logo
University of Michigan severs ties with security company after personnel followed students

University of Michigan severs ties with security company after personnel followed students

Yahoo2 days ago

The Brief
The University of Michigan says they have cut ties with private security companies, but many students are calling them out.
U-M says no individual or group was or should ever be targeted for their beliefs or affiliations.
Attorney Amir Makled said many students in the anti-Israel demonstrations on campus beg to differ.
ANN ARBOR, Mich. (FOX 2) - The University of Michigan says they have severed ties with several private security companies hired to patrol high traffic areas on campus, but many students, including pro-Palestinian demonstrators, say their actions have amounted to surveillance.
Now they are calling the university out.
What they're saying
U-M says no individual or group was or should ever be targeted for their beliefs or affiliations, but many of those students in last year's anti-Israel demonstrations on campus beg to differ.
Attorney Amir Makled represented several Pro-Palestinian protesters at U-M, including some who say they were followed and harassed by undercover security teams whose contracts have now been terminated by the University.
"I think that this is a continuation of what we're seeing nationally," said Makled. "They've spent nearly a million dollars going after students wrongfully monitoring them, recording them, and it's totally unjustified."
The backstory
University leadership has said private security was hired to report suspicious incidents in high-traffic areas, not to conduct surveillance, but tensions came to a head in 2024 during the anti-Israel demonstrations, including a large encampment that was eventually shut down by officials due to safety concerns.
Seven demonstrators were faced with felony charges relating to the encampment, but those charges were dropped in May.
"I think we saw some videos online of one of these private investigative employees acting as if they had some sort of a mental challenge or physical handicap in a way to not maybe raise suspicion that they are actually watching the targeted individual, but who knows what the irregularity was. Nonetheless, they should never have been used in the first place."
The other side
Michigan's Interim President talked about the issue in a letter to the community, saying in part:
"…We recently learned that an employee of one of our security contractors has acted in ways that go against our values and directives. What happened was disturbing, unacceptable, and unethical, and we will not tolerate it.Going forward, we are terminating all contracts with external vendors to provide plainclothes security on campus…"
City Shield, the Detroit company providing some of the contracted security, released a statement to FOX 2 following the contract terminations saying quote:
"City Shield Security Services has a strong history of protecting people and property as a nationally leading provider. We are aware of recent reporting and are investigating the matter. We take all complaints seriously and investigate them rigorously, ensuring appropriate actions and professional standards. We respect the need for client and protection services confidentiality and as a standard industry practice do not discuss the details of those services or contract, which would obviously undermine the protection provided."
Attorney Makled says it's good the private security has been dumped…but wants more change.
"I think the university is going to be held accountable. They need to have some transparency," he said. "We need to have oversight over the spending of these universities and these independent investigations must happen against the university, not against the students."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IU's governance crisis reflects dangerous trend undermining democracy
IU's governance crisis reflects dangerous trend undermining democracy

