Wyoming lawmakers reject ban on Wyoming's tradition of killing wildlife with snowmobiles
A lone coyote standing in sagebrush on a ridge in Wyoming. (John Mosesso, USGS)
Mike Schmid tried twice on Thursday to talk his colleagues into ending the legal-in-Wyoming practice of running down coyotes and other species with snowmobiles and striking exhausted animals.
It's a form of hunting that was put on display for the world to see nearly a year ago, when a resident of Schmid's new district in the Green River Basin badly injured a juvenile wolf with his snowmachine and then took it into a public bar for cheap thrills. The infamous incident attracted global ire that the Wyoming Freedom Caucus-aligned Republican representative's community is still recovering from.
'I truly believe, with the discussions I've had in my district, that this [amendment] will close the door on this issue,' Schmid on Thursday told members of the Wyoming House. 'This black eye that Wyoming has will begin to heal.'
Schmid's motion was to amend House Bill 275, 'Treatment of animals,' which was brought by Rep. Andrew Byron, R-Jackson, in direct response to the wolf torture stunt. That bill, which passed the Wyoming House 57-3 on Thursday, heightens penalties for cruelty and a person who 'tortures, torments or mutilates' living wildlife, regardless of the species.
Schmid, an avid hunter, wanted the bill to go further, proposing a prohibition on striking animals with snowmobiles on public land. So did Rep. Karlee Provenza, a Laramie Democrat, who partnered on the amendment.
'We were on the world stage, and it wasn't just for what happened in the bar — it was for what happened before,' Provenza said. 'Our wildlife are part of our heritage. I've said it 100 times, I'll say it 100 more: 'I think we need to be better stewards of it.''
The unlikely duo partnering on the amendment didn't sway many colleagues. Their amendment was specific to public land, a provision Schmid said was intended to 'protect our agricultural community,' allowing ranchers to continue using the tactic on private land.
Rep. Elissa Campbell, R-Casper, worried about muddying HB 275, which she said strikes a 'beautiful balance' and had support from sportsmen, landowners, concerned citizens and ranchers. The livestock industry, notably, has strongly resisted restrictions on running over animals with snowmobiles.
Rep. McKay Erickson, R-Afton, argued that hunting with over-snow vehicles is a necessary predator control. He referenced the Dog Creek Wolf Pack south of Jackson, which his constituent hunted down relentlessly — the Wyoming Game and Fish Department reports the 12-animal pack was completely eliminated.
'Using a legal snow bike, he pursued and was able to take predators,' Erickson said. 'He would have never been able to even touch these animals without the use of the motorized vehicle, and that was on public land.'
In an overwhelming voice vote, the Schmid-Provenza amendment failed.
That night, Schmid pitched the same plan as standalone legislation to the House Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources Committee, of which he's a member.
'This bill is very simple,' Schmid said. 'All it does is stop … the senseless act of using a machine to repeatedly run over an animal in order to maim it or kill it.'
Although unpopular as an amendment to HB 275, the standalone House Bill 331, 'Taking of predators on public lands,' had a number of supporters in advance. Co-sponsors included a politically diverse group: Reps. Gary Brown, R-Cheyenne; JT Larson, R-Rock Springs; Darin McCann, R-Rock Springs; Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne: Liz Storer, D-Jackson: Nina Webber, R-Cody; and Sen. Lynn Hutchings, R-Cheyenne.
Schmid offered an amendment, proposing to add the word 'intentionally' in several sections of HB 331 to allay concerns shared on the House floor about criminalizing accidentally striking animals while driving.
Late into the evening, the Ag Committee worked on the bill.
Rep. Bob Davis, R-Baggs, inquired whether it would prohibit pursuing predators with snowmachines. It did not, Schmid explained, and was only intended to address using the vehicle as a weapon.
Agricultural industry reps showed up in resistance.
'I don't think this bill is needed,' Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation lobbyist Brett Moline testified. 'I think the actions that would lead up to something being killed are covered by the other bill (HB 275).'
Several others disagreed, commending Schmid's measure.
Were it enacted, Byron's House Bill 275, 'Treatment of animals,' would not prohibit the pursuit and snowmobile-caused injury to the wolf that ended up in the Sublette County bar, Greater Yellowstone Coalition lobbyist Richard Garrett testified.
'So I'm afraid we would still potentially have another eye to be blackened if this bill (HB 275) were to stand as it's drafted,' he said.
Sabrina King, lobbying for the Backcountry Hunters and Anglers' Wyoming chapter, echoed the point.
'I would venture that the sporting community in Wyoming does not support running over animals with vehicles,' she testified. 'We do not consider that fair chase. And we do think that this bill closes that final gap that House Bill 275 does not.'
