logo
Active shooter fears at cheerleading competition turned a skirmish into a stampede

Active shooter fears at cheerleading competition turned a skirmish into a stampede

USA Today07-03-2025

Parents, children and spectators at a cheerleading competition in Dallas fled in a chaotic scene over the weekend as fears of a gunman set off a panic, with at least 10 injured trying to get away. But there was no shooter.
Police in Dallas said a fight that broke out between two people on Saturday set off the false alarm. Word that there was a shooter quickly spread at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center, which was evacuated while people were told to head to a family reunification center.
Attendees told local news outlets they ran because in the moment, they believed their lives were in danger.
"That was the scariest moment of my life that I thought, like, this was it," Ashley Ryan, a Tulsa resident whose daughters competed at the event, told KWTV-DT.
It's the latest active shooter false alarm in a nation constantly on-edge about the potential for the next mass shooting, said Kelly Sampson, senior policy counsel at the gun violence prevention group Brady.
"If you're in a big, crowded area, if you see one person panicking, you're going to panic too," she said. "It's not like it's unreasonable to think that someone would have a gun, because that's sort of the country and the culture that we've created."
How a skirmish turned into a stampede
Police responded to reports of an active shooter that came in starting at about 1 p.m., the Dallas Police Department said. After investigating, they found no shots had been fired, but that crowd had been startled by the sound of poles being knocked down in the fight. The fight was between parents, according to Brian Bianco, a spokesperson for Varsity Brands, which runs the National Cheerleaders Association All-Star Championship.
In the chaos, at least 10 people were injured and taken to local hospitals. Their conditions weren't life-threatening, and included a range of injuries from bumps and bruises to fractured extremities, Dallas Fire-Rescue Public Information Officer Jason Evans said in a statement to USA TODAY.
Video posted to social media showed dozens of children, some in cheerleading uniforms, and adults running from the convention center. Some fled to nearby businesses and buildings.
"Everybody was just screaming, 'active shooter,' so you don't at that moment, you know, try and make a judgment call: is it real or not?" Denise Cox told KHOU 11. "You just have to act."
Ryan, the Tulsa mom, told KWTV-DT she saw people fleeing in a panic. Some were hiding in cars or begging strangers to be let into their cars.
"It was so hysterical, like it was such a chaotic environment, that it felt like there's no way something crazy is not happening," she said.
One apartment building down the street, SoCo Urban Lofts, told its residents in an email that people fleeing the convention center came into the building through the garage and front lobby. Residents, who were warned to shelter in place, also opened an emergency exit to help people get shelter, an email viewed by USA TODAY said.
At a convenience store nearby, owner Amie Amogu told NBC 5 that about 40 people came in to seek safety. Employees welcomed them in and locked the doors, the outlet reported.
The people involved haven't yet been identified, but Bianco said once they are, they will be banned from future events.
On alert for potential gun violence
Sampson said Americans' reactions to gun violence has evolved as mass shootings have become more common in recent decades, at all kinds of public places from schools to churches to grocery stores.
It makes sense that people at a cheer competition would react with fear when they hear a fight and a loud crash, Sampson said. In the 90s, while she was growing up in a city, Sampson said it was common knowledge to "hit the deck" if you heard a loud noise like a car backfiring, in case it might be a gun firing. She said back then, gun violence was often written off as something impacting Black and brown people in inner cities.
"While it still has a disproportionate impact on Black people, it definitely has become more universal as an experience, or at least a fear," Sampson said. "There's not really a place in the United States that I think we feel immune from it."
Even though no shooter was present in this case, people really were injured, and that has an impact on people's sense of safety, Sampson said. She was at a protest against gun violence several years ago when a similar false alarm caused panic.
"We've seen this happen so many times. You don't have time to think and analyze whether that threat is there, you're just trying to survive," she said.
The events can have lasting impacts on communities, even when no shots are fired, experts say.
"This is a real phenomenon," Arthur Evans, CEO of the American Psychological Association, told USA TODAY in 2019 after a string of similar false alarms. "We don't have to go through these events directly. Simply hearing about them" can affect us in ways similar to those who directly experienced the incident.
Last year, a fight and a "popping sound" at Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom caused panic and rumors of a shooter that officials said was untrue. The noise is believed to have been a balloon popping, law enforcement later said.
In June 2019, fears of a mass shooting quickly spread through the crowd attending a Pride parade in Washington, D.C., which caused panic and a stampede as people fled in all directions. Calls of "shooter" were heard as some ducked into nearby businesses and apartment buildings for shelter. Police later said there was no gunfire, but someone was arrested while in possession of a firearm.
Across the country, schools have gone into lockdown and police have swarmed campuses after fake "swatting" calls reported active shootings or bomb threats. Swatting calls are deliberately false reports intended to prompt a mass law enforcement response such as a SWAT team.
"There's a sense of being on edge because we do see so many shootings, and there's no consistent pattern of what type of place a shooting can occur," Sampson said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Stanko, who killed 2 and raped his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter, is executed
Stephen Stanko, who killed 2 and raped his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter, is executed

