunday's disappointment, Scott left Oakmont knowing he was in a position to win, same as he was at Quail Hollow, when he was in second place with seven holes to go before again fading hard and finishing tied for 19th. He expects to contend at Portrush next month and is positioned to make the Tour Championship. And there's what he sees in the mirror. Scott turns 45 next month. His wife and three kids live year-round in Switzerland. He is, at last check, not getting younger. It's hard. Waiting is one thing. Not knowing what you're waiting for is another. Here, Scott acknowledges what he knows. He's on the clock. 'I feel like I can keep this up for another 18 months, for sure,' he said. 'Then, at that point, I'll be 46. I think I can push myself for the next year and a half and then reassess, you know? That's a reasonable goal. It's not so long, but it's like, 'Are you ever going to do it?' I need to give myself a bit of a deadline, a bit of urgency, right?' In truth, he's long had that. It just feels different when time keeps moving.


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
6 popular TV reboots that discovered the secret to Emmy success
Every year, Emmy prognosticators weigh the chances of TV's newcomers. But what about newcomers that are also old-timers? Whether you prefer to call them remakes, revivals or reboots, reimaginations of beloved movies and TV shows are all the rage: Think of CBS' 'Matlock,' which swapped in Academy Award winner Kathy Bates for Andy Griffith as a charming lawyer who gets things done in the legal system; Peacock's 'Bel-Air,' which turned a multicam sitcom into a drama; or HBO's 'Perry Mason,' which was less about the courtroom than Mason as private investigator. When it comes to awards season, though, reboots aren't such a hot commodity. Max's 'Gossip Girl,' Paramount+'s 'Frasier' and ABC's 'The Wonder Years' came and went with no wins, and continuations like NBC's 'Law & Order' and 'Will & Grace,' Fox's 'The X-Files' and CBS' 'Murphy Brown' have generally not received the same love from voters as their original runs. Not all reboots fizzle at the Emmys, though. Here are six examples of rethinks that not only brought back beloved series from the graveyard but made them award-worthy all over again. With 26 nominations and an astounding 18 wins, the premiere season of 'Shōgun' is the first Japanese-language series to take home an Emmy for drama series. In addition to the top prize, the adaptation of James Clavell's 1975 historical novel won awards for stars Hiroyuki Sanada (lead actor, drama) and Anna Sawai (lead actress, drama) plus a raft of below-the-line Emmys. The original miniseries' take on Clavell's story of colonialism and war in medieval Japan didn't do so badly, either — in 1980 it scored 14 nominations and won three Primetime Emmys, including one for limited series. The fixer-upper series featuring five gay men zhuzhing up the lives of more staid straights was a phenomenon when it originally aired between 2003 and 2007 but was comparatively overlooked by the Emmys, picking up a win for reality program in 2004 plus three other nominations. Meanwhile, Netflix's reboot — featuring makeovers of more than just straight guys, and a less snarky sensibility — has earned 11 Emmys to date, including six wins for structured reality program (2018, 2019-23). 'Westworld' stands out on this list because it reimagines a feature film, not an earlier TV series — in this case, the 1973 movie written and directed by Michael Crichton and starring Yul Brynner. The film scored no top-line awards or nominations, but the HBO reboot, which premiered in 2016, landed 54 Emmy nominations and nine wins across its four-season run, including a 2018 trophy for Thandiwe Newton (lead actress, drama) for her performance as the series' cunning madam, Maeve Millay. The story of a single mom raising her growing daughters earned three nominations during its original run from 1975 to 1984, including one in 1982 for star Bonnie Franklin (lead actress, comedy); director Alan Rafkin and supporting actor Pat Harrington won. The Netflix reboot, which recast the Romanos as the Cuban American Alvarez family and shifted the action from Indianapolis to L.A., was nominated for each of its four seasons and won two, as well as a special Television Academy Honor. In the decades between the original 1978-79 'Battlestar' and the full-throttle reboot, science-fiction storytelling on the small screen advanced at lightspeed, which may have helped the latter last far longer than the original. The story of human refugees fleeing space colonies destroyed by Cylon robots (who were now on their tail) earned the original series three nominations and two Emmy wins in below-the line categories. The reboot ended up with three Emmy wins of its own from 19 nominations, though all the wins were for special effects and sound editing. (A 2003 backdoor pilot became a three-hour miniseries and also earned three Emmy nominations.) Let's call this one an unplanned reboot. After ABC canceled its 2018 'Roseanne' revival due to star Roseanne Barr's public flameout, the quick-thinking network teed up 'The Conners,' which follows the titular family after its matriarch's untimely death. Falling somewhere between a traditional revival and a full-on reboot, 'The Conners' hasn't matched the original 'Roseanne's' Emmy haul, which included 25 nominations and four wins (three for Laurie Metcalf and one for Barr). But the series, which recently concluded its own seven-season run, has performed solidly with voters, earning six nominations and one win in 2021 for editing in a comedy series.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
