logo
Mark Clifton: How consolidating mosquito control in Cook County would backfire

Mark Clifton: How consolidating mosquito control in Cook County would backfire

Chicago Tribune17-04-2025

Consolidation advocates such as the Better Government Association and the Civic Federation are taking a dangerous gamble with public health in Cook County — and it's the residents who stand to lose. Critics of Illinois' special-purpose districts argue that mosquito abatement districts (MADs), despite their essential role, are an anachronism. They claim that folding MAD responsibilities into municipal or county government would save money, improve efficiency and increase accountability. But these promises lack any evidence at all — and the risks are higher than most people realize. In fact, consolidating MADs could undermine public health at the worst possible time.
First and foremost, climate change is amplifying the threat posed by mosquitoes and other disease-carrying pests. Rising temperatures are expanding the ranges and seasons of vectors such as mosquitoes, ticks and rodents — along with the diseases they carry. The Chicago region is already a hot spot for the West Nile virus, and climate change will intensify the danger. Without sustained and proactive control, more people will become ill from vector-borne diseases than we've seen in generations. This isn't alarmism — it's the consensus of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Global Change Research Program.
Cook County's MADs are preparing for that future. Last year, the state legislature passed Public Act 103-0932, expanding MAD authority to address emerging threats from ticks and rats as well as mosquitoes. Far from being outdated, MADs are evolving to meet the moment. Consolidation advocates rarely acknowledge this progress, the dire prognosis for the future or the increased risk residents would face if these specialized agencies were weakened or dismantled.
There's also a troubling disconnect between consolidation advocates and the actual work of mosquito control. Many proponents of consolidation seem to have little understanding of what MADs do — or little interest in learning. Before pushing for drastic structural changes, it's critical to engage with the people who deliver these services every day. MADs are transparent, cost-effective and accountable to local taxpayers. Reorganizing them without due diligence undercuts the credibility of those calling for reform.
More importantly, health departments, cities and counties all have a poor track record of managing mosquito control programs. A 2023 report by the National Association of County and City Health Officials found that 89% of local health departments and 90% of city and county mosquito programs 'needed improvement.' In contrast, just 38% of mosquito abatement districts nationwide were flagged for improvement. MADs were six times more likely to be 'fully capable' than other governments. NACCHO's conclusion was clear: We may need more MADs, not fewer.
Real-world failures make the risks of consolidation clear. In 2012, Dallas County, Texas' under-resourced program failed to stop a West Nile virus outbreak that sickened nearly 1,000 people in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and killed almost 20. In 2016, the overwhelmed mosquito control system in Miami-Dade County, Florida, struggled to contain Zika, leading to $30 million in emergency response costs. That wake-up call prompted a major investment — Miami-Dade now spends $14 million annually on mosquito control, 86% more per capita than suburban Cook County.
In 2021, Maricopa County, Arizona, faced one of the largest West Nile virus outbreaks in U.S. history, with more than 100 deaths and over 1,500 becoming seriously ill. In each case, mosquito control programs embedded within county or health department structures failed to prevent disaster. And if you think it can't happen here, think again. In 1975 and 2002, the Chicago region experienced deadly mosquito-borne disease outbreaks that resulted in dozens of fatalities. History shows what happens when mosquito control is underfunded, underprepared or ignored.
There are also serious environmental risks to consider. MADs provide expert-led, comprehensive and ecologically informed services that balance public health needs with environmental protection. In contrast, under-resourced or substandard county programs leave gaps that push residents toward fragmented, do-it-yourself efforts using over-the-counter pesticides. This every-household-for-itself approach can significantly increase pesticide use, harming pollinators and increasing overall pesticide load on the environment. Illinois is home to endangered species such as the monarch butterfly and the rusty patched bumblebee — both of which are vulnerable to uncoordinated, excessive or indiscriminate pesticide applications. A balanced, communitywide strategy remains the most effective way to protect public health while preserving local ecosystems.
Finally, consider the timing. Earlier this year, the federal government blocked more than $400 million in current and future CDC grants to the Illinois Department of Public Health. These funds help support mosquito disease surveillance, especially in areas without a MAD. If mosquito control had been consolidated under the county government, as consolidation advocates suggest, many communities would now be facing serious gaps in protection. In fact, many communities outside of Cook County are going to face serious gaps in protection because of this funding hole. However, residents in MAD-covered areas remain protected, thanks to local funding that doesn't fluctuate with state or federal budgets. And this example is exactly why MADs exist: to provide consistent, reliable protection now and in the future.
Yes, Illinois may have an abundance of local government units. But targeting MADs as an example for consolidation is misguided. These districts are necessary, effective and critical to public health in an era of accelerating climate change and emerging disease threats. MADs save lives and not just money.
If the goal is to streamline local government, there are plenty of other places to start. But rolling the dice on mosquito control is a gamble we can't afford to take.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?
We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we?