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Stephen Stanko, who killed 2 and raped his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter, is executed

Stephen Stanko, who killed 2 and raped his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter, is executed While prosecutors painted Stanko as a cold, calculated psychopath at trial, his attorneys at the time argued that he was insane when he committed the rape and murders. Show Caption Hide Caption US expands execution methods Most death row inmates faced one execution method in modern history. Now, there are many alternative ways to die. South Carolina has executed a conman-turned-murderer convicted of killing two people and raping his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter. Stephen Stanko, 57, was executed by lethal injection on Friday, June 13, for the murder of 74-year-old Henry Lee Turner, a retired Air Force master sergeant and father of three. Stanko was sentenced to death separately for the murder of his 43-year-old girlfriend, whom USA TODAY is not naming to protect her daughter's privacy as a rape survivor. Stanko became the 23rd inmate put to death in the U.S. this year and the third in South Carolina. He was pronounced dead at 6:34 p.m. While prosecutors painted Stanko as a cold, calculated psychopath at trial, his attorneys at the time argued that he was insane when he committed the murders. His current lawyers argued that his life should have been spared because the execution methods in South Carolina amount to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution, an argument refuted by state officials and rejected by courts. Here's what you need to know about Stanko's execution. Stanko's execution just one of four this week Stanko's final breaths came during a busy week for the death penalty in the U.S., with four executions between Tuesday and Friday. Two were executed on the same day on June 10: Anthony Wainwright in Florida by lethal injection and Gregory Hunt in Alabama by nitrogen gas. Oklahoma executed John Hanson by lethal injection on Thursday, June 12. What did Stephen Stanko do? In the middle of the night on April 8, 2005, Stanko attacked his girlfriend's 15-year-old daughter as she slept in her bed at home in Murrells Inlet, an unincorporated seaside community just south of Myrtle Beach. The girl later sobbed and clutched a white teddy bear as she testified about the hours-long attack, according to coverage by the Sun-News. At some point, worried about her mother, the girl broke free and found her lying on the floor in another room. The girl testified that Stanko then hit her over the head and she blacked out. When she woke, he raped her again and then pinned her body to the bed with his knee while he strangled her mother in front of her. "I said, 'Please God, take me and not her,'" the girl testified as people in the courtroom cried, the Sun-News reported. "I fought hard but she stopped making noises, and that was it." After he killed his 43-year-old girlfriend, Stanko then drove 25 miles north the Conway home of one of her friends, Henry Lee Turner, whose body was found fatally shot about 24 hours later. Stanko fled the scene, setting off a nationwide manhunt that made national headlines. Four days after the murders, federal authorities tracked Stanko down about 200 miles west to Augusta, where he was hobnobbing with Masters golf fans, introducing himself as Stephen Christopher, and lying about his wealth. Stanko had also already wooed a woman, moved in with her and had even gone to church with her on the Sunday before he was captured, authorities said at the time. "She said he was the nicest, most courteous young man," the woman's grandmother told Knight Ridder at the time. "You would never know he was a fraud." Charles Grose, Stanko's attorney, said that experts have diagnosed the inmate with brain damage, 'likely from numerous brain injuries including from a troubled birth, a blow to the back of the head as a teen while shielding a classmate from an assault, and repeated traumas from serious sports-related head injuries.' He said that problems resulting from the brain damage were manageable in a controlled environment like prison and that he "productively used his years on death row to repent of his crimes and seek God's forgiveness, help other inmates and write about his experiences.' Grose added: 'While nothing excuses Stephen's terrible crimes, his execution will not make South Carolina safer.' Stanko described as conman, psychopath Archived news reports citing courtroom testimony and interviews describe a con artist who had a knack for reeling in women. Stanko's various lies included, according to archived news accounts: that he was a millionaire, he owned multiple hamburger restaurants, he had an engineering degree from a prestigious university, and he made bigtime deals in oil and real estate. "He has a need for grandiosity," one forensic psychologist observed on the witness stand, according to a 2006 report in the Myrtle Beach Sun-News. Another one simply said: "Mr. Stanko is a psychopath." Although Stanko was adept at charming some, others didn't buy his act. "He was smooth and he was slick," John Gaumer, a colleague of Stanko's slain girlfriend, told the Sun-News. "It's a puzzle to everyone I know what it was that he had − that he was able to exercise so much control over her was a mystery.' Her ex-husband told the paper that he met Stanko at her home. "I didn't like him. He knew that I knew what he was,' he said. 'When we looked at each other, I just could sense that there wasn't something right here. But at the same time, you are being told that he is OK, and you want to believe that." He said that Stanko had admitted to having a criminal past, likely as part of a plan to gain her trust. "The snowing ... obviously it drew her in. It was all part of the barrage, the seduction," he said. Stephen Stanko had criminal past, helped write a book from prison It's unclear just how much of his criminal past Stanko shared with his girlfriend. He had served more than eight years in prison for kidnapping and trying to kill another girlfriend in 1996. He had been living with the woman in Goose Creek when they got into an argument about his involvement in theft and fraud, and she told him he had to move out, according to police reports obtained by Knight Ridder in 2005. The next morning, they fought again, and Stanko soaked a washcloth with bleach, put it over her mouth, and tied up her wrists and ankles before he left. The woman, who told police that Stanko had tried to suffocate her, was able to break free and get help, Knight Ridder reported. Stanko pleaded guilty to charges of assault and battery with intent to kill and kidnapping, and was ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation, according to online court records reviewed by USA TODAY. During Stanko's time in prison for that case, he became an author and co-wrote a book called "Living in Prison: A History of the Correctional System with an Insider's View." On Amazon, the book is described as "a rigorous exploration of our correctional system" from Stanko's perspective "on the harsh realities of prison life." Who were Stephen Stanko's victims? USA TODAY was unable to reach family members of either of Stanko's murder victims. Archived news reports about who they were are limited, but both Stanko's girlfriend and Henry Lee Turner were described as trusting and caring people. Her ex-husband told the Sun-News that the mother of three had a great sense of humor. "She was a vivacious, intelligent, compassionate woman who was a very good mother," he told the newspaper. Turner's daughter, Debbie Turner Gallogly, told the Sun-News that her dad met Stanko when he and his girlfriend went to Turner's house to help him with computer problems. "He's a very trusting person, a very welcoming person," she said. "He loved inviting people into his home for meals."

