Gaps in Wales' Covid response, says committee
There were gaps in Wales' response to the Covid pandemic, a Senedd committee has said.
The cross-party committee said it identified nine gaps in the UK-wide Covid inquiry which require further examination into how the Welsh government and other public bodies responded.
From the findings, the committee wants to look into how the best resilience and preparedness model for Wales can be designed.
The report will be debated in the Senedd next month, when MSs will be asked to approve a further inquiry.
First Covid inquiry report to show UK plan failures
Covid families want lessons learned from pandemic
Bereaved families call for Wales-only Covid inquiry
It is the first report from the Covid-19 Inquiry Special Purpose Committee since it was set up in May 2023, with the remit to find gaps in the ongoing Covid inquiry that need to be examined in more detail in Wales.
The initial UK Covid inquiry report was published last July and the Welsh government gave its response in January.
While the Senedd committee took that response into consideration, it has gathered evidence to establish if there were any gaps, and engaged experts from Nottingham Trent University to assist.
The gaps are:
To review the most effective resilience and preparedness model for Wales
To learn how civil contingency roles can be clarified and accountability improved
Review the ways data access and sharing occurred
Consider the effectiveness of communication of policy and guidance to the public
Look at civil contingencies across borders, where responsibilities are shared, unclear or complex
Review how leading resilience processes can be shared in Wales
Review how societal inequalities could be incorporated into the preparedness and resilience structures
Review the benefits of a Wales-specific approach to strengthen resilience systems
Consider the best way for Wales implement the UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 report recommendations
Co-chairs of the special purpose committee, Tom Giffard MS and Joyce Watson MS, said the pandemic was a "painful and traumatic experience for many in Wales".
In a statement, they said: "We are extremely grateful for the insights and experiences shared by everyone who assisted us with our work, including our public consultation and stakeholder event.
"We have detailed our conclusions and highlighted each area we believe requires further examination."
The Senedd will be asked approve this further inquiry on 2 April.
If agreed, the committee will then begin work on Wales-specific scrutiny beyond the hearings already done by the UK-wide Inquiry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
A historian of fascism is asked whether this was week was a turning point
Do you remember that day in March 2020 — five years and several eternities ago — when Tom Hanks tested positive for COVID-19, the NBA announced they were suspending their season and profound upheaval suddenly seemed inevitable? I've felt echoes of that feeling the past few days, as downtown businesses boarded up their windows and the facts on the ground grew ever more fantastical. Are we at the edge of some irreparable rupture in American democracy? Or is this just another strange and absurd chapter in a long series of them? On Sunday, the president sent federalized National Guard troops into a city against the will of the state's governor for the first time in 60 years. On Thursday, California's senior senator was tackled to the ground by federal agents and handcuffed at a news conference. Hundreds of active duty Marines were sent into the Los Angeles area, where for days they appeared to be performing heavily armed training exercises on what looked like a high school sports field. (A looming scoreboard, palm trees and jacaranda blooms were all visible behind their riot shields, according to a social media post from the U.S. Northern Command.) The president and the governor are having a momentous fight about constitutional rights in the courts, and flaming each other with insults and photoshopped memes on Truth Social and X. The ICE raids have thrown some Angelenos into a state of fear and virtual hiding. But for many others, ordinary life continues apace. Mayor Karen Bass has repeatedly cautioned that L.A. is being treated like 'a grand experiment' — a testing ground for President Trump to see if he can usurp the authority of Democratic mayors or governors in other states. Warning signs of democratic breakdown have been pointed out by scholars and Trump's critics since he took office for his first term in 2017 — so much so that many have grown numb to them. Has this week been any different? I called Federico Finchelstein, a historian of fascism and dictatorships who chairs the history department at the New School for Social Research in New York, to ask whether he saw this week as a turning point for the country. Finchelstein characterized Trump's federalizing of the California National Guard as a clear turn toward authoritarianism. He cited the move, along with attacks on the press and the judiciary and the manhandling of Sen. Alex Padilla on Thursday, as assaults on democratic norms that 'create the conditions for a further erosion of democracy.' But he hesitated about categorizing recent events as a turning point. It's hard while living in the middle of history to know precisely where you stand, he explained. 'It's very difficult to know what is the exact outcome of this sort of militarization of politics,' Finchelstein said. 'What we know is that democracy is at the other end, and this path is towards either disabling, denigrating or even destroying democracy. It's hard to know where it ends.' The outcome would also depend on more than Trump's next move, according to the historian. History has shown that when anti-democratic attempts are met with institutional and public resistance, they are less likely to succeed, Finchelstein said. 'In other words, this is not the end of the story,' he told me. A selection of the very best reads from The Times' 143-year archive. Have a great weekend, from the Essential California team Julia Wick, staff writerKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editor How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The reasons aren't fully clear, but overdose deaths are down in Kern, US
