Prosciutto di Portici: A ham-shaped portable sundial likely owned by Julius Caesar's father-in-law — before it was buried by Mount Vesuvius
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Name: Prosciutto di Portici
What it is: A silver-plated bronze sundial
Where it is from: Herculaneum, near Naples, Italy
When it was made: Between 8 B.C. and A.D. 79
Related: Ram in the Thicket: A 4,500-year-old gold statue from the royal cemetery at Ur
What it tells us about the past:
In the shadow of Vesuvius, archaeologists discovered a pocket-sized bronze sundial in the shape of a ham in the summer of 1755. Nearly overlooked amidst the statues and charred scrolls buried at the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum, the "Prosciutto of Portici" is the earliest known Roman portable sundial.
The silver-coated bronze ham measures about 4.4 by 3 inches (11.3 by 7.8 centimeters). The body of the object is crisscrossed by incised lines, and a series of Latin letters graces the bottom right quadrant. On the left edge, a bronze stump indicates that the gnomon — the "hand" of a sundial — has broken off.
When 18th-century archaeologists stumbled on the object in their excavation tunnels under the municipality of Portici (later identified as the ancient town of Herculaneum) they initially thought it was a miniature ham sculpture with stripes. A closer examination revealed the object was a Roman sundial — a unique object that has been studied for more than two centuries.
According to Christopher Parslow, an archaeologist and art historian at Wesleyan University who published a book on the sundial in 2024, the horizontal lines indicate the number of hours before or after sunset; the seven vertical lines represent months of the zodiac calendar; and the letters below are abbreviations of the 12 months in the Roman calendar. Thanks to one of these abbreviations — AU for August — the sundial can be dated to some time after 8 B.C., when the Roman Senate officially renamed the month of Sextilis to Augustus in honor of the first emperor.
Sundials can be extremely accurate, but only if they are calibrated to a specific location. Based on the markings and the angle of the gnomon, which has since been lost but was originally recorded as being shaped like a pig's tail, Gianni Ferrari, an ancient sundial expert, estimated in 2019 that the ham clock was calibrated for someone living around 41°N latitude — just about where Herculaneum is.
MORE ASTONISHING ARTIFACTS
—Oseberg tapestry: Viking Age artwork from a boat burial that may depict the Norse tree of life
—Hatnefer's heart scarab: An exquisite ancient Egyptian gold necklace inscribed with the Book of the Dead
—Hårby Valkyrie: A 1,200-year-old gold Viking Age woman sporting a sword, shield and ponytail
Historians have long assumed that the owner of the Villa of the Papyri was L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, the father-in-law of Julius Caesar, who likely commissioned the Epicurean philosopher Philodemus to draft the numerous charred scrolls that were recently "virtually unwrapped." This may explain why the Roman pocketwatch was shaped like a ham. For adherents of Epicurean thought, the lowly pig was often used as a metaphor, as it was seen as a naturally pleasure-seeking creature.
Experts continue to debate how well the prosciutto sundial worked. While earlier scholars estimated an error of only a couple minutes, Ferrari found significantly higher errors, in the range of tens of minutes, in the object's time-telling ability. And based on a 3D scan and reconstruction of the sundial, Parslow determined that the sundial could be used to tell time to the half or quarter hour. "The instrument probably was a mark of distinction and a jewel," Ferrari wrote, "rather than being a precision instrument giving the correct time."
