What is a Miller Type B nor'easter?
Nor'easters are powerful storm systems that impact the Eastern Seaboard with a combination of northeasterly winds, heavy precipitation and coastal flooding.
Meteorologists classify nor'easters using the Miller classification system, named after researcher J.E. Miller, from the 1940s.
Originally, only two types of storms - Miller Type A and Miller Type B – were used for identification purposes, but in the early 2000s, forecasters expanded the system to include three additional types, creating five distinct categories: Type A, Type B, Type C, Type D and Type E.
A Miller Type B event is a more west-to-east-originated storm system. These typically occur in the autumn and winter months, when cold air over the continental U.S. clashes with warm, moist air from the Gulf and the Atlantic Ocean.
The resulting event can produce blizzard conditions, hurricane-force wind gusts, severe weather and significant coastal erosion.
Each type of nor'easter has unique characteristics and impact zones that can lead to devastating conditions, with widespread power outages and millions of dollars in damage.
What Is A Nor'easter?
This type of storm system tends to lead to a more expansive precipitation shield when compared to the zone impacted by a Miller Type A, but there are important caveats.
During a Miller Type B nor'easter, a significant storm system usually races through the Ohio Valley only to fall apart around the Appalachians. The center later redevelops along the East Coast and produces a more significant storm system than compared to the first area of low pressure.
This pattern leads to heavy snowfall in the Ohio Valley as well as higher elevations in the Northeast and New England.
Due to the development zone, severe weather across the Southeast is often not a threat, but the risk for significant travel disruptions across the Northeast is usually greater because of less warm air entrained in the nor'easter, which means a greater chance of ice and snow.
It is also important to note that because the center essentially jumps around, Miller Type B nor'easters can be rather tricky to forecast, as a significant jump offshore can limit coastal impacts.
What Does Rain Smell Like?
Feb. 25-26, 2004: Southern winter storm
This storm system took an unusual southern path, which caused cities in the Carolinas to see unusually heavy amounts of snow, while most of the Northeast stayed clear of hazardous weather.
Rock Hill, South Carolina, reported 22 inches of snow, while Charlotte, North Carolina, saw more than a foot of snow.
South Carolina authorities reported more than 1,400 traffic crashes in the Palmetto State with at least four traffic-related fatalities.
The National Weather Service office that covers much of Georgia also reported widespread snowfall amounts of 1-3 inches in the northern part of the state, associated with an influx of moisture from the west.
Jan. 21-24, 2005: North American Blizzard of 2005
One of the more significant storm systems to impact the Northeast occurred in late January 2005.
The nor'easter produced heavy snowfall, hurricane-force winds and coastal flooding, leading to widespread travel disruptions.
The event was enhanced by arctic air that was already in place, which caused much of the precipitation to fall in the frozen variety.
This storm system took on the more classic form of a Miller Type B nor'easter and produced feet of snow and blizzard conditions for Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
Before the main low-pressure center took over, the first low-pressure system caused significant snowfall across the Great Lakes.
Feb. 4-7, 2010: Snowmageddon
Despite being an El Niño year, conditions typically associated with La Niña led to the development of a significant nor'easter.
This system caused blizzard conditions in the Northeast, with widespread reports of 30 inches of snow in parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia.
More than 40 fatalities were reported, and hundreds of thousands of homes lost power due to the Miller Type B storm, which came to be known as "Snowmageddon."
The storm system drew a significant amount of moisture from the Gulf, which helped to intensify the impact in the northern mid-Atlantic and southern Northeast states.
The greatest snowfall total was recorded in Maryland, with 38.3 inches measured in Elkridge.
While the southern end of the storm system produced flooding, there were no widespread reports of severe weather.Original article source: What is a Miller Type B nor'easter?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How many tornadoes has Missouri had this year so far?
