Nova Scotia takes Ottawa to court, saying federal government must protect land link
HALIFAX — The Nova Scotia government argued in court on Tuesday that Ottawa is solely responsible for infrastructure that protects the low-lying strip of land that links the province with New Brunswick.
Nova Scotia says the federal government should pay the entire cost of upgrading the centuries-old dikes that protect the Chignecto Isthmus from flooding, a project expected to cost $650 million.
Ottawa has agreed to pay only half the bill. It argues the dikes have long been used to protect farmland, which means they are covered by a section of the Constitution that says agriculture is a responsibility shared by the two levels of government.
A provincial government lawyer, however, told Nova Scotia's Court of Appeal on Tuesday that the extensive network of dikes protect much more than just farmland. Daniel Boyle said the land bridge now includes a Canadian National Railway line, the Trans-Canada Highway, buried fibre optic cables and overhead electricity lines.
Boyle told the three-justice panel the dikes protect interprovincial trade and communications links, which fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction. He said the federal government has an obligation to protect those links, which are increasingly threatened by flooding caused by fierce and frequent storms and rising sea levels.
Boyle, who represents Nova Scotia's attorney general, also noted that a three-kilometre stretch of the railway line is part of the extensive network of dikes, which were built by Acadian farmers in the 1600s. There are now about 35 kilometres of dikes that help protect roads, railways, farms and communities.
'A flood could sever Nova Scotia from the rest of Canada,' he said.
Michael Wood, chief justice of Nova Scotia, pointed out that agriculture hasn't disappeared from the area, which he said raised questions about shared jurisdiction. But Boyle said the dikes have 'much broader importance,' stressing that the province can't act on its own to protect what has evolved to become an essential 'trade corridor' that is facing serious risks.
The lawyer said an eight-metre storm surge would flow over the dikes and submerge the highway and the rail line. At 12 metres, 'Nova Scotia would effectively become an island,' he said. 'It's a real concern.'
That level of catastrophic flooding would effectively cut off $50-million worth of trade every day, he said, adding that the Port of Halifax would be unable to use trains or trucks to ship goods to the rest of Canada.
'Provinces don't have jurisdiction over the railway,' Boyle said, adding that one of the main reasons Nova Scotia joined Confederation in 1867 was a promise that a new national government would build a railway to link the province's economy with other rapidly growing provinces.
'It wasn't just one piece of infrastructure,' he said. 'It was the wider promise of what that infrastructure brought.'
At one point, Justice David Farrar asked Nova Scotia lawyer Jeremy Smith to explain why the court was asked to settle what is essentially a political dispute over jurisdiction. Smith said the court's decision would 'provide guidance and some certainty to both levels of government.'
During a hearing in March, federal lawyer Lori Ward said rail lines can be raised and transmission lines can be buried, suggesting the dikes are not essential for their protection.
She also questioned whether enough was known about 'which dike protects what' on the isthmus, though Boyle argued Tuesday that the dikes represent a large network that is only as strong as its weakest part. Ward characterized Nova Scotia's case as an attempt to 'enlist the court' to aid in what is really a funding dispute, saying the panel should decline to answer the province's question as to what level of government is responsible for protecting infrastructure. The three justices plan to deal with that issue at a later date.
New Brunswick and P.E.I. are supporting Nova Scotia's case.
The hearing resumes Wednesday.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 20, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
9 minutes ago
- CBC
New U.S. travel ban is 'cruel,' Myanmar association in Ontario says
The head of an association for the Myanmar community in Ontario says a new travel ban announced by U.S. President Donald Trump is "cruel" to the people of his country. Napas Thein, president of the Burma Canadian Association of Ontario, says the people of Myanmar are already facing difficulties in their own country with a military coup and new law mandating military service, and the ban will make it harder to move to a safer place. He says members of his community in Canada will not be allowed into the United States to study or visit due to the new ban, which takes effect Monday. Thein says he and others from the Myanmar diaspora who are Canadian citizens feel uneasy about crossing the border and some have already started cancelling plans to attend conferences or visit their families in the United States. WATCH | Trump defends travel ban: Trump defends travel ban on 12 countries: 'We don't want them' 16 hours ago Duration 2:02 U.S. President Donald Trump defended banning entry to citizens of twelve countries and imposing stiff travel restrictions on seven other countries. Trump said he's focused on countries that pose a terror threat, have a history of visa violations or lack safe travel documentation systems. Trump announced Wednesday that citizens of 12 countries — Myanmar, Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — would be banned from visiting the United States. Seven more countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela — face heightened travel restrictions. Some of the 12 countries on the banned list were targeted by a similar measure Trump enacted in his first term. Dawit Demoz, vice-president of the Eritrean Canadian Community Centre in Toronto, says his organization is "deeply concerned" about the implications of the new travel ban for the Eritrean diaspora. He says many families in the Eritrean community south of the border remain separated due to the ongoing political and humanitarian crisis in their home country, and the new ban further complicates their efforts to reunite. "[The ban] creates additional fear and uncertainty for those seeking safety and connection across borders," he said. "For our community, policies like this do not just impact travel but they deepen isolation, delay reunification and compound the emotional toll experienced by displaced individuals."