This unique ancient "pork clock" was buried during the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in A.D. 79. It is on display at Italy's National Archaeological Museum in Naples.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Letters to the Editor: Readers applaud the return of phonics, but teaching reading shouldn't stop there
To the editor: In 1970, I was a student teacher and then a second-grade teacher in New York. I later became a learning and reading specialist and taught the teachers. Throughout my training, I learned (and subsequently taught) that the most effective way to teach both children and adults to read English is a combination of phonics and whole word recognition instruction ('Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes,' June 2). Roughly 85% of English spelling follows one of multiple recognizable phonics patterns. The remaining 15% of written English words simply have to be memorized or discerned from context. Sadly, at that time, as New York state adopted a balanced language approach to teaching reading, California politicians chose to buy into a whole word-only curriculum that came out of Australia, abandoning the teaching of phonics. The Australian curriculum itself was excellent and actually part of the curriculum we used in New York. Without the phonics component, however, generations of California students have been rowing with one oar. Kudos to California for finally correcting this tragic error. Jane Drucker, Studio City .. To the editor: I had to smile when I read that Gov. Newsom "has pledged his support … to fund teacher training on the new approach' (emphasis mine). It was a "Back to the Future" moment for me. Phonics was one of the tried and true methods that was used to teach reading back in the day (I'm almost 80). Even now, I use it to sound out new words that I come across. For those who are committed to a more holistic approach to teaching reading, I would suggest that one method does not necessarily preclude the other. I would also add that teaching diagramming should be seriously considered as a means of improving reading skills. When my high school Latin teacher realized that most of us in class didn't have a solid grasp of English sentence structure (grammar and syntax), he taught us how to diagram an English sentence and then transferred that new understanding to teach us Latin. I joke to my kids that I had to learn English before I could understand Latin. John Beckman, Chino Hills .. To the editor: As Yogi Berra claimed to have said, 'It's deja vu all over again!' Having taught teachers how to instruct reading and language arts for over 30 years, I've come to several conclusions: 1. Teaching phonics is great and absolutely necessary, but beware of non-phonetic words such as those spelled with 'ough' (tough, bough, ought, through, though). 2. English is a difficult language to learn to read. 3. It's not what you teach, it's how you teach it. Having observed many teachers who said they were teaching phonics, I quickly learned that you can teach it ineffectively. 4. Direct instruction in any reading skill requires step-by-step instruction, modeling and supervised practice. Miss a teaching step and students fail to learn. 5. There is no single effective teaching strategy. We have to use them all. Diana Wolff, Rancho Palos Verdes .. To the editor: I am so happy that phonics will be a focus in California schools again. When I was in second grade in the 1950s, my class spent Tuesday afternoons with a phonics workbook. Then it was a nice change from regular class, but I never imagined how much it would benefit me over the years. I think of those afternoons almost every day and marvel at how much that work continues to help me with spelling and pronunciation. I am a professional writer, and the study of phonics has made me a better one. Mary Daily, Culver City .. To the editor: Here we go again with the pendulum swing. Thirty years ago, I was the director of a state-funded, university-based professional development program for K-12 on teaching reading and literature. At that time, whole language was the prevailing method of teaching reading. Some parents and educators, however, protested that their children could not read, and that kids were not passing reading tests across the U.S. Members of the California State Board of Education implemented phonics and similar skills as the reading curriculum in California. The Los Angeles Unified School District embraced a new reading series that focused on phonics and direct teaching skills. The program I worked for completely overturned our professional development to comply with the new curriculum, but reading scores did not go up much. And now, 30 years later, we are back to where we were. Is it possible that there is no one method to teach today's children how to read? Is it possible that children might learn better if classes were smaller, screens were used educationally and topics in the books were more relevant? Is the pendulum going to keep swinging every 30 years? Anne Sirota, Northridge This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Readers applaud the return of phonics, but teaching reading shouldn't stop there