They buzz, they bite, and they cause some of the deadliest diseases known to humanity. Mosquitoes are perhaps the planet's most universally reviled animals. If we could zap them off the face of the Earth, should we? Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The question is no longer hypothetical. In recent years, scientists have devised powerful genetic tools that may be able to eradicate mosquitoes and other pests once and for all. Now, some doctors and scientists say it is time to take the extraordinary step of unleashing gene editing to suppress mosquitoes and avoid human suffering from malaria, dengue, West Nile virus and other serious diseases. 'There are so many lives at stake with malaria that we want to make sure that this technology could be used in the near future,' said Alekos Simoni, a molecular biologist with Target Malaria, a project aiming to target vector mosquitoes in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet the development of this technology also raises a profound ethical question: When, if ever, is it okay to intentionally drive a species out of existence? Even the famed naturalist E.O. Wilson once said: 'I would gladly throw the switch and be the executioner myself' for malaria-carrying mosquitoes. But some researchers and ethicists warn it may be too dangerous to tinker with the underpinnings of life itself. Even irritating, itty-bitty mosquitoes, they say, may have enough inherent value to keep around. - - - How to exterminate mosquitoes Target Malaria is one of the most ambitious mosquito suppression efforts in the works. Simoni and his colleagues are seeking to diminish populations of mosquitoes in the Anopheles gambiae complex that are responsible for spreading the deadly disease. In their labs, the scientists have introduced a gene mutation that causes female mosquito offspring to hatch without functional ovaries, rendering them infertile. Male mosquito offspring can carry the gene but remain physically unaffected. The concept is that when female mosquitoes inherit the gene from both their mother and father, they will go on to die without producing offspring. Meanwhile, when males and females carrying just one copy of the gene mate with wild mosquitoes, they will spread the gene further until no fertile females are left - and the population crashes. Simoni said he hopes Target Malaria can move beyond the lab and deploy some of the genetically modified mosquitoes in their natural habitats within the next five years. The nonprofit research consortium gets its core funding from the Gates Foundation, backed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and Open Philanthropy, backed by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife, Cari Tuna. 'We believe that this technology can really be transformative,' Simoni said. At the heart of Target Malaria's work is a powerful genetic tool called a gene drive. Under the normal rules of inheritance, a parent has a 50-50 chance of passing a particular gene on to an offspring. But by adding special genetic machinery - dubbed a gene drive - to segments of DNA, scientists can rig the coin flip and ensure a gene is included in an animal's eggs and sperm, nearly guaranteeing it will be passed along. Over successive generations, gene drives can cause a trait to spread across an entire species's population, even if that gene doesn't benefit the organism. In that way, gene drives do something remarkable: They allow humans to override Charles Darwin's rules for natural selection, which normally prods populations of plants and animals to adapt to their environment over time. 'Technology is presenting new options to us,' said Christopher Preston, a University of Montana environmental philosopher. 'We might've been able to make a species go extinct 150 years ago by harpooning it too much or shooting it out of the sky. But today, we have different options, and extinction could be completed or could be started in a lab.' - - - How far should we go in eradicating mosquitoes? When so many wildlife conservationists are trying to save plants and animals from disappearing, the mosquito is one of the few creatures that people argue is actually worthy of extinction. Forget about tigers or bears; it's the tiny mosquito that is the deadliest animal on Earth. The human misery caused by malaria is undeniable. Nearly 600,000 people died of the disease in 2023, according to the World Health Organization, with the majority of cases in Africa. On the continent, the death toll is akin to 'crashing two Boeing 747s into Kilimanjaro' every day, said Paul Ndebele, a bioethicist at George Washington University. For gene-drive advocates, making the case for releasing genetically modified mosquitoes in nations such as Burkina Faso or Uganda is straightforward. 