This railroad has 100 extra locomotives ready to handle a container surge
While U.S. logistics providers wait out the post-trade war lull in import shipments, BNSF Railway is setting up its network to handle an expected surge following a pause in tariffs between China and the United States.
'I guess probably the most overused words in logistics is this 'air pocket' that hit us the last couple of weeks,' said Jon Gabriel, group vice president, Consumer Products, for Omaha, Nebraska-based BNSF, in an interview. 'Now, we do have some line of sight on shipments that are coming our way, but not yet. But if you look at the bookings coming out of Asia, certainly you've seen kind of that V-shaped check mark.'
It was several weeks after the tariff pause went into effect in May that the railroad started to feel the import air pocket.
'We're probably three to four weeks removed from starting to see things charged back up on the West Coast, LA-Long Beach, the Northwest Seaport Alliance [of Seattle and Tacoma],' Gabriel said. 'Post-Fourth of July, we think things will be busy. We're excited again to demonstrate that we're ready to move a lot of freight from the supply chain, just like we did in the first quarter.'The railroad has also used the import downturn to position itself for the coming recovery.
'We have more than 100 locomotives that we would call a 'surge fleet,' ready to go in the state of California alone, some 9 miles of locomotives,' Gabriel said. 'And we have a large quantity of railcars set up against traffic in California, Arizona and in Washington for the Pacific Northwest. We have also taken the opportunity to do some preventative maintenance, both on tracks and rolling stock, in pre-position against the West Coast.
'So again, we feel really good about our ability to quickly respond when traffic starts to make its way into the West Coast.'
Gabriel compared the resumption to the period in 2024 after an early peak season caused by shippers frontloading to avoid East Coast port labor disruptions by the International Longshoremen's Association.'I think we went through both those on the West Coast with strong performance levels, moved a lot of freight, made a lot of capacity available.'
Based on what he's hearing from supply chain partners and customers, 'we suspect we've already bottomed out; we've started to see what we call 'build,' not just in traffic that's sitting on the docks, or within earshot, of the West Coast, but not yet on a railcar. That has bottomed out and started to climb again. We have started to hear from our carriers that they have gone back to essentially full vessel utilization, meaning that for a couple of weeks, if there were still boats running, they just weren't full, and now the boats are full.'
Gabriel described the initial build as 'the first little bit of a wave,' and said that based on new vessel capacity strings and other transit from Asia, the surge is probably three to four weeks away.
'We'll probably see a gradual decline and then a gradual increase, followed by a step-level increase, once all this new added vessel capacity gets to the West Coast,' he said. 'The capacity is coming back into the lane.'
That would include major carriers Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, which this week announced new direct service from Asia to the Port of Long Beach, but also smaller carriers such as CU Lines, seeing an opportunity in sharply rising rates. The China-based company is deploying five vessels of 2,400-2,800 twenty-foot equivalent units each from three Chinese ports to Long Beach.
At the moment, Gabriel said BNSF intermodal volumes are modestly above year-ago levels, on lingering diversions away from the East Coast in late 2024 and frontloading in the first quarter by shippers looking to stay ahead of tariffs.
'It's nothing that we … feel like our network can't handle, offering considerably better transit service and experiences for our customers.'
Gabriel said BNSF's network is performing at its best level since 2020, when volumes were depressed across the supply chain by the pandemic. While there are no pressure points on the network 'we do suspect that there could be some pull-forward of fourth-quarter demand to beat that August 12 [tariff pause] deadline.'Gabriel said BNSF's prior investments have helped it manage through the vagaries of the Trump administration's changing trade policy.
The railroad in the past several years added 100 miles of new main track on its transcontinental route between Los Angeles and Chicago, for double-, triple- or quadruple-track configurations, to accommodate denser traffic when necessary. BNSF has also added more than 8,000 parking spaces at intermodal ramps across its network, the equivalent of one entire Alliance Intermodal Facility in Fort Worth, Texas, largest on the railroad.
