City staff to explore giving tax break to Stoney Creek residents living within 3 km of stinky landfill
Hamilton city staff will look into measures that could provide relief to neighbours of a smelly GFL dump in Stoney Creek, including tax breaks and a temporary closure of the landfill, after councillors discussed the actions last week.
At a general issues committee (GIC) meeting on Feb. 26, councillors voted unanimously in favour of two motions put forward by councillor Brad Clark's (Ward 9). One of those motions will look at "providing area rating relief or any other tax relief" to Upper Stoney Creek residents living within a three kilometre radius of the dump at 65 Green Mountain Rd. W., where neighbours say a stink continues to impact their lives.
Since April 2023, the area surrounding the GFL Stoney Creek Regional Facility has been dealing with a consistent, at times overwhelming stench coming from the dump, neighbours say.
Tenysha Graham, a neighbour of the area, delegated at GIC and said the "sulphuric, rotten fish-like and chemical [smells] are causing unmistakable harm to our community."
"We are unable to use our backyards and children are unable to use community playgrounds," Graham said at the committee meeting.
"I'm extremely concerned for my health and so I no longer go for a walk or jog in our own neighbourhood."
She said the community wants answers from the province, which approved an expansion of the landfill in 2019, and from GFL, the company that runs the landfill.
"These odour events are frequent, unpredictable and have tangible impact on our daily lives," she said.
Ward 1 councillor Cameron Kroetsch asked if residents impacted by other environmental effects in the city's industrial zones could be considered in the report requested to city staff.
"The impact of a decision like this could be very far ranging," he said.
Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance and corporate services in the city, said the report could include findings that could apply to other areas.
Ministry 'dropping the ball,' says councillor
In the second motion put forward Clark, city staff were directed to look into "legal options available to the city" in relation to residents' concerns, including a possible temporary closure of the site.
In it, he said a community group for the area "has had discussions with their lawyers," in light of what they perceive to be inaction from the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) to help resolve the issue.
He said the MECP and GFL are "well aware of the issue," and the ministry is "dropping the ball."
"What frustrates me more than anything is that [GFL] have been gaslighting residents when they call in for an odour complaint," he said.
In November of 2023, the province strengthened penalties to landfills that contravene environmental laws, which could face fines from $1,000 a day to $100,000 a day, which Clark said was a response to around 6,000 petitioners to the province.
Clark said since then, GFL has responded to odour complaints by saying they're not at fault.
MPP-elect Donna Skelly said, during a Cable 14 provincial candidates debate on Feb. 20 for the Flamborough-Glanbrook riding, that the ministry has an "ongoing investigation," and the company hasn't gotten any fines because the investigation is not complete.
The MECP has said previously the smell is due to leachate, a chemical stew of potentially toxic liquid, that came up while building a new landfill cell.
In the second motion, Clark also mentions a section of the Municipal Act which states a court could order the premises to be closed temporarily if a municipality proves it causes a public nuisance that's not being addressed.
Ward 10 councillor Jeff Beattie, who said he regularly sits in community meetings between GFL and neighbours of the area, said he doesn't see "any alternative to closure of this facility if we keep going down this road."
"Ultimately, the residents of this community have a right to be outdoors," he said.
'We cannot continue to live like this'
Graham said residents organized to do their own air testing after hearing the MECP and city often can't conduct air measurements while the odour events are active.
Results showed levels of hydrogen sulfide close to double Ontario standards, according to Graham.
Beattie said the city's Public Health department has said while the hydrogen sulfide odours have not been "a threat to public health, they are public nuisance."
"They can cause people to be nauseous, they can cause sore throats, they can cause asthma, bronchitis and they can certainly cause migraine headaches," he said.
Graham said while some equipment for the testing was donated, residents also donated to cost it, adding to the financial burden some have been feeling as a result of the odours.
She said many, including herself, have bought air purifiers out of fear for their health, other neighbours have said in the past their bills have gone up due to not being able to open their windows during warmer months.
"We cannot continue to live like this," said Graham.
City staff were given until the end of the second quarter of 2025 to report back to GIC on both motions "with all costs to be funded through the GFL royalties."
