This AI image generator lets you create NSFW art, and it's only £30 for life
The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation.
TL;DR: Create anything, even NSFW art, with a lifetime subscription to Imagiyo for only £29.68.
Opens in a new window
Credit: Imagiyo
Imagiyo AI Image Generator: Lifetime Subscription (Standard Plan)
£29.70 £367.57 Save £337.87
Get Deal
Digital creativity has never been more accessible, yet many of us remember the days when crafting a single image meant wrestling with layers and plugins for hours on end. Now there's a way to generate stunning visuals in seconds, simply by typing a description of what you have in mind.
Imagiyo (on sale for life for £29.68) uses Stable Diffusion AI alongside FLUX AI to turn text prompts into high-quality images ready for commercial use, and there aren't many limits to what you can create. Here's what that means.
What do you want to make first? It only takes a brief description to put Imagiyo's advanced algorithms to work, and unlike other image generators, Imagiyo actually lets you really follow your creativity. Craft stunning landscapes, visualise characters from books, or go for something a little more daring. Imagiyo supports NSFW content creation. Just set your prompts to private and let your mind run wild.
Imagiyo's commercial-use license means you can take some of the images you generate and incorporate them into client projects, social media campaigns, or personal portfolios without fear of copyright issues.
Each month, you receive 500 image-generation credits and can submit up to two prompts at once. Unused credits roll over, so you never lose access to your creative potential. Best of all, Imagiyo delivers your purchased engine updates and feature improvements automatically, ensuring you always work with the latest AI models.
Get an Imagiyo AI Image Generator lifetime subscription for £29.68.
StackSocial prices subject to change
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI startups revolutionize coding industry, leading to sky-high valuations
By Anna Tong and Krystal Hu SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Two years after the launch of ChatGPT, return on investment in generative AI has been elusive, but one area stands out: software development. So-called code generation or 'code-gen' startups are commanding sky-high valuations as corporate boardrooms look to use AI to aid, and sometimes to replace, expensive human software engineers. Cursor, a code generation startup based in San Francisco that can suggest and complete lines of code and write whole sections of code autonomously, raised $900 million at a $10 billion valuation in May from a who's who list of tech investors, including Thrive Capital, Andreessen Horowitz and Accel. Windsurf, a Mountain View-based startup behind the popular AI coding tool Codeium, attracted the attention of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, which is now in talks to acquire the company for $3 billion, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Its tool is known for translating plain English commands into code, sometimes called 'vibe coding,' which allows people with no knowledge of computer languages to write software. OpenAI and Windsurf declined to comment on the acquisition. 'AI has automated all the repetitive, tedious work,' said Scott Wu, CEO of code gen startup Cognition. 'The software engineer's role has already changed dramatically. It's not about memorizing esoteric syntax anymore.' Founders of code-gen startups and their investors believe they are in a land grab situation, with a shrinking window to gain a critical mass of users and establish their AI coding tool as the industry standard. But because most are built on AI foundation models developed elsewhere, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, or DeepSeek, their costs per query are also growing, and none are yet profitable. They're also at risk of being disrupted by Google, Microsoft and OpenAI, which all announced new code-gen products in May, and Anthropic is also working on one as well, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The rapid growth of these startups is coming despite competing on big tech's home turf. Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, launched in 2021 and considered code-gen's dominant player, grew to over $500 million in revenue last year, according to a source familiar with the matter. Microsoft declined to comment on GitHub Copilot's revenue. On Microsoft's earnings call in April, the company said the product has over 15 million users. LEARN TO CODE? As AI revolutionizes the industry, many jobs - particularly entry-level coding positions that are more basic and involve repetition - may be eliminated. Signalfire, a VC firm that tracks tech hiring, found that new hires with less than a year of experience fell 24% in 2024, a drop it attributes to tasks once assigned to entry-level software engineers are now being fulfilled in part with AI. Google's CEO also said in April that 'well over 30%' of Google's code is now AI-generated, and Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said last year the company had saved 'the equivalent of 4,500 developer-years' by using AI. Google and Amazon declined to comment. In May, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said at a conference that approximately 20 to 30% of their code is now AI-generated. The same month, the company announced layoffs of 6,000 workers globally, with over 40% of those being software developers in Microsoft's home state, Washington. 'We're focused on creating AI that empowers developers to be more productive, creative, and save time,' a Microsoft spokesperson said. 'This means some roles will change with the revolution of AI, but human intelligence remains at the center of the software development life cycle.' MOUNTING LOSSES Some 'vibe-coding' platforms already boast substantial annualized revenues. Cursor, with just 60 employees, went from zero to $100 million in recurring revenue by January 2025, less than two years since its launch. Windsurf, founded in 2021, launched its code generation product in November 2024 and is already bringing in $50 million in annualized revenue, according to a source familiar with the company. But both startups operate with negative gross margins, meaning they spend more than they make, according to four investor sources familiar with their operations. 'The prices people are paying for coding assistants are going to get more expensive,' Quinn Slack, CEO at coding startup Sourcegraph, told Reuters. Both Cursor and Windsurf are led by recent MIT graduates in their twenties, and exemplify the gold rush era of the AI startup scene. 'I haven't seen people working this hard since the first Internet boom,' said Martin Casado, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, an investor in Anysphere, the company behind Cursor. What's less clear is whether the dozen or so code-gen companies will be able to hang on to their customers as big tech moves in. 'In many cases, it's less about who's got the best technology -- it's about who is going to make the best use of that technology, and who's going to be able to sell their products better than others,' said Scott Raney, managing director at Redpoint Ventures, whose firm invested in Sourcegraph and Poolside, a software development startup that's building its own AI foundation model. CUSTOM AI MODELS Most of the AI coding startups currently rely on the Claude AI model from Anthropic, which crossed $3 billion in annualized revenue in May in part due to fees paid by code-gen companies. But some startups are attempting to build their own models. In May, Windsurf announced its first in-house AI models that are optimized for software engineering in a bid to control the user experience. Cursor has also hired a team of researchers to pre-train its own large frontier-level models, which could enable the company to not have to pay foundation model companies so much money, according to two sources familiar with the matter. Startups looking to train their own AI coding models face an uphill battle as it could easily cost millions to buy or rent the computing capacity needed to train a large language model. Replit earlier dropped plans to train its own model. Poolside, which has raised more than $600 million to make a coding-specific model, has announced a partnership with Amazon Web Services and is testing with customers, but hasn't made any product generally available yet. Another code gen startup Magic Dev, which raised nearly $500 million since 2023, told investors a frontier-level coding model was coming in summer 2024 but hasn't yet launched a product. Poolside declined to comment. Magic Dev did not respond to a request for comment.