The amended version of Schmid's HB 331 died in the Ag committee, albeit in a split vote. Schmid, Provenza and fellow Reps. Steve Johnson, R-Cheyenne and Pepper Ottman, R-Riverton voted to advance it. Opposing were Reps. Davis, Dalton Banks, R-Cowley, John Eklund, R-Cheyenne and Tomi Strock, R-Douglas.
Although it's been struck down, HB 331 lured more support than any prior Wyoming legislative attempt to end a culture of recreationally running over wildlife with snowmobiles.
Rep. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, ran a similar measure with only Democrat sponsors in 2019 that did not get a committee hearing. That same year, Yin tried again, though failed to get any support from the Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee.
Storer, who chaired the 'Treatment of Predators Working Group' in the aftermath of the infamous wolf incident, also was interested in pursuing a ban, but was discouraged from doing so by Gov. Mark Gordon and others.
Schmid told WyoFile in a text message he intends to try again at a prohibition.
'I will continue to do what I can,' Schmid said. 'As an avid hunter, I hate what this says about something I love so much.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Blue state governors to testify on "sanctuary policies" amid L.A. protests over immigration raids
Washington — Three Democratic governors are defending their responses to the migrant crisis and dispute claims of failing to cooperate with federal authorities, according to prepared remarks that will be delivered Thursday before a House oversight panel. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz are among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on so-called "sanctuary policies". "Let me be clear: Sanctuary policies don't protect Americans. They protect criminal illegal aliens," Oversight Chair James Comer, a Kentucky Republican will say in his opening statement. The governors' appearances come as President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom remain embroiled in a legal and political standoff over the deployment of the National Guard troops and Marines to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles. Demonstrations have spread to other U.S. cities, including New York and Chicago following a series of deportation raids. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz will tell lawmakers. "It is ridiculous to suggest that Minnesota — a state that is over 1,500 miles away from the Southern border and a thousand miles from lawmakers in Washington, D.C. who decide and implement border policy is somehow responsible for a failure of immigration enforcement." The former vice presidential candidate has drawn intense scrutiny not only over immigration policy but also for his handling of social justice protests that broke out in Minneapolis following the death of George Floyd in 2020. Trump administration officials have cited Walz' actions to justify the president's decision to federalize troops in California. While Walz does not appear to directly address the controversy in his testimony, he says he is "disappointed" in the federal government's overall approach. "As governor of Minnesota, it is incumbent on me to use the state's resources to help Minnesota families—not turn those resources over to the administration so they can stage another photo-op in tactical gear or accidentally deport more children without observing due process," Walz is set to say. Ahead of the hearing, the GOP-led panel released a video compilation of various news clips accusing the governors of "shielding" undocumented immigrants and "causing chaos" in their states. A memo from Hochul's office suggested the hearing could be "derailed by wild accusations" and "twisted characterizations" but noted the governor's position is "clear" when it comes to supporting strong borders and comprehensive immigration reform. "New York state cooperates with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in criminal cases," Hochul says. "And our values as New Yorkers demand that we treat those who arrive here in search of a better life with dignity and reject policies that tear law-abiding families apart." Hochul also addresses the influx of more than 220,000 migrants to New York City since early 2022, many of whom were bussed from border states, calling it "an unprecedented humanitarian crisis." "We have responded to this crisis with both compassion and pragmatism," Hochul states."And as a result, we largely prevented what could have become an additional crisis — one of street homelessness and tent cities." Pritzker says Illinois also stepped up to the challenge, and blamed the lack of federal intervention and cooperation from border states for exacerbating the problem. "As governor, my responsibility is to ensure that all Illinoisans feel safe in their homes, their businesses, and their communities," Pritzker is prepared to say. "That is why my administration continued to make significant investments in public safety, even as our resources were strained because of the lack of federal support during the crisis — expanding our state police force and investing in efforts to reduce gun violence." Thursday's session follows a March hearing on sanctuary cities with four Democratic mayors: Eric Adams, of New York, Mike Johnston of Denver, Brandon Johnson of Chicago and Michelle Wu of Boston. Comer launched an investigation in January into "sanctuary jurisdictions", including states, counties or cities, to examine their impact on public safety and federal immigration enforcement. President Trump has vowed to crack down on localities that don't back his immigration agenda. Earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security removed its list of sanctuary jurisdictions after several cities challenged the findings.