Indianapolis Star

time22 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

IU's governance crisis reflects dangerous trend undermining democracy

Recent commentary in IndyStar defended Indiana University's leadership and questioned the focus and intensity of faculty criticism. But what's happening at IU isn't just a campus controversy — it's part of a national trend. Across the country, public institutions are quietly dismantling the democratic processes that once guided their decisions. IU has become a flashpoint not because of any one leader or protest, but because it shows how shared governance and expert input are being replaced by top-down control. For over a century, American universities have followed a model known as shared governance. That means faculty, administrators and trustees work together to shape a school's mission and values. It's not just tradition — it's a safeguard. It ensures that decisions about teaching, research and student life are made by the people who do the work. In recent years, IU's shared governance has been steadily eroded through a series of top-down decisions. The April 2024 no-confidence vote in President Pamela Whitten by IU Bloomington faculty — 827 to 29 — wasn't about politics or personalities. It was a response to a pattern: refusing to recognize graduate workers' union efforts; sending state police to arrest peaceful protestors in Dunn Meadow; and canceling a long-planned exhibition by Palestinian-American artist Samia Halaby without consulting curators or faculty committees. These decisions bypassed longstanding university processes like faculty review, shared governance consultation and curatorial oversight — processes that have historically guided how academic and cultural decisions are made. Now, that erosion has been written into law. Indiana's House Enrolled Act 1001, passed in 2024, officially reduced faculty governance to an 'advisory only' role. Some argue that faculty governance was always advisory in practice — but this law removes any doubt. It replaces collaboration with control. Opinion: I was running for IU Board of Trustees — until Mike Braun took it over What is happening at IU is a symptom of a pattern playing out more broadly. We're seeing the slow dismantling of democratic decision-making in public institutions. At the federal level, the National Institutes of Health was recently blocked from posting notices in the Federal Register, which froze the review of over 16,000 new research grant applications — worth about $1.5 billion. Around the same time, the agency abruptly canceled more than 1,400 already awarded grants, halting active research projects without the usual expert review or explanation. Both the review of new applications and the continuation of awarded grants typically rely on deliberative panels of scientists to ensure decisions are fair, transparent and based on merit. In both of these cases, those processes were bypassed. Though some meetings have resumed, the damage is clear: Critical systems can be disrupted with little warning and no input from the people who are supposed to guide them. Other federal agencies have followed suit. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration have recently bypassed their own expert advisory committees in making major public health decisions. The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee was not convened to review or vote on the 2024–2025 influenza vaccine strain selection, breaking with decades of precedent. Around the same time, both ACIP and VRBPAC were sidelined in the rollout of new COVID-19 vaccine guidance and, just this week, the entire 17-member ACIP committee was fired. A top CDC vaccine adviser resigned, citing concerns that the agency was ignoring its own deliberative processes. Whether in universities or federal agencies, the pattern is the same: Leaders are cutting out the people who should have a voice. That might seem faster or easier — but it comes at a profound and ultimately self-defeating cost. When decisions are made without input from those most affected, institutions don't just lose trust — they undermine their own legitimacy and effectiveness. And in a democracy, trust is everything. Opinion: IU deserves a serious president. Pamela Whitten must go. This isn't a partisan issue. No matter your politics, the loss of open, thoughtful decision-making should be alarming. Processes like faculty governance, peer review and public advisory boards aren't meant to slow things down or push a political agenda. They exist because they lead to better decisions. When they're ignored, we don't just lose transparency. We lose trust. Indiana's public universities — and all public institutions — can only succeed when decisions are made with the people who do the work, not imposed on them from above. When we exclude the experts, educators, scientists, and advisors who sustain these institutions, we don't just weaken the process. We weaken the outcomes.

Hamas says it killed 12 Israeli-backed fighters. Israeli-supported group says they were aid workers
Hamas says it killed 12 Israeli-backed fighters. Israeli-supported group says they were aid workers

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hamas says it killed 12 Israeli-backed fighters. Israeli-supported group says they were aid workers

CAIRO (AP) — A unit of Gaza's Hamas-run police force said it killed 12 members of an Israeli-backed militia after detaining them early Thursday. Hours earlier, an Israel-supported aid group said Hamas attacked a bus carrying its Palestinian workers, killing at least five of them. The militia, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, said its fighters had attacked Hamas and killed five militants but made no mention of its own casualties. It also accused Hamas of detaining and killing aid workers. It was not immediately possible to verify the competing claims or confirm the identities of those killed. The Israeli military circulated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation 's statement on its social media accounts but declined to provide its own account of what happened. In a separate development, internet and phone lines were down across Gaza, according to telecom provider Paltel and the Palestinian telecoms authority. They said a key line was severed during an Israeli operation and that the military would not allow technicians into the area to repair it. Connectivity watchdog NetBlocks confirmed there had been a major disruption. The Israeli military said it was looking into the reports. Previous blackouts have deepened Gaza's isolation and made it difficult for people to call first responders after airstrikes. The aid group's operations in Gaza have already been marred by controversy and violence since they began last month, with scores of people killed in near-daily shootings as crowds headed toward the food distribution sites inside Israeli military zones. Witnesses have blamed the Israeli military, which has acknowledged firing only warning shots near people it said approached its forces in a suspicious manner. Earlier this week, witnesses also said Abu Shabab militiamen had opened fire on people en route to a GHF aid hub, killing and wounding many. The United Nations and major aid groups have rejected the Israeli and U.S.-backed initiative, accusing them of militarizing humanitarian aid at a time when experts say Gaza is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and renewed military campaign. Last week, Israel acknowledged it is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. Abu Shabab's militia, which calls itself the Popular Forces, says it is guarding the food distribution points set up by the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks. GHF has denied working with the Abu Shabab group. In a statement released early Thursday, the foundation said Hamas had attacked a bus carrying more than two dozen of its local Palestinian aid workers near the southern city of Khan Younis. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' it said. 'These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives everyday to help others.' Rev. Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump who was recently appointed head of GHF, called the killings 'absolute evil' and lashed out at the U.N. and Western countries over what he said was their failure to condemn them. 'The principle of impartiality does not mean neutrality. There is good and evil in this world. What we are doing is good and what Hamas did to these Gazans is absolute evil,' he wrote on X. Israel and the United States say the new system is needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid from the long-standing U.N.-run system, which is capable of delivering food, fuel and other humanitarian aid to all parts of Gaza. U.N. officials deny there has been any systematic diversion of aid by Hamas, but say they have struggled to deliver it because of Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of law and order in Gaza. U.N. officials say the new system is unable to meet mounting needs, and that it allows Israel to use aid as a weapon by controlling who has access to it and by essentially forcing people to relocate to the aid sites, most of which are in the southernmost city of Rafah, now a mostly uninhabited military zone. Some fear this could be part of an Israeli plan to coerce Palestinians into leaving Gaza. Hamas has also rejected the new system and threatened to kill any Palestinians who cooperate with the Israeli military. The killings early Wednesday were carried out by the Hamas-run police's Sahm unit, which Hamas says it established to combat looting. The unit released video footage showing several dead men lying in the street, saying they were Abu Shabab fighters who had been detained and killed for collaborating with Israel. It was not possible to verify the images or the claims around them. Mohammed Abu Amin, a Khan Younis resident, said he was at the scene of the killings and that crowds were celebrating them, shouting 'God is greatest' and condemning those killed as traitors to the Palestinian cause and agents of Israel. Ghassan Duhine, who identifies himself as a major in the Palestinian Authority's security forces and deputy commander of the Abu Shabab group, posted a statement online saying they clashed with Sahm and killed five. He denied that the images shared by Sahm were of Abu Shabab fighters. The Palestinian Authority, led by rivals of Hamas and based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has denied any connection to the Abu Shabab group, but many of the militiamen identify themselves as PA officers. Israel renewed its offensive in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas and imposed a complete ban on imports of food, fuel, medicine and other aid before easing the blockade in mid-May. The ongoing war and mounting desperation have plunged Gaza into chaos, with armed gangs looting aid convoys and selling the stolen food. The Hamas-run police force has largely gone underground as Israel has repeatedly targeted its forces. The military now controls more than half of the territory. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostage. They are still holding 53 captives, less than half of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants. Israel's offensive has flattened large areas of Gaza and driven around 90% of the population of roughly 2 million Palestinians from their homes. The territory is almost completely reliant on humanitarian aid because nearly all of its food production capabilities have been destroyed. ___ Chehayeb reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Sam Mednick in Tel Aviv, Israel, contributed. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at