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
Chow, Ford strike collaborative tone on future of Toronto bike lanes
Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow appear to have found middle ground on the future of bike lanes in the city as the province looks to rip up 19 kilometres of cycling infrastructure on three major roads. Chow said Friday that city staff have identified areas where car lanes can be restored while keeping bike lanes intact and that her team is currently looking at technical drawings to determine their feasibility. 'So, I think that's a solution that can be arrived at through collaboration, which is what we're doing right now,' Chow said after joking that she and Ford rode a tandem bicycle to Friday's unrelated news. Ford's government passed legislation last year to remove sections of bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue. The legislation also requires that municipalities ask the province for permission to install a bike lane if a lane for cars would be removed. In April, lawyers for a cycling advocacy group challenging the removal of those bike lanes were granted an injunction, which paused the provincial plans until a judge decides on the constitutionality of the case. The Ontario government is appealing that decision. Ford lashed out at what he called 'bleeding heart judges' following the injunction being granted and suggested that Ontario should elect their judges, like they do in the U.S. However, he struck a more agreeable tone on Friday. 'I want to work collaboratively with the mayor, and when it comes to the bike lanes, we had a clear mandate in the last election, but the fact is, we're talking about three bike lanes, and hopefully we can find alternatives and work with the mayor and with the city staff. That's what we want to do,' Ford said, adding that he doesn't 'hate bike riders or bike lanes.' Ford said while the conversations about bike lanes on Bloor, Yonge and University are ongoing, '98 per cent' of the city's other bike lanes would be 'left alone.' It's unclear which areas along those three major streets have been identified as viable options to reintroduce a car lane, but a source familiar with the plan told The Canadian Press in April that it includes returning two car lanes to University Avenue near the city's hospital row, and narrowing the bike lanes and removing on-street parking. The province didn't reject the idea and said it was 'open' to the idea, so long as the city funds their portion of 'their identified infrastructure needs.' With files from The Canadian Press
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
N.B. Official Opposition accuses premier of ignoring potential for ‘province building project'
Premier Susan Holt says New Brunswick is at the forefront of multiple 'nation building' energy projects following this week's First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon, while interim Progressive Conservative Leader Glen Savoie says the governing Liberals are ignoring natural resource development within the province. 'She's interested in national building project. How about a province building project?' said Savoie about Holt during Friday's question period. Savoie said the Liberals and Holt have historically stood in the way of natural resource development in New Brunswick, mentioning pipelines and shale gas exploration. Holt responded to Savoie's comments during question period, saying the Progressive Conservatives weren't effective on developing natural resources while in power. 'He's said they always supported this development. But did they get it done? No,' said Holt. 'Our government is pragmatic. We're looking at what's in front of us and what opportunities will benefit New Brunswick.' Holt has heralded federal support for prioritizing the Eastern Energy Partnership as a success from the First Ministers' meeting. The partnership which would transmit hydro and wind power from Atlantic Canada and Quebec to Western Canada and New England. Holt also said there were positive conversations with Quebec Premier François Legault about extending a natural gas pipeline from Quebec City to New Brunswick. 'We have opportunities to take advantage of the resources that Canada has already developed and already unlocked for the benefit of our province as well,' said Holt. 'We're looking at what we can do tomorrow, where's the investment opportunity, what's going to benefit New Brunswickers, and how we can use our strengths to succeed nationally and internationally.' At the First Ministers' meeting, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith indicated she was focused on developing potential oil pipeline routes from her province to northern British Columbia and Hudson Bay to avoid any route through Quebec. Holt said she was interested in what role New Brunswick could play as an eastern market if a pipeline did go to Hudson Bay. 'With a $600-million deficit, you'd think she'd get on board and develop our resources here,' said Savoie, about Holt. 'They would rather pipe a pipeline in because of their NIMBY policies, their 'not in my backyard' policies, that say it's okay for Alberta to profit from its natural resource development but not New Brunswick.' Friday was the last day of the first session of the 61st Legislature. Legislature The New Brunswick legislature is pictured. (Source: Nick Moore/CTV News Atlantic) For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.
