logo
Sunrise Solar Eclipse Graces the Sky in March: How to Watch

Sunrise Solar Eclipse Graces the Sky in March: How to Watch

Yahoo21-03-2025

Hot on the tail of the "blood moon" total lunar eclipse earlier this month comes a rise-and-shine special: a partial solar eclipse that will be visible at sunrise in some parts of the US. You don't have to be in the eclipse path to join the solar festivities. Livestreams will bring the action onto your screen as the moon takes a dramatic bite out of the sun.
A solar eclipse is a shadow dance involving the sun, Earth and moon. The moon passes before the sun, blocking the star and casting a shadow on our planet. If the weather permits, people in the shadow's path can see the eclipse.
The sun-moon-Earth alignment isn't perfect on March 29, though, so we will get only a partial eclipse that will look like a dark bite taken from a glowing cookie. "The central part of the moon's shadow, where the sun would appear completely blocked, misses Earth, so no one will be able to see a total solar eclipse this time," NASA said in an explainer.
Don't write this one off because it's "just" a partial eclipse.
"It should be a photogenic eclipse," says Emily Rice, associate professor of astrophysics at the Macaulay Honors College of the City University of New York.
Rice says to protect your camera with a solar filter and get ready to capture some scenery.
"The sun will be low in the sky for most observers, so you can get trees, buildings or other landscape features in a shot with the Pac-Man sun," she says.
Eclipse viewers in parts of North America, Africa, Asia and Europe will be able to catch at least some of the show. Greenland, Iceland and some small regions of South America are also in the path, as are wide areas of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans. The northeastern US is the only part of the country that will be in the eclipse path.
NASA's eclipse map shows where the eclipse will be visible. The curved yellow lines indicate the maximum percentage of the sun that will be covered. The green lines indicate time. The looping orange lines indicate sunrise and sunset. If that's confusing, just check your location with Timeanddate.com for details on timing and coverage.
Viewers in the northeastern US should put the coffee pot on an automatic timer. The eclipse will already be in process at sunrise. That's 6:55 a.m. ET for Baltimore, 6:31 a.m. for Boston and 6:44 a.m. for New York City. Washington, DC. should be on eclipse lookout starting at 6:56 a.m. The eclipse will be at its maximum very close to sunrise in these locations.
Places like Baltimore will get to see only a little bit of shadow for a few minutes, so it's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it situation.
Portland, Maine, residents will have one of the best views in the US. Partial viewing begins at 6:27 a.m. with maximum at 6:30 a.m. and the end of the eclipse coming at 7:10 a.m. You'll get to see 64% coverage of the sun, according to NASA. Compare that with Baltimore's 3%.
Eclipse fans in other parts of the world won't have to get up so early. Dublin witnesses the eclipse late morning, while Paris will see the eclipse at maximum right around noon local time.
Most of the US will be out of luck when it comes to seeing the eclipse in person, but that doesn't mean you have to miss out on the fun. Timeanddate.com is running a livestream so anyone can enjoy the view. It starts bright and early at 5:30 a.m. ET on March 29.
The Royal Observatory Greenwich in the UK goes live with its eclipse coverage at 6 a.m. ET.
The lunar eclipse earlier in March didn't require fancy eyewear, but the solar eclipse does. Eye safety is key.
"Because the sun is never completely covered, observers must use proper eye protection at all times while watching this eclipse," NASA cautions.
That means it's time to dig out your protective solar eclipse eyewear.
"The upcoming partial eclipse is why I encourage people to keep their 'eclipse" glasses' -- which would more accurately be called 'sun viewers' because they can be used to observe the sun any time," Rice says. Here's how to tell if your glasses are safe.
No glasses? No problem. Make a pinhole projector.
"Stand facing away from the sun and use the viewer to cast a shadow and you can see the eclipsed shape of the sun," Rice says. She also encourages viewers to examine dappled shadows around them, looking for changes in the shape.
Solar and lunar eclipses happen throughout the year, but each is a special moment. It's worth a sunrise sojourn outside to witness a cosmic trick of the light.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump-Musk Fight Could Have Huge Consequences for U.S. Space Programs
The Trump-Musk Fight Could Have Huge Consequences for U.S. Space Programs

