US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say
Satellite image over Fordow, before the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025. 2025 Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS/File Photo
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment has determined that U.S. strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's program by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.
The initial report was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters.
The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking U.S. officials - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear program.
Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Hegseth on Sunday said that the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been "completely and fully obliterated."
Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. did not know the extent of the damage yet.
Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed.
One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear program may have been set back only a month or two.
The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear program was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists.
"Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons," Hegseth said in a statement provided to Reuters.
"Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target—and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission."
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
But in a statement to CNN, which first reported the intelligence assessment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the conclusion was incorrect.
"This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong," Leavitt said, according to CNN.
"Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."
Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different U.S. intelligence agencies.
Democrats have previously said Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence.
"There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed," House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday.
Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were canceled on Tuesday.
(Reporting by Jonathan Landay and Idrees Ali in Washington and Gram Slattery in The Hague; Additional reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Don Durfee and Cynthia Osterman)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
44 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Trump shakes Nato with defence ultimatum, dodges commitment to protect Europe
THE HAGUE, June 25 — US President Donald Trump swept into Nato's Hague summit Tuesday, with allies hoping a pledge to ramp up defence spending will keep the mercurial leader of the military superpower committed to protecting them. Trump joined leaders from Nato's 31 other members to kick off the two-day gathering with a dinner hosted by Dutch King Willem-Alexander in the ornate Orange Hall at his royal residence. The alliance hopes to keep Trump bound to its mutual defence vow by meeting his demand for a headline figure of five percent of GDP on defence spending. But Trump refused to say he was committed to Nato's Article Five clause and protecting Europe in comments that will likely rattle his counterparts on the continent. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists aboard Air Force One. 'I'm committed to being their friend.' To keep Trump on board, Nato members have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5 per cent to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. Nato says the military build-up is crucial to deter Russia, which officials warn is rapidly rebuilding its forces depleted by the war in Ukraine and could be ready to attack the alliance in five years. But it is just as important for keeping Trump engaged as Washington warns it may shift forces from Europe to face the threat from China. 'They're going to be lifting it to five percent, that's good,' Trump said. 'It gives them much more power.' But while the promise of more spending could win Trump over, deep divisions remain over the approach to Europe's key security issue: Russia's war in Ukraine. Trump said he would probably meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky while in The Hague, with Kyiv hoping it can avoid a repeat of the pair's infamous Oval Office bust-up. 'Radical uncertainty' European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen told an audience in The Hague that Nato's 'historic' spending pledge showed that 'the Europe of defence has finally awakened'. Alliance leaders meanwhile — many of whom are struggling to find the money that will be required — lined up to argue that the threats facing the continent required bold steps. 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility,' British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in announcing the UK's commitment to meet the target. Starmer on Wednesday will formally announce that his country is buying a dozen F-35A fighters, capable of carrying atomic weapons to support Nato's nuclear mission. The purchase marks an expansion of Britain's nuclear deterrence, which is currently limited to submarine-launched missiles. A statement late Tuesday from Starmer's office quoted Rutte as saying: 'I strongly welcome today's announcement,' calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to Nato'. Separately, powerhouse Germany announced plans to hit the 3.5-per cent figure for core defence needs by 2029 — six years before the timeline. At the other end of the scale, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has risked Trump's ire by insisting his country doesn't have to meet the five percent target. For its part, the Kremlin attacked Nato for its 'rampant militarisation', with spokesman Dmitry Peskov saying: 'This is the reality that surrounds us.' Trump-Zelensky meeting Since storming back to power, Trump has upended the West's approach to the three-year conflict by turning his back on Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. Zelensky was set to play less of a central role than at recent Nato gatherings and will not attend the main working session. But Ukraine's president said he would discuss with Trump buying a package of weapons made up mainly of air defences. Zelensky would also push Trump on imposing new sanctions on Russia as Moscow has stalled peace efforts being pressed by Washington, Kyiv said. 'There are no signs that Putin wants to stop this war. Russia rejects all peace proposals including those from the US. Putin only thinks about war,' the Ukrainian leader told a defence forum held alongside the summit. Trump did briefly meet on the sidelines of the summit late Tuesday with Turkiye's Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who urged 'close dialogue' to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Rutte said allies would send the message that support for Kyiv was 'unwavering and will persist'. But despite his insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains 'irreversible', Nato will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. — AFP
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Pahang ready to repatriate students from Jordan if conflict escalates
BENTONG: The Pahang government is prepared to repatriate 232 students currently studying in Jordan should the conflict in West Asia escalate. Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail said the state would take all necessary measures, including arranging special flights, and is closely monitoring updates from Wisma Putra and the Malaysian Embassy in Amman. "We are ready to provide assistance to Pahang students, especially those in Jordan, should the situation in West Asia deteriorate. We will continue to monitor official updates from the Foreign Affairs Ministry and Wisma Putra, as well as seek advice on the situation from the Malaysian Embassy in Amman, Jordan," he was quoted by Sinar Harian. On June 23, the Malaysian Embassy in Jordan confirmed that all Malaysian citizens are safe. A 12-day direct conflict erupted on June 13, 2025, when Israel launched surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks on Israeli targets, prompting a ceasefire brokered on June 23 and enforced the following day — though early violations by both sides have left the truce fragile.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Kenyans brace for protests one year after storming parliament
Pro-government counter-protesters and riot police officers disperse people protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya/File Photo NAIROBI (Reuters) -Kenyans are expected to take to the streets in large numbers on Wednesday to mark the one-year anniversary of anti-government protests that culminated in the storming of parliament and several deaths as police opened fire on demonstrators. Although the protests eventually faded after President William Ruto withdrew proposed tax hikes that had initially sparked the rallies, public anger over the use of force by security agencies has not abated, with fresh demonstrations erupting this month over the death of a blogger in police custody. Six people, including three police officers, were charged with murder on Tuesday over the killing of 31-year-old blogger and teacher, Albert Ojwang. All have pleaded not guilty. The death of Ojwang has become a lightning rod for Kenyans still mourning the deaths of more than 60 people killed during last year's demonstrations and blaming security forces for the fatalities and dozens of unexplained abductions. Police sources told Reuters that a heavy security presence would be deployed around downtown Nairobi, particularly near the presidency, parliament and the central business district. The interior ministry in a post on X on Tuesday warned protesters not to "provoke police" or "attempt to breach protected areas". The unprecedented scenes on June 25, 2024, showing police firing at demonstrators as they broke through barriers to enter parliament, created the biggest crisis of Ruto's presidency and sparked alarm among Kenya's international allies. On Tuesday, the embassies of the United States, Britain, Canada, and other Western nations released a joint statement on X urging all involved to "facilitate peaceful demonstrations and to refrain from violence." "The use of plain clothed officers in unmarked vehicles erodes public trust," the statement said. Rights campaigners condemned the presence of unidentified police officers at protests last year. The embassies also said they were troubled by the use of hired "goons" to disrupt peaceful demonstrations, after Reuters reporters saw groups of men beating protesters with sticks and whips last week. The counter-protesters have defended their actions, telling Reuters that they are not goons but rather patriots protecting property from looters. Two police officers were arrested last week over the shooting of an unarmed civilian during a protest in Nairobi over the death of Ojwang, the blogger. Kenya's police chief initially implied that Ojwang had died by suicide but later apologised after an autopsy found that his wounds pointed to assault as the cause of death. President Ruto said that Ojwang had died "at the hands of the police", which he said was "heartbreaking and unacceptable". (Reporting by Nairobi newsroom; Writing by Ammu Kannampilly; Editing by Alexandra Hudson)