'This is not a difficult audience, because these are people that are living in an area where children are dying,' said Krystal Birungi, an entomologist for Target Malaria in Uganda, though she added that she sometimes has to fight misinformation, such as the false idea that bites from genetically modified mosquitoes can make people sterile. But recently, the Hastings Center for Bioethics, a research institute in New York, and Arizona State University brought together a group of bioethicists to discuss the potential pitfalls of intentionally trying to drive a species to extinction. In a policy paper published in the journal Science last month, the group concluded that 'deliberate full extinction might occasionally be acceptable, but only extremely rarely.' A compelling candidate for total eradication, according to the bioethicists, is the New World screwworm. This parasitic fly, which lays eggs in wounds and eats the flesh of both humans and livestock, appears to play little role in ecosystems. Infections are difficult to treat and can lead to slow and painful deaths. Yet it may be too risky, they say, to use gene drives on invasive rodents on remote Pacific islands where they decimate native birds, given the nonzero chance of a gene-edited rat or mouse jumping ship to the mainland and spreading across a continent. 'Even at a microbial level, it became plain in our conversations, we are not in favor of remaking the world to suit human desires,' said Gregory Kaebnick, a senior research scholar at the institute. It's unclear how important malaria-carrying mosquitoes are to broader ecosystems. Little research has been done to figure out whether frogs or other animals that eat the insects would be able to find their meals elsewhere. Scientists are hotly debating whether a broader 'insect apocalypse' is underway in many parts of the world, which may imperil other creatures that depend on them for food and pollination. 'The eradication of the mosquito through a genetic technology would have the potential to create global eradication in a way that just felt a little risky,' said Preston, who contributed with Ndebele to the discussion published in Science. Instead, the authors said, geneticists should be able to use gene editing, vaccines and other tools to target not the mosquito itself, but the single-celled Plasmodium parasite that is responsible for malaria. That invisible microorganism - which a mosquito transfers from its saliva to a person's blood when it bites - is the real culprit. 'You can get rid of malaria without actually getting rid of the mosquito,' Kaebnick said. He added that, at a time when the Trump administration talks cavalierly about animals going extinct, intentional extinction should be an option for only 'particularly horrific species.' But Ndebele, who is from Zimbabwe, noted that most of the people opposed to the elimination of the mosquitoes 'are not based in Africa.' Ndebele has intimate experience with malaria; he once had to rush his sick son to a hospital after the disease manifested as a hallucinatory episode. 'We're just in panic mode,' he recalled. 'You can just imagine - we're not sure what's happening with this young guy.' Still, Ndebele and his colleagues expressed caution about using gene-drive technology. Even if people were to agree to rid the globe of every mosquito - not just Anopheles gambiae but also ones that transmit other diseases or merely bite and irritate - it would be a 'herculean undertaking,' according to Kaebnick. There are more than 3,500 known species, each potentially requiring its own specially designed gene drive. And there is no guarantee a gene drive would wipe out a population as intended. Simoni, the gene-drive researcher, agreed that there are limits to what the technology can do. His team's modeling suggests it would suppress malaria-carrying mosquitoes only locally without outright eliminating them. Mosquitoes have been 'around for hundreds of millions of years,' he said. 'It's a very difficult species to eliminate.' Related Content Donald Trump and the art of the Oval Office confrontation Some advice from LGBTQ elders as WorldPride kicks off amid fears Black Democrats fume over 2024 while 'searching for a leader' in 2028