Overdose deaths, specifically from opioids, are on the decline across the nation and data from the Kern County Coroner's Office shows local deaths are down as well. According to KCSO, there were 189 fentanyl-related overdose deaths in Kern County in 2024, down from 297 in 2023, a roughly 36% decline. The decline is part of a broader trend nationally. Opioid overdose deaths declined sharply from 2023-2024, according to provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC, 48 states and the District of Columbia all saw decreases in overdose deaths from December 2023 to 2024, a 26% decrease nationwide. California's reported overdose deaths dropped by 24%, the most of any West Coast state. Only Nevada and South Dakota saw an increase in overdose deaths, both by less than 4%. It's not entirely clear what's driving the decline, and experts are pointing to a range of factors. "Over the past, I'd say this calendar year, we have seen an increase in the people who are coming into our treatment system," said Ana Olvera, an administrator with Kern Behavioral Health and Recovery Services. "More people have accessed our treatment system than in years past, even coming out of COVID, which is a good sign for us," Olvera said. The increased availability of treatment programs and the overdose reversal drug naloxone were likely contributors to the decrease, she said, as well as reduced stigma about seeking treatment. Olvera also pointed to the passage of Proposition 36, which increased penalties for certain crimes. "Just from that — working with the courts and people who are eligible for this program that have a treatment-mandated felony — we have seen an increase of folks who are eligible and who come into our system of care," Olvera said. BHRS and other health care providers have increased their treatment options, Olvera said. The county's 24-hour substances-use-disorder hotline, which helps connect people with treatment, has seen higher call volume over the years, she said. "The call center is how most people access treatment in our substance use system," Olvera said. The average number of calls has increased from 908 in the 2018-2019 fiscal year to 1,272 in 2023-2024. From July 2024 to April of this year, there were 1,061 calls. There's no doubt overdose deaths are dropping, but exactly why is still a matter of conjecture. The Opioid Data Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill tracks information related to opioids and its researchers have said there's no single explanation for such a steep, nationwide decline in overdose deaths. "Ascribing a single national explanation for the drop in overdoses is not grounded in data," the lab said in a February analysis. Even with the large decline in deaths, the mortality rate from drug overdoses remains high, with most states still recording death rates higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from the CDC and the California Department of Public Health shows overdose deaths peaking in 2023 before dropping sharply in 2024. According to CDPH, Kern County's opioid-related overdose deaths reached an all-time high of 321 in 2023. That was up from 308 in 2022 and 274 in 2021. As of April 30, Kern had seen 50 fentanyl-related deaths so far this year, according to KCSO.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr.'s HHS Shakeup Spares Dr. Plescia, Backer Of Vaccine Credentials
Despite firing every member of the federal vaccine advisory committee, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has retained one key figure with a radically pro-passport past. Kennedy, who recently disbanded the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), kept Dr. Marcus Plescia in a top post at HHS as Deputy Assistant Secretary and Director of the Office of Science and Medicine. Plescia's past comments in favor of vaccine passports place him well to the left of even the Biden White House's stance during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, Plescia — then serving as chief medical officer for the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials — told The New York Times that vaccine passport credentials were 'going to be necessary,' calling it 'perplexing' that the federal government was keeping its distance from such a proposal. His remarks came even as White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki assured reporters that 'there will be no federal vaccinations database and no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential.' Plescia's position, made public at the time through The New York Times' reporting, stood in contrast not only to Biden's hesitancy but also to an ongoing wave of state-level opposition. Governors from Texas, Florida, and Mississippi issued orders banning or opposing any form of vaccine credentialing, arguing it violated basic liberties and privacy. Kennedy's implicit decision to retain contrasts with his other decisions. On June 9, the new health secretary made headlines for his sweeping removal of the 17-member ACIP panel, citing what he called a 'crisis of public trust' caused by conflicts of interest and pharmaceutical industry influence. 'The committee has become… little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine. It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.' Kennedy wrote in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, adding that many members had received 'substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies.' But the retention of Plescia — whose support for vaccine passports predates the Biden administration's relatively more cautious approach — raises questions. Plescia's 2021 endorsement of vaccine credentials aligned more with European-style digital health passes and apps like those trialed by Cathay Pacific Airlines and implemented by companies such as Walmart. 'There is going to have to be some kind of system where [vaccination status] is verified,' he said, arguing it was the only way to safely reopen businesses and restore public trust. The White House was unwilling to go that far at the time, concerned about the ethical implications and civil liberties involved. Instead, Psaki emphasized the government's position that any such system should 'meet key standards, including accessibility, affordability and privacy,' but would ultimately be left to the private sector. President Biden never fully implemented a vaccine passport system, but he did issue an executive order requiring nearly every private sector employee to get the COVID shot, which in turn prompted companies to create systems of verification for employees and customers. RFK Jr., a longtime COVID vaccine critic, ran a presidential campaign and later accepted his appointment to HHS on promises to dismantle what he called medical 'fascism.' His decision to purge the ACIP panel came after immense pressure from MAHA allies, including Dr. Mary Talley Bowden of Houston, who slammed the secretary for not taking more aggressive policy action to date, The Dallas Express reported. Kennedy's shakeup alarmed some congressional figures. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), a physician, said, 'Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion. I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.' Kennedy was contacted for comment in the production of this story, but he did not respond. A spokesman for HHS did not immediately respond. Plescia's HHS bio describes his duties as follows: 'He advises the Assistant Secretary and OASH leadership across scientific and medical issues covering the full suite of public health priorities. He oversees staff and program work focused on state and federal health systems, infection-associated chronic conditions, vector borne disease, data-driven decision making and healthcare innovation.' The bio qualifies him for the job by saying, '[He] has widespread experience in medicine and public health. He is Board Certified in Family Medicine and practiced for over 20 years in a variety of settings serving homeless, urban poor and rural underserved populations.'