MISSOURI — If it seems like Missouri has already had an unusually high number of tornadoes this year, you are correct. The state of Missouri has already seen double the yearly average of tornadoes only halfway through the year, according to the National Weather Service. The NWS shared on X that the state has had a very active weather season, with 43 tornadoes already accounted for so far. This number is two times more than the yearly average of 21.5 tornadoes while only half through 2025. At-large murder suspect arrested after wild crash in north St. Louis The majority of these tornadoes were rated EF-1 tornadoes with 86 to 110 mile-per-hour winds, making up 20 of the tornadoes experienced across the state. EF-0 tornadoes with 65 to 85 mile per hour winds have been seen 10 times already in Missouri. The state has also had nine EF-2 tornadoes with 111 to 135 miles per hour winds and three EF-3 tornadoes with 136 to 165 miles per hour winds. Missouri has only had one tornado with an unknown tornado rating, leaving no damage to rate. Compared to previous years, in 2024 the state had 47 tornadoes in total. The NWS reports other active years include 2006, when the state saw 75 tornadoes. FOX 2 Severe Weather Specialist Chris Higgins said one big clue for this year's active severe weather season can actually be found in the Pacific Ocean. The possible cause: the slowly fading La Niña in the central Pacific Ocean. The cold water associated with La Niña and a warmer-than-normal pocket further north up towards Alaska enhance the northern branch of the jet stream. That branch of the jet stream is a key contributor to the wind energy needed for an active severe weather season across the Midwest. That wind energy helps contribute to storm rotation, and rotating storms produce our most violent severe storms. The active jet stream has supplied a constant flow of triggers, which is why severe weather events have come at somewhat regular intervals since March. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why two tornado warnings near St. Louis came without a watch last week
ST. LOUIS – Twice last week, the National Weather Service issued tornado warnings in the St. Louis region without a tornado watch officially in place – a scenario that perhaps left some residents surprised or concerned. On Wednesday, an EF-1 tornado tore through parts of Wildwood and Chesterfield. On Saturday, another EF-1 tornado struck just outside of De Soto city limits. In both cases, the tornadoes developed after a warning was issued, but without any prior tornado watch. Fortunately, no injuries were reported from either tornado, but both storms caused various damages to homes, trees and properties. After both tornados, many residents may wonder: How can a tornado warning be issued without a watch beforehand? After all, watches are typically meant to alert the public that conditions may support tornado development, giving people time to prepare. Warnings, by contrast, indicate a tornado is imminent or already happening, and more immediate action is needed. While it's not exactly common to skip the tornado watch phase, it's not entirely unprecedented either. During live coverage of Wednesday's storms from the FOX 2 studios, Extreme Weather Specialist Chris Higgins said of the sudden warnings: 'I know it's hard to believe this was a Level 1 risk out of 5, but that goes to show you that even a Level 1 risk can sometimes surprise you. And there's no question this was a tornado that sort of came out of nowhere, and the conditions that pulled it together happened very, very quickly over the course of less than 10s of minutes. More in the neighborhood of minutes or two minutes that it started to come together.' Then, three days later, came another tornado-warned storm without a watch, marking two such instances over four days. Higgins dove deeper into what happened with Saturday's tornado during a FOX 2 Weather Extra digital stream on Monday. He explained that Saturday's storm developed from a weak surface low-pressure system moving from Kansas into Missouri. While it wasn't especially strong in terms of pressure or wind speed, it had enough low-level spin and wind shear to support rotating storms. That included mini-supercells, small, but potent thunderstorms capable of producing tornadoes. The biggest reason a tornado watch wasn't issued? A discrepancy between local and national forecasting centers. According to Higgins, the local National Weather Service office flagged concerns about possible tornado development well in advance and pushed for greater attention. However, the Storm Prediction Center, the national office responsible for issuing tornado watches, scaled back the outlined risk area the morning of the event and chose not issue a watch. As the storms developed Saturday evening, meteorologists closely tracked rotation on radar, a key indicator of tornadic potential. Higgins said early radar scans showed some rotation, but not enough to immediately justify a severe weather alert. 'The National Weather Service at this point is aware that most of these storms are rotating, and I'd venture to say [before 7 p.m. Saturday], they're starting to draw up a possible tornado warning, but there's still the the rotation in the wind field here is still not supportive of a tornado,' Higgins said on Weather Extra. 