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates
Newsom v. Trump heads to court as protests against ICE raids spread: Updates Show Caption Hide Caption See how Los Angeles protests intensified over one weekend What started as a small protest over immigration raids on Friday ballooned into large demonstrations throughout the weekend. Here's what happened. Nearly a week after protests over federal immigration enforcement raids first broke out in Los Angeles, a showdown between federal and state officials is expected to land in court on Thursday over whether President Donald Trump can use the military to assist the raids against California leaders' wishes. In the hearing, scheduled for Thursday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will hear Gov. Gavin Newsom's motion for a temporary restraining order limiting the activities of the 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines Trump deployed in Los Angeles. Newsom has decried the military intervention as an illegal waste of resources and is asking the court to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. He ultimately wants the National Guard returned to state control and Trump's actions declared illegal. Downtown Los Angeles remained under a curfew after days of demonstrations against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement led to hundreds of arrests. The protests broke out on June 6 in response to ongoing ICE raids that have sparked fear among immigrant communities. While many protests have been relatively peaceful, some have turned into scenes of chaos as police fired with less lethal munitions, tear gas and flash-bangs to disperse crowds. "If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," Trump said at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Wednesday. State and local leaders have disputed Trump's claims, saying the decision has only provoked the unrest, likening the president's actions to "authoritarian regimes." U.S. Northern Command announced on Wednesday that the 700 active-duty Marines had completed their training for the Los Angeles mission, which included de-escalation and crowd control. The Marines were expected to be deployed within 48 hours to protect federal officers and property. National Guard commander Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman said on Wednesday that the troops wouldn't conduct arrests or searches and seizures, but would be authorized to detain protesters temporarily. Protests are planned for 1,800 communities across the country on June 14, the same day Trump holds a military parade in Washington, D.C. For decades, the GOP has claimed most of the symbols of patriotism, including the American flag, but the people protesting Trump, a Republican, say they are the true patriots now. The rallies, named "No Kings Day" to oppose what they see as Trump's power grab, are expected to be the largest and most numerous protests since Trump's second term began, dwarfing the Hands Off protests in early April that drew as many as 1 million Americans to the streets at more than 1,000 rallies. No Kings Day was organized by grassroots groups in cities and towns of all sizes to coincide with the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration, which is also Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. Administration officials insist it is a coincidence that the parade falls on Trump's birthday. Read more here. Contributing: Reuters
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid
WASHINGTON — House Republicans are moving to cut about $9.4 billion in spending already approved by Congress as President Donald Trump's administration looks to follow through on work by the Department of Government Efficiency when it was overseen by Elon Musk . The package to be voted on Thursday targets foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, as well as thousands of public radio and television stations around the country. Republicans are characterizing the spending as wasteful and unnecessary, but Democrats say the rescissions are hurting the United States' standing in the world. 'Cruelty is the point,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said of the proposed spending cuts. The Trump administration is employing a tool rarely used in recent years that allows the president to transmit a request to Congress to cancel previously appropriated funds. That triggers a 45-day clock in which the funds are frozen pending congressional action. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the spending stands. The benefit for the administration of a formal rescissions request is that passage requires only a simple majority in the 100-member Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to get spending bills through that chamber. So, if they stay united, Republicans will be able to pass the measure without any Democratic votes. The administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along. Republicans, sensitive to concerns that Trump's sweeping tax and immigration bill would increase future federal deficits , are anxious to demonstrate spending discipline, though the cuts in the package amount to just a sliver of the spending approved by Congress each year. They are betting the cuts prove popular with constituents who align with Trump's 'America first' ideology as well as those who view NPR and PBS as having a liberal bias. In all, the package contains 21 proposed rescissions. Approval would claw back about $900 million from $10 billion that Congress has approved for global health programs. That includes canceling $500 million for activities related to infectious diseases and child and maternal health and another $400 million to address the global HIV epidemic. The Trump administration is also looking to cancel $800 million, or a quarter of the amount Congress approved, for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation, and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. About 45% of the savings sought by the White House would come from two programs designed to boost the economies, democratic institutions and civil societies in developing countries. The Republican president has also asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's slated to receive during the next two budget years. About two-thirds of the money gets distributed to more than 1,500 locally owned public radio and television stations. Nearly half of those stations serve rural areas of the country. The association representing local public television stations warns that many of them would be forced to close if the Republican measure passes. Those stations provide emergency alerts, free educational programming and high school sports coverage and highlight hometown heroes. Advocacy groups that serve the world's poorest people are also sounding the alarm and urging lawmakers to vote no. 'We are already seeing women, children and families left without food, clean water and critical services after earlier aid cuts, and aid organizations can barely keep up with rising needs,' said Abby Maxman, president and CEO of Oxfam America, a poverty-fighting organization. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said the foreign aid is a tool that prevents conflict and promotes stability but the measure before the House takes that tool away. 'These cuts will lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, devastating the most vulnerable in the world,' McGovern said. 'And at a time when China and Russia and Iran are working overtime to challenge American influence.' Republicans disparaged the foreign aid spending and sought to link it to programs they said DOGE had uncovered. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said taxpayer dollars had gone to such things as targeting climate change, promoting pottery classes and strengthening diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Other Republicans cited similar examples they said DOGE had revealed. 'Yet, my friends on the other side of the aisle would like you to believe, seriously, that if you don't use your taxpayer dollars to fund this absurd list of projects and thousands of others I didn't even list, that somehow people will die and our global standing in the world will crumble,' Roy said. 'Well, let's just reject this now.'