This beautiful mess of a U.S. Open was for golf's real ones. Like J.J. Spaun
This was a moment was for the diehards. Those true golf fans who'll wake up early on a Thursday to catch a sleepy PGA Tour Live stream. The ones who'll read the articles and listen to the podcasts and tune in to watch final rounds each Sunday, no matter who happens to be in contention. If you know, you know. And if you aren't one of those golf fans, you probably didn't know much about the newest U.S. Open champion. Advertisement J.J. Spaun is — or was — what they call in sports a journeyman. He's 34 years old. Had logged 235 PGA Tour events before this game-changer, and of those, he'd won once. Spaun was playing the best golf of his career in 2025, though. Posted four top-10 finishes in 16 starts. Lost a playoff to Rory McIlroy at The Players. He'd even started to get some buzz about being a possible selection for the U.S. Ryder Cup team. For those paying close attention, this wasn't entirely out of nowhere. But nonetheless, as Spaun stood over a 64-foot putt on the 18th green in the rain, seeking a two-putt for the trophy, how could anyone know what to expect? Advertisement The torturous Oakmont Country Club near Pittsburgh had been spanking the world's best golfers for days, making carnage out of the 2025 U.S. Open. The rain-soaked final round was an especially tough watch. Nothing but bad breaks and bad shots. This wasn't about winning. It was pure survival. And so there was that last man standing. Spaun's moment was finally at hand and in his hands, and boy, did he act like it. Dude stepped up there and slapped that long putt toward the hole with the confidence of someone who knew it was going in . . . And then . . . it did. Golf! A highlight for the ages. Everyone had to smile. Other players had to smile. There simply couldn't have been a more beautifully rewarding conclusion after such an ugly tournament. Advertisement Spaun's final round was straight Hollywood. He bogeyed five of his first six holes, and it wasn't that he was playing terribly. He was dealt some incredibly bad luck, like an approach shot on No. 2 bouncing into the flag stick and ricocheting back off the front of the green. Then there was a timely weather delay, during which he collected himself and went on to birdie four of the final seven holes while everyone else who'd been in contention was busy falling apart. 'I never thought I would be here holding this trophy,' Spaun told NBC's Mike Tirico afterward. 'I've always had aspirations and dreams, but a few months ago, I never knew what my ceiling was. I never knew how good I could be. But I'm just proud that I've been resilient in my career and pushed through a lot of things.' Spaun's victory was a refreshing change of pace from a recent run of big stars claiming all of the biggest events in men's golf. The past six major titles had gone to four people: Scottie Scheffler, McIlroy, Xander Schauffele, Bryson DeChambeau, Schauffele and Scheffler — with Scheffler also winning gold at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Advertisement Estes: We loved Rory McIlroy's Masters because he outdueled his toughest foe: himself Felt kind of fitting in this instance that a no-name like Spaun who'd been grinding for years in the Tour's shadows was the one best equipped to overcome the non-stop adversity. This laughably difficult throwback golf course might be the toughest in America, if not the entire sport, and it had taken a toll on everyone. Only one golfer — Spaun at 1 under — didn't finish with a score over par. By the end, the sport's best and brightest had enough of Oakmont. McIlroy barely made the cut and told reporters on site that 'it's much easier being on the cut line when you don't really care if you're here for the weekend or not. Advertisement 'I was sort of thinking, 'Do I really want two more days here?' ' McIlroy finished 7 over, which was good enough to tie for 19th. World No. 1 Scheffler (4 over) kept hanging around and tied for seventh, but he could never get enough momentum for that late push. DeChambeau (10 over) didn't even make the cut. By the soggy end, the leaderboard offered a collection of names that casual sports fans looked at on a ticker on another channel and wondered, 'Who?' But this wasn't for those casual fans anyway. This was a U.S. Open for the real ones. Like J.J. Spaun. Reach Tennessean sports columnist Gentry Estes at gestes@ and hang out with him on Bluesky @ This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: The 2025 U.S. Open was for golf's real ones. Like J.J. Spaun.