'It's not overly alarming, but it's certainly enough that it's getting attention. But I would not be issuing a warning. If you issued a warning for either one of those cells all the time, you'd have hundreds of warnings and very few actual touchdowns. We're conscious of the fact that we want the weather service warnings to matter. They don't want them to issue and cry wolf because otherwise folks will not heed the warning.' Higgins added that the tornado warning came about nine minutes before the actual touchdown, which is considered an adequate amount of lead time for sudden warnings. FOX 2 also reached out to the National Weather Service for comment. Kevin Deitsch, a warning coordination meteorologist at the National Weather Service, answered five specific questions with the following remarks: : Is it generally standard practice to issue a tornado watch before a tornado warning if there is any possibility of tornado threats for a particular day? : 'Tornado Watches are issued in cases where conditions are becoming favorable for tornadoes over fairly broad areas. In these cases, the atmospheric conditions to produce tornadoes were marginal and very localized, therefore we did not feel a Tornado Watch over a broad area was necessary.' What factor influence a decision to issue a tornado watch versus waiting on that and instead issuing a tornado warning without a watch? 'We look at the atmospheric ingredients conducive for tornadoes and how we expect storms to evolve as factors that go into issuing a Tornado Watch. The main reasons we did not issue a Tornado Watch on these two days were that the atmospheric conditions were only marginally supportive of tornadoes, and we did not deem it to be a widespread threat.' Were there any specific challenges or uncertainties in forecasting last Wednesday or Saturday that affected why a watch was not issued? 'Marginal setups like that are challenging. You run the risk of issuing a Tornado Watch for millions of people, to have no tornadoes occur at all. Or in these cases, we didn't issue a Watch, but a couple brief, weak tornadoes did develop. The tornado in Chesterfield on Wednesday was about as isolated as they come, with it being the only tornado within about 1,000 miles of St. Louis.' How is the National Weather Service looking to communicate with news agencies of the general public in cases where a storm may become tornado-warned without a tornado watch? 'We are constantly communicating to the TV meteorologists and public safety officials through our internal chat system. On each of those days, we gave a heads up that some of these storms were growing more capable of producing tornadoes, and we gave them a heads up on Tornado Warnings coming before they were officially issued. We also create weather packets for severe weather threats each day, which can be found at this link where we expect any threat of severe weather. These packets did highlight the low end threat of severe weather on those dates.' Is there anything that could be different in the future with forecasting tornado threats after two severe storms that suddenly end up tornado-warned last week? Dietsch: 'There is often a very low chance for tornadoes, but due to those low chances, tornadoes rarely materialize. If we were to issue tornado watches when there was any possibility of a tornado, we would have several dozen watches a year where no tornado develops. Instead, Tornado Watches are issued in cases where conditions are becoming favorable for tornadoes over fairly broad areas. In the recent cases [June 4 and June 7], the atmospheric conditions to produce tornadoes were marginal and very localized, therefore we did not feel a Tornado Watch over a broad area was necessary. The important piece is to take warnings seriously. Both of these tornadoes were warned in advance, thus as soon as folks get the warning, they should go to their safe space to shelter from the possible tornado.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elevated fire danger in Oregon amid thunderstorm and wind threat
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Parts of Oregon will see elevated wildfire danger today as thunderstorms and gusty winds develop this afternoon. The National Weather Service has issued a Red Flag Warning through 8 p.m. Tuesday for wind and low relative humidity in Washington's Kittitas Valley and Lower Columbia Basin of Washington. The Columbia River Gorge will see winds gusting up to 30 mph with relative humidity as low as 10 percent in the region. Due to the abundant dry fuels, any fires that start may spread rapidly. Scattered thunderstorms are also expected to develop throughout the hotter afternoon hours, both Tuesday and Wednesday, around central and southeastern Oregon. While some storms may bring heavy downpours, dry lightning will bring the risk of new wildfire starts. Temperatures remain hot through Wednesday with high temps in the 80s and 90s, further drying out burn fuels in the region. A cooler pattern arrives later in the week. However, little to no rainfall is likely across much of the state for at least the next week. Folks are urged to use extreme caution and avoid outdoor burning, especially during Red Flag Warnings and other fire alerts. Stay with the KOIN 6 Weather Team for your forecast and fire weather updates throughout fire season. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