To the editor: In 1970, I was a student teacher and then a second-grade teacher in New York. I later became a learning and reading specialist and taught the teachers. Throughout my training, I learned (and subsequently taught) that the most effective way to teach both children and adults to read English is a combination of phonics and whole word recognition instruction ('Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes,' June 2). Roughly 85% of English spelling follows one of multiple recognizable phonics patterns. The remaining 15% of written English words simply have to be memorized or discerned from context. Sadly, at that time, as New York state adopted a balanced language approach to teaching reading, California politicians chose to buy into a whole word-only curriculum that came out of Australia, abandoning the teaching of phonics. The Australian curriculum itself was excellent and actually part of the curriculum we used in New York. Without the phonics component, however, generations of California students have been rowing with one oar. Kudos to California for finally correcting this tragic error. Jane Drucker, Studio City .. To the editor: I had to smile when I read that Gov. Newsom 'has pledged his support … to fund teacher training on the new approach' (emphasis mine). It was a 'Back to the Future' moment for me. Phonics was one of the tried and true methods that was used to teach reading back in the day (I'm almost 80). Even now, I use it to sound out new words that I come across. For those who are committed to a more holistic approach to teaching reading, I would suggest that one method does not necessarily preclude the other. I would also add that teaching diagramming should be seriously considered as a means of improving reading skills. When my high school Latin teacher realized that most of us in class didn't have a solid grasp of English sentence structure (grammar and syntax), he taught us how to diagram an English sentence and then transferred that new understanding to teach us Latin. I joke to my kids that I had to learn English before I could understand Latin. John Beckman, Chino Hills .. To the editor: As Yogi Berra claimed to have said, 'It's deja vu all over again!' Having taught teachers how to instruct reading and language arts for over 30 years, I've come to several conclusions: 1. Teaching phonics is great and absolutely necessary, but beware of non-phonetic words such as those spelled with 'ough' (tough, bough, ought, through, though). 2. English is a difficult language to learn to read. 3. It's not what you teach, it's how you teach it. Having observed many teachers who said they were teaching phonics, I quickly learned that you can teach it ineffectively. 4. Direct instruction in any reading skill requires step-by-step instruction, modeling and supervised practice. Miss a teaching step and students fail to learn. 5. There is no single effective teaching strategy. We have to use them all. Diana Wolff, Rancho Palos Verdes .. To the editor: I am so happy that phonics will be a focus in California schools again. When I was in second grade in the 1950s, my class spent Tuesday afternoons with a phonics workbook. Then it was a nice change from regular class, but I never imagined how much it would benefit me over the years. I think of those afternoons almost every day and marvel at how much that work continues to help me with spelling and pronunciation. I am a professional writer, and the study of phonics has made me a better one. Mary Daily, Culver City .. To the editor: Here we go again with the pendulum swing. Thirty years ago, I was the director of a state-funded, university-based professional development program for K-12 on teaching reading and literature. At that time, whole language was the prevailing method of teaching reading. Some parents and educators, however, protested that their children could not read, and that kids were not passing reading tests across the U.S. Members of the California State Board of Education implemented phonics and similar skills as the reading curriculum in California. The Los Angeles Unified School District embraced a new reading series that focused on phonics and direct teaching skills. The program I worked for completely overturned our professional development to comply with the new curriculum, but reading scores did not go up much. And now, 30 years later, we are back to where we were. Is it possible that there is no one method to teach today's children how to read? Is it possible that children might learn better if classes were smaller, screens were used educationally and topics in the books were more relevant? Is the pendulum going to keep swinging every 30 years? Anne Sirota, Northridge
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elden Ring Nightreign patch 1.01 is out even if the game isn't – and welcome back FromSoftware, these patch notes don't tell us a darn thing
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. No matter where you live or play, it's not Elden Ring Nightreign release time just yet, but that hasn't stopped developer FromSoftware from releasing the game's first patch. Elden Ring Nightreign patch 1.01 is rolling out ahead of release, and in classic FromSoft form, we barely know anything about what it does. This is one of those patch note stories where I can very easily share the entire list of contents verbatim: Improved handling of playable characters Soundtrack addition and adjustments Text adjustments Balance adjustments Added character scenarios Bug fixes Elden Ring Nightreign director Junya Ishizaki recently told us that he and the team have been working on game balance "until the last minute," and the "handling of playable characters" and miscellaneous "balance adjustments" sound like they'd fall under that category. The text and soundtrack stuff, along with general bug fixes, is more generic still. "This update aims to improve gameplay and stability," the patch notes add. Good news, I suppose. Ahead of launch, the 1.01 patch notes have also included a small advisory for PC gamers, who will get access a few hours early. "If issues such as being unable to start the game occur on the PC version, they can sometimes be resolved by performing the following steps in Steam," FromSoftware advises. Just double check "Verify Integrity of Game Files" in your Steam library properties. Additionally, "we have confirmed that some PC configurations using the latest graphics cards may experience frame rate drops," the patch notes read. "We are currently investigating the cause." I'm now nervously eyeing my new 5080, which I assume falls under "the latest graphics cards" mentioned here, but thankfully FromSoftware has a possible solution: turn your graphics settings down. Thanks, FromSoftware. The director of Elden Ring Nightreign has been thinking about this game since Dark Souls 3, and "seeing the scope of Elden Ring" finally made it click in his mind. We've collected all the details in our Elden Ring Nightreign live coverage.