Northern Ireland Struck by Anti-Immigrant Violence for Third Night
Northern Ireland Struck by Anti-Immigrant Violence for Third Night

New York Times

time30 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Northern Ireland Struck by Anti-Immigrant Violence for Third Night

Violence wracked Northern Ireland for a third night on Wednesday, as police clashed with anti-immigrant rioters across the territory. In Ballymena, where the unrest began on Monday, groups of masked rioters hurled petrol bombs and bricks at police officers. In Larne, about 20 miles west, masked groups set fire to a leisure center that was temporarily used as emergency housing for families forced out of Ballymena earlier in the week. The local authorities told the BBC in a statement later that the families had all been safely relocated. The arson attacks come after homes and cars were targeted in Ballymena, in what the police say are 'hate-fueled' attacks after an alleged sexual assault in the town on Saturday. By The New York Times Northern Ireland's power sharing executive issued a joint statement on Wednesday condemning what they described as 'racially motivated violence.' 'Those weaponising the situation in order to sow racial tensions do not care about seeing justice and have nothing to offer their communities but division and disorder,' the statement said. At least 32 police officers have been injured. On Wednesday, the Police Service of Northern Ireland requested mutual aid from elsewhere in the United Kingdom; the police in Scotland confirmed they would be sending a deployment of officers to Northern Ireland on Thursday. The conflagration, which started in Ballymena and has quickly spread to other towns in Northern Ireland, began on Monday after two 14-year-old boys appeared in court, charged with the attempted oral rape of a teenage girl in Clonavon Terrace on Saturday night. The boys spoke through a Romanian translator, the BBC reported, and both denied the charges through their lawyer. The incident prompted outrage in Ballymena, a town about 30 miles northwest of Belfast. It was quickly amplified by far-right and anti-immigration voices on social media. On Wednesday afternoon, the streets of Clonavon Terrace were quiet. Children peered out of windows as heavily armored police vehicles zipped through the streets. Several homes were boarded up — some displayed Union Jack flags in the windows, signaling that those inside were British. Residents stood in doorways, quickly shutting doors if approached. By nightfall, large groups had once again gathered, squaring off with nearly a dozen heavily armored police vehicles and dozens of officers in riot gear. Bricks, fireworks and petrol bombs smacked against riot shields of dozens of police officers, who used water cannons and, later, attack dogs on those who refused to disperse. The tit-for-tat exchange wound its way through the mazelike streets of the neighborhood until the crowds began to scatter around 11 p.m. More demonstrations are expected on Thursday, when a status yellow warning may bring rain and heavy thunderstorms to parts of Northern Ireland.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store