Why Mosquitoes Are Getting More Dangerous—And What You Can Do About It
Why Mosquitoes Are Getting More Dangerous—And What You Can Do About It

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Why Mosquitoes Are Getting More Dangerous—And What You Can Do About It

Texas officials are warning residents to brace themselves—not for hurricanes or heatwaves, but for something far smaller and deadlier: mosquitoes. Thanks to recent storms and rising global temperatures, health officials say mosquito season is arriving early, lasting longer, and becoming far more dangerous, according to the Austin American-Statesman. Experts are sounding the alarm as conditions across the South, from Texas to Florida, create a perfect breeding ground for the so-called deadliest animal on the planet. 'Mosquito seasons are running longer than before,' said Marcel Elizondo, head of Austin's Environmental Health Services division. 'We're seeing more standing water, more heat, and more ideal conditions for mosquito reproduction.' That's bad news when you consider what mosquitoes actually bring with them. According to the American Mosquito Control Association, mosquitoes kill over 1 million people a year worldwide, not directly, but by spreading devastating diseases like malaria, dengue, Zika, and West Nile. Malaria alone is responsible for more than 600,000 preventable deaths annually, and U.S. cases of West Nile and Zika are climbing in southern states. "Mosquitoes are the deadliest animals on the planet," Bethany Bolling, who leads virus testing for the Texas Department of State Health Services, told KAXN. Climate change is supercharging the threat. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, warmer temperatures speed up mosquito lifecycles, increase biting rates, and accelerate the disease incubation process inside the insect. Add in flooding and standing water from spring storms, and you've got a perfect storm. What can you do? Public health officials recommend draining standing water from gutters, buckets, and flower pots, fixing leaks, and treating ponds with mosquito dunks. If you're hiking or camping, DEET-based repellents and full-coverage clothing are your best bet. This isn't just about comfort. It's about stopping a silent killer from getting louder and protecting your health while enjoying the Mosquitoes Are Getting More Dangerous—And What You Can Do About It first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 5, 2025

Health officials sound alarm as 'deadliest animal on the planet' spreads across southern US — here's what you need to know
Health officials sound alarm as 'deadliest animal on the planet' spreads across southern US — here's what you need to know

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Health officials sound alarm as 'deadliest animal on the planet' spreads across southern US — here's what you need to know

Officials in Texas have sounded the alarm after recent storms left prime breeding conditions just in time for peak mosquito season, the Austin American-Statesman reported. Local experts are particularly concerned about the spread of mosquito-borne diseases like West Nile and Zika. Already facing an uphill battle as rising global temperatures expand peak mosquito season beyond its traditional dates, Texas officials in charge of managing mosquito populations now must combat high levels of standing water and hot, humid conditions perfect for mosquito reproduction, per the American-Statesman. "We've seen the weather changing over the years here in Austin, and as a result, we've seen mosquito seasons running longer than before," Marcel Elizondo, chief of Austin's Environmental Health Services division, said in a statement. Mosquitoes are an annoyance for some; for others, they can be deadly. According to the American Mosquito Control Association, over 1 million people around the world die every single year from mosquito-borne diseases. "Mosquitos are the deadliest animals on the planet," Bethany Bolling, who oversees mosquito virus testing at the Texas Department of State Health Services, told KXAN. Mosquitoes transmit disease through their bites, spreading deadly illnesses like malaria and dengue in addition to West Nile and Zika, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria alone is responsible for over 600,000 preventable deaths annually. Mosquitoes are a prime example of the negative impacts that rising global temperatures have on human health. In addition to hotter temperatures, changes in weather patterns are causing increased rainfall in certain areas, creating the perfect breeding grounds for mosquitoes, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Rising temperatures can influence the way mosquitoes spread disease in other ways, too. "Studies show that warmer temperatures associated with climate change can accelerate mosquito development, biting rates, and the incubation of the disease within a mosquito," according to the EPA. Do you worry about getting diseases from bug bites? Absolutely Only when I'm camping or hiking Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. While public health officials monitor mosquito populations and test breeding grounds for diseases like West Nile, there are several things that you can do to help protect yourself and your family. First, try to eliminate all standing water, as that is the primary breeding ground for mosquitoes. This includes places like clogged gutters, plant saucers, buckets, and toys, according to Austin Public Health. If you have bird baths or other outdoor water for animals, make sure to change it at least once a week to prevent mosquitoes from developing. Next, make sure to repair all leaky faucets and pipes, as these can provide sources of the moisture mosquitoes need to reproduce. Similarly, if you have a rainwater cistern, make sure it is properly sealed to prevent mosquitoes from entering. Finally, if you have permanent standing water on your property, such as a pond, you can purchase a mosquito dunk, which contains a biological larvicide that will kill young mosquitoes, per Austin Public Health. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store