Scientific American

time18 minutes ago

  • Scientific American

The Trump-Musk Fight Could Have Huge Consequences for U.S. Space Programs

For several hours yesterday, an explosively escalating social media confrontation between arguably the world's richest man, Elon Musk, and the world's most powerful, President Donald Trump, shook U.S. spaceflight to its core. The pair had been bosom-buddy allies ever since Musk's fateful endorsement of Trump last July—an event that helped propel Trump to an electoral victory and his second presidential term. But on May 28 Musk announced his departure from his official role overseeing the U.S. DOGE Service. And on May 31 the White House announced that it was withdrawing Trump's nomination of Musk's close associate Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Musk abruptly went on the attack against the Trump administration, criticizing the budget-busting One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now navigating through Congress, as ' a disgusting abomination.' Things got worse from there as the blowup descended deeper into threats and insults. On June 5 Trump suggested on his own social-media platform, Truth Social, that he could terminate U.S. government contracts with Musk's companies, such as SpaceX and Tesla. Less than an hour later, the conflict suddenly grew more personal, with Musk taking to X, the social media platform he owns, to accuse Trump —without evidence—of being incriminated by as-yet-unreleased government documents related to the illegal activities of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Musk upped the ante further in follow-up posts in which he endorsed a suggestion for impeaching Trump and, separately, declared in a now deleted post that because of the president's threat, SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' (Some five hours after his decommissioning comment, tempers had apparently cooled enough for Musk to walk back the remark in another X post: 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.') Dragon is a crucial workhorse of U.S. human spaceflight. It's the main way NASA's astronauts get to and from the International Space Station (ISS) and also a key component of a contract between NASA and SpaceX to safely deorbit the ISS in 2031. If Dragon were to be no longer be available, NASA would, in the near term, have to rely on either Russian Soyuz vehicles or on Boeing's glitch-plagued Starliner spacecraft for its crew transport—and the space agency's plans for deorbiting the ISS would essentially go back to the drawing board. More broadly, NASA uses SpaceX rockets to launch many of its science missions, and the company is contracted to ferry astronauts to and from the surface of the moon as part of the space agency's Artemis III mission. Trump's and Musk's retaliatory tit for tat also raises the disconcerting possibility of disrupting other SpaceX-centric parts of U.S. space plans, many of which are seen as critical for national security. Thanks to its wildly successful reusable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets, the company presently provides the vast majority of space launches for the Department of Defense. And SpaceX's constellation of more than 7,000 Starlink communications satellites has become vitally important to war fighters in the ongoing conflict between Russia and U.S.-allied Ukraine. SpaceX is also contracted to build a massive constellation of spy satellites for the DOD and is considered a leading candidate for launching space-based interceptors envisioned as part of Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile-defense plan. Among the avalanche of reactions to the incendiary spectacle unfolding in real time, one of the most extreme was from Trump's influential former adviser Steve Bannon, who called on the president to seize and nationalize SpaceX. And in an interview with the New York Times, Bannon, without evidence, accused Musk, a naturalized U.S. citizen, of being an 'illegal alien' who 'should be deported from the country immediately.' NASA, for its part, attempted to stay above the fray via a carefully worded late-afternoon statement from the space agency's press secretary Bethany Stevens: 'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Stevens wrote. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' The response from the stock market was, in its own way, much less muted. SpaceX is not a publicly traded company. But Musk's electric car company Tesla is. And it experienced a massive sell-off at the end of June 5's trading day: Tesla's share price fell down by 14 percent, losing the company a whopping $152 billion of its market value. Today a rumored détente phone conversation between the two men has apparently been called off, and Trump has reportedly said he now intends to sell the Tesla he purchased in March in what was then a gesture of support for Musk. But there are some signs the rift may yet heal: Musk has yet to be deported; SpaceX has not been shut down; Tesla's stock price is surging back from its momentary heavy losses; and it seems NASA astronauts won't be stranded on Earth or on the ISS for the time being. Even so, the entire sordid episode—and the possibility of further messy clashes between Trump and Musk unfolding in public—highlights a fundamental vulnerability at the heart of the nation's deep reliance on SpaceX for access to space. Outsourcing huge swaths of civil and military space programs to a disruptively innovative private company effectively controlled by a single individual certainly has its rewards—but no shortage of risks, too.

In the Feud Between Trump and Musk, NASA Has a Lot to Lose
In the Feud Between Trump and Musk, NASA Has a Lot to Lose

Gizmodo

time42 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

In the Feud Between Trump and Musk, NASA Has a Lot to Lose

The SpaceX CEO threatened to pull his Dragon spacecraft, flaunting an incredible amount of leverage. In the heat of the moment, Elon Musk threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft and then he took it back. In doing so, however, the rocket billionaire dragged NASA into his messy breakup with Donald Trump, with the agency's access to orbit now at stake. Musk and Trump parted ways earlier this week, and their breakup has been very messy. Shortly after leaving the administration, Musk began criticizing the budget bill passed by Republicans in the U.S. House, instigating a public feud between the president and the billionaire oligarch. The childish back-and-forth was entertaining, until it wasn't. 'SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk threatened on X. He later took another X user's advice to 'cool off,' and wrote, 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Although short-lived, the threat put the International Space Station (ISS) at risk. NASA relies heavily on SpaceX's Dragon to transport its astronauts and cargo supplies to the orbiting lab, having weaned itself from hitching rides aboard Russia's Soyuz spacecraft. SpaceX's closest alternative, Boeing, failed miserably at proving its vehicle's capability to reach the ISS safely. Without Dragon, NASA would lose its access to low Earth orbit and not be able to operate the space station at the same capacity. It's not clear how serious Musk was in his threat, but it was a serious display of leverage on his part. SpaceX is no doubt a leader in the industry, and canceling its government contracts would hurt the national space program, which has come to rely on the private sector in recent years. In response to Musk's clear advantage, Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, called on the president to nationalize SpaceX under a 1950 law known as the Defense Production Act, according to The Wall Street Journal. During his show, War Room Live, Bannon urged the use of the Korean War-era law which grants the president powers to prioritize national defense. The plan might seem outrageous now, but the current administration is unpredictable. Trump has yet to respond to Bannon's call. If he doesn't move to nationalize SpaceX, Trump could also sacrifice NASA for the sake of proving a point against his now opponent, Musk. On Thursday, Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to SpaceX. Aside from Dragon, NASA also plans on using SpaceX's Starship rocket to launch astronauts to the Moon as part of the Artemis program. The agency has already invested $4 billion into the rocket's development, and canceling its contract with SpaceX would leave it without a viable alternative. In short, NASA needs SpaceX and canceling the company's government contracts would affect the national space program as a whole. At this point, it comes down to how much Trump is willing to sacrifice in order to gain the upper hand in his ongoing feud with Musk while NASA is caught in the middle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store