President Trump is on a pardon spree
President Trump is on a pardon spree

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

President Trump is on a pardon spree

President Trump is on a pardon spree | The Excerpt On a special episode (first released on June 12, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Trump's spate of controversial pardons hint at a two-tiered system of justice where only allies get clemency. Former U.S. Pardon Attorney Liz Oyer shares her insights on her former role and why recent clemency grants are so unprecedented. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Dana Taylor: Hello, I'm Dana Taylor, and this is a special episode of The Excerpt. It's been a busy few months in the world of federal pardons. It started on day one of the Trump administration with more than 1,500 people pardoned for their role in the January 6th Capitol Riot, and the pardons just keep coming. The past few weeks, we've seen a spate of controversial clemency grants, including a couple of reality TV stars who were found guilty of defrauding community banks out of tens of millions of dollars, a gang leader serving multiple life sentences, and a Virginia sheriff convicted of bribery in what prosecutors called a cash for badges scheme. The pardons are legal, but what are the ethical concerns here as President Donald Trump's list of pardons continues to grow? Here to dig into some of the details of the president's current pardon spree is former U.S. pardon attorney Liz Oyer. Thanks for joining me, Liz. Liz Oyer: Thanks for having me. Dana Taylor: Let's start off with full transparency here. You're suing the DOJ for your dismissal earlier this year. What's the background here, and can you please explain what the job of a U.S. pardon attorney is? Liz Oyer: I was fired in March from my position as pardon attorney, which is non-political position within the Department of Justice that is entrusted with reviewing applications for clemency from individuals around the country who are seeking that relief from the president and making recommendations to the President about who presents a worthy case for clemency. The position of pardon attorney is one that historically has been filled by a career employee of the Department of Justice, not a political appointee, to ensure that that position is one that is neutral and objective and that the clemency process is not fully politicized. Nevertheless, I was fired very abruptly in March, and my firing violated a whole host of civil service protections that apply to career employees. So I am appealing my termination to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which is the agency that's entrusted with adjudicating those types of issues. President Trump is on a pardon spree Trump's spate of controversial pardons hint at a two-tiered system of justice where only allies get clemency. Dana Taylor: There were some surprising pardons recently. We can't address them all, but I do want to discuss a handful. Let's start with Larry Hoover, a Chicago gang leader serving multiple life sentences for charges including murder, extortion, and money laundering. Trump can pardon whoever he wants. Do you worry he's not getting the best research for each case to determine if clemency is warranted? Liz Oyer: Well, the case of Larry Hoover is actually a very complex one. He has state convictions for an offense involving murder, and then he went on while in state prison to run a continuing criminal enterprise from the state prison, and he incurred additional federal convictions. So the federal convictions are the ones that were pardoned, not the state convictions. His sentence was commuted, and now he still has to deal with those state charges. But it is extremely unusual to grant a commutation of sentence to someone who goes on to commit a massive criminal offense while they're in prison. One of the things that's especially notable about Hoover's case is that he was serving his sentence at the federal super max prison. It's called ADX, it's a notorious prison where people who present challenging conduct in prison and need ultra restrictive conditions of confinement are housed. So the fact that he was granted a commutation by President Trump is very unusual and suggests that not a lot of weight is being placed on conduct in prison in considering who is worthy of a commutation of sentence. Dana Taylor: Many of these pardons are for people who owed significant sums of money and restitution for their crimes, Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality TV stars, for example. What recourse do the people or entities who are due that money have, if any, and do you worry that Trump is granting clemency to people who don't show remorse? Liz Oyer: What the president has done in terms of using the pardon power to wipe out financial obligations that are owed to victims of crimes is unprecedented. The Chrisleys are one example among many of individuals who were required under federal law to pay what's called restitution, that means essentially paying back victims of crimes, but the pardons have the effect of wiping out that obligation to repay the victims, and those include people who are out of pocket very substantial sums. So that's an extremely unusual use of the pardon power, and it's one that really does prejudice the interests of people who have been victimized by crimes. Dana Taylor: And Liz, I mentioned former Virginia Sheriff Scott Jenkins at the top. He was convicted of receiving at least $75,000 in exchange for appointing North Virginia business executives as auxiliary deputies. He was scheduled to start a 10-year prison sentence the following day when the pardon came in. President Trump wrote on Proof social that he and his family were, "Dragged through hell by a corrupt and weaponized Biden DOJ." Do you worry that Trump is responding to personal emotional appeals rather than legal research? Liz Oyer: Trump does appear to be granting pardons to people in whom he sees something of his own story, something that he can relate to. But the case of Sheriff Jenkins was actually one that was a very straightforward case. He was caught on video accepting envelopes full of cash in exchange for bestowing badges upon people, so it's not a case where there was any doubt about his guilt. It is a case where the president decided to reward someone who was a political loyalist, and it's very unusual to see pardons of corrupt public officials in the way that Trump has been granting them. Sheriff Jenkins is actually one of, I believe, about eight public officials, elected officials, who have committed crimes involving an abuse of their official office