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Hollywood Minute: Rick Astley's billion streams
Rick Astley hit gets one billion Spotify streams, 'Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale' first look, and no more 'Luke' for Mark Hamill? Douglas Hyde reports.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Wiretap: Trump Says Goodbye To The AI Safety Institute
The Wiretap is your weekly digest of cybersecurity, internet privacy and surveillance news. To get it in your inbox, subscribe here. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images) The Trump administration has announced plans to reorganize the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI) into the new Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI). Set up by the Biden administration in 2023, AISI operated within the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) to research risks in widely-used AI systems like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic's Claude. The move to dismantle the body had been expected for some time. In February, as JD Vance headed to France for a major AI summit, his delegation did not include anyone from the AI Safety Institute, Reuters reported at the time. The agency's inaugural director Elizabeth Kelly had stepped down earlier in the month. The Commerce Department's announcement marking the change is thin on details about the reorganization, but it appears the aim is to favor innovation over red tape. 'For far too long, censorship and regulations have been used under the guise of national security. Innovators will no longer be limited by these standards. CAISI will evaluate and enhance U.S. innovation of these rapidly developing commercial AI systems while ensuring they remain secure to our national security standards,' said Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. What could be gleaned from Lutnick's paradoxical phrasing – national security-focused standards are limiting, but America needs national security-focused standards – is that it's very difficult to tell just how much the new body will differ from the old one. The announcement goes on to state that CAISI will 'assist industry to develop voluntary standards' in AI, which summed up much of what the old body did. Similarly, just as the AI Safety Institute was tasked with assessing risks in artificial intelligence, CAISI will 'lead unclassified evaluations of AI capabilities that may pose risks to national security.' CAISI will also still be a part of NIST. And, despite Lutnick's apparent disdain for standards, the Commerce press release concludes that CAISI will 'ensure U.S. dominance of international AI standards.' That there's little obvious change between the Institute and CAISI might alleviate any immediate concerns the U.S. is abandoning commitments to keep AI safe. Just earlier this year, a coalition of companies, nonprofits and academics called on Congress to codify the Institute's existence before the year was up. That included major players like OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which had agreements to work with the agency on research projects. What happens to those is now up in the air. The Commerce Department hadn't responded to a series of questions at the time of publication, and NIST declined to comment. Got a tip on surveillance or cybercrime? Get me on Signal at +1 929-512-7964. (Photo by Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images) Unknown individuals have impersonated President Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles in calls and texts to Republican lawmakers and business executives. Investigators suspect the perpetrators used artificial intelligence to clone Wiles' voice. One lawmaker was asked by the impersonator to assemble a list of individuals for potential presidential pardons, according to the Wall Street Journal. It's unclear that motives lay behind the impersonation, or how they pulled the stunt off. Wiles had told confidantes that some of her contacts from her personal phone had been stolen by a hacker. A Texas police officer searched Flock Safety's AI-powered surveillance camera network to track down a woman who had carried out a self-administered abortion, 404 Media reports. Because the search was conducted across different states, experts raised concerns about police using Flock to track down individuals getting abortions in states where it's legal before going back home to a state where it's illegal. The cops said they were simply worried about the woman's safety. Nathan Vilas Laatsch, a 28-year-old IT specialist at the Defense Intelligence Agency, has been arrested and charged with leaking state secrets after becoming upset at the Trump administration. The DOJ did not specify to which country Laatsch allegedly tried to pass secrets, sources told the Washington Post it was Germany. He was caught out by undercover agents posing as interested parties, according to the DOJ. Europol announced it had identified more than 2,000 links 'pointing to jihadist and right-wing violent extremist and terrorist propaganda targeting minors.' The agency warned that it had seen terrorists using AI to generate content like short videos and memes 'designed to resonate with younger audiences.' A 63-year-old British man, John Miller, was charged alongside a Chinese national by the Department of Justice with conspiring to ship missiles, air defense radar, drones and unspecified 'cryptographic devices' to China. They're also charged with trying to stalk and harass an individual who was planning protests against Chinese president Xi.