Both motions passed unanimously, with 13 councillors and the mayor voting on the first motion, and councillors only voting on the second. The vote will go to council for final approval on Wednesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 days ago
- Globe and Mail
The illusion of safety: Rethinking ‘risk-free' investments
In turbulent markets, investors often reach for reliable tools such as high-interest savings accounts (HISAs) and guaranteed investment certificates (GICs). They may hold these investments to maturity and realize the intended yield, but they may not understand their actual profit. These so-called 'risk-free' investments have long been considered cornerstones of conservative portfolios, but they deserve a closer look. While GICs, term deposits and HISAs can protect against nominal losses, they can also erode wealth in real terms, especially when inflation outpaces interest rates. That's because these investments set their yield on the overnight rate, which is tied directly to inflation. So, on an after-tax basis, there's no way to beat inflation with these assets aside from locking in rates for longer terms as inflation declines. With inflation potentially lingering, now is the time for advisors to revisit the conversation around capital preservation, inflation risk and what safety really means. Advisors are trained to evaluate investment options through various lenses, including risk tolerance, time horizon and objectives, but clients often anchor on the emotional comfort of guarantees. That's where the disconnect happens. The phrase 'risk-free' implies security but fails to account for other forms of risk. These include inflation risk, opportunity cost, reinvestment risk, and taxes. Educating clients on these less visible risks is essential. They may not feel as immediate as a market drop, but over time, they can be just as damaging, especially for long-term financial goals. True safety comes down to understanding an investment's 'real return,' which refers to the gain after accounting for inflation and taxes. Real return reflects the true value of the increase in purchasing power that the investment delivers. From a technical standpoint, investments such as HISAs and GICs carry minimal credit risk. But the real-world performance of these products tells a more nuanced story. Consider this example: a client invests $100,000 in a one-year GIC paying 4 per cent interest. At first glance, that seems like a solid return. But if inflation is running at 4.5 per cent over the same period, the client has actually lost purchasing power. Let's also not forget about taxes; interest income is taxed at a higher rate than dividends and capital gains. Therefore, the real return is negative. Over the longer term, the erosion of real wealth becomes significant. The client's account balance may grow nominally, but the lifestyle that money can support will be diminished. Clients may be receptive to innovative, inflation-conscious investment strategies when these alternatives are explained in terms of real, after-tax outcomes. Private real estate is one example. It has historically served as a reliable hedge by generating income and preserving purchasing power through rising rents and asset values. A key opportunity lies in shifting the conversation from just nominal yields to more tax-efficient ways of generating income and preserving purchasing power. Take capital gains, for instance. While equities come with market risk, they offer preferential tax treatment compared to interest income. Consider an investor who earns a 5.5 per cent return through capital appreciation. Only half of that gain is taxable. So, for an investor in a 40 per cent tax bracket, the effective tax is just 1.1 per cent. Subtracting that from the original 5.5 per cent return leaves a post-tax gain of 4.4 per cent. If inflation were at 3.5 per cent, the investor would be left with a real return of 0.9 per cent – significantly better than the negative real return generated by GICs taxed as interest income in a non-registered account. Return of capital (RoC) is another powerful strategy for investors seeking to generate cash flow in a tax-efficient way. Unlike interest or dividend income, RoC distributions are not taxable immediately. Instead, they reduce the adjusted cost base of the investment, with tax implications deferred until the asset is sold. Consider the example of an investor who earns a 5.5 per cent return. On a $10,000 investment in a private real estate investment trust (REIT), the investor would receive $550 in RoC distributions without triggering any taxes in the current year. After accounting for inflation at 3.5 per cent, the real return is 2 per cent. This tax deferral and the avoidance of annual tax drag make RoC one of the most efficient income strategies available, particularly for investors in higher tax brackets or those planning to withdraw funds during retirement when their tax rate may be lower. For clients willing to look beyond traditional fixed-income instruments such as GICs and HISAs, alternatives such as private REITs present a compelling path toward preserving wealth and maintaining purchasing power. Travis Forman is a portfolio manager at Strategic Private Wealth Counsel with Harbourfront Wealth Management Inc. in Surrey and Kelowna, B.C.
Toronto Star
29-05-2025
- Toronto Star
Ontario unveils changes to provincial immigration nominee program
Ontario has introduced changes to its popular provincial immigration program to meet evolving economic needs. On Wednesday, the government tabled new legislation which, if passed, will give the provincial immigration minister the ability to establish or remove immigrant nomination streams to quickly respond to the changing job market and labour demand. The proposed changes to the provincial immigration program would also: •Allow officials to return applications that no longer match current job market needs or raise concerns; ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW •Grant inspectors the authority to require in-person interviews with applicants through the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program, to improve program integrity and prevent fraudulent claims; •Further digitalize the application process by letting employers hoping to sponsor foreign workers for permanent residence submit applications directly and electronically to a new employer portal, starting this summer. These are among 18 new proposed measures in the Working for Workers Seven Act, 2025 that the Conservative government hopes to adopt to meet changing economic needs and build a stronger workforce. 'We're proposing changes that will prepare workers and businesses for the jobs of the future, while helping workers facing impacts from U.S. tariffs and economic uncertainty,' said David Piccini, minister of labour, immigration, training and skills development, in a statement. 'This package underscores our unwavering commitment to protecting our province's most valuable resource — our workers.' The Ontario immigration program, which allows the province to select and nominate prospective permanent residents for federal processing, has grown in capacity from 6,650 spots in 2019 to 21,500 last year, becoming a significant driving force of economic immigrants to the province. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW However, the Office of the Auditor General last December also identified numerous problems with the management of the program. Not only did few nominated immigrants have jobs or work experience in occupations with the highest vacancies, it found that verification processes were weak, particularly where documents are susceptible to misrepresentation or forgery. 'Results of inspections pointed to weaknesses in the Ministry's processes and mechanisms to prevent and catch misrepresentation before an application is approved and candidates are nominated,' said the report, noting that most inspections took the form of desk audits. Other proposed measures in the Working for Workers Seven Act include: requiring automated external defibrillators on construction projects; demanding job posting platforms to have a mechanism to report fraudulent publicly advertised job postings to the platform; speeding up referrals to in-demand training such as micro-credentials; and increasing support for workers in response to tariff-related terminations and layoffs.
CTV News
27-05-2025
- CTV News
InterRent REIT agrees to offer from executive chair Mike McGahan
The logo of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust is shown in this handout image. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-InterRent REIT *MANDATORY CREDIT* InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust has signed a deal to be acquired by a group including executive chair Mike McGahan and Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC for about $2 billion. Under the agreement, CLV Group and GIC will pay InterRent unitholders $13.55 per unit in cash. The transaction is valued at a total of about $4 billion including the assumption of net debt. InterRent units were up $1.80 at $13.64 in trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Tuesday. In addition to his role at InterRent, which owns residential properties in B.C., Ontario and Quebec, McGahan is the chief executive and controlling shareholder of CLV Group. The deal requires approval of a two-thirds majority vote by unitholders as well as a majority vote by unitholders, excluding CLV Group, its affiliates and any other unitholders required to be excluded. It also requires court and regulatory approvals, consents and approvals from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. and certain existing lenders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 27, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX: The Canadian Press