who have received pardons from President Trump just in his second term alone. Dana Taylor: Why do you think it's important to have an independent set of eyes researching cases? Liz Oyer: What's so essential about the function that the Office of the Pardon Attorney has played historically is the vetting of candidates that they provide. The Department of Justice has a set of criteria that are very detailed and very rigorous that apply in every case before a recommendation is made to grant clemency. And in the interests of public safety, that vetting is taken very seriously so individuals who are not vetted won't get through this process. The vetting is an important component of it. And the other really important role that the Office of the Pardon Attorney has historically played is accessibility, making sure that the clemency process is accessible to all, not just those who have political connections, which unfortunately appear to be the only types of people who are getting clemency under the current administration. Dana Taylor: Paul Walczak, a former nursing home executive, also received a pardon. His mother recently attended a $1 million plate Mar-a-Lago fundraiser for Trump's Super PAC. Do you worry the president will grant clemency in exchange for gifts or even bribes? Liz Oyer: It appears that we're getting very close to that line. Individuals who are making large donations to the President or his causes are seeing those donations rewarded in the form of pardons. Walczak is one example of that, but not the only example. There's an individual named Trevor Milton, who committed a massive fraud, defrauded his investors of over $600 million, and he made a campaign donation of $1.8 million to Trump and then got a pardon early in the administration. So it's becoming almost sort of a business transaction for people who are involved in white collar crime. They're making a calculation that, "I can pay X and that I can profit X times 100 on committing white collar crimes," which is not something that we should be encouraging in this manner, and it's not how the pardon process is supposed to work. Dana Taylor: The president was asked a couple of weeks ago if he would consider pardoning P Diddy, who's currently on trial for sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution. In witness testimony, he's been described as violent and abusive. If this pardon were to happen, it would of course put an end to an emotional and taxing trial for his alleged victims. Is there any legal precedent for this? Liz Oyer: It's very unusual to grant pardons to people who are the subject of ongoing cases, but that has not deterred this president. This president has undercut his own justice department multiple times by pulling the rug out from under prosecutions that they're actively pursuing. It would be very unusual to grant a pardon to somebody in this circumstance who's currently on trial, but the president does have the authority to do that if that's what he chooses. I will note that one of the things that the Department of Justice ordinarily does is solicit input from victims of crimes about how they would feel about a pardon. That step is being skipped by this current administration. The people who are victims of these crimes that are being pardoned are not being consulted for their input, which again, is not how the process is supposed to work. Dana Taylor: These recent clemencies came on the heels of the biggest blanket clemency of all time, and that was for the January 6th rioters, including those who assaulted police officers. As a former pardon attorney, what's the takeaway here for the American public when it comes to pardons for Trump loyalists, and what message does it send to the law officer community? Liz Oyer: Well, that action, along with the other things this president has done have sent a very strong message that the pardon power is going to be used to reward political loyalists. He appointed a pardon attorney who essentially has said as much. After the pardon of that corrupt sheriff that you mentioned, Sheriff Jenkins, the new pardon attorney, Ed Martin, announced, "No MAGA left behind," which seemed to convey a view that MAGA supporters would be broadly considered for pardons if they have committed crimes. And certainly that's what the January 6th pardons reflect on an absolutely massive scale, that the president's supporters don't have to worry about committing crimes because they will be protected by pardons. Dana Taylor: Liz, does the Constitution say anything about the appearance of a two-tiered system of justice? Liz Oyer: The Constitution grants the President this unchecked power to grant pardons and commutations of sentence, and there really are no limits to it. But the framers who wrote this broad power into the Constitution intended that it would be used for mercy, that it would be used to correct excesses of the criminal justice system, not that it would be used to do special favors for people who have political connections or wealth, but that's exactly how it's being used now. The judge in the case of Paul Walczak that you mentioned actually said in sentencing Walczak to prison, "I'm sending the message that wealth is not a get out of jail free card in this country." And literally days later, Trump granted Walczak a pardon, which just illustrates that in fact, under Trump's system of justice, wealth can be and often is a get out of jail free card. Dana Taylor: As you've said, the power of the pardon has been used for centuries to grant clemency to those the President feels are deserving of it. In your opinion, has the legitimacy of the pardon power been called into question? Liz Oyer: Absolutely the legitimacy of the pardon power has been called into question. I think that there are a lot of people in this country now who are watching what's happening and asking why does this power even exist? It is a power that has a great deal of potential to be used for good. We saw it at its height under President Obama who used it in a very principled and disciplined way to reduce sentences of people who were over-incarcerated due to outdated mandatory minimums, and he did that in a way that was very fair and consistent across the board and did a lot of good. But the way it's been used more recently and what Trump is doing with it now is really raising legitimate questions about whether this power is a good thing. Dana Taylor: Thank you so much for sharing your insights and for being on The Excerpt, Liz. Liz Oyer: Thank you very much for having me. Dana Taylor: Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@ Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.