'That's surge capacity for our network, and at the same time, we've added more production tracks so we can lift-on lift-off more traffic simultaneously,' Gabriel said. 'We haven't had a quote-unquote 'normal period' going back several years in the supply chain. If we recognize that's kind of a new state of life that we're in, hence, we've made all these resiliency, and I would say, recoverability, investments.'
As for Chicago, the mid-American choke point for rail freight, Gabriel said BNSF has the most rail capacity of any Class I, operating a total of four facilities. Three are domestic intermodal, while the fourth is a major international rail terminal, outside Joliet, Illinois. BNSF has added on- and off-site parking throughout, and a three-year expansion project at Cicero, Illinois. has increased capacity by 30%.
Manufacturing is starting to flex up in China even as companies look to diversify supply chains throughout the region rather than to North America.
'I think you saw a large movement of that during the Trump 1 tariffs in 2018,' said Gabriel. ''China Plus One' didn't necessarily mean China onshore to nearshore; there's certainly some of that, but really it was China to somewhere else in Southeast Asia, which bodes well to the West Coast and in our networks.'
As for cross-border traffic with Mexico outside of automotive, Gabriel said, 'I wouldn't say that we've seen meaningful movement in nearshore activity, from a manufacturing standpoint. What we've really seen is modal conversion, and that's all we're targeting, just like we are stateside of highway traffic that's going cross-border.'
Gabriel said BNSF isn't seeing much warehousing on the rails as was typical post-pandemic in 2021.
'Dwell has stayed really, really low, historically low levels. We haven't seen a lot of rolling storage on our network; the product has continued to leave our rail ramps in a relatively normal flow. Less than 12 hours for our truckload segment, 24 to 30 hours for international, somewhere in that two- to three-day morning [delivery].'
That reflects well on supply chain partners, as well as the railroad.
'That tells you, if the supply chain is relatively intact and moving, there's deep, relatively good balance,' Gabriel said. 'Chassis drayage, drivers, warehouse capacity, all those elements, those underpinnings seem like they're holding up and more positioned to move traffic here throughout the next several months.'
Subscribe to FreightWaves' Rail e-newsletter and get the latest insights on rail freight right in your inbox.
Find more articles by Stuart Chirls here.Baun joins railcar builder Greenbrier as chief commercial officer
Norfolk Southern expands short line interchange improvement program
Rail agenda steams up as short lines blitz Congress
Coal extends surprising lead in weekly US rail traffic
The post This railroad has 100 extra locomotives ready to handle a container surge appeared first on FreightWaves.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Hamilton Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann's intellectual property and fan-favorite labels
NEW YORK (AP) — Craft labels from the now-shuttered fabrics seller Joann are making their way to a new home: Michaels. The Michaels Companies announced on Thursday that it had completed its purchase of Joann's intellectual property and private label brands — in an acquisition that arrives as the Texas-based arts and crafting chain works to expand its own fabric, sewing and yarn offerings. 'We're honored to have the opportunity to welcome JOANN customers into our creative community and are committed to delivering the selection, value, and inspiration they are looking for at Michaels,' Michaels CEO David Boone said in a statement. The deal, he added, allows the company to better 'respond to rising demand' among both new and existing customers. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. The Associated Press reached out to Michaels for further information on Friday. With roots dating back to a single Ohio storefront in 1943 , Joann had grown into a destination for generations of sewers, quilters, knitters and lovers of other crafts for more than 80 years. But more recently, operational challenges continued to pile up — with the retailer pointing to sluggish consumer demand, inventory shortages and rising competition. Joann announced it would be going out of business back in February, just one month after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time within a year. At the time, the company said financial services company GA Group, together with Joann's term lenders, had been selected as the winning bidder to 'acquire substantially all of Joann's assets' and conduct going-out-of-business sales at all store locations. Michaels on Thursday said that its purchase of Joann's IP and private brands included the acquisition of 'Big Twist' yarns, which had become a staple in Joann stores over the years. Those 'Big Twist' labels are now being developed as part of Michaels' portfolio — and will be available in-stores and online later this year, the company said. In the meantime, Michaels has also dedicated a landing page to welcome former Joann customers online. And as part of its overall expansion into fabrics, Michaels said on Thursday that its adding more than 600 new products from new and existing brands — including quilting supplies and fabrics, specialty threads, sewing machines and more. Michaels, founded in 1973, currently operates 1,300 stores across 49 U.S. states and Canada. Its parent company also owns Artistree, a framing merchandise manufacturer.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kimberly-Clark, Suzano form $3.4B tissue joint venture