Judge asks to dismiss juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial for 'lack of candor' issue
Judge asks to dismiss juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial for 'lack of candor' issue

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Judge asks to dismiss juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial for 'lack of candor' issue

Judge asks to dismiss juror in Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial for 'lack of candor' issue Show Caption Hide Caption Rapper Ye makes surprise appearance at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial Rapper and fashion designer Ye made an appearance in New York at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial. The judge in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex-crimes trial asked to dismiss a juror, two days after prosecutors raised issues about the man's alleged "lack of candor with the court." U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian ordered for Juror No. 6 to be removed from the 12-person jury on Friday, June 13. Six alternates have been on the sidelines in the trial, which is wrapping its sixth week in Manhattan federal court. Addressing the court, Subramanian said, "Removal of the juror is required" and added, "The juror will be dismissed." The reason was "several inconsistencies" in the man's answers regarding where he lives. Subramanian continued, "The juror is unable to answer simple questions. … There are serious questions about the juror's candor and ability to follow instructions." Though it "seems like a trivial matter," it "goes to a juror's basic criteria to serve," he said. Because of the "changing answers and inconsistency," Subramanian said it brings up questions about whether the juror was truthful in responding to other questions more directly related to the case. Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson objected to the juror's dismissal. What happened with Juror No. 6? Before the jurors in question entered the courtroom June 11, prosecutors reportedly asked the judge to oust one of them, known as Juror No. 6. Several news outlets reported Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey told Judge Subramanian she saw "what appeared to be a lack of candor with the court" from Juror No. 6 "that raises serious issues." Alexandra Shapiro from Combs' team reportedly pushed back against the request, calling it "a thinly veiled effort to dismiss a Black juror." This story is developing. Contributing: Patrick Ryan, USA TODAY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store