This story was originally published on Manufacturing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Manufacturing Dive newsletter. Kleenex tissue maker Kimberly-Clark and pulp producer Suzano are forming a $3.4 billion global consumer and professional tissue joint venture in an effort to bolster their long-term growth strategies, the companies announced Thursday. Suzano has agreed to pay the tissue manufacturer $1.7 billion to acquire 51% of the new entity, which will be based in the Netherlands. The deal includes 9,000 employees and 22 manufacturing facilities across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, South and Central America, Africa and Oceania. Kimberly-Clark will own the remaining 49% and retain its consumer and professional entities in the United States, as well as existing joint ventures in Mexico, South Korea and Bahrain, among other countries. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2026. The joint venture is part of Kimberly-Clark's long-term growth strategy introduced last year, Chairman and CEO Mike Hsu said in a statement. The plan aims to save the company more than $3 billion through improved productivity and accelerate the growth of its brands and businesses, particularly its North America and international personal care segments. More than 40 of Kimberly-Clark's regional brands under its international family care and professional portfolio will be transferred into the joint venture. Additionally, Suzano plans to enter a long-term license with the new company for the use of global brands, including Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, WypAll, Viva and Kimberly-Clark Professional, the Brazil-based pulp producer said in its press release. The deal follows Suzano's acquisition of Kimberly-Clark's Brazilian tissue assets and brands in 2023, the paper maker said in its release. The pending transaction aligns with Suzano's long-term cost-effective and growth strategy that's focused on scalable businesses where it can strengthen its operational efficiency. Once the deal closes, approximately two-thirds of Kimberly-Clark's net revenues will come from its personal care categories, progressing its long-term growth, profitability and returns on investment, according to the tissue maker's press release. The joint venture is expected to reduce Kimberly-Clark's exposure to volatile input costs, improving the company's ability to deliver expected and deliverable margins and profitability over time. Kimberly-Clark anticipates $300 million in additional costs from tariffs this year, Hsu said in his remarks during an April earnings call. The majority of products sold in the U.S. are sourced and domestically produced, Kimberly-Clark CFO Nelson Urdaneta said in the earnings call. In terms of raw materials and finished goods, the company's exposure to China, Mexico and Canada was around or less than 10% of its total cost of goods. 'If we factor in all of our raw materials and finished goods imports for our US business, 80% of our total costs in the U.S. are U.S.-based, so only 20% of our U.S. costs are exposed to tariffs,' Urdaneta said. The volatile tariff backdrop is affecting Kimberly-Clark on three fronts. The 145% duty on China drives about two-thirds of the $300 million, Urdaneta said. The U.S.'s reciprocal tariffs account for 10% and retaliatory tariffs from other countries represent 25% of the impact costs, he added. The company is working fast to mitigate the costs, Urdaneta said. Still, he added that Kimberly-Clark is in a much better position to handle many of these headwinds. 'You can't solve that overnight because we're having to reaccommodate some of the elements of our supply chain, and we intend to already be able to address about a third of the impact this year,' Urdaneta said. 'Now it'll take us through 2026 to pretty much be able to address the whole element in a consistent manner based on what's been enacted today.' The joint venture is one of many actions Kimberly-Clark has taken to make progress on its strategy and alleviate tariff costs. Last month, the Scott paper towel maker announced plans to invest more than $2 billion over the next five years in its North America segment, expanding its U.S. manufacturing capacity and modernizing its supply chain. Recommended Reading Kimberly-Clark to invest over $2B in US operations